Kevin O'Leary: Four-Day Workweeks Are the 'Stupidest Idea'
O'Leary is a remote work enthusiast who often does television interviews wearing a suit jacket paired with pajama bottoms and flip-flops.
AI is already changing the workplace, from taking on the tasks of junior employees to creating PowerPoints in your place. Some experts suggest AI could help eliminate wasteful work time and, in turn, cut an entire day from the workweek. And it isn't such a far-fetched idea anymore.
After examining 245 businesses and nonprofits that piloted a four-day workweek over the last three years, a new study found that working one less day a week improved employees' mental health and boosted the businesses' bottom line. Moreover, Iceland adopted a four-day workweek in 2019, and Australia and France have piloted programs. Atom Bank in the U.K. has a four-day workweek — and employees can even be fully remote, if they choose.
Related: Here's How Eliminating a Workday Without Cutting Pay Impacted Hundreds of Businesses
But don't tell this to Kevin O'Leary. Despite being a remote work enthusiast who often does interviews from his hotel room in pajama pants, eliminating a day of work during the week is out of the question.
"That's the stupidest idea I have ever heard," O'Leary said on "Outnumbered" on Fox News after being asked for his thoughts on four-day workweeks. "There's no such thing as a work week anymore anyway, in a digital economy."
That's the stupidest idea I have ever heard. I think we should let the French go to a two-day work week and then kick their ass internationally. There's no such thing as a work week anymore anyways on a digital economy. I look at my staff, 40% of them work remotely all around the… pic.twitter.com/jElB5lzLBK — Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful (@kevinolearytv) June 1, 2025
O'Leary said about 40% of his staff "work remotely all around the world" and that "it's project-based," noting that he only cares about the work getting done, not where or when his staff is working on it.
"Can you get it done by the 15th of June? 'Yes, I can.' I don't care when you do it, four-day, three-day, five-day," he said.
Related: AI Is Dramatically Decreasing Entry-Level Hiring at Big Tech Companies, According to a New Analysis
We don't expect the new study data to change O'Leary's mind, either.
Last year, Kickstarter CEO Everette Taylor told O'Leary that his employees and their four-day workweek (adopted in 2021) are "very productive," and engagement is up 50%.
It doesn't look like O'Leary was swayed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
37 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
FTSE 100 on Best Weekly Winning Streak Since January
The bittersweet week is closing out for UK markets. The FTSE 100 is getting closer to its record high, but London suffered a couple of blows in its ambitions to turn around a moribund IPO picture. Here's what's been happening today: The FTSE 100 is up for a sixth day in a row and is creeping closer to notching up a new record high. It's actually outdoing the Magnificent 7 big tech stocks by a fair margin. Surging defence and gold mining stocks are helping the index, as it a shift in its composition. On the former, BAE Systems is now bigger than BP. And on the latter, Fresnillo is outpacing Rio Tinto by a distance. The UK's lack of tech stocks, and the departure of Wise's primary listing, is likely to be a self-perpetuating cycle. And Manchester United shares have surged the most since 2022 in New York as, despite a poor season for the men's team, the club raised its earnings guidance.
Forbes
39 minutes ago
- Forbes
SXSW London Debates: Is The Green Transition Financially Viable?
Rhian-Mari Thomas argues that the green transition is financially viable at SXSW London, referencing ... More the record amount of investment in the sector in 2024 Thought leaders across green finance and economics gathered to debate the financial viability of climate progress on day four of SXSW London. Held at the innovation and ideas festival's Climate & Nature House, a space hosted by Bellwethers to have meaningful environmental conversations, the session followed a traditional debate format encouraging a jovial air of competition. Sophie Lambin, founder and CEO of Kite Insights, and Stephen Dunbar-Johnson, president, international at the New York Times Company moderated the conversation. Lambin clarified that the debaters were tasked with addressing whether we can realistically and successfully invest our way to a green future, considering our current economic system and the state of the climate emergency, or whether we need new financial tools and a financial system. Arguing for the notion that 'the green transition is financially viable' were Rhian-Mari Thomas, CEO Green Finance Institute, Marisa Drew, chief sustainability officer, Standard Chartered Bank, and Fiona Howarth, CEO of Octopus Electric Vehicles. Arguing against the notion were Kathy Boughman McLeod, CEO Climate Resilience for All, Chaitanya Kumar, head of economy & environment at New Economics Foundation and Erinch Sahan, business and enterprise lead at Doughnut Economics Action Lab. Each debater was given three minutes to make their case. The debaters prepare their arguments on stage at SXSW London In support of the motion, Thomas started the conversation by saying that the green transition is 'economically strategic, it is socially imperative, and it is already underway.' She highlighted that a record $2.1 trillion was invested in green energy technology in 2024 according to BloombergNEF. Thomas sees this as evidence that the financial markets view green investments as smart economic strategy that not only provides financial opportunity, but protects us from the social and economic damage of the climate crisis. Howarth drew on the enormous success of her employer, Octopus Energy Group, as evidence that current investment is working. Started nine years ago, the company now employs 10,000 people and is valued at $9 billion while making green energy a viable option for consumers. She says this is thanks to 'smart innovators', and 'clever policy mechanisms'. Drew, instead, highlighted that emerging markets such as India, China, Indonesia and Middle Eastern countries have some of the fastest growing economies and are doubling down on green energy transition. 'What is Saudi Arabia doing? It is spending billions, if not trillions, on diversifying its economy. What does that tell you? The energy transition is viable, and the old way is no longer going to be the case in the not-too-distant future,' she argued. The first rebuttal came from Sahan, who highlighted that while $2.1 trillion was invested in green energy last year, the Climate Policy Initiative estimates that $6 trillion per year is needed to fund a green transition. He also argued that financial viability of a movement currently means that it is still satisfying the ROI needs of the financial market. 'These parameters are holding us back,' he said, taking off his belt to use as a symbol that financial markets are placing a straightjacket on businesses and governments to make progress on climate. He then pulled out an apple to make the point that the current green transition focuses on low hanging fruit, undermining the need for larger systemic change that picks the fruit at the top of the tree too. Chaitanya Kumar argued that the current financial system is too heavily influenced by fossil fuel ... More companies to be a fully viable solution to the green transition Kumar's speech made the point that large investment funds have interests in many of the biggest companies in the world as well as oil and gas companies, intrinsically tying them together, and creating strong lobbying power. 'Incumbent power and the political economy of the transition is still very much held by fossil fuel interests around the world,' he said. He drew on examples of the lobbying by fossil fuel companies which saw the EU label natural gas as a 'green energy' in 2022 and Microsoft's pivot on its sustainability strategy to adjust for escalating AI emissions. Finally, McLeod, highlighted the social costs, as well as the environmental costs of the current system. 'The market we have, not necessarily the market we wish to have, incentivizes pollution, devalues people and overlooks protection,' she told the audience. Addressing the plight of informal women workers who are on the frontline of the climate crisis, she said: 'This economy is chaos. We cannot maintain these expectations of return and believe that there is a green future. That is a fantasy.' The debate was declared a tie after the audience were invited to applaud the team they felt debated the best. Summarising the conversation, Dunbar-Johnson emphasised the importance of debate on these issues: 'What you did is encapsulate the complexity of the arguments in these subjects. This is a subject that we must grapple with. If the money is there, do we have the political solutions to drive that? We do have instruments to drive it, but the reality is, too much of the narrative is about the cost of the transition, not about the cost of not transitioning and the opportunities.'
Bloomberg
43 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Thames Water Needs £10 Billion Under Elliott, Silver Point Plan
Funds including Silver Point Capital and Elliott Management are working on a rescue plan for British utility Thames Water that would total more than £10 billion ($13.5 billion), according to people familiar with the matter. The proposal, the main terms of which are similar to the one presented by US alternative investor KKR & Co. before it walked away from its planned investment this week, would involve a sweeping debt restructuring. There would be a multibillion pound haircut for senior creditors, the people said. That would be on top of cuts for the utility's more junior Class B bonds and loans, as well as for debt at the holding level, amounting to approximately £3 billion.
