The assisted dying debate has been politics – but not as we know it
The House of Commons is a place defined by confrontation where political battles play out and engage more actively with their constituents.
But the atmosphere could not have been more different on Friday, as those on both sides of the assisted dying debate listened respectfully, almost solemnly, to one another in the final hours before the crucial vote.
As MPs headed for the division lobbies, the bill's supporters seemed confident but nervous.
When the voting was completed and the result imminent, a long and profound silence fell over the House.
From the press gallery, it seemed that the entire Commons was holding its breath together, collectively aware of the historic moment we were all about to witness, whatever the outcome.
The woman at the centre of this seismic moment, the bill's sponsor Kim Leadbeater, braced herself as the result came in.
Many months of pressure and responsibility appeared to be lifted from her shoulders as the win was announced and colleagues gathered to commend her efforts.
Throughout the process this been politics but not as we know it, with party divisions put aside and MPs asked to search their own consciences and come to their own conclusions.
It has created a more collaborative atmosphere in parliament and encouraged MPs to engage more actively with their constituents.
3:06
In the end there was still anger, frustration and disappointment among those who were against the law change, either on principle or because they believed the legislation was flawed.
And of course, politics will go back to being combative and voices in the Commons will be raised once again.
But for a brief period, historic change was calmly ushered in.
The challenge for the proponents now is to take the legislation through the next phases and deliver it with the same smoothness and determination.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
14 minutes ago
- Sky News
Ex-classmates died after being treated at same mental health hospital - as concerns raised over more deaths
They were former classmates who both died after receiving care from the same mental health hospital three years apart. Warning: This article contains reference to suicide Multiple failings led to the death of 22-year-old Alice Figueiredo - who took her own life in July 2015 - and the NHS trust responsible for her care was charged with corporate manslaughter. Last week, following a months-long trial, the trust was found not guilty of that charge but was convicted of serious health and safety failings. Karis Braithwate, who had gone to school with Alice, also died in 2018, having been treated by the same NHS trust. Reports seen by Sky News detail a decade of deaths at North East London NHS Foundation Trust (NELFT), with coroners repeatedly raising concerns about the mental health services provided by the trust - in particular at Goodmayes Hospital in Ilford. Rushed assessments and neglect were often cited. One patient was marked as alive and well, even though he had taken his own life inside the hospital the previous day. Another patient told staff he was hearing voices telling him to kill himself, yet staff did not remove crucial items from his possession - items he would later use to take his own life. Karis, 24, was sent to Goodmayes Hospital after she tried to take her own life at a train station in October 2018. The next day, staff spent 27 minutes assessing her and a further two minutes confirming their conclusion. She was discharged from hospital in the afternoon. She then went to a nearby railway station and took her own life. Her death came less than an hour after she had left the hospital. Karis had been friends with Alice, her mother said. The pair had been classmates at the same school. Karis told her mother she was upset at being put on the same ward where Alice had taken her own life three years earlier. Her stepfather Mark Bambridge called Karis sweet and kind and said she often "struggled with life". He felt relief when she was taken to hospital, saying: "She was in a place where she would be taken care of." Karis's mother - who asked not to be named - said her daughter confided in her about the neglect she endured at the hospital. Karis told her mother that her carer would sleep when they were supposed to be watching over her and said she never felt safe. "She spoke of her belongings going missing, of being treated with indifference and disrespect, and of staff who showed little concern for her wellbeing," her mother said. Karis's mother said her daughter was failed by the hospital and the family was offered only a "hollow, superficial and indifferent 'apology' from the administration team of those who were meant to protect her". In the wake of the verdict in Alice's case, Karis's mother said: "I am holding Alice's family in my thoughts and praying they receive the justice they - and we - so clearly need and deserve." A spokesperson for NELFT called Karis's death a "profound tragedy" and said the trust had conducted an in-depth review of patient safety since 2018, "resulting in significant changes in the way we assess risk of suicide". "We train our staff to consider the trauma in a patient's history, rather than focusing solely on their current crisis," the spokesperson added. "This approach allows us to see the person behind the diagnosis, making it easier to identify warning signs and support safe recovery." The trust said it had also improved record-keeping and communication between emergency workers and mental health practitioners. The man marked as alive after he'd died Sky News looked at more than 20 prevention of future death reports, which are written by a coroner to draw attention to a matter in which they think action could be taken to prevent future deaths. Behind each report is a different person, but there are some strikingly similar themes - failure to carry out adequate risk assessments; issues sharing and recording information; neglect. One report said staff at Goodmayes Hospital "panicked and did not follow policy" in the wake of a man's death in 2021, instead writing that he was still alive when he had died the day before. Speaking in response at the time, the trust said it had written a "detailed action plan" to address concerns raised. Another report said one woman developed deep vein thrombosis after she was left to sit motionless in her room. She had not eaten or drunk anything in the two days before her death, and the trust was criticised for failing to record her food intake. Responding to the report at the time, the trust said it had implemented new policies to learn from her death. Issues stretched beyond Goodmayes Hospital and spanned the entire NHS trust. One man was not given any community support and overdosed after his access to medication was not limited. Another man, a father of three, was detained under the Mental Health Act but released from Goodmayes after just a few hours. The 39-year-old was found dead two weeks later after being reported missing by his family. At his inquest, a coroner raised concerns about the lack of a detailed assessment around him, with a junior doctor saying he was the only doctor available for 11 wards and 200 patients. 'Don't kill yourself on my shift' It has been 10 years since Alice took her own life inside the walls of Goodmayes Hospital. But current patients say the issues haven't gone away. Teresa Whitbread said her 18-year-old granddaughter Chantelle was a high suicide risk but she still managed to escape from the hospital "20 times". "I walked in one day and said, 'Where is Chantelle?', and no one could tell me," she told Sky News. On another occasion, Chantelle managed to get into the medical room and stabbed herself and a nurse with a needle. She said one nurse told her granddaughter: "Don't kill yourself on my shift. Wait until you go home and kill yourself." Teresa grew emotional as she talked about her granddaughter, once a vibrant young girl and avid boxer, whose treatment is now managed by community services. "It's made her worse," Teresa said of Chantelle's experience at Goodmayes Hospital. "There's no care, there's no care plan, there's no treatment." The NEFLT said it could not comment on specific cases but added that "patient safety is our absolute priority, and we work closely with our patients and their families to ensure we provide compassionate care tailored to their needs". Chantelle's family say she is a shell of her former self and have begged mental health services not send her back to Goodmayes. "Something has to change, and if it doesn't change, [the hospital] needs to be closed down," Teresa said. "Because people are not safe in there."
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rhode Island lawmakers pass bill to ban sales of assault weapons
Rhode Island's Democratic-controlled state House on Friday approved legislation that would ban the sale and manufacturing of many semiautomatic rifles commonly referred to as assault weapons. The proposal now heads to the desk of Democratic Gov. Dan McKee, who has said he supports assault weapons bans. If the bill is signed into law, Rhode Island will join 10 states that have some sort of prohibition on high-powered firearms that were once banned nationwide and are now largely the weapon of choice among those responsible for most of the country's devastating mass shootings. Gun control advocates have been pushing for an assault weapons ban in Rhode Island for more than a decade. However, despite being a Democratic stronghold, lawmakers throughout the country's smallest state have long quibbled over the necessity and legality of such proposals. The bill only applies to the sale and manufacturing of assault weapons and not possession. Only Washington state has a similar law. Residents looking to purchase an assault weapon from nearby New Hampshire or elsewhere will also be blocked. Federal law prohibits people from traveling to a different state to purchase a gun and returning it to a state where that particular of weapon is banned. Nine states and the District of Columbia have bans on the possession of assault weapons, covering major cities like New York and Los Angeles. Hawaii bans assault pistols. Critics of Rhode Island's proposed law argued Friday during floor debates that assault weapons bans do little to curb mass shootings and only punish people with such rifles. 'This bill doesn't go after criminals, it just puts the burden on law-abiding citizens,' said Republican Sen. Thomas Paolino. It wasn't just Republicans who opposed the legislation. David Hogg — a gun control advocate who survived the 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Florida — and the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence described the proposed ban as the 'weakest assault weapons ban in the country.' 'I know that Rhode Islanders deserve a strong bill that not only bans the sale, but also the possession of assault weapons. It is this combination that equals public safety,' Hogg said in a statement. Elisabeth Ryan, policy counsel at Everytown for Gun Safety, rejected claims that the proposed law is weak. 'The weakest law is what Rhode Island has now, no ban on assault weapons,' Ryan said. 'This would create a real, enforceable ban on the sale and manufacture of assault weapons, just like the law already working in Washington state, getting them off the shelves of Rhode Island gun stores once and for all.' Nationally, assault weapons bans have been challenged in court by gun rights groups that argue the bans violate the Second Amendment. AR-15-style firearms are among the best-selling rifles in the country. The conservative-majority Supreme Court may soon take up the issue. The justices declined to hear a challenge to Maryland's assault weapons ban in early June, but three conservative justices — Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas — publicly noted their disagreement. A fourth, Brett Kavanaugh, indicated he was skeptical that the bans are constitutional and predicted the court would hear a case 'in the next term or two.' ___ Associated Press writers David Lieb in Jefferson City, Missouri and Lindsay Whitehurst in Washington, D.C. contributed to this report.
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Weight loss pill shows promise in new trial
A new weight loss medication, which can be offered by injection or tablet, can help patients lose a significant amount weight, studies suggest. An early study have found that people who received higher doses of amycretin as a weekly jab lost 24.3% of their body weight after 36 weeks of treatment. And initial trials assessing a tablet form of the drug also showed promising results, with patients taking daily tablets losing an average of 13.1% of their body weight after 12 weeks. Weight loss jabs have been hailed as transformative by NHS leaders. But injections come with additional work for over-stretched health services so tablet forms of medication may offer a new hope for the millions of people looking to lose weight. It has been estimated that around 1.5 million Britons are having weight loss jabs, which have been either prescribed through specialist weight loss services or private prescriptions. GPs will be able to dish out that jabs from next week. Amycretin, made by Novo Nordisk, helps to control blood sugar and appetite by targeting two specific receptors in the body – GLP-1 and the amylin receptor. An early trial in 125 adults testing weekly injections of amycretin, which has been published in The Lancet, found that those taking the highest dosage (60mg) lost 24.3% after 36 weeks of treatment. It also showed signs in improving blood sugar levels. Side effects included nausea and vomiting and were mostly mild to moderate and resolved by the end of treatment. 'These phase 1b/2a data support the potential of once-weekly subcutaneous amycretin as a therapeutic for people living with overweight or obesity,' the authors wrote. 'Amycretin appeared safe and tolerable, and there were significant reductions in body weight after 36 weeks of treatment.' The second early trial, published in the same journal, assessed amycretin in tablet form in 144 people over 12 weeks. There were mild to moderate side effects including loss of appetite, nausea and vomiting. Researchers found that people taking the highest dose of 100mg per day, lost 13.1% of their body weight over four months. The authors wrote: 'Amycretin effectively lowered body weight and improved metabolic and glycaemic parameters in people with overweight or obesity. 'Longer studies with more participants are warranted for evaluation of the safety and efficacy of amycretin in individuals living with obesity and type 2 diabetes, and to optimise the dosing regimen.' The studies were also presented at the American Diabetes Association's Scientific Sessions in Chicago, in the US. It comes as a separate study, which was published at the same meeting, examined the effects of weight loss jab Wegovy at higher doses. Researchers found that giving patients 7.2mg of Wegovy, also known as semaglutide, once a week led to an average weight loss of 20.7%, with a third of participants losing 25% or more of their body weight after 72 weeks.
