
Canada must learn from the green backlash
As Canadians prepare to elect a new government, the rapid deterioration in relations with the United States will be front of mind. But the slow pace of decarbonisation of our planet, and Canada's role in turning this around, must be right alongside it.
The chance of limiting global warming to 1.5° Celsius above pre-industrial levels, as set out in the 2015 Paris climate agreement, is now vanishingly small. Despite many countries' efforts, global greenhouse-gas emissions have not even started to fall, and would have to decline by a staggering 7.5 per cent per year to stay within the carbon budget envisaged by the Paris agreement. If this does not change soon, the planet will start to cross climate tipping points, from the collapses of the Greenland Ice Sheet and the Labrador Sea Current to the abrupt thawing of the permafrost.
Addressing this existential crisis requires implementing policies that will accelerate the pace of decarbonisation by leveraging the improvements in green-energy generation and infrastructure. The desire is seemingly there – global surveys show that voters want more, not less, climate action. But politicians rightly sense that they will be penalised in the next election for taking aggressive action, leading to an overly cautious approach. We are thus winning the war too slowly, which, as climate activist Bill McKibben has pointed out, is the same as losing.
The political backlash against climate action is growing worldwide. Green parties are in retreat across Europe, and the European Commission is rethinking its Green Deal legislation in light of the continent's declining competitiveness, stoking fears that the bloc may scale back its targets. From Australia to Germany, incumbent governments have faced public pressure to abandon green policies. In the United States, President Donald Trump ran for re-election on a platform to reverse Joe Biden's signature climate policy. Similarly, in Canada, the Conservatives have embraced the rallying cry 'axe the tax' – referring to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's carbon tax.
The political backlash against climate action is growing worldwide.
Policy backsliding is to be expected on occasion, and global progress must be resilient to such lapses, as it was during the first Trump administration. But the populist revolt against green policies offers some important lessons for the next Canadian prime minister.
Some of this pushback reflects the fact that the costs of climate action are not evenly distributed. To be politically sustainable, such policies must internalise these costs in the initial design phase. For example, economists have rightly championed carbon taxation as the most efficient way to curb emissions. But sometimes efficiency must be sacrificed – in this case, by resorting to alternative instruments or complementary measures to soften the blow of the green transition on segments of society that are less able to bear the cost.
To be clear, that does not mean invoking the compensation principle, which claims that the most efficient policy maximises the resources available to provide compensation for those negatively affected (it does), but fails to recognise that such compensation rarely takes place. Nor is it enough to say that if carbon taxation is revenue-neutral, as it is designed to be in Canada, this will somehow ensure that compensation will reach those who need it. Voters are smart, and unless policy credibly convinces potential losers that they will be made whole, the mere risk that they will lose can provoke a backlash. And, as we are seeing now, even a small group of affected citizens can wield outsize political influence, and their cause can be taken up by populist politicians.
This is not idle theorising. A paper that my former International Monetary Fund colleagues and I published in 2023 examined whether climate policies were politically costly in OECD countries, including Canada, over the last few decades. Our findings suggest that a voter backlash is avoidable when policy design ensures that those likely to lose disproportionately – whether poorer households or fossil-fuel firms – are protected, for example through social insurance, monetary compensation, or the gradual phase-in of green policies. Perceptions matter, too, and our research implies that some measures, especially carbon taxes, are particularly likely to be unpopular, while regulations that reduce emissions at a slightly higher social cost are more palatable for voters.
Climate policies must be compatible with social and political realities, and not based solely on economic efficiency. This is a lesson for all countries – including Canada – experiencing broad pushback against green measures. The world cannot afford populist politicians denigrating decarbonisation as a harmful obsession of the elite. Buy-in from the households and firms that will disproportionately bear the costs is necessary if we are to have any chance of avoiding catastrophic global warming. @Project Syndicate, 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times of Oman
3 hours ago
- Times of Oman
Trump slams Los Angeles protests as 'full-blown assault' on peace, order
North Carolina: United States President Donald Trump on Tuesday (local time) called the protests in Los Angeles "a full-blown assault on peace, on public order, and national sovereignty," Al Jazeera reported. The US President is speaking at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, marking the 250th anniversary of the US Army. "These guys are professionals. These are not amateurs," he said, adding he was working with US Senators to pass legislation to imprison people who burn the American flag for "one year." According to Al Jazeera, Trump then took aim at California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, calling them "incompetent" and accusing them of paying "troublemakers, agitators, and insurrectionists" to participate in the protests. "Their position is that the rioting will not stop unless ICE withdraws from Los Angeles and ceases the enforcement of federal immigration law," he said. "So sad what they've done to our country." Notably, the protests erupted after ICE agents conducted raids across the city, arresting dozens of undocumented immigrants. Earlier, the Department of Defence confirmed that Trump is sending an additional 2,000 National Guard troops to support Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and federal law enforcement officers in Los Angeles. Monday's deployment is in addition to the 2,000 National Guard troops ordered to deploy by Trump on Saturday, warning of tougher action against those protesting immigration arrests. "At the order of the President, the Department of Defence is mobilising an additional 2,000 California National Guard to be called into federal service to support ICE & to enable federal law-enforcement officers to safely conduct their duties," Sean Parnell, Assistant to the Secretary of Defence for Public Affairs, wrote on X. The latest deployment comes on the same day California filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, asking a judge to declare the deployments unconstitutional.


Times of Oman
3 hours ago
- Times of Oman
Protests in LA intensify over federal immigration sweeps, tear gas used
Los Angeles: Protests outside a federal detention centre in Los Angeles turned tense as law enforcement agencies, including the California National Guard and Department of Homeland Security, fired non-lethal tear gas outside the facility to disperse protesters, CNN reported. Notably, the protests erupted after ICE agents conducted raids across the city, arresting dozens of undocumented immigrants. According to CNN, the authorities cleared a path for an armoured vehicle to come through, while protesters chanted slogans. The protesters were heard chanting: "This is what democracy looks like!" They were seen throwing water bottles at the officers. The Los Angeles Police Department wrote on X a "dispersal order" had been issued: "The use of less lethal munitions has been authorised. Less lethal munitions may cause pain and discomfort." Earlier in the day, United States President Donald Trump on Tuesday (local time) called the protests in Los Angeles "a full-blown assault on peace, on public order, and national sovereignty," Al Jazeera reported. The US President is speaking at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, marking the 250th anniversary of the US Army. "These guys are professionals. These are not amateurs," he said, adding he was working with US Senators to pass legislation to imprison people who burn the American flag for "one year." According to Al Jazeera, Trump then took aim at California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, calling them "incompetent" and accusing them of paying "troublemakers, agitators, and insurrectionists" to participate in the protests. "Their position is that the rioting will not stop unless ICE withdraws from Los Angeles and ceases the enforcement of federal immigration law," he said. "So sad what they've done to our country." Earlier, the Department of Defence confirmed that Trump is sending an additional 2,000 National Guard troops to support Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and federal law enforcement officers in Los Angeles. Monday's deployment is in addition to the 2,000 National Guard troops ordered to deploy by Trump on Saturday, warning of tougher action against those protesting immigration arrests. "At the order of the President, the Department of Defence is mobilising an additional 2,000 California National Guard to be called into federal service to support ICE & to enable federal law-enforcement officers to safely conduct their duties," Sean Parnell, Assistant to the Secretary of Defence for Public Affairs, wrote on X. The latest deployment comes on the same day California filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, asking a judge to declare the deployments unconstitutional.


Times of Oman
3 hours ago
- Times of Oman
Federal Judge denies California's request for immediate restraining order on Trump's military deployment
California: A federal judge in San Francisco has denied California's request to immediately block the US President Donald Trump administration from using Marines and National Guard troops to assist federal officials with immigration enforcement, CNN reported. Instead, Senior US District Judge Charles R Breyer has scheduled a hearing for 1:30 pm Thursday to consider the state's request for a temporary restraining order that would bar officials from directing the service members to assist with certain law enforcement activities. The state had asked the judge to swiftly issue the order without waiting for a response from the Trump administration. However, Judge Breyer has decided to allow both sides to submit additional written arguments before deciding, as per CNN. In a brief filing to the court Tuesday afternoon, the Justice Department called the state's request "legally meritless" and argued that if granted, it "would jeopardise the safety of Department of Homeland Security personnel and interfere with the Federal Government's ability to carry out operations." According to CNN, the Trump administration deployed thousands of National Guard troops to California, casting it as a necessary move to quell protests in Los Angeles that erupted in a section of the city over ICE enforcement actions. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump said today that the military will remain in Los Angeles "until there's peace," amid criticism of his mobilisation of the California National Guard and 700 Marines to the city. "I just want to see peace. If there's peace, we get out. If there's even a chance of no peace, we stay there until there's peace, and a lot of people are being arrested. The rioters or whatever you want to call them. They better know that a lot of people are being arrested. They're going to be in jail for a long time," the president told reporters at Joint Base Andrews. Speaking at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, Trump also called the protests in Los Angeles "a full-blown assault on peace, on public order, and national sovereignty," "Within the span of a few decades, Los Angeles has gone from being one of the cleanest, safest and most beautiful cities on earth, to being a trash heap with entire neighbourhoods under the control of transnational gangs and criminal networks. As the entire world can now see, uncontrolled migration leads to chaos, dysfunction, and disorder... Very simply, we will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean, and safe again," he added. The US President is speaking at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, marking the 250th anniversary of the US Army. "These guys are professionals. These are not amateurs," he said, adding he was working with US Senators to pass legislation to imprison people who burn the American flag for "one year." According to Al Jazeera, Trump then took aim at California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, calling them "incompetent" and accusing them of paying "troublemakers, agitators, and insurrectionists" to participate in the protests. Immigration and Customs Enforcement posted images on X today of officers detaining individuals in Los Angeles while surrounded by National Guard troops, in what appears to be the first photos marking the Guard involved in ICE operations. Following the intense protests, Mayor Karen Bass said that a curfew for downtown Los Angeles could be announced within the next hour. She said she is about to meet with the police chief, and an announcement would be coming "before nightfall, and it would go into effect."