The poison paradox: How Australia's deadliest animals save lives
With a pair of bright pink tweezers in hand, Emma Teni is delicately wrestling a large and leggy spider in a small plastic pot.
"He's posing," the spider-keeper jests as it rears up on its back legs. It is exactly what she's trying to achieve - that way she can suck the venom from its fangs using a small pipette.
Emma works from a tiny office known as the spider milking room. On a typical day, she milks - or extracts the venom from - 80 of these Sydney funnel-web spiders.
On three of the four walls there are floor-to-ceiling shelves stacked full of the arachnids, with a black curtain pulled across to keep them calm.
The remaining wall is actually a window. Through it, a small child stares, both fascinated and horrified, as Ms Teni works. Little do they know that the palm-sized spider she's handling could kill them in a matter of minutes.
"Sydney funnel-webs are arguably the most deadly spider in the world," Emma says matter-of-factly.
Australia is famously full of such deadly animals - and this room at the Australian Reptile Park plays a critical part in a government antivenom programme, which saves lives on a continent where it's often joked that everything wants to kill you.
While the quickest recorded death from a Sydney funnel-web spider was a toddler at 13 minutes, the average is closer to 76 minutes - and first aid gives you an even better chance of surviving.
So successful is the antivenom programme here at the Australian Reptile Park that nobody has been killed by one since it started in 1981.
The scheme relies, however, on members of the public either catching the spiders or collecting their egg sacs.
In a van plastered with a giant crocodile sticker, each week Ms Teni's team drives all over Australia's most famous city, picking up Sydney funnel-webs that have been handed in at drop-off points such as local veterinary practices.
There are two reasons why these spiders are so dangerous, she explains: not only is their venom extremely potent, but they also live exclusively in a densely populated region where they're more likely to encounter humans.
Handyman Charlie Simpson is one such person. He moved into his first home with his girlfriend a few months ago, and the keen gardener has already found two Sydney funnel-webs. He took the second spider to the vet, where Ms Teni picked it up shortly after.
"I had gloves on at the time, but realistically I should have had leather gloves on because their fangs are so big and strong," the 26-year-old says.
"I [just thought] I had better catch it because I kept getting told you're meant to take them back to be milked, because it's so critical."
"This is curing my fear of spiders," he jokes.
As Ms Teni offloads one arachnid that was delivered to her in a Vegemite jar, she stresses her team isn't telling Australians to go looking for the spiders and "throw themselves into danger".
Rather, they're asking that if someone comes across one, they safely capture it rather than kill it.
"Saying that this is the world's most deadly spider and then [asking the public to] catch it and bring it to us does sound counter-intuitive," she says.
"[But] that spider there now, thanks to Charlie, will… effectively save someone's life."
All of the spiders her team collects get brought back to the Australian Reptile Park where they are catalogued, sorted by sex and stored.
Any females that get dropped off are considered for a breeding programme, which helps supplement the number of spiders donated by the public.
Meanwhile, the males, which are six to seven times more toxic than the females, are used for the antivenom programme and milked every two weeks, Emma explains.
The pipette she uses to remove the venom from the fangs is attached to a suction hose - crucial for collecting as much venom as possible, since each spider provides only small amounts.
While a few drops is enough to kill, scientists need to milk 200 of these spiders to have enough to fill one vial of antivenom.
A marine biologist by training, Emma never expected to spend her days milking spiders. In fact, she started off working with seals.
But now she wouldn't have it any other way. Emma loves all things arachnid, and goes under various nicknames - spider girl, spider mama, even "weirdo", as her daughter calls her.
Friends, family and neighbours rely on her for her knowledge of Australia's creepy crawlies.
"Some girls arrive home to flowers on their doorstep," jokes Emma. "For me it's not unusual to arrive home to a spider in a jar."
Spiders represent just one small part of what the Australian Reptile Park does. It's also been providing snake venom to the government since the 1950s.
According to the World Health Organisation, as many as 140,000 people die across the world from snake bites every year, and three times that many are left disabled.
In Australia though, those numbers are far lower: between one and four people each year, thanks to its successful antivenom programme.
Removing a King Brown snake from its storage locker, Billy Collett, the park's operations manager, brings it to the table in front of him.
With his bare hands, he secures its head and puts its jaws over a shot glass covered in cling film.
"They are very uninclined to bite but once they go, you just see it pouring out of the fangs," Mr Collett says, as yellow venom drips to the bottom.
"That is enough to kill all of us in the room five times over - maybe more."
Then he switches to a more reassuring tone: "They're not looking for people to bite. We're too big for them to eat; they don't want to waste their venom on us. They just want to be left alone."
"To get bitten by a venomous snake, you've got to really annoy it, provoke it," he adds, noting that bites often occur when someone is trying to kill one of the reptiles.
There's a fridge in the corner of the room where the raw venom Mr Collett is collecting is stored. It's full of vials labelled "Death Adder", "Taipan", "Tiger Snake" and "Eastern Brown".
The last of these is the second-most venomous snake in the world, and the one that's most likely to bite you here, in Australia.
This venom gets freeze-dried and sent to CSL Seqirus, a lab in Melbourne, where it's turned into an antidote in a process that can take up to 18 months.
The first step is to produce what's known as hyper-immune plasma. In the case of snakes, controlled doses of the venom are injected into horses, because they are larger animals with a strong immune system.
The venom of Sydney funnel-web spiders goes into rabbits, which are immune to the toxins. The animals are injected with increasing doses to build up their antibodies. In some cases, that step alone can take almost a year.
The animal's supercharged plasma is removed from the blood, and then the antibodies are isolated from the plasma before they're bottled, ready to be administered.
CSL Seqirus makes 7,000 vials a year – including snake, spider, stonefish and box jellyfish antivenoms - and they are valid for 36 months. The challenge then is to ensure everyone who needs it has supplies.
"It's an enormous undertaking," says Dr Jules Bayliss, who leads the antivenom development team at CSL Seqirus.
"First and foremost we want to see them in major rural and remote areas that these creatures are likely to be in."
Vials are distributed depending on the species in each area. Taipans, for example, are in northern parts of Australia, so there's no need for their antivenom in Tasmania.
Antivenom is also given to the Royal Flying Doctors, who access some of the nation's most remote communities, as well as Australian navy and cargo ships for sailors at risk of sea snake bites.
Papua New Guinea also receives about 600 vials a year. The country was once connected to Australia by a land bridge, and shares many of the same snake species, so the Australian government gives the antivenom for free – snake diplomacy, if you like.
"To be honest, we probably have the most impact in Papua New Guinea, more so than Australia, because of the number of snake bites and deaths they have," says CSL Seqirus executive Chris Larkin. To date, they reckon they've saved 2,000 lives.
Back at the park, Mr Collett jokes about the nickname of "danger noodles" that is sometimes given to his serpentine colleagues – a classic Australian trait of making light of something that gives so many visitors nightmares.
Mr Collett, though, is clear: these animals should not put people off from visiting.
"Snakes aren't just cruising down the streets attacking Brits - it doesn't work like that," he jokes.
"If you're going to get bitten by a snake, Australia's the best place – we've got the best antivenom. It's free. The treatment is unreal."
'For holding a wombat, thousands threatened my life'
To conserve or cull? Life in Australia's crocodile capital
Inside the Australian magpie's annual reign of terror
An iconic wildlife park has banned koala cuddles. Will others follow?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wave Capsizes Boat in Bali, Tourists Panic to Escape (Video)
Passengers on a ferry boat heading from Bali to the nearby isle of Nusa Lembongan, yesterday, experienced a horror scenario as the boat was struck by strong surf, and began to sink. Panic spread through the ferry, carrying around 100 people, as they broke windows, fighting for their lives. Luckily, there have been no reports of casualties or serious injuries. Scenes from the sinking boat, however, showed chaos and cries for help – no doubt turning a dream vacation for the passengers, many of whom were tourists, into a momentary nightmare. A handful of Australians were amongst the travelers on the sinking ship, and local news heard their tales. 'The one point of exit was literally a small little hatch,' said Andy Wood, a man from Perth aboard the boat with his wife and two kids. 'So, I think the people, particularly in the back where the water was coming in, were in a real panic state.' One woman busted open a window to escape. Bobbing bodies were floating as the boat slowly sank. Some people clinging on the bow, reaching out for help as another boat swooped in to rescue.'It was just people who weren't used to being familiar in water,' Wood continued. 'And I think the majority of them couldn't swim, so it was causing a fair bit of anxiety and panic amongst people.' Reportedly, the boat was overcapacity – that's being investigated as a possible cause of the catastrophe. Meanwhile, another recent near-tragedy on a separate Balinese island, also involving a tourist and the wrath of the ocean. A travel influencer was at Angel's Billabong, a popular sightseer spot on Nusa Penida, when a rogue wave almost swept her to a watery grave. Sadly, others have died at the spot. Bali bagus? Bali Capsizes Boat in Bali, Tourists Panic to Escape (Video) first appeared on Surfer on Jun 5, 2025
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr.'s New Report Actually Nails What's Wrong With American Health. Too Bad About the Other Part.
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. Emma lives in France. She wakes up in a country where junk food advertising to children is controlled. At school, she eats a nutritious lunch—half of which must come from locally sourced ingredients. The chemicals in her food are more strictly monitored; France bans many food additives that are still allowed in American products. When she gets home, she's not bombarded by algorithm-driven social media designed to maximize engagement through addictive content. Madison lives in Ohio. She wakes up to a breakfast, marketed directly to her through cartoon characters, packed with sugar and artificial additives. At school, she can buy snacks from a vending machine—something banned in French schools—stocked with products from companies that spend millions targeting her developing psychology. Her toys and environment contain harmful chemicals like PFAS and bisphenols that remain largely unregulated in America, unlike in France. After school, she's on social media platforms that use sophisticated algorithms to keep her scrolling, often on to content that makes her feel worse about herself. The health outcomes speak for themselves: France ranks third globally in child well-being, while the U.S. ranks 36th. The difference between Emma and Madison isn't that French doctors practice medicine differently. It's that the French government governs differently. As a pediatrician, I see this policy gap play out in my practice every day. The food we eat and the environment we live in are the primary drivers of chronic disease. Poor nutrition from ultra-processed foods drives obesity and diabetes, environmental toxins contribute to asthma and developmental disorders, and social media algorithms fuel mental health issues. I spend most of my time recommending lifestyle changes that work beautifully in countries like France but struggle to take hold in America's toxic environment. So when I opened the Trump administration's new 'Make America Healthy Again' report on childhood chronic disease, I was genuinely intrigued. Finally, I thought, a government document that seemed to understand what I see daily in clinical practice. The statistics cited are sobering. Over 40 percent of American children now have at least one chronic disease, with childhood obesity increasing by more than 270 percent since the 1970s. As a pediatrician treating these conditions, I was impressed by how thoroughly the commission had documented the crisis. But as I continued reading, I kept waiting for the group to outline a solution. Nearly 70 percent of children's calories come from ultra-processed foods designed to override satiety mechanisms and increase caloric intake, and kids are exposed to 15 food ads a day, with over 90 percent promoting products high in fat, sugar, and sodium. Not to mention the pesticides and microplastics commonly found in at alarming levels in their blood and urine. Americans, as the report demonstrates, simply live in an environment that is saturated with foods and chemicals that are terrible for our health. Just trying to avoid all this stuff can be impossible, particularly if you are a child. The logical thing to do to 'make America healthy' might be to regulate the industries that profit from making us sick—restricting predatory food marketing, cleaning up our chemical environment, and ensuring that kids have access to nutritious options. But MAHA doesn't suggest doing that. Instead, I found something far more fascinating: a document that makes the most compelling progressive case for government intervention I've ever seen, while at the same time steadfastly refusing to embrace its own conclusions. The MAHA report reads as if it were ghostwritten by a liberal think tank. It meticulously details what it calls 'corporate capture'—the way industry interests dominate and distort government actions, regulatory agencies, and medical institutions. The commission even provides a blueprint for solutions, citing countries with superior pediatric health outcomes. It notes that France bans junk food advertising to kids. Japan mandates comprehensive school nutrition programs. Regulation is possible and desirable. It's a lever that government could pull so that citizens lead healthier lives. The MAHA Commission has accidentally written a landmark conservative admission that the free market doesn't work in health care—that allowing corporations to operate without regulation corrupts institutions and undermines children's well-being. Stunningly, rather than embrace the obvious solution its data demand, the report pivots to blaming 'the overmedicalization of our kids.' That is, it claims that doctors like me and our health care system at large are too focused on treating illness and not on preventing it in the first place. It calls for 'unleashing private sector innovation' while explicitly rejecting 'a European regulatory system'—the kind that bans harmful food additives and restricts corporate marketing directed at children. This is where the commission's logic completely breaks down. It has spent dozens of pages documenting how corporate greed harms children, from selling them ultra-processed foods to exposing them to chemical toxins, creating an environment that leads to obesity, asthma, and other chronic illnesses. Then the group proposes solving this issue by giving those same interests more power while scapegoating the doctors trying to treat the resulting diseases of a system that prioritizes profit over well-being. As someone who treats these children regularly, I can tell you: This 'overmedicalization' narrative is completely backward. One example that the report gives of this phenomenon is asthma, noting that prescriptions for medications to control it went up by 30 percent over the course of a decade and declaring, 'American children are on too much medicine.' But the medicine isn't the problem. When I treat a child with asthma, I am dealing with the social determinants of health. That child gasping for breath in my office needs an inhaler because they live in substandard housing with environmental toxins that the government refuses to regulate. This is the reality of practicing pediatrics in America: We're forced to medicalize what other countries prevent through policy. Childhood obesity isn't just a medical condition—it's the symptom of a society that refuses to regulate the food industry. Doctors are left treating the symptoms, with the actual disease being the upstream social and economic factors. I agree with MAHA. This is not ideal. As much as we try, a doctor's stethoscope can't fix what a politician's pen breaks. The MAHA report's critique of doctors reveals how little the commission, which includes not one pediatrician, understands about practicing medicine. For example, the report notes that antidepressant prescriptions were written for greater than 2 million adolescents in 2022, a statistic that makes it seem as if doctors randomly hand out antidepressants. But this ignores that teenage depression rates have skyrocketed, with 5 million adolescents (20 percent of them) having a major depressive episode. When I prescribe an antidepressant to a teenager, it's not because I prefer pharmaceutical solutions. It's because I've already recommended therapy and behavioral changes. We spend much of our time advising nutritional improvement, increasing physical activity, and limiting screen time. However, that teenager lives in a country where all of that is constantly undermined by social media and chronic stress—the very societal factors the report identifies. When it comes to food and mental health, can kids and teens really do anything differently? The typical anti-regulation argument of 'personal responsibility' completely collapses when applied to minors. Children aren't autonomous actors who can meaningfully consent to destructive behaviors. Society has a moral imperative to protect children from predatory behavior. The typical response—that parents should simply 'take more responsibility'—ignores that we're asking families to fight billion-dollar industries alone. That approach has clearly failed. This is particularly true when it comes to guns. A child cannot be held responsible for gun safety. The report's ideological blinders are perhaps most evident in what it omits entirely: There is no discussion of firearm-related fatalities, the leading cause of pediatric deaths. The report does make important observations about pharmaceutical-industry capture, noting: '9 out of the last 10 FDA commissioners have gone on to work for the pharmaceutical industry.' This is a real problem, and the solution is shutting the revolving door between industry and government. Instead, the MAHA Commission uses these legitimate concerns to promote distrust of evidence-based medicine entirely— undermining confidence in the childhood vaccination schedule and framing the worsening mental health crisis as doctor-driven overmedicalization. Despite its flaws, the MAHA commissioners have handed both parties a critical moment of choice. For conservatives, it's a test of whether they're truly the populist party they claim to be. The commission has made the case for government intervention better than any progressive ever has. The question is whether they'll follow their own logic or remain trapped by free-market orthodoxy that's clearly failing America's children. For progressives, it's a reckoning: MAHA has accurately diagnosed the problem. It has correctly identified that U.S. institutions—the Food and Drug Administration, which approves medications from companies that later hire its commissioners; the Department of Agriculture, whose dietary guidelines are written by committees with extensive food-industry ties—are failing American families. Democrats, meanwhile, have found themselves defending institutions that are no longer serving their original purpose—regulatory agencies captured by the very industries they're supposed to regulate. While Republicans have the diagnosis correct, neither side has presented a cure. MAGA's answer is to let DOGE destroy the government's ability to regulate, while establishment Democrats champion the failing status quo. As the popularity of the MAHA movement shows, Americans aren't anti-government; we're anti-corruption. The real answer is pragmatic progressivism—not defending captured institutions but reimagining government—by explicitly channeling antiestablishment anger into pro-government reform. Without these changes, in another decade a different administration will release the next report documenting the same crisis, but with worse statistics. If that happens, the MAHA report will be remembered not as the document that made America healthy again—it'll be remembered as the moment we chose ideological paralysis over taking back our democracy, despite the cost to our children.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
'It's my time': Justis Huni is pain-free for the first time ever and ready to shock Fabio Wardley
LONDON — Justis Huni stares intently with a bemused look on his face. The 26-year-old sits in a London hotel, jet-lagged up to the eyeballs following a commute from Australia, and is trying, politely, to feign interest in the trials and tribulations of Ipswich Town Football Club. It's at Ipswich Town's home of Portman Road that Huni will make his debut on U.K. soil this Saturday night, challenging hometown hero Fabio Wardley for the WBA interim heavyweight title. But the gravitas of the event doesn't loom large in the eyes of the challenger as we speak six weeks out from the card titled 'Running Towards Adversity.' Advertisement 'It's just me versus me — that's how I have viewed my whole boxing career so far,' he explains. 'Nothing that Fabio [Wardley] or the crowd can bring can impact me in the slightest. It's just me and myself. If I can continue to improve every day of my life and beat the past version of myself, then I know that nobody can stop me.' 'Having 20,000 or however many booing me makes no difference to me. I am arriving to do a job — it's a sport where I have always believed I am here to take over, rather than just take part.' Huni (12-0, 7 KOs) displays an impressive one-track mind with unshakeable confidence. My detailing of Ipswich Town's relegation from the English Premier League is met with further confusion, and unlike his predecessor for this contest, Jarrell Miller, he isn't willing to cheapen himself with a faux hatred of Wardley's beloved team. With just 12 fights and 78 rounds under his belt in the pro game, you'd be forgiven for suggesting that this potential career-defining opportunity has come early in the Australian's story. But he's a believer that timing is everything in boxing, and opportunities are there to be snatched. Advertisement 'It was an easy decision to make [to accept the fight], if I am being honest, even at six weeks' notice,' he says. 'It's a massive opportunity for a fighter like me from the other side of the world. As Australians, we don't tend to be gifted these sort of fights, so I knew I had no option but to take it. 'It's my time — it's as simple as that. If you turn down opportunities like this, then who knows when the next one might arise.' In sport, sometimes you need several moving parts to align. They say it's better to be a lucky athlete than a talented athlete, and Huni feels he is benefitting from this in his fifth year as a pro. At the start of this year, he underwent surgery on his left elbow, solving a problem that had dogged him for the past few years. 'I had several chipped bones in my elbow — something I have had to fight with for my whole pro career,' he explains. 'Before the surgery, I didn't know what it felt like to throw a jab without having this painful numbing sensation afterward. I would be scared to miss, as this pain would come and wouldn't disappear for a couple of rounds after. I guess I just learnt how to adapt and fight with it. Advertisement 'But now it's fixed, I feel like a free man. I won't go into spars of fights with that nagging feeling at the back of my brain of it going again. I have been punching well for the past couple of months since the surgery, just getting back into the swing of things, and I am ready to let it fly against Wardley. 'The timing of this fight was just meant to be. This fight is potentially life-changing for me, so to come into it with basically a fully functioning elbow is great.' Despite the injury, Huni has remained a very active heavyweight. He has been moved quickly by Matchroom Boxing since signing with Eddie Hearn's promotional outfit in February 2023, fighting four times, winning three by knockout. Justis Huni punches Kevin Lerena during his WBO Global heavyweight title fight at the Kingdom Arena on March 8, 2024 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. () (Richard Pelham via Getty Images) 'I enjoy being active,' he adds. 'Staying ready is very important in this sport. This gives me a reason to train all year round and keep in shape. The last couple of years have gone by very quickly, but it has become very expensive to find opponents that want to fight me now — so jumping up into a challenge the size of Wardley makes the perfect sense for me now." Advertisement Huni was due to participate in the 2020 Olympic Games representing Australia, but a hand injury forced him to withdraw after his fifth professional contest against fellow countryman Paul Gallen. This was the sign for him to stay in the pro game rather than waiting on another cycle, and this decision could bear fruits on Saturday night. 'I have loved the transition from amateur to pro," he says. "The journey has been good so far, but I am always on the hunt to perfect my craft — that will come with time. Amateur boxing is a sprint to the line, but in the pros you are able to work into a fight and rely more on tactics. 'That's what I will have to do in order to beat Wardley. I feel I am better than him in every department except his power, so if I am able to keep him long and use my ring IQ, then there is no reason why I can't win this fight. He keeps saying he is going to hunt me down, but I am a boxer. I have fought every style in the world and these are the kind of fights where that experience is priceless. 'He can be assured that I've done my homework on him. He's still pretty raw himself and will be surprised when he gets into the ring with someone like me who he will have to work out. I know that with the crowd behind him he is going to want to lure me into a tear-up, but that's not going to work — I would be stupid to trade with him.' Advertisement Huni closes the conversation with a smile. A 22-hour flight quickly followed by a 12-hour media day has clearly taken it's toll on the 6-foot-4 heavyweight, but he's convinced it'll all be worth it when the opening bell chimes inside Portman Road. 'I want to spearhead this next generation of heavyweights,' he concludes. 'After this, it's only big fights. It's my time to open the next door.'