Ukraine's Zelenskiy to seek G7 support as Trump's early exit puts dampener on summit
KANANASKIS, Alberta - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy will on Tuesday urge the Group of Seven to provide more backing for the war against Russia even after U.S. President Donald Trump left the summit early due to developments in the Middle East.
Zelenskiy is due to meet Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in the morning before attending a G7 working breakfast on "A strong and sovereign Ukraine", accompanied by NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte.
The Ukrainian embassy in Canada said Zelenskiy's travel plans had not changed.
Trump said on Monday he needed to be back in Washington as soon as possible due to the situation in the Middle East, where the escalating attacks between Iran and Israel have raised risks of a broader regional conflict.
"I'm very grateful for the President's presence and I fully understand why he must return," said Carney, who holds the rotating presidency of the G7.
A European Union diplomat said all other members wanted to stay to meet Zelenskiy and continue conversations.
The G7 has struggled to find unity over conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East as Trump overtly expressed support for Russian President Vladimir Putin and has imposed tariffs on many of the allies present.
Trump did agree to a group statement calling for de-escalation of the Israel-Iran conflict.
"We urge that the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza," the statement said.
The statement said Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror and that Israel has the right to defend itself.
Last week Zelenskiy said he planned to discuss continued support for Ukraine, sanctions against Russia, and future financing for Kyiv's reconstruction efforts.
Trump said on Monday the then Group of Eight had been wrong to expel Russia after Putin ordered the occupation of Crimea in 2014.
Though the U.S. president stopped short of saying Russia should be reinstated in the group, his comments had already raised doubts about how much Zelenskiy could achieve in a scheduled Trump meeting.
Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said they had finalized a trade deal reached last month while Carney said he and the U.S. president had agreed to seal a new economic and trade relationship inside the next 30 days.
But the news was not as good for Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru, who had been hoping to seal an agreement of his own on Monday. He told reporters he had had a frank discussion with Trump but did not reach a final agreement.
G7 leaders prepared several draft documents seen by Reuters, including on migration, artificial intelligence, and critical minerals. None of them have been approved by the United States, according to sources briefed on the documents.
Without Trump, it is unclear if there will be any declarations, a European diplomat said.
Carney also invited non-G7 members Mexico, India, Australia, South Africa, South Korea and Brazil, as he tries to shore up alliances elsewhere and diversify Canada's exports away from the United States.
Canada's relationship with India has been tense since former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2023 accused India's government of involvement in the June 18, 2023, murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Sikh separatist leader in Canada.
Modi's government has denied involvement in Nijjar's killing and has accused Canada of providing a safe haven for Sikh separatists. It is Modi's first visit to Canada in a decade. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
33 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Israel's air power reigns over Iran, but needs US for deeper impact
Smoke rising from the site of an Iranian missile attack in Herzliya, Israel, on June 17. PHOTO: REUTERS Israel's air power reigns over Iran, but needs US for deeper impact JERUSALEM - Israel's command of Iranian air space leaves few obstacles in the way of its expanding bombardment, though it will struggle to deal a knock-out blow to deeply buried nuclear sites without the US joining the attack, experts say. While Iran has responded with deadly missile strikes on Israeli cities, Israel has shown its military and intelligence pre-eminence as its warplanes have crisscrossed the Middle East, hitting Iranian nuclear installations, missile stockpiles, scientists, and generals - among other targets. On June 16, several Israeli officials declared the establishment of air superiority over Iran. The military likened its control of Iranian skies to its command of the air space over other arenas of conflict with Iran-aligned enemies, such as over Gaza and Lebanon - where Israel continues to bomb at will. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on June 16 Israel's control of Iranian air space was 'a game-changer'. National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi said pilots could operate 'against countless more targets' over Tehran, thanks to the destruction of 'dozens and dozens' of air defence batteries. But even as Israeli officials laud the damage done so far, some publicly acknowledge Israel won't be able to completely knock out Iran's nuclear programme - unless the US joins the campaign with strategic bombers that can drop ordnance with the potential to penetrate sites buried deep underground. Dr Andreas Krieg, a senior lecturer at the School of Security Studies at King's College London, said Israel had achieved 'quite a lot of operational and tactical successes... But translating that into a strategic success will require more than what air power can deliver'. Dr Krieg said even the heaviest US bunker-busting bombs might struggle to penetrate Iran's deepest sites - in the event President Donald Trump decides to join the attack - suggesting special, commando-style forces might be needed on the ground. Nevertheless, 'Israel can act with impunity now, and they can do that in the way they did in it in Lebanon'. Israel launched its campaign on June 13, saying Tehran was on the verge of building a nuclear bomb - something Iran has always denied seeking from its uranium enrichment programme. While the Iranian military says it has downed Israeli warplanes, Israel denies this and says no crews or planes have been harmed during their missions to Iran, a return journey of some 3,000km or more. A senior Western defence source said Israeli warplanes have been refuelling over Syria - a bastion of Iranian influence until Dr Bashar al-Assad was toppled in December. Israel is now operating over Syria with 'near-total freedom', the source said. Echoes of Lebanon Israel's assault bears echoes of 2024's devastating offensive against Hezbollah in Lebanon, during which Israel wiped out the Tehran-aligned group's top command - including its leader Hassan Nasrallah - within the first days. Two US officials told Reuters on June 15 that President Donald Trump had vetoed an Israeli plan in recent days to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Mr Netanyahu on June 16 did not rule out targeting Ayatollah Khamenei, saying doing so would end the conflict. Further echoing its 2024 campaign in Lebanon, the Israeli military on June 16 issued an evacuation warning for a specific area of Tehran, saying in a post on X that it planned to target the 'Iranian regime's military infrastructure' in the capital. A regional intelligence source said Israel had built a 'truly surprising' network of agents in Tehran, likening the targeted killings of top officials to the blows directed at Hezbollah's leadership. The source said Israel's ability to 'penetrate Tehran from the inside' had been astonishing. Professor Justin Bronk, a senior research fellow at the RUSI think-tank in London, said Iran has 'few technical answers' to the combination of Israeli F-35 aircraft capable of waging electronic warfare against its anti-aircraft systems, supported by F-16s and F-15s carrying precision-guided ballistic missiles. Though Israel was long assessed to have the upper hand, the speed, scale and effectiveness of its strikes - particularly against top Iranian generals - caught many off guard, said Associate Professor Barin Kayaoglu, a Turkish defence analyst. Iran's military appeared to have been 'sleeping at the wheel', he said. However, he cited challenges for Israel, saying its air force could find it difficult to maintain the current tempo of its operations because of the need to replenish ammunition stocks and maintain warplanes. Weapons shipped In April, Israeli media reported an unusually large shipment of bombs arriving from the US. An unsourced report by public broadcaster Kan on April 17 said the delivery included hundreds of bombs, among them bunker busters. Iranian air defences were damaged by Israeli strikes during exchanges of fire in 2024, Israeli officials said then. As last week's attack began, Israel said Mossad commandos on the ground in Iran destroyed more of Iran's anti-aircraft systems. Despite Israeli air supremacy, Israeli officials have acknowledged that Iran's nuclear programme cannot be disabled entirely by Israel's military, emphasising goals that fall short of its total destruction. A former senior Israeli security official told Reuters that while US military support was needed to do damage to Iran's most deeply buried facility, the Fordow enrichment plant, Israel was not counting on Washington joining the attack. Israel has said it has not targeted Fordow - built beneath a mountain south of Tehran - to date, rather just the installations at Natanz and Isfahan. Either way, the former official said Israel had already done enough meaningful damage to Iran's nuclear programme, declining to be named so he could speak freely about sensitive matters. If after the conflict ends Iran retained a residual uranium enrichment capability but not the people and facilities to do anything of concern with it, then this would be a major achievement, added the official. Mr Trump has repeatedly said Iran could end the war by agreeing to tough restrictions on its enrichment programme. Ms Emily Harding from the Washington-based Centre for Strategic and International Studies said conventional wisdom held that Israel could not completely eliminate the deepest buried parts of Iran's nuclear programme. 'But Israel has strongly hinted that it has more capability than that conventional wisdom would suggest. For example, the ability to operate freely over the target allows for multiple sorties that could do a lot of damage,' she said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
33 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Germany's Merz says diplomacy offer to now-weakened Iran still stands
KANANASKIS, Canada - German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Tuesday that the leadership in Tehran has been weakened by Israel's attacks in the past few days and will likely not return to its former strength. "This regime is very weakened and will probably not return to its former strength, making the future of the country uncertain. We will have to wait and see," Merz said in an interview with broadcaster Welt at the G7 summit in Canada. He added that the Europeans' offer of diplomatic assistance, should talks resume, still stood as they did before the attacks. "If a new situation were to arise, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom would again be prepared to provide diplomatic assistance, as they were until last Thursday," he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
US appeals court to hear arguments on troop deployment in Los Angeles
FILE PHOTO: U.S. Marines stand watch as people protest against U.S. President Donald Trump's policies and federal immigration sweeps during a No Kings Day demonstration in Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 14, 2025. REUTERS/David Ryder/File Photo A federal appeals court will hear arguments on Tuesday on President Donald Trump's authority to deploy the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles amid protests and civil unrest, days after a lower court ruled that the president unlawfully called the National Guard into service. The lower court's ruling last Thursday was put on hold hours later by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which will consider the Trump administration's request for a longer pause during its appeal. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco had ruled that the Republican president unlawfully took control of California's National Guard and deployed 4,000 troops to Los Angeles against the wishes of Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump also ordered 700 U.S. Marines to the city after sending in the National Guard, but Breyer has not yet ruled on the legality of the Marines' mobilization. Breyer said Trump had not complied with the law that allows him to take control of the National Guard to address rebellions or invasions, and ordered Trump to return control of California's National Guard to Newsom, who sued over the deployment. Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles sparked a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and inflamed political tensions in a city in the midst of protest and turmoil over Trump's immigration raids. Political unrest spread to other parts of the country over the weekend, when a gunman assassinated a Democratic lawmaker in Minnesota and large protests took place in many other cities to coincide with a military parade that celebrated the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary on the same day as Trump's 79th birthday. California's lawsuit, filed on June 9, argues that Trump's deployment of the National Guard and the Marines violate the state's sovereignty and U.S. laws that forbid federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement. The Trump administration has denied that troops are engaging in law enforcement, saying that they were instead protecting federal buildings and personnel, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. The Trump administration argues that the law gives the president sole discretion to determine whether a "rebellion or danger of a rebellion" requires a military response and that neither the courts nor a state governor can second-guess that determination. In Thursday's order, Breyer said the protest fell far short of qualifying as a rebellion. "The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion," Breyer wrote. The three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit that will hear the case consists of two judges appointed by Trump in his first term and one judge who was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
