US silence as Russia steps up attacks on Ukraine highlights Trump's failure
The noises in Kyiv in the early hours of Sunday morning went like this. First was the staccato sound of the air defences booming on the edge of the city. As those guns stopped, the sound of drone motors approaching was audible, getting quickly louder before the briefest moment of silence and then a sudden detonation.
But, after two days of heavy Russian air raids that hit civilian buildings across Ukraine, there has been only silence from Donald Trump.
In the space of just over a week, since the first direct talks between Russia and Ukraine since March 2022 broke up inconclusively with no sign of a ceasefire, the failure of his intervention has become clear.
Boasting before his inauguration as US president that he could end the war in 24 hours, he has instead emboldened the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, by declining to impose pressure for an immediate ceasefire – backed by Europe – or meaningful sanctions.
Since Trump's two-hour call with Putin last Monday, the Russian leader has made clear his disdain even as Trump's own Defense Intelligence Agency predicted that Moscow would continue fighting through this year.
In the aftermath of the call, Putin has ordered the creation of a 'security buffer zone' along Ukraine's eastern border. Strikes on civilian targets only seem to be accelerating, culminating in two straight days of air raids, including Saturday night's – the heaviest aerial bombardment of the war so far, with almost 300 drones and nearly 70 missiles.
Ukrainian and western officials anticipate that Russia will once again attempt a large-scale offensive during the summer, even if they are highly sceptical that it will be effective given Moscow's punishing losses.
The reality is that with deadlock on the ground, the escalating long-range drone war on both sides is becoming ever more significant, even if it cannot conquer territory.
As it has become ever larger, with Russian and Ukrainian factories turning out thousands of new drones, it has become more sophisticated with Moscow's employment of big numbers of decoys and systems designed to fool air defence systems.
While Ukraine has targeted bases and factories, including those producing fibre optic cable for a new generation of small combat zones, the purpose on Russia's side appears aimed solely at undermining morale on the home front. In recent days, drones and missiles have hit apartment blocks, homes and a student dormitory.
On Sunday the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, angrily denounced 'the silence of America … encouraging Putin'. His words raised a more critical question: whether Trump, as he has long threatened, has already walked away from his perfunctory efforts to end the war.
Phillips O'Brien, a professor of strategic studies at the University of St Andrews, has suggested in his newsletter on the war that, far from the recent talks heralding any hopes of a breakthrough, they had in fact removed any pretence that the US-mediated talks were going anywhere.
'On Monday the great charade we have been seeing for months came to an end,' wrote O'Brien this weekend. 'The charade was that Trump was trying to negotiate a deal between Ukraine and Russia that would work for both states. The reality was always that Trump was trying to bludgeon Ukraine into making major concessions to Russia and help Putin achieve many of his strategic goals.'
If Trump has already disengaged, that raises a number of difficult questions for Kyiv: will the US continue supplying military aid in sufficient quantities? More crucially, can Europe step into the diplomatic and military void provoked by that disengagement?
What is clear to Ukrainians, despite the several weeks of headlines over the potential for a breakthrough in peace talks, is that without pressure from Washington, or hugely accelerated aid from Europe, the war will grind on. And there will be more nights like Saturday's in their future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump wanted to unleash the troops on George Floyd protests. Now the gloves are off
President Donald Trump saw an opportunity to deploy thousands of active-duty troops to American streets in 2020 after the police murder of George Floyd galvanized protests across the country. However, some officials in his first administration resisted the idea and checked some of Trump's more violent impulses when it came to resistance against his agenda. Trump ultimately did not invoke the Insurrection Act that year — reportedly at the guidance of officials who are no longer in his circle. Five years later, the president — surrounded by 'law and order' loyalists — federalized the National Guard for the first time in more than 50 years to deploy 4,000 service members across Los Angeles. Another 700 U.S. Marines are standing by, with dozens already guarding federal agents while they make immigration arrests. The administration appears to be aiming to avoid what Trump sees as a mistake from his first term. The White House and Homeland Security have spent weeks planning how to more broadly deploy the nation's military into American cities to support the president's anti-immigration agenda. A spark from protests in Los Angeles, largely confined to pockets of the sprawling city's downtown areas and two nearby communities, appeared to give officials the fire they were looking for to put the plan into action and boots on the ground. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told members of Congress on June 11 that Trump's order sending the Guard to California could apply to other states. He called it 'getting ahead of the problem.' 'So that if in other places, if there are other riots, in places where law enforcement officers are threatened, we would have the capability to surge National Guard there, if necessary,' Hegseth told House lawmakers. Trump now appears to be trying to avoid a repeat of the summer of protests that plagued the final months of his first term in office and derailed a campaign he ultimately lost at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and political debate focused on racial justice. 'Can't you just shoot them?' Thousands of people flooded streets across the country throughout the summer of 2020. The police killings of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor sparked daily demonstrations against police brutality and racism, including in the streets of Washington, D.C. It led to violent clashes and vandalism in cities. Pictures of burning buildings and cops in riot gear dominated news coverage. 'Can't you just shoot them?' Trump said at the time, according to his former Defense Secretary Mark Esper. 'Just shoot them in the legs or something?' 'I had to figure out a way to walk Trump back without creating the mess I was trying to avoid,' Esper wrote in his book A Sacred Oath, describing Trump as 'red faced and complaining loudly about the protests underway' in the nation's capital. Trump demanded law enforcement officers 'crack skulls' and 'beat the f*** out' of protesters, according to the book Frankly, We Did Win This Election: The Inside Story of How Trump Lost by The Wall Street Journal 's Michael Bender. 'Don't we have an island that we own? What about Guantanamo?' Trump reportedly said, referring to the Cuban naval base that became a notorious prison during the War on Terror. Esper and General Mark Milley, then the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff serving as the nation's top military leader, appeared to be among the only senior administration officials who could confront the president and his chief loyalists. During one Oval Office debate, Trump's adviser Stephen Miller compared scenes of burning buildings and crowds clashing with police to war zones — which infuriated Milley, according to Bender's book. 'Shut the f*** up, Stephen,' Milley reportedly fired back. But in public, Trump praised Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, whose state erupted with unrest and chaotic scenes after Floyd's murder. 'I know Governor Walz is on the phone, and we spoke, and I fully agree with the way he handled it the last couple of days,' Trump said at the time. 'I was very happy with the last couple of days, Tim,' he said. 'You called up big numbers and the big numbers knocked them out so fast it was like bowling pins.' Trump even dismissed the idea of invoking the Insurrection Act at the time and suggested he could not go over the heads up governors to deploy federal troops into the states. 'We have laws. We have to go by the laws. We can't move in the National Guard. I can call insurrection, but there's no reason to ever do that,' Trump said during an election town hall. 'We can't call in the National Guard unless we're requested by a governor,' he said. 'If a governor or a mayor is a Democrat, like in Portland, we call them constantly.' 'We're gonna have troops everywhere' Trump is no longer moored by advisers willing to argue against his instincts. During his 2024 campaign, Trump appeared to change his tune, suggesting that he would call on the National Guard 'if things were getting out of control.' 'I would have no problem using the military, per se,' he told Time in April 2024. 'We have to have safety in our country. We have to have law and order in our country. And whichever gets us there, but I think the National Guard will do the job.' Within weeks after his inauguration, administration officials began to discuss how to leverage the military to support the president's immigration enforcement plans, a hallmark of his 2024 campaign, according to CNN. First, Trump sent thousands of active-duty troops to the U.S.-Mexico border with permission to detain anyone caught illegally crossing until law enforcement officers arrived on the scene. Troops have been deployed to the southern border under previous administrations, typically in a supporting role alongside federal officers. But under Trump, federalized troops are allowed to detain and search anyone within a 170-mile stretch of federal land spanning three states. The administration also is mulling the use of military bases to detain immigrants. A February memo outlined a plan to detain roughly 1,000 immigrants at Fort bliss in Texas. That plan could serve as a model for immigration detention at several other military bases, according to DHS officials. In January, Trump outlined a plan to detain as many as 30,000 immigrants inside the notorious naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The detention center has held dozens of immigrants at various points since February. But officials have also discussed how to send troops into the nation's interior, and whether they could act as a protective body for federal agents performing raids and arrests. After anti-ICE raid demonstrations kicked off across Los Angeles, Trump mobilized the California National Guard against the wishes of Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. His order said troops would protect federal property and federal personnel. Then he announced active-duty Marines would support local law enforcement, escalating a response that critics fear is a test for Trump's radical expansion of military force against civilians. Trump did not invoke the Insurrection Act, though the president and administration officials have repeatedly labeled protesters 'insurrectionists' and 'seditionists' — sparking fears that the president is laying the groundwork for mass deployment of military assets across the country. Both actions drew legal challenges from Newsom and watchdog groups. In a televised address, Newsom said Trump's actions put his state and the nation at the brink of authoritarian control. 'California may be first, but it clearly won't end here. Other states are next. Democracy is next,' he said. Another lawsuit from watchdog group American Oversight called the deployment 'an opening salvo in a coordinated national strategy and not simply an isolated incident.' 'Deploying the military to quash protests over the administration's inhumane and legally dubious immigration policies — especially over the objection of elected state leaders — is a dangerous, though unfortunately predictable, escalation by the Trump administration,' according to American Oversight executive director Chioma Chukwu. 'If left unchecked, this abuse of power under thin legal pretense can be readily replicated across other states in the future,' he added. In his testimony before House lawmakers on June 12, Hegseth refused to answer whether the Defense Department would respect court rulings — including the Supreme Court — if they struck down Trump's order. 'We should not have local judges determining foreign policy or national security policy for the country,' he said. Asked on June 8 whether he planned to send troops to other parts of the country, Trump said 'we're gonna have troops everywhere.' 'We're not going to let this happen to our country. We're not going to let our country be torn apart like it was under Biden,' he said. Two days later, he warned that any protests during a military parade in Washington, D.C. would be met with 'very heavy force.' 'If there's any protester who wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' he said from the Oval Office. 'I haven't even heard about a protest, but [there are] people that hate our country.' Noem, appearing next to the president that day, said Minnesota's Governor Walz 'let his city burn' in 2020. 'The president and I have talked about this in the past,' she said. 'He was not going to let that happen to another city and to another community, where a bad governor made a bad decision.'
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Consumer sentiment rose in June for 1st time this year as inflation remains stayed tame
Consumer sentiment increased in June for the first time in six months, the latest sign that Americans' views of the economy have improved as inflation has stayed tame and the Trump administration has reached a truce in its trade fight with China. The preliminary reading of the University of Michigan's closely watched consumer sentiment index, released Friday, jumped 16% to 60.5. The large increase followed steady drops that left the preliminary number last month at the second-lowest level in the nearly 75-year history of the survey. Consumer sentiment is still down 20% compared with December 2024. ' Consumers appear to have settled somewhat from the shock of the extremely high tariffs announced in April and the policy volatility seen in the weeks that followed,' Joanne Hsu, director of the survey, said in a written statement. 'However, consumers still perceive wide-ranging downside risks to the economy.' Americans have largely taken a darker view of the economy's future after President Donald Trump unleashed a wide-ranging trade war, imposing steep tariffs on China, the European Union, and dozens of other countries. Yet in April Trump postponed a set of sweeping tariffs on about 60 nations and last month reached a temporary truce with China, after both sides had sharply ratcheted up tariffs on each other. U.S. duties remain elevated compared with historical levels, but so far they have not worsened overall inflation.
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Sen. Lindsey Graham slammed for ‘game on' tweet after Israel bombs Iran
South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham is facing widespread criticism for a tweet he posted following the Israeli strikes on Iran. 'Game on. Pray for Israel,' he wrote on Thursday night. Israel struck bases and nuclear sites in an attack more severe than previous attacks on Iran, with President Donald Trump pushing the country to agree to fresh restrictions on its nuclear program as additional strikes could be 'more brutal.' 'Game? Your soul is lost,' said broadcaster Keith Olbermann in response. 'I have no doubt that you are incredibly turned on right now, Senator. Iranians, who are caught in this mess, deserve your prayers too but I know we are just an afterthought. You're a disgrace,' said journalist Yashar Ali. 'Game? You're disgusting,' Owen Shroyer added. Israel killed a number of Iran's security chiefs, dealing a severe blow to the country's chain of command. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has described the attack as a way to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, which is seen as an existential threat by the Israelis. 'A game? You piece of s***,' wrestling reporter Sean Ross Sapp wrote to Graham. Meghan McCain, the daughter of the late Arizona Senator John McCain, whom Graham admired, added to the criticism, writing, 'It's not a f****** game Lindsey.' 'It isn't a game, Senator. You confirmed a talkshow host SecDef who texts strike plans on unsecured apps,' said Heath Mayo, the founder of the conservative group Principles First. 'You supported a President who thinks Ukraine caused Putin's invasion. You should pray for all of us. We're going to need all the help we can get with amateurs in charge.' 'It's not a game, dip****,' attorney Ron Filipkowski added. Meanwhile, Pennsylvania Democratic Senator John Fetterman called for Israel to continue 'wiping out Iranian leadership.' 'Our commitment to Israel must be absolute and I fully support this attack,' he wrote on X late on Thursday. 'Keep wiping out Iranian leadership and the nuclear personnel. We must provide whatever is necessary—military, intelligence, weaponry—to fully back Israel in striking Iran.' While writer Tim Shorrock called Fetterman 'The drooling War Maniac from Pennsylvania,' singer/songwriter John Ondrasik called the senator 'a Lion in a sea of Lemmings' and former White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer said Fetterman 'is amazing.' 'His support of Israel used to be standard for almost every D in Washington. Now he's a lonely voice, but he remains an amazingly powerful and inspiring voice,' he added.
