
Emergency services concerned about what FEMA revisions could mean
Editor's note: Federal Fallout is a Tribune-Democrat news series addressing the potential local impact of funding cuts.
SOMERSET, Pa. – In the coming months, a review of the Federal Emergency Management Agency ordered by President Donald Trump should bring a streamlining of the organization amid ongoing federal downsizing and cost-cutting measures.
That may lead to greater responsibility for disaster responses transferring to the state and local levels, area leaders said.
Joel Landis, Somerset County Emergency Management Agency director, has paid close attention to this process to prepare for any potential adjustments.
He said, in his opinion, FEMA does need revamped, and there could be a benefit to removing layers of response.
Landis noted a variety of concerns regarding the agency's efficiency and effectiveness, but added that diminishing response capacity will not help.
"What we don't want to see is a reduction of capabilities on the local level," Landis said.
Joel Landis | Somerset County Emergency Management Agency Director
Somerset County Emergency Management Agency Director Joel Landis stands Thursday, May 22, 2025, near North Street Bridge, where a debris pile had gathered after flooding from a May 13 storm in Meyersdale Borough.
'Priorities and competence'
A review of FEMA operations was launched in January, when Trump issued an executive order creating a review council to assess the agency.
According to that order, the federal responses to storms such as Hurricane Helene and other recent disasters demonstrate "the need to drastically improve the Federal Emergency Management Agency's efficacy, priorities and competence, including evaluating whether FEMA's bureaucracy in disaster response ultimately harms the agency's ability to successfully respond."
The order claimed that, despite having a $30 billion annual budget, the agency has "managed to leave vulnerable Americans without the resources or support they need when they need it most."
It also alleges FEMA may foster political bias against Trump and his supporters, citing the incident in Florida during Hurricane Milton last October when a FEMA responder allegedly told workers not to assist homes that displayed flags or yard signs for Trump, who was the Republican presidential candidate at the time.
The responder has since claimed the organization had hostile encounters with residents at those homes, and a report released in April said there was no evidence FEMA employees skipped Trump-supporting homes.
Federal Fallout logo
Throughout the 2024 hurricane season, baseless rumors about FEMA also circulated on social media, such as unequal aid distribution and the agency seizing evacuated people's property.
The purpose of the council is to review FEMA's disaster response throughout the past four years, compare that to how local, state and private-sector teams handled disasters, gather information from stakeholders and advise the president.
It was written that the council had to hold its first public meeting 90 days from the order's publication Jan. 24, submit a report to Trump 180 days after that and be disbanded one year later.
The team met for the first time Tuesday.
Since January, Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem have called for FEMA's termination, and around 2,000 of 6,000 full-time emergency management workers have left the agency or plan to leave through early retirement and waves of terminations, according to published reports.
'Impact on response'
The potential changes to the federal response are concerning for Cambria County Department of Emergency Services and Emergency Management Agency Executive Director Thomas Davis.
"The lack of assistance from federal – I believe it would be a major impact on response and for the people," he said.
Davis has served with the 911 emergency communications system for 32 years, and has spent decades as a firefighter.
He said moving more disaster responsibilities to the state and local levels would put a burden on those capabilities.
It could be possible, he added, but federal assistance is "absolutely huge" to achieve that.
Trump wrote in a March executive order that empowering local and state authorities is part of his goal.
"Federal policy must rightly recognize that preparedness is most effectively owned and managed at the state, local and even individual levels," he wrote, "supported by a competent, accessible and efficient federal government."
In response to requests for input by the review council, the international nonprofit Natural Resources Defense Council has responded to the president's actions and comments.
"Much has changed with regards to FEMA staffing, operations and capacity since the start of this administration," the group wrote. "Most of those changes are to the detriment of the nation's ability to prepare for, respond to and recover from disasters. As climate-influenced disasters continue to increase in frequency and severity, the administration has hobbled federal, state, and local efforts to prepare for and address the growing risks and vulnerabilities we now face."
'Layers don't work'
Landis said if FEMA is downsized or eliminated and the responsibilities and funding are turned over to the states, that could be a benefit.
He added that his salary as EMA director is paid for through a FEMA Emergency Management Performance Grant.
Joel Landis | Somerset County Emergency Management Agency Director
Somerset County Emergency Management Agency Director Joel Landis carries a box of supplies on Thursday, May 22, 2025, at Meyersdale Volunteer Fire Department as disaster relief efforts continue after flooding from a May 13 storm hit Meyersdale Borough.
Landis has been a Somerset County employee for 26 years, in public safety for 28 years, and was on the third ambulance to respond to the tornado that tore through Salisbury in the late 1990s.
He said multi-agency approaches to disasters, especially when it comes to recovery funding, are slow and tedious.
"Layers don't work when you're the disaster victim," he said.
He provided the example of flooding on May 13 in southern Somerset County that hit eight communities, including Meyersdale and Garrett.
On that night, which brought the evacuation of some of those communities, Landis said his team began requesting damage assessments because he knows how slow the process can be.
A week later, representatives from the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency and federal Small Business Administration toured the communities surveying the damage to homes and businesses.
"It's always a race to get the amount of damages submitted up so we can do the most amount of good," he said.
'Do this together'
Despite that effort, Landis doesn't expect FEMA assistance will be triggered due to the large thresholds weather events have to reach.
The agency annually sets dollar figures for the thresholds that are multiplied by the impacted population to determine if federal intervention is warranted.
For example, the statewide indicator for 2025 is $1.89, meaning the Pennsylvania threshold is around $25 million.
The county threshold for 2025 is $4.72, which would mean Somerset's triggering point exceeds $330,000.
Davis said Pennsylvania's threshold is so high it's difficult to achieve even in devastating storms, such as the region has experienced this spring.
Joel Landis | Somerset County Emergency Management Agency Director
Somerset County Emergency Management Agency Director Joel Landis stands Thursday, May 22, 2025, near North Street Bridge where a debris pile had gathered after flooding from the May 13 storm in Meyersdale Borough.
He and Landis also acknowledged a growing trend of severe storms impacting the two counties over the past few years.
Unlocking funding was partly why the Small Business Administration was in the Somerset following the flooding.
Landis said if the SBA provides a disaster declaration, that will be open funding that can help county flood victims.
Gov. Josh Shapiro announced Wednesday his administration will support a declaration.
Looking ahead, Davis said if the federal element is downsized or removed, that will lead to a expanded cooperation on the local level.
"One thing we have to start looking at to prepare for changes is relationships with volunteer and community-based groups," he said. "We're going to have to do this together."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

17 minutes ago
Republicans urge Donald Trump and Elon Musk to end their feud
WASHINGTON -- As the Republican Party braces for aftershocks from President Donald Trump's spectacular clash with Elon Musk, lawmakers and conservative figures are urging détente, fearful of the potential consequences from a prolonged feud. At a minimum, the explosion of animosity between the two powerful men could complicate the path forward for Republicans' massive tax and border spending legislation that has been promoted by Trump but assailed by Musk. 'I hope it doesn't distract us from getting the job done that we need to,' said Rep. Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington state. "I think that it will boil over and they'll mend fences' Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, was similarly optimistic. 'I hope that both of them come back together because when the two of them are working together, we'll get a lot more done for America than when they're at cross purposes,' he told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Thursday night. Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, sounded almost pained on social media as Trump and Musk volleyed insults at each other, sharing a photo composite of the two men and writing, "But … I really like both of them.' 'Who else really wants @elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump to reconcile?' Lee posted, later adding: 'Repost if you agree that the world is a better place with the Trump-Musk bromance fully intact.' So far, the feud between Trump and Musk is probably best described as a moving target, with plenty of opportunities for escalation or detente. One person familiar with the president's thinking said Musk wants to speak with Trump, but that the president doesn't want to do it – or at least do it on Friday. The person requested anonymity to disclose private matters. In a series of conversations with television anchors Friday morning, Trump showed no interest in burying the hatchet. Asked on ABC News about reports of a potential call between him and Musk, the president responded: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump added in the ABC interview that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk at the moment. Still, others remained hopeful that it all would blow over. 'I grew up playing hockey and there wasn't a single day that we played hockey or basketball or football or baseball, whatever we were playing, where we didn't fight. And then we'd fight, then we'd become friends again,' Hannity said on his show Thursday night. Acknowledging that it 'got personal very quick,' Hannity nonetheless added that the rift was 'just a major policy difference.' House Speaker Mike Johnson projected confidence that the dispute would not affect prospects for the tax and border bill. 'Members are not shaken at all,' the Louisiana Republican said. 'We're going to pass this legislation on our deadline.' He added that he hopes Musk and Trump reconcile, saying 'I believe in redemption' and 'it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' But he also had something of a warning for the billionaire entrepreneur. 'I'll tell you what, do not doubt and do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. "He is the leader of the party. He's the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era.'
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is keeping his distance from Elon Musk even after the billionaire's extraordinary public rebuke of President Trump and the GOP's domestic agenda. Asked Friday if Musk's bitter break from Trump presents Democrats with an opportunity to form a strange-bedfellows alliance with the tech titan, Jeffries shifted the conversation immediately to the Democrats' efforts to kill Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'The opportunity that exists right now is to kill the GOP tax scam,' Jeffries told reporters in the Capitol. 'It's legislation that we have been strongly opposed to, and uniformly opposed to, from the very beginning. … It rips health care away from millions of people. It snatches food out of the mouths of hungry children. And it rewards billionaires and [GOP] donors in ways that are fiscally irresponsible.' Pressed on whether Musk should be 'welcomed back' to the Democratic Party after the high-profile split from Trump, Jeffries punted again. 'Same answer,' he said. Jeffries's cautious remarks demonstrate the limits of the old adage that the enemy of one's enemy is one's friend. They also highlight the potential difficulties Democrats would face if they embraced a polarizing and nationally unpopular figure in Musk — one they've spent most of the last year bashing for heavy spending on Trump's campaign and, more recently, for his role in heading Trump's efforts to gut the federal government. Still, some Democrats say Musk's influence is significant enough that Democrats should make the effort to try to court him to their side amid the Trump feud. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who represents parts of Silicon Valley, is leading the charge. 'If Biden had a big supporter criticize him, Trump would have hugged him the next day,' Khanna posted Thursday on social platform X, which is owned by Musk. 'When we refused to meet with @RobertKennedyJr, Trump embraced him & won. We can be the party of sanctimonious lectures, or the party of FDR that knows how to win & build a progressive majority,' referring to former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Jeffries isn't going nearly so far. But he has welcomed Musk's attacks on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' and the Republicans who voted for it. And he aligned Democrats with Musk's sentiments that the package piles too much money onto the federal debt, a figure the Congressional Budget Office estimated to be $2.4 trillion. 'To the extent that Elon Musk has made the same point that everyone who has voted for this bill up until this moment should be ashamed of themselves, we agree,' Jeffries said. 'And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the point that the bill is a 'disgusting abomination,' we agree. And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the observation about the GOP tax scam — that it is reckless and irresponsible to explode the deficit by more than $3 trillion, and that potentially could set our country on a path toward bankruptcy — we agree.' 'These are arguments that Democrats have been making now for months.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Vance Sucks Up to Trump to Deny He's Part of Musk Coup Plot
J.D. Vance was forced to reaffirm his allegiance to President Trump after Elon Musk backed a call for the vice president to replace his boss. A spat between Musk and Trump over the president's 'big beautiful bill,' which the Tesla CEO denounced as a 'disgusting abomination,' has blown up into an all-out MAGA civil war, with Musk and Trump dramatically trading blows in public. On Thursday, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO replied 'Yes' to a post by an X user who asked: 'President vs Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. Trump should be impeached and Vance should replace him.' Musk publicly mused about starting a political party, and told his followers in a bombshell allegation that Trump was named in the Epstein files, signing off by saying: 'Have a nice day, DJT!' He added in a follow-up post, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' Vance also features in a conspiracy theory called 'Dark Enlightenment' or Dark MAGA" that suggests a secretive cabal of tech titans is plotting to blow up the government and rule as a giant corporation with a CEO instead of a president. The Silicon Valley plotters, including Musk, chose Vance as the person who would take over when Trump is toppled, according to the theory. Trump has yet to address the latest allegations personally. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt issued a statement saying: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it does not include the policies he wanted.' As the drama escalated, Vance posted a picture teasing a Friday appearance on the podcast of Trump-friendly comedian Theo Von. 'Slow news day, what are we even going to talk about?' Vance joked. In a follow-up post, the vice president added: 'President Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads. I'm proud to stand beside him.' Musk and Trump's alliance began to unravel after the GOP-controlled House of Representatives narrowly passed Trump's flagship budget proposal last month. Before that, Musk had pushed Trump's agenda by leading his so-called Department of Government Efficiency, an initiative within the administration tasked with cutting government spending and jobs. Musk publicly attacked Trump's bill on the grounds that it would undermine his work with DOGE by adding trillions to the U.S. budget deficit. But on Thursday, Trump claimed that Musk was really upset about the effect the bill will have on his electric vehicle company, Tesla. 'I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' the president added.