Qantas announces first international flights out of Adelaide in more than a decade with new service to Auckland
Qantas has announced it is launching international flights out of Adelaide for the first time in more than a decade, but only on a seasonal basis.
The flying kangaroo has not flown an overseas route out of the South Australian capital since 2013 when it axed flights to Singapore.
But that will change on October 31 when Qantas services between Adelaide and Auckland commence.
The Boeing 737 flights will operate four times per week until May 3 next year, with Qantas competing against Air New Zealand, which already operates the route.
Qantas said that in addition to connecting South Australia and New Zealand, it will provide a one-stop service to New York through its Auckland-New York service.
South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas appeared hopeful that Qantas would continue to grow its international network out of Adelaide after such a long hiatus.
"It is great news that Qantas is re-establishing a direct international flight out of Adelaide with this new service to Auckland," Mr Malinauskas said.
"There is no better friend to Australia than New Zealand – and this connection is only set to bring us even closer.
"It also connects South Australians through to New York City with a single stop, strengthening our bond with a key economic and AUKUS partner.
"We hope that this marks the beginning of a long-term commitment by Qantas to grow their international services out of Adelaide."
Tourism Minister Zoe Bettison noted that "New Zealand is presently the equal second biggest source market for visitation to South Australia - behind only the UK and equal with China".
'Tourism expenditure from New Zealand grew by 29 per cent in the last year, with 48,000 visitors coming to South Australia in 2024," she said.
"We invite our friends across the ditch to come and experience the simple pleasures of South Australia – to taste our premium food and wine, experience our natural beauty, and enjoy a plethora of events and festivals across the calendar."
The announcement comes less than two weeks after Qantas confirmed it was launching seasonal flights between Perth and Auckland from December 8.
The Airbus A330-200 flights will operate three times per week.
Earlier this year, Mr Malinauskas revealed United Airlines will commence seasonal flights between San Francisco and Adelaide on December 11.
Airlines which currently operate international flights out of Adelaide include Fiji Airways, Emirates, China Southern, Jetstar, Malaysia Airlines, Qatar Airways, Singapore Airlines and Air New Zealand.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
26 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Senior federal politicians questions US presence in Australia after Pentagon launches formal review into AUKUS partnership
The Albanese government has been urged to reconsider the joint US secretive military base Pine Gap and the presence of US troops in Australia as the Trump administration questions the AUKUS pact. Greens senator and defence spokesman David Shoebridge has called on the Albanese government to 'put a stop' to de facto US territories in Australia amid the AUKUS review. The US announced a formal review of the $300 billion AUKUS arrangement after the Albanese government resisted demands to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Mr Shoebridge told Sky News that Australia should stop 'bankrolling' US defence facilities in Darwin, and the secretive Pine Gap facility. 'Australia has for too long allowed Pine Gap and Defence facilities in Darwin to operate as de facto US territories, it's time we put a stop to that,' he said. 'Labor and the Coalition say having US troops stationed here makes us safer. The Greens say it is a major national security risk. 'Donald Trump is erratic, reckless and careless of America's allies and alliances but he does have one fairly constant trait, he puts US interests first. 'If only Australian decision makers did the same for us.' Mr Shoebridge said the US decision to review AUKUS should be met with Australia's own review. 'It's time for Parliament to launch a full inquiry into this dud deal, and allow critics of AUKUS a seat at the table, not just a nodding bunch of Labor and Coalition members.' Several other federal politicians outside of the major parties have also called into question whether the AUKUS deal served the national interest. Independent Senator David Pocock told Sky News he did not have full confidence in the US administration in relation to the AUKUS agreement. 'I think we should take this as an opportunity to actually do a review ourselves. It's long overdue,' he said on Thursday. Teal MP Monique Ryan also said it was 'not surprising' the Trump administration was considering an end to AUKUS, and suggested Mr Albanese should 'do the same'. 'Nations act in their own best interests. Spending $400 billion on subs which may never arrive might well not be in our best interest,' she said on X. Tasmanian Senator Jacqui Lambie recently called into question the Pine Gap facility and said it should be closed in response to Trump's controversial tariffs. 'We don't owe the United States anything. It's time these leaders stood up … It's about time you started hitting them back where it hurts,' Ms Lambie told the ABC. 'I can tell you, if they do not have access to Pine Gap and the communications there, then they are not gathering any intelligence over this side of the world. 'Tell them they've got seven days to remove their US Marines off Australian soil. That will really hurt .' Ms Lambie said Australia had shown the US 'loyalty and our mateship' in various wars, and it was time to show them 'we mean business'. 'We can no longer trust our US allies … with everything that we've given to them over the years, the loyalty, the mateship, the sacrifice … we don't owe the United States anything,' she said. Mr Shoebridge echoed Ms Lambie's sentiment, saying that despite 'all the mateship talk', Australia was not an equal partner but a 'useful patsy for US power projection'.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Defence Minister claims government has known about AUKUS review for weeks
Defence Minister Richard Marles has claimed he has known about the review of AUKUS by the Pentagon for weeks, claiming the Albanese government is comfortable with the progress of AUKUS under the Trump administration. The review comes due to concerns of whether the administration believes it fits in with US President Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda. The Trump administration has stated it wants its allies to spend more on defence, including Australia.
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'Least curious and least informed': what is AUKUS and why does it matter?
A US review of the contentious AUKUS deal has revived public debate in Australia about how our nation got involved and what we're expected to get out of it - at what cost. AUKUS is a three-nation security pact between Australia, the US and the UK, brokered in 2021 when Scott Morrison was prime minister. Mr Morrison controversially dumped a deal with France to supply diesel-powered submarines in favour of the partnership which is designed to deliver nuclear-powered submarines instead. Pulling out of that deal ultimately cost Australian taxpayers about $3.4 billion and strained diplomatic relations with France. AUKUS is widely seen as response to China's strategic moves and growing influence in the Pacific. Under the partnership, Australia is set to acquire three Virginia-class submarines from the US in the early 2030s before a new fleet of boats is built for delivery from the 2040s. But the US is lagging in production of the boats, and the American president can sink the deal if his navy's capabilities are at risk, which is why the review flagged by the Pentagon has some people worried. It's estimated AUKUS will cost Australia about $368 billion and ultimately deliver at least eight nuclear-powered submarines, some of which would come from the US. In February, Australia made the first of six $800 million payments to the US under the deal. The UK recently completed a review of its involvement in AUKUS review and reiterated its support. Critics of AUKUS point to the lagging production of boats in the US and have warned the deal might jeopardise the US navy's capabilities. The US is also pressuring Australia to raise its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, while President Donald Trump wants to double tariffs on imported steel from 25 per cent to 50 per cent. Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull took to social media on June 12 to declare America's AUKUS review was a "wake up call". "But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed," he wrote on X. "Time to wake up?" Former South Australian independent senator and transparency warrior Rex Patrick said it was time to "pull the plug" on AUKUS. "The program is an unaffordable, sovereign sapping and highly risky defence acquisition - a huge blunder of [Scott Morrison], embraced by [Prime Minister Anthony Albanese]," he wrote, also on X. "Trump will likely demand more $ billions, or else exit. We should pull the plug." Australia's defence minister, Richard Marles, played down the US review, saying it was "natural" the Trump administration would want to re-examine the partnership, which was forged under the leadership of former president Joe Biden. A US review of the contentious AUKUS deal has revived public debate in Australia about how our nation got involved and what we're expected to get out of it - at what cost. AUKUS is a three-nation security pact between Australia, the US and the UK, brokered in 2021 when Scott Morrison was prime minister. Mr Morrison controversially dumped a deal with France to supply diesel-powered submarines in favour of the partnership which is designed to deliver nuclear-powered submarines instead. Pulling out of that deal ultimately cost Australian taxpayers about $3.4 billion and strained diplomatic relations with France. AUKUS is widely seen as response to China's strategic moves and growing influence in the Pacific. Under the partnership, Australia is set to acquire three Virginia-class submarines from the US in the early 2030s before a new fleet of boats is built for delivery from the 2040s. But the US is lagging in production of the boats, and the American president can sink the deal if his navy's capabilities are at risk, which is why the review flagged by the Pentagon has some people worried. It's estimated AUKUS will cost Australia about $368 billion and ultimately deliver at least eight nuclear-powered submarines, some of which would come from the US. In February, Australia made the first of six $800 million payments to the US under the deal. The UK recently completed a review of its involvement in AUKUS review and reiterated its support. Critics of AUKUS point to the lagging production of boats in the US and have warned the deal might jeopardise the US navy's capabilities. The US is also pressuring Australia to raise its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, while President Donald Trump wants to double tariffs on imported steel from 25 per cent to 50 per cent. Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull took to social media on June 12 to declare America's AUKUS review was a "wake up call". "But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed," he wrote on X. "Time to wake up?" Former South Australian independent senator and transparency warrior Rex Patrick said it was time to "pull the plug" on AUKUS. "The program is an unaffordable, sovereign sapping and highly risky defence acquisition - a huge blunder of [Scott Morrison], embraced by [Prime Minister Anthony Albanese]," he wrote, also on X. "Trump will likely demand more $ billions, or else exit. We should pull the plug." Australia's defence minister, Richard Marles, played down the US review, saying it was "natural" the Trump administration would want to re-examine the partnership, which was forged under the leadership of former president Joe Biden. A US review of the contentious AUKUS deal has revived public debate in Australia about how our nation got involved and what we're expected to get out of it - at what cost. AUKUS is a three-nation security pact between Australia, the US and the UK, brokered in 2021 when Scott Morrison was prime minister. Mr Morrison controversially dumped a deal with France to supply diesel-powered submarines in favour of the partnership which is designed to deliver nuclear-powered submarines instead. Pulling out of that deal ultimately cost Australian taxpayers about $3.4 billion and strained diplomatic relations with France. AUKUS is widely seen as response to China's strategic moves and growing influence in the Pacific. Under the partnership, Australia is set to acquire three Virginia-class submarines from the US in the early 2030s before a new fleet of boats is built for delivery from the 2040s. But the US is lagging in production of the boats, and the American president can sink the deal if his navy's capabilities are at risk, which is why the review flagged by the Pentagon has some people worried. It's estimated AUKUS will cost Australia about $368 billion and ultimately deliver at least eight nuclear-powered submarines, some of which would come from the US. In February, Australia made the first of six $800 million payments to the US under the deal. The UK recently completed a review of its involvement in AUKUS review and reiterated its support. Critics of AUKUS point to the lagging production of boats in the US and have warned the deal might jeopardise the US navy's capabilities. The US is also pressuring Australia to raise its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, while President Donald Trump wants to double tariffs on imported steel from 25 per cent to 50 per cent. Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull took to social media on June 12 to declare America's AUKUS review was a "wake up call". "But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed," he wrote on X. "Time to wake up?" Former South Australian independent senator and transparency warrior Rex Patrick said it was time to "pull the plug" on AUKUS. "The program is an unaffordable, sovereign sapping and highly risky defence acquisition - a huge blunder of [Scott Morrison], embraced by [Prime Minister Anthony Albanese]," he wrote, also on X. "Trump will likely demand more $ billions, or else exit. We should pull the plug." Australia's defence minister, Richard Marles, played down the US review, saying it was "natural" the Trump administration would want to re-examine the partnership, which was forged under the leadership of former president Joe Biden. A US review of the contentious AUKUS deal has revived public debate in Australia about how our nation got involved and what we're expected to get out of it - at what cost. AUKUS is a three-nation security pact between Australia, the US and the UK, brokered in 2021 when Scott Morrison was prime minister. Mr Morrison controversially dumped a deal with France to supply diesel-powered submarines in favour of the partnership which is designed to deliver nuclear-powered submarines instead. Pulling out of that deal ultimately cost Australian taxpayers about $3.4 billion and strained diplomatic relations with France. AUKUS is widely seen as response to China's strategic moves and growing influence in the Pacific. Under the partnership, Australia is set to acquire three Virginia-class submarines from the US in the early 2030s before a new fleet of boats is built for delivery from the 2040s. But the US is lagging in production of the boats, and the American president can sink the deal if his navy's capabilities are at risk, which is why the review flagged by the Pentagon has some people worried. It's estimated AUKUS will cost Australia about $368 billion and ultimately deliver at least eight nuclear-powered submarines, some of which would come from the US. In February, Australia made the first of six $800 million payments to the US under the deal. The UK recently completed a review of its involvement in AUKUS review and reiterated its support. Critics of AUKUS point to the lagging production of boats in the US and have warned the deal might jeopardise the US navy's capabilities. The US is also pressuring Australia to raise its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, while President Donald Trump wants to double tariffs on imported steel from 25 per cent to 50 per cent. Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull took to social media on June 12 to declare America's AUKUS review was a "wake up call". "But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed," he wrote on X. "Time to wake up?" Former South Australian independent senator and transparency warrior Rex Patrick said it was time to "pull the plug" on AUKUS. "The program is an unaffordable, sovereign sapping and highly risky defence acquisition - a huge blunder of [Scott Morrison], embraced by [Prime Minister Anthony Albanese]," he wrote, also on X. "Trump will likely demand more $ billions, or else exit. We should pull the plug." Australia's defence minister, Richard Marles, played down the US review, saying it was "natural" the Trump administration would want to re-examine the partnership, which was forged under the leadership of former president Joe Biden.
