You may be contributing to State Labour Welfare Fund from your salary: What is it, and how it helps employees
Not many employees are aware, but a small portion of their salary may be contributing to the
State Labour Welfare Fund
. For instance, if you are working for a company in Gurugram, then your company can charge you Rs 34 per month for the contribution towards the State Labour Welfare funds. Similarly, if you are based in Hyderabad, your company can charge Rs 2 per month for contribution towards the State
Labour Welfare Fund
. For different states, there may be a contribution amount that varies.
ET Wealth Online explains what the State Labour Welfare Fund is and how it benefits employees.
What is State Labour Welfare Fund?
Vaibhav Bhardwaj, Partner at Khaitan & Co - a law firm, says, "The labour welfare fund (LWF) is a statutorily set up fund that is intended to promote the welfare of workers engaged in various specified sectors such as manufacturing, hospitality, construction, textile, transport, and agriculture.
How does State Labour Welfare Fund help employees?
The Labour Welfare Fund is used to finance activities that promote the welfare of labour in the state. It also helps to utilize unpaid accumulations (such as wages, bonuses, gratuities, etc.) lying with the employer in the best interests of labour.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Hombre (68) entabla relación con cuidadora - Meses después, ella entra en el sótano y le denuncia
Crowdy Fan
Undo
Puneet Gupta, Tax Partner at EY India says, "The Labour Welfare Fund is utilised to cover the expenses of labour by providing various facilities." Some of these facilities provided to employees, as per Gupta, are:
(a) Community and social education centres, including reading rooms and libraries;
(b) Community necessities;
(c) Games and sports;
Live Events
(d) Excursions, tours, and holiday homes;
(e) Entertainment and other forms of recreation;
(f) Home industries and subsidiary occupations for women and unemployed persons;
(g) Corporate activities of a social nature;
(i) Such other objects as would, in the opinion of the state government, improve the standard of living and ameliorate the social conditions of labour.
According to Aarti Raote, Partner at Deloitte India, says, "The objective of the State Labour Welfare Fund is to provide financial assistance, improve working conditions and provide medical facilities for the workers. It is supposed to be financial aid."
Bhardwaj says, "The amount collected through the LWF is used to provide financial aid, social security, improved working conditions, and higher standards of living for workers. The benefits offered via LWF include educational support, medical care, housing, and recreational facilities for workers and their dependents. The impact of the LWF is significant, especially for low-income workers. By providing vocational training to workers and educational support to their children, the LWF enables skill development, which can allow workers to access better employment opportunities and better educational opportunities for their families in the future.
Additionally, by providing workers and their families with medical facilities, housing facilities, access to nutrition, etc, the LWF provides for their long-term well-being and enhances their socio-economic status. The financial assistance available through the LWF also helps ensure workers have a safety net during emergencies, contributing to their financial security."
How are contributions to Labour Welfare Fund made?
Gupta from EY India, says, "It comprises contributions from employers, employees, and the Government/State Government (in a few states). Unpaid accumulations (such as wages, bonuses, and gratuities) held by the employer are also deposited into the fund. Currently, there is a total of 16 states where state-specific labour welfare laws are applicable, including two Union Territories."
"It is governed by the state-specific Labour Welfare Fund Acts and the rules framed thereunder, which inter alia often mandate employers and employees to make periodic contributions to the LWF. However, do note that contribution requirements, applicability, and benefits vary from state to state. In fact, some states such as Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, etc, do not have a statutorily set up LWF," says Bhardwaj.
He adds, "The contribution is determined on a state-specific basis, depending mostly on economic factors (for instance, the cost of implementing welfare schemes, inflation, cost of living adjustments, etc). The State Labour Welfare Boards, at times, pass amendments revising the contribution rates to ensure that the LWF is maintained sustainably and it achieves its purpose. It is common for contributions to be required both on the part of the employer and the employee. In some cases, the State government makes a separate contribution as well."
Raote says, "The contribution is made by the employer and the employee. Since this is a state legislation, the contribution may differ from State to State. Some states have not incorporated this legislation, so it's not applied uniformly across India."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
KP to spent 48 lakh on grooming its dogs, horses
1 2 3 4 5 6 Kolkata: The Kolkata Police is all set to spend more than Rs 48.5 lakh this year for the grooming of the four-legged members of its two prized units – the horses of the Kolkata Mounted Police unit and its dogs in the KP Dog Squad. "These are essential equipment, other than food and medicines, for which tenders are floated. These equipment help to keep the kennels and stables clean, but more importantly, help in training the animals so that they are always ready to go into operation. Add to it the various events and competitions they need to attend in their best shape," said a joint commissioner. While there are 65 horses at its two stables at SN Banerjee Road and Police Training School at Alipore, there are presently 42 dogs under the Kolkata Police Dog Squad, with cops planning to induct 12 more. Kolkata Police proposed to spend Rs 31.5 lakh for the grooming of horses this financial year. These items are essential equipment and supplies used in horse care, riding, and stable management. The equipment is also important for Kolkata police horses to prepare for all India equestrian championships where the team's performances – especially in the police and paramilitary competitions – were noteworthy. The first category of items to be procured by the Kolkata Mounted Police includes basic horse grooming and care items. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Tabletă Puternică la Preț Incredibil - Oferta Limitată! LUO Cumpără acum Undo Brushes (grooming, dandy brush), curry combs, and grooming gloves are used daily to clean horses and maintain their coat health. GI buckets are necessary for water and feed, while nose bags are used for feeding horses individually. These items ensure proper horse hygiene and feeding management. The second category comprises riding equipment and tack. Saddles (colonial pattern), bridle headgear, bits (snaffle and duty), reins, stirrups (both iron and leather), and girths are fundamental for horse riding. These items provide control, comfort, and safety for both rider and horse. Lunging reins are used for training horses in circular exercise patterns. Maintenance supplies form the third category. Horse shoes and nails are essential for proper hoof care and protection. Various polishes (saddle polish cream, liquid, and white cherry polish) are used to maintain leather equipment. Baggage straps and surcingles help secure equipment and loads. Lastly, stable equipment includes wooden bars for stalls, sword frogs for military ceremonies, and white ear covers for horse protection. V-attachments are used for specific equipment mounting. Another Rs 17 lakh has been earmarked for the dog squad. Among the items, several are for training and controlling the dogs, especially the newer inductees. These include nylon leashes, collars, harnesses, and tracking leashes, which are fundamental tools for controlling and training dogs. They help handlers maintain control during various training exercises and daily walks. The choke chains and steel chains provide additional control options for stronger dogs. Training items like wooden dumbbells, flying discs, and rope toys are used for obedience training, exercise, and mental stimulation. The specific grooming equipment includes rubber gloves, wooden and rubber brushes, steel combs, hair trimmers, scissors, and hair dryers. The order includes various items for the dog's comfort and protection in different weather conditions.
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
PM Modi meets UK foreign secretary: Calls for united global action against terrorism; hails India-UK FTA potential
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday called for decisive global efforts to combat terrorism and those who enable it, during a meeting with visiting UK foreign secretary David Lammy. The talks took place amid strong British condemnation of the recent Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir. According to a statement from the Prime Minister's Office, Lammy 'strongly condemned' the attack and expressed the UK's firm support for India's fight against cross-border terrorism. PM Modi , in turn, underlined the need for the international community to act firmly and collectively. 'The UK Foreign Secretary strongly condemned the Pahalgam terror attack and expressed support for India's fight against cross-border terrorism,' the statement read. 'PM Modi underscored the need for decisive international action against terrorism and those who support it.' The two leaders also welcomed the successful conclusion of the long-pending India-UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and the double taxation avoidance convention. PM Modi appreciated the 'constructive engagement' from both sides in reaching the milestone. Lammy said the UK was keen to deepen cooperation across key sectors such as defence, security, trade, clean energy, technology and innovation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo PM Modi also noted the growing strength of the India-UK Comprehensive Strategic Partnership and praised the ongoing collaboration under the technology security initiative, calling it a step toward building 'trusted and secure innovation ecosystems'. Lammy's visit comes at a time of heightened diplomatic outreach between New Delhi and London. During his two-day stay, he also held wide-ranging talks with external affairs minister S Jaishankar. The EAM also highlighted India's zero-tolerance policy on terrorism and urged global partners to recognise the clear divide between perpetrators and victims. 'India expects its partners to understand that we will never countenance the perpetrators of evil being equated with those they target,' Jaishankar said. Lammy's visit is aimed at reviewing key areas of the strategic partnership and building momentum for deeper cooperation in the post-Brexit and post-FTA landscape. PM Modi also extended his warm greetings to UK prime minister Sir Keir Starmer and renewed the invitation for him to visit India at the earliest mutual convenience.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's tariffs could pay for his tax cuts -- but it likely wouldn't be much of a bargain
The tax cuts in President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act would likely gouge a hole in the federal budget. The president has a patch handy, though: his sweeping import taxes - tariffs. The Congressional Budget Office, the government's nonpartisan arbiter of tax and spending matters, says the One Big Beautiful Bill, passed by the House last month and now under consideration in the Senate, would increase federal budget deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. That is because its tax cuts would drain the government's coffers faster than its spending cuts would save money. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Kardioloog: Buikvet na je 50e? Stop dit in je schoenen Gezondheidstip By bringing in revenue for the Treasury, on the other hand, the tariffs that Trump announced through May 13 - including his so-called reciprocal levies of up to 50% on countries with which the United States has a trade deficit - would offset the budget impact of the tax-cut bill and reduce deficits over the next decade by $2.5 trillion. So it's basically a wash. Live Events That's the budget math anyway. The real answer is more complicated. Actually using tariffs to finance a big chunk of the federal government would be a painful and perilous undertaking, budget wonks say. "It's a very dangerous way to try to raise revenue," said Kent Smetters of the University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model, who served in President George W. Bush's Treasury Department. Trump has long advocated tariffs as an economic elixir. He says they can protect American industries, bring factories back to the United States, give him leverage to win concessions over foreign governments - and raise a lot of money. He's even suggested that they could replace the federal income tax, which now brings in about half of federal revenue. "It's possible we'll do a complete tax cut,'' he told reporters in April. "I think the tariffs will be enough to cut all of the income tax.'' Economists and budget analysts do not share the president's enthusiasm for using tariffs to finance the government or to replace other taxes. "It's a really bad trade,'' said Erica York, the Tax Foundation's vice president of federal tax policy. "It's perhaps the dumbest tax reform you could design.'' For one thing, Trump's tariffs are an unstable source of revenue. He bypassed Congress and imposed his biggest import tax hikes through executive orders. That means a future president could simply reverse them. "Or political whims in Congress could change, and they could decide, 'Hey, we're going revoke this authority because we don't think it's a good thing that the president can just unilaterally impose a $2 trillion tax hike,' '' York said. Or the courts could kill his tariffs before Congress or future presidents do. A federal court in New York has already struck down the centerpiece of his tariff program - the reciprocal and other levies he announced on what he called "Liberation Day'' April 2 - saying he'd overstepped his authority. An appeals court has allowed the government to keep collecting the levies while the legal challenge winds its way through the court system. Economists also say that tariffs damage the economy. They are a tax on foreign products, paid by importers in the United States and usually passed along to their customers via higher prices. They raise costs for U.S. manufacturers that rely on imported raw materials, components and equipment, making them less competitive than foreign rivals that don't have to pay Trump's tariffs. Tariffs also invite retaliatory taxes on U.S. exports by foreign countries. Indeed, the European Union this week threatened "countermeasures'' against Trump's unexpected move to raise his tariff on foreign steel and aluminum to 50%. "You're not just getting the effect of a tax on the U.S. economy," York said. "You're also getting the effect of foreign taxes on U.S. exports.'' She said the tariffs will basically wipe out all economic benefits from the One Big Beautiful Bill's tax cuts. Smetters at the Penn Wharton Budget Model said that tariffs also isolate the United States and discourage foreigners from investing in its economy. Foreigners see U.S. Treasurys as a super-safe investment and now own about 30% of the federal government's debt. If they cut back, the federal government would have to pay higher interest rates on Treasury debt to attract a smaller number of potential investors domestically. Higher borrowing costs and reduced investment would wallop the economy, making tariffs the most economically destructive tax available, Smetters said - more than twice as costly in reduced economic growth and wages as what he sees as the next-most damaging: the tax on corporate earnings. Tariffs also hit the poor hardest. They end up being a tax on consumers, and the poor spend more of their income than wealthier people do. Even without the tariffs, the One Big Beautiful Bill slams the poorest because it makes deep cuts to federal food programs and to Medicaid, which provides health care to low-income Americans. After the bill's tax and spending cuts, an analysis by the Penn Wharton Budget Model found, the poorest fifth of American households earning less than $17,000 a year would see their incomes drop by $820 next year. The richest 0.1% earning more than $4.3 million a year would come out ahead by $390,070 in 2026. "If you layer a regressive tax increase like tariffs on top of that, you make a lot of low- and middle-income households substantially worse off,'' said the Tax Foundation's York. Overall, she said, tariffs are "a very unreliable source of revenue for the legal reasons, the political reasons as well as the economic reasons. They're a very, very inefficient way to raise revenue. If you raise a dollar of a revenue with tariffs, that's going to cause a lot more economic harm than raising revenue any other way.''
