logo
MP's 'regret' after education leaflet sent out with spelling mistakes

MP's 'regret' after education leaflet sent out with spelling mistakes

Yahoo2 days ago

A Birmingham MP has spoken of his 'regret' after householders received a leaflet riddled with spelling mistakes.
The letter, which highlighted a project to establish a learning hub for Life Sciences in Selly Oak and Artificial Intelligence (AI), was sent out by the office of Selly Oak MP Al Carns.
READ MORE: Travellers move back on to popular family park 24 hours after clean-up
READ MORE: Travellers move back on to popular family park 24 hours after clean-up
READ MORE: All the parts of England set for 31C heatwave with 23 counties roasted
Around half a dozen words, including education, survey, artificial intelligence, announced, guarantee and Britain, were spelt incorrectly.
His office said an earlier version of a newsletter containing the errors was published by accident.
It was put down to 'human error' and the mistakes were rectified for the rest of the print run.
A statement from the Minister for Veterans & People in the Ministry of Defence office said: "Yes, unfortunately an earlier version of the newsletter was accidentally printed for a small number of households.
"This was human error and rectified for the vast majority of the print job. It is regrettable that any went out at all."
Get breaking news on BirminghamLive WhatsApp, click the link to join
The leaflet prompted an amusing reaction on Facebook.
Bournville resident Mik Barton said: "It's not a good look when you're writing about education and the skills you need to get a job.
"It's also quite amusing that so much of the letter is about AI and when all the spelling mistakes are pointed out to him, Al blames it on human error !"
Mr Carns is a former Royal Marine who served in the military for 24 years.
He was awarded the Military Cross for his service in Afghanistan.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former congressional candidate enters Alabama governor race
Former congressional candidate enters Alabama governor race

Associated Press

time39 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Former congressional candidate enters Alabama governor race

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — Former congressional candidate Ken McFeeters announced Tuesday that he is running for governor of Alabama next year, casting himself as a political outsider and accusing his opponent U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville of being a 'part of the establishment.' Tuberville announced his highly anticipated candidacy for governor a week earlier. Tuberville is expected to be a strong candidate in the race to replace Republican Gov. Kay Ivey, who cannot run again because of term limits. McFeeters is the second Republican candidate to enter the race. He ran for congress in 2024, winning 6% of the vote in the Republican primary, according to McFeeters runs an insurance agency just outside of Birmingham that he founded in 1981 and was the president of the mid-Alabama Republican Club, he said in his announcement. He said he plans to hire military personnel for Alabama schools, take steps to protect family farms, and prioritize independent production of medicine and energy. McFeeters immediately tried to distance himself from Tuberville, a famed football coach of Auburn University who became a U.S. senator in 2020 after casting himself as a political outsider closely aligned with President Donald Trump. 'Alabama deserves better than a puppet of the globalists,' McFeeters said. 'We need a governor who will fight for the people, not for the money.'

"I would have voted no": Marjorie Taylor Greene didn't read Trump spending bill before voting on it
"I would have voted no": Marjorie Taylor Greene didn't read Trump spending bill before voting on it

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

"I would have voted no": Marjorie Taylor Greene didn't read Trump spending bill before voting on it

Marjorie Taylor Greene wishes she had read Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" more carefully. On Tuesday, the Georgia Republican took to X to condemn a portion of the spending bill that she voted in favor of on May 21. "Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years," Greene wrote. "I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of states' rights, and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there." Greene called for the portion to be "stripped out" in the Senate, criticizing the "free rein" the bill gives to "potentially dangerous" AI development. She added that she would vote against the bill when it comes back to the House if the portion barring AI regulation remains. Greene is not the only Trump ally to break ranks with the president's controversial bill. Recent Trump administration departee Elon Musk called the bill "a disgusting abomination" earlier this week."Shame on those who voted for it," Musk wrote on X. "You know you did wrong. You know it." Kentucky Senator Rand Paul called the spending cuts "wimpy and anemic" while saying the bill would "explode" the deficit, a claim backed up by an analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

Keller: Artificial intelligence provision in spending bill has unlikely allies lining up to fight it
Keller: Artificial intelligence provision in spending bill has unlikely allies lining up to fight it

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

Keller: Artificial intelligence provision in spending bill has unlikely allies lining up to fight it

The opinions expressed below are Jon Keller's, not those of WBZ, CBS News or Paramount Global. The "big, beautiful bill" passed by the House contains an artificial intelligence provision that has unlikely allies lining up to fight it. Artificial intelligence - or AI - is rapidly becoming a key part of our daily lives, providing lightning-fast information and helping machines operate more efficiently. Halting AI regulation But like social media before it, AI is also being misused, with many states moving to stop that with new laws. They're all jeopardized by language tucked deep inside the House version of President Trump's so-called "big, beautiful" tax and spending bill that would bar states from regulating artificial intelligence for the next 10 years. It's a move that has left-wing Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren and right-wing Georgia Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene singing the same time. "Republicans just threw the software companies a lifeline," says Warren, and Greene accuses the authors of the provision of "allowing AI to run rampant and destroying federalism in the process." The halting of AI regulation was just a rhetorical concept at a Senate Commerce committee hearing in early May. "To lead in AI, the U.S. cannot allow regulation, even the supposedly benign kind, to choke innovation or adoption," declared Sen. Ted Cruz. And with at least 16 states having already passed AI regulations, the tech moguls on hand loved the idea of overriding them. "Our stance is that we need to give adult users a lot of freedom to use AI in the way that they want to use it and to trust them to be responsible with the tool," said Open AI CEO and founder Sam Altman. Calls for guardrails on AI But like social media before it, AI is often used irresponsibly, fueling misinformation, political manipulation, and pornographic deepfakes. "Twenty-plus years ago there was a small startup in Cambridge called Facebook and we all thought it was cute and fun," recalled Massachusetts State Sen. Barry Finegold, who is co-sponsoring AI regulation here. "But now Meta says, they'll even admit, that one out of three women have body issues because of their algorithm." Finegold is one of 260 state legislators from both parties and all states who sent a letter to Congress opposing the regulation moratorium. "We are all about seeing the growth of AI, we want more companies to come here to Massachusetts, we think it's going to do dynamic things in biotech and so many others," said Finegold. "But what's so wrong with having guardrails out there to protect the public?" Just a couple of weeks ago President Trump signed into law the "Take it Down Act" which requires platforms to remove pornographic deepfakes and other intimate images within 48 hours of a victim's complaint. And the unusually-bipartisan outcry against this ban on state regulation shows how the tech lobbyists may have overreached this time. But this episode is part of a larger, long-running debate about the proper balance between regulation and economic growth, and that tug-of-war isn't ending anytime soon.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store