US warns against attending UN conference on Israel-Palestinian two-state solution
FILE PHOTO: A military vehicle manoeuvres in Gaza, as seen from the Israeli side of the border, June 10, 2025. REUTERS/Amir Cohen/File photo
PARIS/WASHINGTON - U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is discouraging governments around the world from attending a United Nations conference next week in New York on a possible two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians.
The cable, sent on June 10, says countries which take "anti-Israel actions" on the heels of the conference will be viewed as acting in opposition to U.S. foreign policy interests and could face diplomatic consequences from the U.S.
It adds that Washington would oppose any steps that would unilaterally recognise a conjectural Palestinian state.
The U.S. State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
35 minutes ago
- Business Times
Oil settles lower as traders gauge Middle East tensions
[NEW YORK] Oil prices settled slightly lower on Thursday as traders booked profits from a 4 per cent rally in the prior session, driven by concerns that worsening tensions in the Middle East could cause supply disruptions. Brent crude futures settled down 41 cents, or 0.6 per cent, at US$69.36 a barrel. US West Texas Intermediate crude fell 11 cents, or 0.2 per cent, to settle at US$67.97 a barrel. US President Donald Trump on Thursday said an Israeli strike on Iran 'could very well happen,' but added that he would not call it imminent and prefers to avoid conflict. The US had earlier decided to move personnel out of the Middle East, sending both crude oil benchmarks up more than 4 per cent to their highest since early April on Wednesday. The surge put the market in overbought territory based on several technical indicators, so it was likely due for a brief correction, StoneX Energy analyst Alex Hodes said. US and Iranian officials were scheduled to hold a sixth round of talks on Tehran's uranium enrichment programme in Oman on Sunday, according to officials from both countries and their Omani mediators. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Trump has repeatedly threatened strikes against Iran if the nuclear talks fail to reach an agreement. Tehran, which asserts its nuclear activity is for peaceful purposes, has said it would retaliate against strikes by hitting US bases in the region. Rising tensions in the region have oil traders worried about possible supply disruptions. Britain's maritime agency warned on Wednesday that increased tensions in the Middle East may escalate military activity and impact shipping in critical waterways. 'For the oil market, the absolute nightmare is a closure of the Strait of Hormuz,' Arne Rasmussen, an analyst at Global Risk Management, said in a LinkedIn post. 'If Iran blocks this narrow chokepoint, it could affect up to 20% of global oil flows,' he added. JPMorgan said oil prices could surge to US$120 to US$130 a barrel if the Strait of Hormuz were to be shut, a scenario the bank considered to be severe but a low risk. Still, oil traders were growing cautious. 'We are still higher than two days ago as some short investors prefer to stay on the sidelines amid the uncertainty,' said Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS. US special envoy Steve Witkoff plans to meet Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Oman on Sunday to discuss Iran's response to a US proposal for a deal. The UN nuclear watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations on Thursday for the first time in almost 20 years, raising the prospect of reporting it to the UN Security Council. REUTERS
Straits Times
39 minutes ago
- Straits Times
US sees no immediate reason to ground Boeing 787 after Air India crash
A tail of an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner plane that crashed is seen stuck on a building after the incident in Ahmedabad, India, June 12, 2025. REUTERS/Amit Dave US sees no immediate reason to ground Boeing 787 after Air India crash WASHINGTON - U.S. officials said on Thursday they have not seen any immediate safety data that would require halting Boeing 787 flights after a fatal Air India accident killed over 240 people. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and Acting Federal Aviation Administration head Chris Rocheleau made the comments at a news conference and said they had seen videos of the crash in India. Duffy said he had spoken to National Transportation Safety Board Chair Jennifer Homendy. An NTSB and FAA team, with support from Boeing and engine manufacturer GE Aerospace, was going to India, Duffy said. "They have to get on the ground and take a look. But again right now it'd be way too premature," Duffy said. "People are looking at videos and trying to assess what happened, which is never a strong, smart way to make decisions on what took place." Duffy said the FAA was reviewing information with Boeing and GE as part of the investigation into the crash. Duffy also emphasized the U.S. government "will not hesitate to implement any safety recommendations that may arise. We will follow the facts and put safety first." Rocheleau said, "As we proceed down this road with the investigation itself, if there's any information that becomes available to us regarding any risk, we will mitigate those risks." Duffy said the FAA is "prepared to send additional resources to get the data we need to ensure the safety of the flying public." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Commentary: How China beat Trump before the trade battle even started
LONDON: In the cult film The Princess Bride, the hero Westley tricks a villain, Vizzini, into killing himself in a battle of wits. Vizzini has to choose between two cups of wine, one of which Westley says is poisoned. In fact, Westley's cup is also poisoned, but he survives: he had spent years building up immunity to the toxin. Through long and careful preparation, Westley won the battle of wits long before it had begun. Substitute Xi Jinping for Westley and Donald Trump for Vizzini, and this week's US-China trade talks in London make a lot more sense. They didn't end in the US lying dead on the ground, but not far off. The sides agreed on a comically vague framework of co-operation, with the US asking for a handshake to seal the deal – an activity at which Donald Trump, as it happens, is famously poor. THE CLEAR WINNER Nor is he much good at negotiating. Beijing is the clear winner in these early skirmishes. Trump has now lifted most of the extraordinarily punitive tariffs he has imposed on China since his inauguration. What he got back this time was China vaguely promising to lift the restrictions on rare earth exports it imposed on April 4, as plaintively requested by his chief economic adviser Kevin Hassett. As I wrote recently, China's decision in April to cut off exports of certain rare earth minerals is a much more surgical strike than previous ineffectual scattergun restrictions. The restrictions of the early 2010s were undermined by the expansion of mineral production outside China and through smuggling by its notoriously lawless miners and processors. The latest round of restrictions focuses on the less common 'heavy' rare earth elements such as dysprosium, which has no large rival producers outside China and whose price shot higher after the controls were announced. Since the 2010s, Beijing has clamped down heavily on wildcat rare earth production and smuggling. Production is dominated by a small number of tightly state-controlled companies, and the latest controls are imposed via 'dual-use' export licensing for products used in defence manufacturing. This makes it much easier for the authorities to control the supply chain. The Chinese state certainly has its own issues with judgment and co-ordination. Its rare earth controls are threatening economies Beijing is trying to pull out of the US orbit. European car manufacturers have complained volubly. CLEARING A LOW BAR Alienating all buyers of rare earths is politically risky, but China is at least differentiating somewhat between European companies and American ones. Suppliers to Volkswagen, which has more than 30 plants in China, were among the first to receive a licence to buy rare earths. Beijing is managing to clear the low bar of exceeding the Trump administration's competence by some distance. US weapons, although formidable, are harder to target precisely. Just as the UK was wrongly convinced that its trade deficit with the EU gave it the superpower Brexit weapon of access to the British consumer, Trump thought prohibitive tariffs on Chinese imports would bring Beijing to heel. There's no doubt China is vulnerable, having maintained dependence on overseas demand by clinging to its traditional export-oriented growth model. But Trump's untargeted tariffs meant US companies risked losing key industrial inputs, as well as shelves potentially emptying of consumer goods. As for the US's own attempts to use export controls to crimp China's economy, its tools have proved too easily circumvented. Joe Biden's administration used restrictions on US technology and outward investment to slow China's technological development in semiconductors and other sectors, and leaned on allies to do the same. It didn't really work. China rapidly developed its own chip technology. Similarly, it's unlikely that Trump's recent restrictions on the export of chip software will allow the US to regain ground lost to China. Trump's attempt to fight on China's own ground of controlling critical physical inputs by restricting exports of ethane, a gas used in the chemical industry, is more likely to damage his country's companies and those of allies. The US still has some extremely powerful weapons, such as restricting access to the global dollar payment system, but their use on a large scale is untested. The triumph of the serenely calculating Westley over the bombastically ignorant Vizzini is a truly great moment in cinema. If Trump wants to win the next round, he is going to have to assess the ordnance at his disposal and deploy it far more accurately. History does not suggest this is a likely outcome.
