logo
Calls to delay Dail summer recess to pass Occupied Territories Bill

Calls to delay Dail summer recess to pass Occupied Territories Bill

The opposition has called on the Government to delay the summer recess in a bid to pass the Occupied Territories Bill.
Tánaiste and Foreign Affairs Minister Simon Harris received Cabinet approval on Tuesday to draft legislation that would ban the purchase of goods from illegally-occupied Palestinian Territories.
The proposal does not involve provisions to ban the purchase of services as contained in the original Occupied Territories Bill proposed by Senator Frances Black.
Mr Harris stated that the plans will be sent to the Oireachtas Foreign Affairs Committee next month.
However, there are doubts whether there will be time to have it in place by the Dáil summer recess.
The Dáil is on a one-week break next week. When it returns, it will sit for six weeks before taking its summer holidays from July 18.
The Social Democrats' foreign affairs spokeswoman, Patricia Stephenson, called on the holidays to be postponed in order to get the Occupied Territories Bill over the line.
She said: 'We need to see this bill enacted as a matter of urgency, even if this means recalling the Dáil next week and delaying summer recess.
'Almost six months into this government, we are only now seeing the Tánaiste bringing a memo to Cabinet on the drafting of a bill.
'Like the previous administration, this government has dragged its feet when it comes to progressing the Occupied Territories Bill, which was first proposed back in 2018.
'As a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, I believe the Dáil should sit next week for pre-legislative scrutiny, which would allow the bill to progress to the final stages.
'Government condemnation of Israel's atrocities in Gaza is no longer enough – we need to see action now.'
This was echoed by Labour's Duncan Smith, who said that the Foreign Affairs Committee should 'sit as quickly and often as is necessary' to get the legislation passed.
Senator Black welcomed the Government's decision to draft the legislation but said her 'work is not done yet'.
She said: 'I first tabled the Occupied Territories Bill in 2018, and finally, after seven years of delay, I'm relieved we are finally seeing some action.
'It's horrible that it has taken so much suffering to get here and we can't afford to waste any more time.
'The onus is now on Government to act with the urgency this moment demands – to stand firmly against the horrific war crimes being committed both in Gaza and the West Bank.
'The key thing, however, is getting the detail right.
'We need to see a full ban on all trade with the illegal Israeli settlements, which includes both physical goods like fruit and veg, but also intangible services like tech and IT.
'That is the standard set in the original Occupied Territories Bill, which I tabled, and it's what the International Court of Justice has said is required.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Book review: Unravelling every wrongdoing
Book review: Unravelling every wrongdoing

Irish Examiner

time18 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Book review: Unravelling every wrongdoing

'The prevailing narrative is one thing. The truth is quite different.' When the evidence of nefarious wrongdoing is so ubiquitous and overwhelming — as it is in Israel's ongoing genocide in Gaza — perhaps the greatest achievement for any writer is simply to be discerning. Journalist, media entrepreneur, and migration activist Fintan Drury has handled the almost impossible task of framing the unframeable in his latest book, Catastrophe: Nakba II. In the book, he eschews hyperbole and emotional outrage and speaks directly to the symptoms of Zionism and its catastrophic effects on the Palestinian people — from the original Nakba in 1948 until today. Written and impeccably researched in real time, the book provides a compelling and concise account of the contemporary history of the Middle East, the birth of an ethno-terror state, and Western complicity in its manifestation from violent philosophy to brutal protagonist. An Israeli citizen, who relocated his family from Tel Aviv to Paris, said: 'Israel is a very different now to a decade or two ago; the IDF is different to when I did my three years mandatory service 20 years ago. Truth is a casualty.' File picture: AP 'Israel is a coloniser; aided by the West,' he writes. 'It has been allowed not just to establish itself as a sovereign state with internationally accepted boundaries, but one that has methodically extended its territory in contravention of multiple UN resolutions and international law.' Such straightforward opinions might otherwise seem subjective had Drury not backed them up with unimpeachable detail. Unable to travel to Gaza, he might well have stayed at home and still produced a book of considerable merit given the evidence remotely available. Instead, he travelled to Lebanon, Jordan, the occupied West Bank, and Paris to include incredibly worthwhile testimony that — among other things — provides nuance to the oft-misunderstood complex relationship between Lebanon and Palestine. Buried within another testimony from an Israeli citizen, who relocated his family from Tel Aviv to Paris, was a nugget of truth too jarring to ignore: 'Israel is a very different now to a decade or two ago; the IDF [Israel Defense Forces] is different to when I did my three years mandatory service 20 years ago. Truth is a casualty.' Perhaps, but the 'truth' Drury lays bare repeatedly confirms that the IDF — and the state it purports to defend — was no different 20 years ago than it is today. The only difference — as Drury explains — is that the restrictions and boundaries the international community once imposed upon it no longer exist. The Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023, gave them the excuse to test that theory, and the results are now visible on the faces of emaciated Palestinian children. What is perhaps most revealing is the carefully teased out confessionals from inside Israel, by Israelis. Not because they elicit sympathy, but because their indifference is so flagrant. There is also insight into an inherently racist educational system that has contributed so much to the maturation of an apartheid state, especially as it seeks to punish any voice from within who questions government policy. Parallels between the Troubles and the Palestinian cause have often proven lazy and reductive. Not so here. Few are better placed than Drury to carefully examine the strategy and consequences of internment. One Israeli non-governmental organisation quoted references the weaponisation of a scabies outbreak among Palestinian prisoners to impose even more hardship on detainees. It's a horrific image, and one that is depressingly consistent with the tone and tenor of this book. With excellent pacing and an admirable ability to make the complex comprehensible, Drury prosecutes the roles of the Israeli Knesset, international media, and UNRWA, as well as the ambivalence of modern society as they pertain to Palestine. Crucially, he neatly presents irrefutable facts regarding what Gaza and the occupied territories looked like on October 6 — the day before — as a method of framing every horror since. Some will absurdly argue this book is antisemitic. Others may say Drury does not go far enough, that the reality unfolding on the ground in Gaza and elsewhere renders the objectivity he covets obsolete. To his immense credit, he lets the facts scream from the page. This is an essential book. One that should be read and understood today, before the horror becomes history, and that history is repeated. Read More Israel has used detention and starvation to bring Palestine to heel

Elaine Loughlin: Presidential poker — who's bluffing, who's stalling, and who's really in the race?
Elaine Loughlin: Presidential poker — who's bluffing, who's stalling, and who's really in the race?

Irish Examiner

time30 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Elaine Loughlin: Presidential poker — who's bluffing, who's stalling, and who's really in the race?

It's gearing up to be a last-minute dash for the Áras as all parties, and none, seem caught up in a game where no one wants to make the first move. With Frances Black all but ruling herself out of the race, the grand plan to put forward one consensus candidate of the left could fall apart before it fully materialises. However, many willing to back her still quietly believe the singer, campaigner and senator wasn't fully serious when she declared in recent days that she is "98%" out of the race. "I wouldn't believe that from Frances Black, she is interested in running for the presidency. I think it's just something that people feel they have to say, I'm not sure why," a TD on the left confidently said. "No one is campaigning, but Frances Black was on The Late Late and she was on radio," the source joked. Whether the belief that Black can still be swayed is borne out of solid information or comes from a place of hope remains to be seen. But if the left is sincere in wanting to put forward a strong consensus candidate, a decision will have to be made soon. Independent TD Catherine Connolly. Picture: Collins Photos Galway TD Catherine Connolly is a name that those on the left have cited as another possibility, but her support may not be as widespread. "There is no way on earth that the Labour party could nominate her," one source said stressing that she had "given the party a kicking" in the past — a party that she resigned from back in 2006 after she failed to be selected in the Galway West constituency as running mate of Michael D Higgins. "There is a deep, deep beef between members in Galway and Catherine Connolly. We would have resignations in Galway if we backed her," the source added. Possible candidate: Katriona O'Sullivan Author and academic Katriona O'Sullivan, as well as former WHO executive director Mike Ryan, have been floated as potentials, but have also failed to develop further than that. "We are keen to have a centre left candidate in the race, someone who can build on the legacy of Michael D. I think it's import that people have a good choice in the election, that it's not just one strong candidate and a load of others," said one Social Democrats TD but added that "nothing has crystalised" out of initial talks with other parties. Likewise, time is ticking down for Fianna Fáil, which has yet to identify a strong individual who is not tainted by the party's handling of the recession. Names including Bertie Ahern and Mary Hanafin have been bandied about but largely dismissed within the party. Others in the mix include sitting MEPs Barry Andrews and Cynthia Ní Mhurchú. Senior sources have indicated that the only serious option would be to follow the route taken with Mary McAleese in 1997 by selecting a person with close links to the party who does not have the baggage that might come with a previous role as an elected representative. Mairead McGuinness is expected to get the nod from Fine Gael. Fine Gael is now seen to be furthest along in its election selection with former EU Commissioner Mairead McGuinness widely expected to get the nod after a number of other contenders including Frances Fitzgerald, Sean Kelly, and Heather Humphreys, ruled themselves out. But even Simon Harris's party appears in no rush to start a formal campaign, so far avoiding what should be a natural political urge to get out and about canvassing. Knowing that it is likely to become a bruising and highly personal fight, no one wants to get into the presidential election ring too early this time around It was an aspect that Black referenced, in declaring that she is all but certain she doesn't want the presidency before slightly rowing back to Anton Savage by clarifying that "there's a part of me that feels, if I'm the right person — I'm not sure I am — but if I am the right person, then that's the 2%." In stressing the reason why she may not end up running under a unified left banner, she said: "I've seen how other campaigns have been run, and they have been — I could only describe — blood baths. So it's not something that I would want, to be honest with you." Part of the delay from the left also lies with Sinn Féin. Before the likes of Labour, the Social Democrats, and People Before Profit can get behind a combined candidate, they must wait for Mary Lou McDonald's party to make a decision — row in with the others or go it alone. After a disastrous election last time around, which saw Liadh Ní Riada gain just 6.4% of the vote, Sinn Féin has sought direction from the grassroots up. "We got it wrong in 2018, so we're trying to take on more feedback from members this time. It will guide a lot of what our next moves are," a senior party source told Irish Examiner deputy political editor Paul Hosford this week. This process has included emails to all members and online meetings, with the consultation process due to come to a close this weekend. Looking to outsiders, a number of high-profile individuals, including Conor McGregor and Peter Casey, have suggested they will seek a nomination but have yet to lobby local councils in a bid to get the required backing of four local authorities or 20 Oireachtas members. The slow start means we could have a very speedy election campaign when it eventually does get underway.

Housing Minister pulls plug on almost 500 social homes across six sites over rising costs
Housing Minister pulls plug on almost 500 social homes across six sites over rising costs

The Journal

time3 hours ago

  • The Journal

Housing Minister pulls plug on almost 500 social homes across six sites over rising costs

ALMOST 500 HOMES have been delayed after Housing Minister James Browne pulled the plug over concerns about the costs involved in the multimillion euro project. The social housing developments were understood to be near shovel-ready and were to be delivered under a public private partnership (PPP) scheme across six sites. Up to 244 of the homes were planned for Dublin and the others are spread across Kildare, Wicklow and Sligo. It is unclear when the homes will now be delivered, but the Housing Minister stressed tonight in a statement to The Journal that the government aims to to deliver them 'as expeditiously as possible' through an 'alternative procurement and delivery strategy'. The decision is set to have significant ramifications, as the department confirmed this evening that housing officials will now carry out a review of four upcoming PPP bundles – each earmarked to contain hundreds of homes. 'After careful evaluation of the costs associated with the 486 homes which were to be delivered under PPP Bundle 3, the Department has decided not to proceed with contract award on a value for money basis,' Browne said tonight. 'The department and the relevant local authorities remain fully committed to delivering the social housing that PPP Bundle 3 was designed to provide. These social homes are very much needed and remain a priority for Government, my Department and the relevant Local Authorities.' Brown said that all six sites have 'full planning permission' and that the department is determined to deliver the homes quickly under a new procurement and delivery strategy. The sites that have been hit by the delay are: 68 homes at the Ready Mix Site, East Wall Road, Dublin 3; 93 homes earmarked for older people in Shangan Road, Ballymun, Dublin 9; 83 homes in Collins Avenue, Whitehall, Dublin 9; 73 homes in Ardrew, Athy, Co. Kildare; 106 homes in Burgage More, Blessington, Co. Wicklow; and 63 homes in Rathellen, Finisklin, Sligo. Advertisement It is not yet known how much the project was set to cost the taxpayer but inflation has been an increasing issue in the housing sector in recent years. In the two previous public private partnership projects, delivered under the same process, final capital spend was €119 million and €129 million respectively. Homes in the latter of those projects costed on average €277,000, excluding VAT. Sinn Féin housing spokesperson Eoin Ó Broin said the sudden reversal means the minister needs to provide funding to local councils to deliver the homes directly with contractors 'without any further delay'. 'I have always argued that PPPs don't represent value for money for the taxpayer. It's somewhat ironic the government are now saying they don't believe PPPs are good value for money,' Ó Broin told The Journal . He said that the schemes are a poor way to deliver social housing, partly due to the complex structure requiring up to five different partners for each housing project. 'The most important thing now – on foot of the minister's decision – is what he's going to do to deliver, as a matter of urgency, these homes which are badly needed,' Ó Broin added. 'Homelessness is rising, house prices are rising, waiting lists are rising, council waiting lists are rising. This needs to be resolved as soon as possible.' This week's halting of the PPP scheme is likely to pile further pressure on the government over its housing delivery numbers. The government came under fire in recent months for missing its overall 2024 housing target of 40,000 homes by a margin of 10,000. And it came in for further criticism in April when it emerged that it had fallen short of its social housing target for last year by 18%, amounting to 2,345 homes. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store