Zia Yusuf quits as Reform UK chairman after burka ban row
The chairman of Reform UK has quit, saying working to get the party elected was no longer 'a good use of my time'.
His decision follows a row in which he described a question to the Prime Minister concerning a ban on burkas from his party's newest MP as 'dumb'.
The former banker who sold his tech start-up company for more than £200m has previously described himself as a 'proud British Muslim patriot'.
He joined Nigel Farage's party 11 months ago as chairman, but on Thursday he suddenly quit after less than a year in the role.
Announcing his resignation on Thursday afternoon, he said: '11 months ago I became chairman of Reform. I've worked full time as a volunteer to take the party from 14 to 30%, quadrupled its membership and delivered historic electoral results.
'I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office.'
11 months ago I became Chairman of Reform. I've worked full time as a volunteer to take the party from 14 to 30%, quadrupled its membership and delivered historic electoral results.
I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and… — Zia Yusuf (@ZiaYusufUK) June 5, 2025
Yusuf's unexpected resignation comes after he has spearheaded the party's DOGE initiative to identify and cut wasteful spending of taxpayer money, seemingly styled after Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency programme in the United States.
It also comes less than a day after Reform UK MP Sarah Pochin, who won last month's Runcorn and Helsby by-election, called for a ban on burqas at her Prime Minister's Questions debut on Wednesday.
Pochin asked Keir Starmer to ban the burqa 'in the interests of public safety'.
Her call was rejected by the PM, and within minutes Reform UK declared that banning burqas is 'not party policy'.
Yusuf said on social media site X: 'Nothing to do with me. Had no idea about the question nor that it wasn't policy. Busy with other stuff. I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do.'
Following Yusuf's resignation, Reform leader Nigel Farage said he was 'genuinely sorry' that he had decided to stand down, paying tribute to him as 'enormously talented' and 'a huge factor in our success' at the local elections.
Farage added: 'Politics can be a highly pressured and difficult game and Zia has clearly had enough. He is a loss to us and public life.'
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch responded to Yusuf's announcement by saying Reform 'is not a political party'.
'It is a fan club,' she added, in a criticism of Farage.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Awkward! How the new chairman of Reform UK called party leader Nigel Farage 'an idiot' and branded his comments about HIV-infected migrants using the NHS 'prejudiced'
Reform UK's new chairman once called leader Nigel Farage an 'idiot', it emerged last night. Dr David Bull, who was unveiled as Zia Yusuf's replacement, also branded as 'prejudiced' comments that Mr Farage had made about HIV-infected migrants using the NHS. The remarks surfaced just hours after Dr Bull gave his maiden speech as chairman and threatened to overshadow his appointment, while at a Press conference unveiling the new chairman, Mr Farage unexpectedly ruled out putting the return of the death penalty on Reform's manifesto at the next general election. Dr Bull's comments, first reported by The Daily Telegraph, were made on social media in 2014. He posted them after Mr Farage, then leader of his previous party UKIP, suggested that HIV-positive immigrants should not be allowed to come to the UK and receive treatment on the NHS. He said it should not be used as a 'global health service', adding: 'I do not think people with life-threatening diseases should be treated by our National Health Service, and that is an absolute essential condition for working out a proper immigration policy.' Sharing an article about Mr Farage's comments, Dr Bull wrote on X/ Twitter: 'Nigel Farage's comments are ill-judged, prejudiced and dangerous. HIV can affect anyone regardless of sex, race and class.' In the post, still visible online, he added: '#idiot #unhelpful.' Dr Bull, 56, is a long-time ally of Mr Farage and has held roles in both Reform and its former iteration, the Brexit Party. He served as an MEP for North West England between 2019 and 2020. Mr Farage said that Dr Bull would bring 'terrific verve, energy, enthusiasm' to his new role. Mr Yusuf plunged the party into turmoil on Thursday after announcing his shock resignation on social media, giving Mr Farage only ten minutes' notice. He said he was quitting after attacking one of his own MPs, Sarah Pochin, for calling for a burka ban during Prime Minister's Questions. But just 48 hours after leaving, he said he was returning to the party. The 38-year-old businessman said his resignation had been 'born of exhaustion' after working for the party for 11 months 'without a day off'. He will now lead Reform's Elon Musk-inspired Doge unit, which the party says will root out wasteful spending in the ten councils it controls, starting in Kent. The decision not to include anything in Reform's manifesto about the death penalty will likely disappoint millions of its voters. A poll by the think-tank More In Common in January found nearly eight in ten of its backers support it 'for certain crimes'. Mr Farage said 'nothing on the death penalty will be part of [Reform] party policy' and that 'personally I don't think I could ever support it'. He said he was opposed because of hundreds of 'quite serious miscarriages of justice' having emerged since the 70s, adding that he believed it will become a big national issue because of polling suggesting younger generations are increasingly in favour. It may lead to suspicions that Mr Farage is trying to make Reform UK appear less Right-wing and controversial as it increasingly tries to target Labour voters. It also emerged that Reform lost nearly 3,500 members in the past week amid the Yusuf fiasco.
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
House of Lords canteen slammed for serving rainbow-coloured ‘Pride crumble' dessert
A HOUSE of Lords canteen has been given a roasting for serving a rainbow-coloured 'Pride crumble' dessert. Peers and staff working on the Parliamentary estate have been offered the woke sweet treat, pictured above, to mark Pride month. Portions of the pudding were on offer yesterday for £2.15 with custard. Only last week, rainbow couscous was on the menu in the River Restaurant overlooking the River Thames. But campaigner Fiona McAnena questioned whether the colourful crumble had been created after so-called Progress Pride flags were removed from the cafeteria earlier this week. Ms McAnena, who represents the Sex Matters charity, added: 'Whoever is behind this may think that they are supporting a noble cause. 'But do they really support the reality of what the transgender rights flag represents, including sterilising surgeries, cross-sex hormones that cause permanent physical damage, and rapists in women's prisons?' Tory peer Baroness Nicholson had demanded the cafeteria's Pride flags be taken down as they had not been given proper permission. The latest row comes weeks after Nigel Farage's Reform UK party said town halls under its control would be stopped from flying LGBTQ+ and Pride flags. Reform said it would allow only the St George's Cross and the Union flag to be displayed. 1
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EUAN McCOLM: Farage has tickled the tummies of Nationalist voters. He won't win the next election...but he may end SNP's reign
Reform leader Nigel Farage was supposed to be the perfect bogeyman. As last week's Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse by-election drew closer, First Minister John Swinney implored voters to back the SNP if they wished to keep Mr Farage's brand of politics out of Holyrood. A vote for Labour, said Mr Swinney, would hand the constituency to Reform. In the end, it was Labour's Davy Russell who took the seat, made vacant by the untimely death of sitting nationalist MSP Christina McKelvie, nudging the SNP's Katy Loudon into second. Reform's Ross Lambie came a very close third. Mr Swinney's claim that the by-election was a two horse race between his and Mr Farage's parties could not have been more wrong. Within minutes of last week's result being declared, the briefing against the First Minister was in full swing. SNP insiders muttered darkly about strategic errors and poor campaigning. Former SNP health secretary Alex Neil was among senior nationalists calling for Mr Swinney to go. The result, said Mr Neil, showed the current SNP leadership needed to be replaced, urgently. Political leadership requires the ability to be bullish in the face of disaster, something which Mr Swinney attempted during a SKY News interview. Speaking on Sunday Morning With Trevor Philips, the First Minister said, if current polls were to be believed, the SNP was on course to win its fifth consecutive Holyrood election next year and to remain - 'by a country mile' - the largest party at Holyrood. Snarkier sorts than me might be tempted to point out that, before voting opened last Thursday morning, Mr Swinney reckoned current polls showed Labour hadn't a hope of winning in Lanarkshire. It is routine for politicians, when confronted with polling that looks bad for them, to declare that the only poll that counts takes place on election day. Surveys, they say, are nothing more than a snapshot of a moment in time. With this in mind, perhaps the First Minister should spend less time focusing on opinion polls and more examining last Thursday's result. The numbers make for fascinating - and surprising - reading. Mr Swinney has expended considerable effort over recent months attempting to build the case that Nigel Farage's politics is anathema to Scots. His disruptive approach is cruel and unfeeling while we prefer something more compassionate, more progressive, more downright baby-boxy. Even a cursory glance at last week's result shows many take a different view. In fact, the numbers show a substantial number of Scots are more than happy to vote for Mr Farage's party. Reform won 26.1 per cent of the vote in Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse last week. Not bad for a party contesting a seat for the first time. Unsurprisingly, much of Reform's support came from people who had previously backed the Tories. But a drop of 11.5 per cent in the Conservative vote, compared with the result of the 2021 election, doesn't account for the level of support achieved by Mr Farage's party. It must, then, have been disillusioned former Labour voters who got behind Reform, mustn't it? It would certainly suit Mr Swinney for that to be so but a drop of just two per cent in Labour's support doesn't make up the shortfall. What does balance the books is the fall in support for the SNP. Last week, the nationalists' vote share plummeted by 16.8 per cent. Add that to the Tory and Labour losses and the Reform result is explained. It would appear that Nigel Farage is able to tickle the tummies of voters who previously sought to express their disillusionment with 'the establishment' by voting SNP. If this is so - and some Scottish nationalist politicians believe it to be - then the chances of another Scottish Parliamentary election victory have slimmed down. As the 2014 referendum campaign kicked off, support among Scots for the break-up of the United Kingdom sat at below 30 per cent. These voters - die hard nationalists - were of the 'independence at any cost' variety. Nothing could have shaken the belief of those voters that Scotland should stand alone. During the referendum campaign, support for independence rocketed. No, the Yes campaign didn't prevail but it took 45 per cent of the vote, a result which emboldened the SNP to believe it was just a matter of time until its separatist dream came true. But were the new converts to the independence cause true believers whose loyalty would remain unshakeable? Doesn't look like it, does it? Eleven years ago, then SNP leader Alex Salmond enthusiastically fomented great anger among a section of the electorate. He encouraged the belief that a distant political elite had abandoned ordinary voters and - to an extent - he did so very successfully, indeed. For some, a Yes vote was less about self-determination than it was about furious rejection of the status quo. And, so long as 'Indyref2' was being denied by big bad Westminster, those supporters looked like they'd stick by the SNP. These days, even John Swinney accepts there will be no second referendum any time soon. That reality makes the SNP offer less appealing to the hacked-off voter who wishes to 'shake things up'. The more self-aware among the upper echelons of the SNP know that the same dissatisfaction which boosted the independence cause in 2014 also drives support for Reform. Understandably, senior SNP figures take succour from a recent poll by Norstat which revealed that - once undecideds are removed - support for Scottish independence sits at 54 per cent, with just 46 per cent in favour of maintenance of the United Kingdom. Surely such a result shows the independence dream is very much alive? Well, up to a point, Lord Copper. One SNP source cautions colleagues against agitating for a second referendum, now, on the grounds both that the party - and wider independence movement - is unprepared and that support for breaking up the UK is not concrete. 'In the last few years,' said the party insider, 'we've seen polls which say people are in flavour of a second referendum and lots of our people get very excited. The thing is, though, that when you get down into the detail, it's usually been the case that people would be happy to see a second referendum at some vague point in the future which means we're just stuck in a time-loop where a referendum is always in sight but always out of reach.' The SNP moved from the fringes of Scottish politics to become the dominant party by persuading a substantial number of voters that it was an insurgent, anti-establishment force. After almost 20 years in government, the SNP is very much part of the establishment and that makes it vulnerable to the sort of attacks it once launched on Scottish Labour. Nigel Farage's Reform won't win next year's Holyrood election but the result in Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse suggests it could help end the SNP's reign.
