
Real's April Agent Survey: Market Momentum Slips, But Agents Remain Upbeat
TORONTO & NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Real Brokerage Inc. (NASDAQ: REAX, 'Real'), a technology platform reshaping real estate for agents, home buyers and sellers, today released results from its April 2025 Agent Survey. Agents reported a modest pullback in home sales activity in April following March's rebound. However, agent sentiment remained constructive, with nearly 60% of agents optimistic about the outlook for their local markets over the next 12 months.
'April's survey data reflects a market still searching for direction,' said Tamir Poleg, Chairman and CEO of Real. 'While higher rates continue to weigh on affordability, agent optimism remains strong, a positive signal as we move into the peak selling months, especially with the potential for improving trade developments to ease broader macro concerns.'
'Our platform was built to support agents across all market conditions,' said Sharran Srivatsaa, President of Real. 'Whether listings are marketed publicly or privately, our job is to give agents the tools to make the right call for their clients — because in real estate, one size never fits all.'
Key Survey Findings: Market Trends and Insights
Home Sales Activity Slows in April: Real's Transaction Growth Index, which measures year-over-year changes in home-sales activity reported by agents, declined to 47.8 in April, down from 50.2 in March. A reading below 50 indicates a decline. In the U.S., the subindex slipped to 49.0 from 50.8 in March, while Canada's reading dropped to 36.3 from 45.0.
Real's Transaction Growth Index, which measures year-over-year changes in home-sales activity reported by agents, declined to 47.8 in April, down from 50.2 in March. A reading below 50 indicates a decline. In the U.S., the subindex slipped to 49.0 from 50.8 in March, while Canada's reading dropped to 36.3 from 45.0. Agent Optimism Softens but Remains Elevated : Real's Agent Optimism Index, which measures how agents feel about the 12-month outlook for their local market, declined to 65.8 in April from 70.4 in March. A reading above 50 indicates that, on balance, agents feel more optimistic than they did the month before. In April, 59% of agents said they felt more optimistic, including 19% who felt significantly more optimistic. Fourteen percent (14%) felt more pessimistic, while 27% reported no change in sentiment.
: Real's Agent Optimism Index, which measures how agents feel about the 12-month outlook for their local market, declined to 65.8 in April from 70.4 in March. A reading above 50 indicates that, on balance, agents feel more optimistic than they did the month before. In April, 59% of agents said they felt more optimistic, including 19% who felt significantly more optimistic. Fourteen percent (14%) felt more pessimistic, while 27% reported no change in sentiment. Market Power Remains Split Between Buyers and Sellers: In April, 34% of agents said their local market favored sellers, 34% favored buyers, and 32% described conditions as balanced. The relative balance of power continues a trend that has been largely unchanged over the past six months.
In April, 34% of agents said their local market favored sellers, 34% favored buyers, and 32% described conditions as balanced. The relative balance of power continues a trend that has been largely unchanged over the past six months. Affordability Still the Top Concern; Economic Worries Rise: Affordability remained the biggest challenge for buyers, cited by 49% of agents, up slightly from March. However, concerns about the broader economy grew more pronounced: 23% of agents pointed to economic uncertainty as the primary barrier to home buyers (up from 21% in March), the highest since the survey began. Inventory constraints were cited by 18% of agents, while only 6% reported buyer competition as a leading issue.
Key Survey Findings: Agent Views on Private Listing Networks
Agent Awareness of Private Listing Networks Is Growing: Nearly two-thirds of agents (64%) said they are at least somewhat familiar with private or exclusive listing networks, while only 21% described themselves as very familiar. This suggests broad awareness but limited hands-on adoption of private networks among agents.
Nearly two-thirds of agents (64%) said they are at least somewhat familiar with private or exclusive listing networks, while only 21% described themselves as very familiar. This suggests broad awareness but limited hands-on adoption of private networks among agents. Private Listings Seen as Niche Tool, Not a Broad Solution: Sixty-five percent (65%) of agents believed private listings are appropriate for fewer than 10% of homes, with an additional 21% seeing private listings as valuable for between 11–25% of listings. These results point to selective use cases rather than widespread applicability.
Sixty-five percent (65%) of agents believed private listings are appropriate for fewer than 10% of homes, with an additional 21% seeing private listings as valuable for between 11–25% of listings. These results point to selective use cases rather than widespread applicability. Agents Report No Clear Trend in Private Listing Price Outcomes: When asked how privately marketed homes typically compare in terms of sale price, 38% of agents said outcomes depend heavily on property type and market conditions — indicating no consistent pricing pattern. Another 33% said private listings usually sell for less than comparable public listings, while only 13% reported a price premium.
When asked how privately marketed homes typically compare in terms of sale price, 38% of agents said outcomes depend heavily on property type and market conditions — indicating no consistent pricing pattern. Another 33% said private listings usually sell for less than comparable public listings, while only 13% reported a price premium. Many Agents Doubt Whether Private Listings Serve Clients' Best Interests: More than half of agents (54%) said they do not believe private or exclusive listing networks are generally in the best interest of clients. By comparison, 23% said they believe they are in the client's best interest, while 23% of agents were neutral.
More than half of agents (54%) said they do not believe private or exclusive listing networks are generally in the best interest of clients. By comparison, 23% said they believe they in the client's best interest, while 23% of agents were neutral. Agent Willingness to Recommend Private Listings Is Limited and Context-Specific: Only 25% of agents said they would be likely to recommend a private listing strategy to their clients, while 53% said they would be unlikely to— including 28% who said they would be very unlikely. Among those open to private listings, the top reasons cited were seller privacy (69%), unique property needs (37%), and discreet price testing (30%). The most common concerns about the strategy included lower sale prices (64%), reduced buyer competition (55%), and limited online exposure (40%). Only 8% of agents said they had no major concerns with private listings.
A summary presentation of these results can be found on Real's investor relations website at https://investors.onereal.com/.
About the Survey
The Real Brokerage April 2025 Agent Survey included responses from over 400 real estate agents across the United States and Canada and was conducted between May 2, 2025 and May 13, 2025. Responses to questions regarding transaction growth and agent optimism were calibrated on a 0-100 point index scale, with readings above 50 indicating an improving trend, whereas readings below 50 indicate a declining trend. Responses are meant to capture industry-level information and are not meant to serve as an indication of Real's company-specific growth trends. Additionally, given the smaller sample size, there can be greater variability in Canada index results on a month-to-month basis.
About Real
Real (NASDAQ: REAX) is a real estate experience company working to make life's most complex transaction simple. The fast-growing company combines essential real estate, mortgage and closing services with powerful technology to deliver a single seamless end-to-end consumer experience, guided by trusted agents. With a presence in all 50 states throughout the U.S. and Canada, Real supports over 27,000 agents who use its digital brokerage platform and tight-knit professional community to power their own forward-thinking businesses.
Forward-Looking Information
This press release contains forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking information is often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as 'seek', 'anticipate', 'believe', 'plan', 'estimate', 'expect', 'likely' and 'intend' and statements that an event or result 'may', 'will', 'should', 'could' or 'might' occur or be achieved and other similar expressions. These statements reflect management's current beliefs and are based on information currently available to management as of the date hereof. Forward-looking information in this press release includes, without limiting the foregoing, expectations regarding the residential real estate market in the U.S. and Canada.
Forward-looking information is based on assumptions that may prove to be incorrect, including but not limited to expectations regarding 2025 market conditions. Real considers these assumptions to be reasonable in the circumstances. However, forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking information. Important factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to, slowdowns in real estate markets and economic and industry downturns, and those risk factors discussed under the heading 'Risk Factors' in the Company's Annual Information Form dated March 6, 2025, and 'Risks and Uncertainties' in the Company's Quarterly Management's Discussion and Analysis for the period ended March 31, 2025, copies of which are available under the Company's SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca. These factors should be carefully considered and readers should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements. Although the forward-looking statements contained in this press release are based upon what management believes to be reasonable assumptions, Real cannot assure readers that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this press release, and Real assumes no obligation to update or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances, except as required by law.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Tesla (TSLA) Shares Are Trading Lower Today
Shares of electric vehicle pioneer Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) fell 4.9% in the afternoon session as momentum slowed after a 40% rally that followed the Q1 2025 selloff, suggesting that the recent surge may have exhausted short-term buying interest. It is also possible some investors were taking profits amid uncertainty as they wait for more concrete updates on Tesla's highly anticipated product updates scheduled for later this year. These updates are critical for improving Tesla's growth story, as reported sales in Europe and China were weak in the first quarter of the year. Contributing to the pullback, a widely circulated Bloomberg report resurfaced concerns about the safety of Tesla's driver-assistance technology, highlighting a fatal 2023 crash. The timing of the story is especially sensitive, as Tesla prepares to unveil its AI-powered robo-taxi service in Austin later in the month, a launch that risked being overshadowed by renewed scrutiny and could shake investor confidence in the company's autonomous driving ambitions. Adding to the wall of worry is Elon Musk increasingly looking like an enemy to President Trump rather than a confidant. President Trump has shown the willingness to punish companies that do not fall in line with his agenda and vision. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Is now the time to buy Tesla? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Tesla's shares are extremely volatile and have had 131 moves greater than 2.5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business. The previous big move we wrote about was 9 days ago when the stock gained 5.2% after the major indices (Nasdaq +2.0%, S&P 500 +1.5%) rebounded as President Trump postponed the planned 50 % tariff on European Union imports, shifting the start date to July 9, 2025. Companies with substantial business ties to Europe likely had some relief as the delay reduced near-term cost pressures and preserved cross-border demand. The update should be beneficial for Tesla, as data from the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association revealed the company sold 7,261 cars in Europe in April, down 49% year on year. So, the delay could help the company avoid being caught in the crossfire of retaliatory tariffs and potential complications from escalating trade tensions between the US and the EU. Contributing to the stock's momentum, CEO Elon Musk noted in a social media post on X (formerly Twitter) that he would be allocating more of his time to the company. He added, "I must be super focused on /xAI and Tesla (plus Starship launch next week), as we have critical technologies rolling out." Tesla is down 19.8% since the beginning of the year, and at $304.24 per share, it is trading 36.6% below its 52-week high of $479.86 from December 2024. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Tesla's shares 5 years ago would now be looking at an investment worth $5,152. Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) semiconductor stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report on our favorite semiconductor growth story. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Business Wire
32 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Deadline Alert: Organon & Co. (OGN) Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP About Securities Fraud Lawsuit
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP reminds investors of the upcoming deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the class action filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Organon & Co. ('Organon' or the 'Company') (NYSE: OGN) securities between October 31, 2024 to April 30, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'). IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR ORGANON INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS UNDER THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS. What Happened? On May 1, 2025, Organon released its first quarter 2025 financial results, announcing that management had reset the Company's dividend payout, from $0.28 to $0.02 and would 'redirect those funds to debt reduction.' On this news, Organon's stock price fell $3.48, or 26.9%, to close at $9.45 per share on May 1, 2025, thereby injuring investors. What Is The Lawsuit About? The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) Organon's optimistic reports of the dividend payout as the Company's 'number one priority,' were offset by Organon's newly implemented debt reduction strategy, thus, leading to a drastic decrease – over 70% – of the quarterly dividend; (2) Organon planned to prioritize debt reduction following the Company's acquisition of Dermavant; and (3) as a result, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. If you purchased or otherwise acquired Organon securities during the Class Period, you may move the Court no later than July 22, 2025 to request appointment as lead plaintiff in this putative class action lawsuit. Contact Us To Participate or Learn More: If you wish to learn more about this action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us: Charles Linehan, Esq., Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles California 90067 Email: shareholders@ Telephone: 310-201-9150, Toll-Free: 888-773-9224 Visit our website at Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook. If you inquire by email, please include your mailing address, telephone number and number of shares purchased. To be a member of the class action you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the class action. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nanox AI Bone Solution Receives CE Mark Certification
By Karen Roman Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (Nasdaq: NNOX) said its AI bone solution HealthOST has received CE mark certification which enables its commercialization across Europe. HealthOST examines CT scans to assess vertebral height loss and bone mineral density and helps identify disease risk, such as osteoporosis, before fractures occur, it stated. 'This CE mark for HealthOST represents a significant expansion of our AI capabilities in Europe,' said Erez Meltzer, Nanox CEO and acting Chairman. 'By integrating seamlessly into routine CT scans, HealthOST helps healthcare providers maximize their existing resources, while identifying patients who might otherwise fall through the cracks of traditional screening methods.' Contact: Exec Edge Editor@