logo
Iranian missiles fired towards US airbase in Qatar as Trump meets security team

Iranian missiles fired towards US airbase in Qatar as Trump meets security team

Irish Daily Mirror13 hours ago

Iran has officially retaliated against the US, launching a wave of missile strikes aimed at US bases in Qatar and Iraq as Trump hosts a meeting with his top security team.
According to a senior US official, the White House and Pentagon are aware of, and closely monitoring, the potential threats, including to Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. Iranian state media has said the missile operation 'Blessings of Victory' against US sites in Qatar and Iraq has begun.
It comes after one British national has been injured in Israel during missile attacks by Iran, David Lammy has said. The Foreign Secretary said the Middle East is now going through "a perilous moment" as the conflict continues after the US got involved too at the weekend. Strikes between Iran and Israel have now continued for 10 days.
Meanwhile, hundreds of Iran's elite soldiers are believed to have been killed after Israel struck at the "heart of Tehran" today. In fresh strikes on the ideological symbols of the Iranian regime, Israel targeted the entrance of the notorious Evin Prison - where enemies of the state are held - and the Basij Headquarters. The Basij is the shadowy paramilitary wing of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps - which the US previously prescribed as a terrorist organisation.
Follow our live blog below...
Dr. Majed Al Ansari, Advisor to the Prime Minister and spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Qatar, has said the country condemns that attack on the Al Udeid Air Base.
In a statement shared on X, he said Qatar "reserves the right to respond directly in a manner proportional to the nature and scale of this blatant aggression and in accordance with international law."
Dr. Al Ansari said Qatari aid defences "thwarted the attack and successfully intercepted the Iranian missiles."
The State of Qatar strongly condemns the attack that targeted Al-Udeid Air Base by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. We consider this a flagrant violation of the sovereignty of the State of Qatar, its airspace, international law, and the United Nations Charter. We affirm that…
The attack on the US air base came shortly after Qatar closed its airspace as a precaution amid threats from Iran.
Just before the explosions in Qatar, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian wrote on the social platform X: "We neither initiated the war nor seeking it.
"But we will not leave invasion to the great Iran without answer."
US President Donald Trump, Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and other officials are in the White House Situation Room monitoring the latest updates.
Iran has begun its "mighty and victorious" response to US strikes, state media reported this evening.
According to the state-run Tasnim agency, Iran's Revolutionary Guard launched missiles at a US base in Qatar.
Iran says it has launched an attack on US forces at Qatar's Al Udeid Air Base.
It comes after a senior administration official, who was not authorised to comment publicly, said the White House and Pentagon were aware of, and closely monitoring, the potential threats to the air base.
Explosions were heard in Qatar on Monday night as witnesses said they saw what appeared to be missiles in the skies over the country.
There was no immediate acknowledgment from Qatari authorities of any attack.
The reports emerged as Qatar closed its airspace amid Iranian threats to retaliate against the United States over its bombing early Sunday of three Iranian nuclear sites.
Donald Trump is scheduled to meet with his national security team at 1pm ET (6pm BST) at the White House.
The US president is set to discuss the threat of Iranian retaliation, which could determine how he responds, and establish whether the US will plunge deeper into Israel's war with Iran.
Tony Redondo, founder at Cosmos Currency Exchange, has said it would be "wise for consumers to fill up their tanks now" as even a partial closure of the Strait of Hormuz would have an "immediate and significant" impact on petrol prices.
The expert said the closure could spike Brent crude up 15% to over $80/barrel, pushing prices to 152p/litre very quickly, The Sun reported.
Mr Redondo als warned a full closure could see oil hit $100-$150, driving petrol up towards £2/litre, saying: "That's why now could be a smart time to fill up your tank before any further hikes come into effect."
Please note, you should only fill up your tank if you believe you need to - and most importantly, if you can afford it.
Ken James, Director at Contractor Mortgage Services, said crude oil could soar "well beyond $150 (£111) per barrel - levels not seen since the 2008 financial crisis."
He explained: "While the final decision rests with Iran's powerful Security Council and has not yet been made, the symbolic move has begun to send shockwaves through energy markets.
"Analysts warn that any actual closure could ignite a sharp spike in oil prices, with estimates suggesting crude could soar well beyond $150 per barrel - levels not seen since the 2008 financial crisis. Investor sentiment is already showing signs of a risk-off shift.
"Safe-haven assets like gold, US Treasuries, and the Swiss franc could see significant inflows if tensions escalate. As markets await a final decision from Tehran, traders are on high alert. The Strait of Hormuz may still be open for now but the global economic ripple effects are already being felt."
The worst possible outcome is least likely and that involves Iran declaring all-out war on America and Israel, says our Defence and Security Editor Chris Hughes.
He writes: "This would happen if the Iranian regime miscalculated and goes too far when it makes a revenge gesture of reply to the United States.
"The problem is that US President Donald Trump has warned Tehran will be hit by far worse if it does hit US interests so that starts a cycle of escalating violence.
"I believe if Iran does something below the threshold for war then America may be forced to let it pass and give Iran that off-ramp, saving face and avoiding all-out war."
To read the full story, click here.
Shelter in place is a public safety protocol which means finding a safe location indoors and staying there until you are given an "all clear" or told to evacuate.
It can be invoked during various emergencies including extreme weather, chemical or radiological hazards, or even active shooter situations.
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) has updated its travel advice for Qatar to recommend British nationals in the Gulf state "shelter in place".
In an update to the page, the FCDO said: "Following a US security alert for US nationals in Qatar, out of an abundance of caution, we recommend that British nationals in Qatar shelter in place until further notice. Follow instructions from local authorities.
"The FCDO is in contact with local authorities and international partners, and will provide further updates as the situation develops."
There are fears that petrol prices could increase if Iran decides to close the Strait of Hormuz, which sees around a fifth of the world's global oil supply pass through.
After the US attacked nuclear facilities at the weekend, Iran's parliament voted to close the strait - but this requires approval from the country's Supreme National Security Council.
This could lead to oil prices surge - and when the market opened earlier today Brent Crude, the international benchmark for oil prices, hit $81.40 (£60.41) a barrel.
However, it later dropped to trade 0.3% lower on the day at $76.76 (£56.97) by early afternoon in the UK.
To see which other everyday items could go up in price as a result of the conflict, click here.
Israel's military is warning Iranians it will continue to attack military sites around Tehran over "the coming days."
The military issued the warning on social media, though Iranians are struggling to access the outside world because of an internet shutdown in the country.
The warning says "we ask you to stay away from weapons production centres, military bases and security institutions affiliated with the regime."
Iran has criticised the warnings as a way to scare its public. However, the Israelis have carried out strikes after their warnings multiple times in the war.
One British national has been injured in Israel during missile attacks by Iran, David Lammy has said.
In a statement to the Commons, the Foreign Secretary said: "This is a perilous moment in the Middle East, waves of strikes between Israel and Iran have now lasted for 10 days, continuing overnight.
"I know the whole House will have in their thoughts the many civilians impacted by the fighting. I can confirm today, this includes one British national, injured in Israel. We've reached out to offer consular support."
South Africa is calling on the United States, Israel and Iran to allow the United Nations to lead diplomatic efforts to find a resolution to the conflict.
It is also calling on them to allow an inspection and verification of Iran's uranium enrichment and its nuclear capacity.
South Africa has strong diplomatic ties with Iran, which the Trump administration has criticised.
The leader of Lebanon's Hezbollah has indicated that the group will not join the war between Iran and Israel for now.
Naim Kassem spoke in his first public comments since the US inserted itself into the war on Sunday. He said his group is ready to back any decision taken by the Lebanese state to force Israel to stop the war.
He also told the Iran-backed group's Al-Ahad newspaper in a report published Monday that the attacks on Iran will "have a high cost" as the whole region is in danger, and says Donald Trump's threats to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei are a "vile act and a sign of weakness."
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt says US operations in the Middle East haven't changed despite Trump raising the possibility of what he called "regime change" in Iran on Sunday.
"The president was just simply raising a question that I think many people around the world are asking," Leavitt told reporters on Monday.
She added: "If they refuse to engage in diplomacy moving forward, why shouldn't the Iranian people rise up against this brutal terrorist regime?"
US President Donald Trump has called for oil prices to stay down amid fears Iran could retaliate to US strikes by closing the Strait of Hormuz, the world's busiest oil shipping channel.
In a post shared to TruthSocial, Mr Trump said: "Everyone, keep oil prices down.
"I'm watching. You're playing right into the hands of the enemy. Don't do it."
Donald Trump shocked the world when he boasted the US had "totally obliterated" Iran's nuclear sites during "Operation Midnight" - but what sparked such drastic action?
President Trump claimed on Sunday that the US had carried out a "successful" bombing attack on three nuclear sites in Iran after more than a week of strikes by Israel on Iran that have moved to systematically eradicate the country's air defences and offensive missile capabilities, while damaging its nuclear enrichment facilities.
Israel confirmed they were in "full co-ordination" with the US in planning the strikes, which signals a significant escalation in the ongoing war between Iran and Israel.
Iran has downplayed Israel's targeted attacks on Evin prison as part of its fresh strikes on the country.
The Mizan news agency, which is affiliated with the country's judiciary, said "all necessary measures" were put in place to "protect the safety of prisoners."
It is the same prison where dual British-Iranian citizen Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe spent four years of her sentence.
This is the moment British nationals boarded a Royal Air Force plane out of Israel - one of the first emergency evacuations since the US attacked nuclear sites in Iran.
Keir Starmer has urged British nationals in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories to make contact with the Foreign Office as it prepares for an evacuation flight.
Reports yesterday said evacuation flights for British citizens trapped in Israel could begin "within hours".
And today at 3pm local time a flight of around 50 people took off from Tel Aviv airport, headed for a base in Larnaca, Cyprus.
It is currently in the air. It is understood passengers will then board another plane returning to the UK.
One passenger - who wants to be anonymous - said he was notified at 3am local time that a flight would be made available to take people home. According to the Israeli Government, the flights will have a strict limit of 50 people.
The passenger on board said: "We were notified at 3am this morning."People are feeling very relieved, there are lots of empty seats on board despite people saying it is full."
Administration officials are openly speaking about regime change, saying that the Iranian people should be able to overthrow the "violent regime".
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt says if Iran refuses to come to diplomatic solution, "why shouldn't the Iranian people take away the power of this incredibly violent regime?"
Some recent reports from Iran say there is a huge amount of solidarity among the Iranian people against the US and Israel, with the public demanding a strong response and a refusal of negotiations.
Israeli and American attacks on Iran's nuclear programme have had a "huge" impact, according to the UK's former ambassador to Iran.
However, Rob Macaire - who served from 2018 to 2021 - said that it's still unclear what's happened at the subterranean Fordow plant.
"The cumulative impact of the Israeli attacks and the US attacks on Iran's nuclear programme has seen huge damage," he said.
"The question is whether Iran comes out of this determined to rebuild that programme and to try to get towards a nuclear weapon as a result of this - or whether it comes out of it recognising that's not going to be an option and seeing if there is a negotiation route for them
"That is what is to play for now."
The UK government has responded to questions over its position on the US's decision to bomb Iran over the weekend.
Downing Street has issued a statement, saying: "We're clear that the prevention of Iran getting nuclear weapons is a good thing for this country.
"But our focus is on diplomacy. That is the priority and that is what every member of this government is working towards and that's been the focus of the calls with international partners over the weekend."
The spokesman added: "Iran should take the opportunity presented by the US to re-enter talks."
حمله نمادین اسرائیل به سردر زندان اوین pic.twitter.com/usisqnk7Yq
Israel Air Force strikes in Tehran/Karaji- Iranian state television buildings- Stone (Evin) Prison and another prison in Karaj- Ministry of Energy Building- Shahid Behashti University- Police/Basij regional stations Iranian media thinks these attacks are carried out by… pic.twitter.com/4zdaPYGccY
Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi has met with Russia's Vladimir Putin today.
The Russian leader told Araghchi: "You are visiting Russia at a difficult time, during a sharp aggravation of the situation in the region and around your country."
He said Russia is "making efforts to assist the Iranian people".
Israeli media is reporting that Israel's most recent strike in Iran has killed hundreds of members of the country's shadowy IRGC organisation.
Israel targeted a number of locations across the capital, including Evin Prison and the Basij headquarters, an Israeli official told the Jerusalem Post.
Israel Katz, the country's defence minister, said Israel is now attacking "the heart of Tehran" with "unprecedented force". He mentioned Evin as the home of political prisoners held by the regime, and the Basij headquarters as the internal security base for the revolutionary guard corps' paramilitary wing.
"For every shot fired at the Israeli home front, the Iranian dictator will be punished and the attacks will continue with full force," he says.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Israel and Iran have negotiated ‘complete' ceasefire
Trump says Israel and Iran have negotiated ‘complete' ceasefire

Irish Examiner

time18 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Trump says Israel and Iran have negotiated ‘complete' ceasefire

Donald Trump has claimed that Israel and Iran have negotiated a ceasefire, halting a two-week-old war that has killed hundreds in tit-for-tat strikes by Israeli warplanes and Iranian ballistic missiles. Just after 5am GMT on Tuesday, the US president posted to social media that the ceasefire was now in effect and asked both countries not to violate it. However, confusion over the timeline of the agreement continued, with no immediate confirmation from Israeli officials and further exchanges of fire into Tuesday morning. Iran launched several salvoes of ballistic missiles at Israel early on Tuesday – before the ceasefire came into effect – with at least one of the missiles directly hitting a residential building in Beersheba, killing four and injuring 22 more, emergency services said. The launches came after 4am Tehran time, the time that Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said it would end its attacks if Israel stopped its bombings. Overnight, Israel had carried out some of its most intense airstrikes on Tehran yet, residents said. Fighting often intensifies in the lead-up to ceasefire deadlines, but the absence of official statements left it unclear what the continuing strikes would mean for a truce. Trump said he hoped that the ceasefire would lead to an end of what he called the '12 Day War'. 'CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE!' Trump wrote on the Truth Social platform. 'It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE.' Hours earlier, Reuters reported that three Israeli officials had signalled Israel was looking to wrap up its strikes on Iran soon and had passed the message on to the US. On Sunday, prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel was 'very, very close to completing' its goals. Iranian state TV said that a ceasefire was coming into effect, which it described as a being 'imposed on the enemy.' Trump's initial ceasefire announcement appeared to suggest that Israel and Iran would have time to complete missions that were underway, at which point the ceasefire would begin in a staged process, but commentators continued to question the choreography of the agreement, even after it reportedly came into effect. 'Does Israel have 12 more hours to strike based on his first announcement? Or are they supposed to be in ceasefire now?' asked Daniel Shapiro, a former Pentagon official for Middle Eastern affairs and ex-ambassador to Israel. An Iranian social media user in Tehran wrote that the Israeli strikes on the capital city were 'intense' in the run-up to the announced ceasefire. 'The bombardment tonight in Tehran was extremely intense. For a full hour the explosions wouldn't stop. We are a completely defenseless people,' the user wrote. The ceasefire announcement came after the US joined the Israel-led campaign by striking Iranian uranium enrichment facilities early on Sunday morning, prompting Iran on Monday to launch a choreographed retaliatory strike against a US airbase in Qatar. Trump had called the Iranian attack a 'very weak response' and said he would renew efforts to negotiate a peace between Israel and Iran. In an online post, Trump earlier thanked Iran for 'giving us early notice' of a missile barrage against the US airbase in Qatar and said that no Americans had been killed or harmed in the attack. His remarks suggested that the Iranian response was carefully coordinated to allow Tehran and Washington an off-ramp after the US joined in Israeli strikes target Iranian uranium enrichment facilities in order to cripple Iran's nuclear program before the country could produce a bomb. Trump advisers privately said they believed Iran would accept the US president's olive branch in order to avoid continued strikes by Israel, and because they had inflicted symbolic retaliation. The ceasefire announcement also appeared an effort to reframe the metrics for success for the US operation targeting Iran's nuclear facilities, after it was unclear whether the deeply buried Fordow site had been destroyed. In a post on social media, Trump said the Iranian sites had been 'totally destroyed'. But the UN's nuclear chief, Rafael Grossi, said: 'At this time, no one, including the [International Atomic Energy Agency], is in a position to assess the underground damage at Fordow.' Trump advisers tried to suggest it did not matter if Fordow was destroyed because Iran had been forced to the negotiating table – even though that would mark a departure from what Trump said he was aiming for over the weekend. Still, the actual damage to the nuclear facilities remains an important question ahead of possible talks between US and Iran – expected to be led by Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff – as it would affect Witkoff's negotiating leverage. Other senior administration officials claimed victory. Vice-president JD Vance on Monday evening claimed Iran was 'incapable of building a nuclear weapon with the equipment they have because we destroyed it'. The US attack followed a wave of missile strikes between Israel and Iran, with Israel bombing the notorious Evin prison, and came after Trump raised the prospect of regime change in Tehran. But as of Monday evening, senior US officials had suggested that the Iranian attack on Qatar was designed to avoid a further escalation that could lead to an all-out war which could imperil the Iranian regime. Trump said 13 of the 14 missiles fired by Iran had been shot down and that one was allowed to hit its target because it was 'headed in a non-threatening direction'. In a statement posted on the X social platform while the missiles were in the air, Iran's president, Masoud Pezeshkian, said: 'We neither initiated the war nor were we seeking it. But we will not leave aggression against the great Iran without answer.' Iranian armed forces said the barrage was not directed at Qatar itself, which it described as a 'friendly and brotherly' regime. Emmanuel Macron expressed solidarity with Qatar, but he also warned that the US strikes against Iran had no 'framework of legality', adding that any regime change in the country should be a result of the will of the people, not of bombs. Over the first 11 days of its attacks on Iran, the governing coalition of Netanyahu has repeatedly denied that regime change was a formal war aim, though the prime minister has said it would be a welcome outcome, and called on Iran's people to rise up against the regime in Tehran. On Monday, however, members of his cabinet openly called for the overthrow of Iran's theocratic regime. The science and technology minister, Gila Gamleil, a leading member of Netanyahu's Likud party, wrote on X, according to a translation by the Haaretz newspaper: 'As long as the Nazi ayatollah regime sits in Tehran, it has the potential to rebuild its destructive capabilities.' He added: 'Therefore, we must continue the campaign until the conditions are created for revolution and the removal of the ayatollah regime.' He signed off with the slogan: 'Next year in Tehran.' Iran's judiciary confirmed the damage to Evin but, through its mouthpiece, the Mizan news agency, said: 'The situation in the prison is under control and all means have been used to manage the prison complex.' A Washington-based group, the Abdorrahman Boroumand Center for Human Rights in Iran, said: 'Many families of current detainees have expressed deep concern about the safety and condition of their loved ones held inside the prison.' Evin is not just used by the regime to incarcerate Iranian dissidents, but also foreigners and dual nationals who have been seized over the past several years for use as hostages and bargaining chips. Read More Trump calls for producers to pump more oil amid Iran shipping lane fears

Divide emerges between Micheál and Simon over response to US bombing of Iran
Divide emerges between Micheál and Simon over response to US bombing of Iran

Extra.ie​

timean hour ago

  • Extra.ie​

Divide emerges between Micheál and Simon over response to US bombing of Iran

A divide has emerged between Micheál Martin and Simon Harris on the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, with the Taoiseach failing to back his Foreign Affairs Minister – who yesterday said 'there are international laws that say you shouldn't do this. Over the weekend, US president Donald Trump confirmed the strikes had caused 'monumental damage', adding in a social media post: 'Obliteration is an accurate term.' The US attacked three key Iranian nuclear facilities early on Sunday, local time. Speaking in Brussels yesterday ahead of a meeting of the European Foreign Affairs Council, Minister Harris said of the ongoing dangers in the region and the attacks by the US over the weekend: 'I'm very clear in relation to international law around attacks on nuclear installations. Over the weekend, US president Donald Trump confirmed the strikes had caused 'monumental damage', adding in a social media post: 'Obliteration is an accurate term.' Pic: Getty There are international laws that say you shouldn't do this. 'I'm also very clear…that actually the actions of the United States added a significant level of danger to an already volatile situation. So it was a very unhelpful intervention.' He added: 'While there will be, I'm sure, different views and different perspectives, the reality is… to make progress in relation to this, to stop an already tinderbox-type situation getting even worse, is to get back to a negotiated situation.' Referring to the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, he continued: 'It has added a huge layer of extra volatility and danger. 'But what we now need to see is no further escalation of measures, and that really has to be where the focus of the European Union has to be on.' Speaking before Iran launched its own strikes against a US airbase in Qatar yesterday, Mr Harris said that there was a 'real risk' of the conflict between Iran and Israel 'spilling over and broadening, and all control of it being lost'. Minister Harris said of the ongoing dangers in the region and the attacks by the US over the weekend: 'I'm very clear in relation to international law around attacks on nuclear installations. Pic: Sam Boal/Collins Photos He added: 'This is an important point to remember that while we've seen in the past, you know, the nuclear deal with Iran and the likes that was imperfect, it certainly yielded much more in terms of any level of military aggression. The only way forward in relation to this situation will be a diplomatic negotiation solution. 'Nobody in the European Union wants to see Iran with a nuclear weapon, but we know the way to best keep people safe in the world, to best ensure that never happens in relation to Iran, is through a negotiated settlement.' However, the Taoiseach declined to back up the comments made by the Tánaiste when queried on the matter later in the day. Asked by if he agreed with the Tánaiste's comments, Mr Martin said: 'Ireland is multi-lateralist. We believe in international rules-based order, and in that sense, we would have preferred the dialogue and diplomacy in this in relation to the nuclear issue in Iran [had continued]. 'And this has been an issue for quite a number of decades now.' Mr Martin said: 'Ireland is multi-lateralist. Pic: Leah Farrell/© He continued: 'Iran has been a malign actor in the Middle East for quite some time. 'It even got involved in the Ukraine war by providing drones and so forth. But in particular, its support of Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, its declaration of its position of destroying Israel, openly declared, makes for a very complex scenario in the Middle East. 'And the issue around Iran disavowing its intentions to have nuclear weapons or to build a nuclear weapon is something that has bedevilled international diplomacy for quite a long time.' The Taoiseach said that 'it's our view that those efforts should have been exhausted with Iran and the international community', adding: 'What is required now is a complete de-escalation, an ending of the war.' Pressed by whether or not he believed the US had broken international law, as suggested by the Foreign Affairs Minister earlier in the day, he would only say: 'I've given my position in relation to that.'

Nuclear weapons have been in the Middle East for decades – not in Iran, but in Israel
Nuclear weapons have been in the Middle East for decades – not in Iran, but in Israel

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Nuclear weapons have been in the Middle East for decades – not in Iran, but in Israel

Donald Trump 's decision to go to war against Iran will not stop the spread of nuclear weapons. On the contrary, it has taught every dictator a simple lesson: get yourself a H-bomb fast or you will be bombed whenever we feel like it. Trump once threatened to unleash 'fire and fury' on North Korea . He didn't do it because North Korea has 50 nuclear warheads. But the Iranian regime is fair game, not because it was probably developing its own nuclear weapons , but because it had not actually done so. This is the grotesque irony of this war – if the mullahs had been more reckless, they would be safe. Ostensibly, the American and Israeli war on Iran has a laudable aim: to keep nuclear weapons out of the combustible Middle East. Fine – until we remember that nuclear weapons have been in the Middle East for decades – specifically in Israel. Israel's nuclear doomsday plan is called the Samson Option , after the biblical hero who pulled down the temple in Gaza, killing himself but also all the Philistines. With Trump in harness, it is pulling the temple of international order down on all our heads. READ MORE Israel's possession of about 90 nuclear warheads ('A-bombs and H-bombs, low yield and high yield, nuclear artillery shells and nuclear mines,' writes Ari Shavit in My Promised Land) is almost the definition of cognitive dissonance. For the Samson threat to be effective, everybody has to know it exists. Yet Israel does not acknowledge that existence and punishes those who do so. In 1986, Mordechai Vanunu , who worked at Israel's nuclear weapons facility at Dimona, revealed details of the programme to the Sunday Times. He was kidnapped in Italy by Mossad agents, drugged and flown back to Israel. There, he was tried in secret and sentenced to 18 years in prison, much of which he served in solitary confinement. The point of Vanunu's punishment was to sustain at all costs what has been called Israel's policy of 'implausible deniability'. This cognitive conjuring trick has worked. As Shavit puts it in his essential book about Israel in his lifetime: 'the international community accepted and adopted Israel's policy of opacity regarding [the] existence' of Dimona. It did so at least in part because the Samson Option was developed with active assistance from France while the United States (from the Eisenhower presidency onwards) turned an appropriately blind eye. Thus the presence of a major nuclear arsenal in the most inflammable part of the world has been an unknown known. The fear of nuclear weapons in the Middle East is focused on a country where they do not exist (Iran). It cannot be placed in the country where they do exist. Israel successfully created a reality distortion field in which the possible (Iran might get nuclear weapons) obscures the actual (Israel already has them). Even when, in November 2023, Amihai Eliyahu , a minister in the Israeli government, suggested in a radio interview that Israel could consider dropping an atomic bomb on Gaza , the EU and the US stuck their fingers in their ears and pretended not to hear. This great cloud of deliberate unknowing shrouds an obvious truth – the inevitability that, since Israel has been allowed to become a nuclear power, its regional rivals will eventually do the same. Many senior figures in Israel opposed the creation of the Samson Option because they feared, in Shavit's phrase, that it would 'open the gates of a future hell'. [ Nuclear threat is more real than at any time since second World War Opens in new window ] Writing in 2013, Shavit predicted: 'Sooner or later, the Israeli monopoly will be broken. First one hostile state will go nuclear, then a second hostile state, then a third. In the first half of the 21st century, the Middle East is bound to be nuclearised. The world's first multi-rival nuclear arena might emerge in the world's most unstable region.' When Shavit put this to one of the main architects of Israel's nuclear programme, the unnamed 'engineer' did not demur. 'He can definitely foresee a Middle East glowing in radioactive green ... As far as the engineer is concerned, there is only one answer: a pre-emptive strike.' Nuke them before they nuke us. This is the nihilistic logic set in train when the West gave the green light to a nuclear-armed Israel. In choosing to ignore this reality, the democratic world implicitly accepted that Israel exists in a twilight zone where the normal rules do not apply. It allowed Isreal to become a black hole of accountability. The problem with black holes is that they suck in everything that approaches them. Once you exempt Israel from the principle of nuclear non-proliferation, you also give it licence to ignore every other norm of behaviour. As we saw last week, Iran hitting a hospital in Israel with a rocket is an outrage (and yes it really is) but Israel launching 700 attacks on hospitals and healthcare facilities in Gaza is a regrettable necessity. A double standard is worse than no standard at all. It makes those who practice it look like liars, not just to the outside world but to their own citizens. When a war crime is merely an act of violence against civilians committed by people we don't like, all moral pronouncements become hollow. The US called Vladimir Putin's attacks on 'heat, water, electricity' in Ukraine 'barbaric'. But that word loses all meaning when it cannot be uttered in relation to Gaza. What's pulled down in this destruction of principles is any sense that democratic politicians believe what they say. As citizens watch their leaders switch their outrage on and off and collude in the atrocities they have so recently condemned, they become ever more deeply cynical. And cynicism corrodes democracy. The invasion of Iraq in 2003 wasn't just disastrous for the people of that country. It poisoned the wells of public trust on which democracy depends. The attack on Iran combined with the continuing slaughter in Gaza will be equally toxic. More voters will exercise their own Samson Option – pull the whole damn thing down on all our heads.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store