logo
Tim Dowling: how can my wife live without her glasses – and even her phone?

Tim Dowling: how can my wife live without her glasses – and even her phone?

The Guardian4 hours ago

It is early in the morning, and my wife and I are setting off on a long car journey. My wife is driving; I am looking at my phone. It is my plan to look at my phone for at least the first hour, even though it is unlikely my wife will allow this.
'Bit hazy,' she says.
'Hmm,' I say, looking at my phone.
'But I think it might burn off later,' she says.
'What?' I say, forcing my eyes up to the horizon.
'Never mind,' my wife says, turning on the radio. I return to my phone.
'Sorry, will you clean these please?' my wife says, handing me her glasses.
'What?' I say. Instead of answering, she drops her glasses into my lap. Reluctantly I put down my phone, pull out the hem of my shirt, and fog the lenses with my breath.
'By the way, I don't approve of this,' I say, overtaken by irritation.
'Of what?' she says.
'I mean, first, I can't believe how filthy these glasses are,' I say.
'I know,' she says. 'That's why I asked you to …'
'And second,' I say. 'I can't believe you didn't notice until we'd done eight miles on the motorway.'
'I just realised the haze I was seeing was on my glasses,' she says.
'That's the best I can do,' I say, handing her glasses back.
'Much better, thank you,' she says.
'It's not safe,' I say.
After a few minutes spent looking at my phone, my irritation subsides. I remind myself that my wife doesn't need her glasses the way I need my glasses: she will sometimes lose them for an entire weekend without suffering any particular inconvenience. I couldn't take off my glasses while driving without quickly crashing into a bridge support.
Something I've seen on my phone catches my attention.
'Interesting,' I say. 'Guess how many …'
'No,' my wife says.
'Wait, just guess how many countries have a …'
'You didn't want to chat,' she says. 'Don't try to start a conversation now, using facts you found on your phone.'
'Fine,' I say. I take off my glasses to clean them, and the world ahead becomes a blur.
Two days later, it is time to set off for home, but my wife can't find her phone.
'I swear I just had it,' she says, coming back from the car. 'Will you ring it?'
'Straight to voicemail,' I say, holding my own phone to my ear.
'Why is it doing that?' she says. 'It's fully charged.'
'Probably because there's no signal wherever you left it,' I say. In practical terms, this means outside, and it's raining outside.
We try to approach the problem logically. My wife's laptop indicates the last picture she took on her phone was of a nearby pond, only 35 minutes previously.
'And then what?' I say. 'Did you fling it into the pond?'
'I went across that meadow, through the gate, and then to the car,' she says. 'But I really don't think I would have left my phone outside.'
'I once found your phone in the crook of the tree,' I say.
'That was different,' she says. 'I was listening to the Archers omnibus while I was weeding.'
My wife returns to the pond, while I walk the meadow twice over, getting soaked. I am longing, for reasons both admirable and shameful, to be the person who finds the phone. But I don't see how anyone could find anything in this expanse of long grass.
As I approach the car, the rain turning heavy, I see my wife coming. When she sees me she holds her phone above her head.
'Where was it?' I say.
'It was lying on a stone wall, getting rained on,' she says. 'I think I was taking a picture, and then my shoe was untied, and then … never mind.'
'Let's go,' I say.
As we drive the sky begins to clear toward the east. The recent rain and the warm weather have caused the hedgerows to explode with growth.
'I'm glad we found it,' my wife says. 'It felt very uncomfortable not having my phone.'
I do not say what I am thinking, which is: people who are truly uncomfortable without their phones don't leave them on stone walls in the rain. I need to be an exemplar of patience, if only because I so often try the patience of others.
As we approach an intersection made blind by fresh greenery, my wife hands me her glasses.
'Will you clean these?' she says.
'Of course,' I say.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Young country diary: An explosion of emerald butterflies
Young country diary: An explosion of emerald butterflies

The Guardian

time29 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Young country diary: An explosion of emerald butterflies

It was late morning, and my family and I were walking along the coast of south Devon. The sun blazed in the clear sky, and a green carpet of grass was interspersed with violets, bluebells and sea campions. Seals basked in the morning sunshine below us and the occasional bloody-nosed beetle lumbered across the path. It wasn't long before we got our first glimpse of a green hairstreak butterfly. It had emerald wings and black and white antennae. It was so delicate, it looked as if it was made of porcelain. My mum said it was a rare sight, as she had only ever seen three before in her life and although they're widespread across Britain, they're hard to spot. Unfortunately, their population is declining, partly due to habitat loss. But further on, we saw another, its wings glinting in the sunlight and the flower it was perched on nodding gently in the breeze. We continued to see the green wonders darting about, occasionally settling on a clump of prickly gorse. By the end of the walk, my legs were burning from the steep ascent, and we had encountered perhaps about 50 of them. My mum said we probably wouldn't see anything like it again. They must have just hatched, because there were so many, and there was a lot of gorse around, which is one of their caterpillar food-plants. I wonder if, when we go back next year, we'll find some more of those magical creatures. Read today's other YCD, by Issy, 11: 'Looking into the big eyes of a brown hare' To submit an article for consideration in Young Country Diary, please fill out the form here (or, if that does not work, as has been the case recently, try the form here). The deadline for submissions is Monday 30 June

Young country diary: Staring into the big eyes of a brown hare
Young country diary: Staring into the big eyes of a brown hare

The Guardian

time34 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Young country diary: Staring into the big eyes of a brown hare

Each time I see a brown hare, I'm usually in a car and worried it'll get knocked down, but recently I almost stood on one. I was walking through the grass in my wellies one morning when I saw a pair of big, brown eyes peering up at me. The body didn't move, and I've since found out that hares freeze when they sense danger. Its ears were long, velvety, folded straight down behind its head, reaching its bony shoulders. I couldn't see its legs but I knew they were strong and long … Suddenly it bolted, showing me just how fast its legs could go. I tried to chase it but couldn't keep up, not in wellies. They can reach up to 45 miles per hour. The long grass parted ahead of me as her body rocked like my old hobby horse, zig-zagging through the meadow. I wish I could have touched him or her. I bet its fur would be warm and silky against my hand. It ended up on the hill, its rounded back black against the sun and those ears, alert now, pointing like fingers to the sky. I think she was a doe (a female) as they are bigger than the bucks (the males) and sometimes punch them when they're angry, especially in breeding season from spring until summer. Yes, I think she's definitely a female and my new best 11 Read today's other YCD, by Joscelyn, 10: 'An explosion of emerald butterflies' To submit an article for consideration in Young Country Diary, please fill out the form here (or, if that does not work, as has been the case recently, try the form here). The deadline for submissions is Monday 30 June

Network Rail ‘wrongly' felled 300 trees
Network Rail ‘wrongly' felled 300 trees

Telegraph

time35 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Network Rail ‘wrongly' felled 300 trees

'Cowboy' Network Rail workers unnecessarily felled more than 300 healthy trees in a valley in Derbyshire, an analysis of its own figures suggests. Dozens of contractors are accused of spoiling the area around the village of Higham, near the Peak District, by chopping down oak and ash trees during bird nesting season. According to a vegetation management plan outlined to residents, the government-controlled company – which is responsible for maintaining lines across Britain – was seeking to 'remove or reduce trees and vegetation that could disrupt railway operations '. It laid out plans to 'clear all vegetation within 6.5 metres of the tracks', removing 648 trees between the settlements of South Wingfield and Clay Cross. The company said it would 'prune or remove' any trees further away that 'posed a risk'. However, analysis by The Telegraph of the company's data found that 433 of the trees felled – more than two-thirds of the total – were more than 6.5 metres away from the line. Around 22 per cent of those trees would likely have needed felling under national guidelines for dealing with ash dieback disease, suggesting the remaining 336 were cut down unnecessarily. It comes after distraught residents accused Network Rail of a 'scorched earth operation' which had left the countryside stripped bare. People living nearby said they had woken to find stacked piles of trunks and branches – containing nests to which birds still returned – following overnight weekend works. Cllr Heather Liggett said it had devastated a unique area of greenery which had been untouched ever since the railway line was built in 1840. 'There seems to be one law for them and another for the rest of us,' she said. She pointed out how a local golf club was refused permission to trim back an overgrown footpath because it was bird nesting season, leaving members of the public at risk from golf balls. Branding the Network Rail workers 'cowboys', Cllr Liggett added: 'Where is the law when it comes to these people? The community has been treated diabolically. 'To go felling trees at midnight; you are not going to know what [birds are] nesting. It's deplorable.' Sarah McRow obtained the Network Rail data through a freedom of information (FOI) request and suspects it ploughed ahead with clearing the vegetation to ready the line for electrification. The 56-year-old, who co-owns a nearby alpaca farm, said: 'It's completely brazen. They are absolutely doing this to bypass all the stringent ecological rules if they went down the electrification line. 'They've just gone hell for leather to take as much down as they possibly can... everyone has kicked up a fuss. You can't stick a tree back up once it's been felled. It's just outrageous what they are doing.' A report from the Tree Council, a charity, found oak trees had been felled 'which could have been retained' in what it described as a 'slash and burn' approach. In Network Rail's FOI response, an unnamed senior engineer said: 'Through climate change, our weather is becoming more extreme every year and this risk is growing. 'Whilst the vegetation has grown in this location for some time, the year-on-year increased risk this creates means we must action. 'We acknowledge that it's not ideal to start this work in bird nesting season. However, if we were to wait, we'd have to carry more of the risks through another autumn and winter storm season, which isn't tolerable.' Network Rail did not explain why hundreds of trees more than 6.5 metres away had been chopped down. A spokesman said: 'We have received the Tree Council's report about our work in this area. 'We take their recommendations seriously. We will review their report thoroughly and develop a detailed response in due course.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store