Mobile internet gender gap narrows in sub-Saharan Africa
The gender gap in mobile internet use narrowed in sub-Saharan Africa for the second year in a row, a new report found, though it remains the region with the highest proportion of women not yet adopting the technology.
Sub-Saharan Africa showed 'promising progress in closing mobile gender gaps,' the telecoms industry body GSMA wrote in the report seen by Semafor, with the gulf between men and women using mobile internet dropping from 36% in 2022 to 29% in 2024. Yet around 205 million women are still unconnected to mobile internet services, nearly two-thirds of the adult female population, the report to be published on Wednesday noted. Globally, progress in bridging the mobile gender gap in low- and middle-income countries has stalled.
The barriers 'disproportionately affect women because of structural inequalities around income and education,' Claire Sibthorpe, head of digital inclusion at GSMA, told Semafor, with 'social norms' also playing a role in driving the gender gap.
The lack of a smartphone and internet connectivity lowers women's access to education and employment, according to development experts, which is why improving women's digital connectivity is listed by the UN as a key indicator for achieving gender equality. Researchers at Oxford University have found that women who own mobile phones and use the internet are more empowered to make decisions over their health, while others have shown how phones can help alleviate poverty and boost women's economic independence.
In sub-Saharan Africa, affordability — particularly of handsets but also data costs — came up as the top barrier for men and women already aware of mobile internet, GSMA found. That was in contrast to South Asia where literacy and digital skills are the biggest obstacles.
Aside from the well-documented benefits of digital access for women, their families, and their communities, there is also a huge commercial and GDP opportunity, Sibthorpe said. The GSMA estimates that closing the gender gap in mobile ownership and use between 2023 and 2030 in low- and middle-income countries would add $1.3 trillion in additional GDP.
'Women are half the population, so this is critical for not just economies and governments, but also for businesses, to reduce this inequality in their customer base,' said Sibthorpe.
GSMA data from Pakistan — where the gender gap narrowed more than any other country surveyed in 2024 — offers an insight into the importance of tackling social norms to improve digital inclusion. It found that 'family disapproval' was the second most-reported top barrier to mobile internet use for female respondents in the South Asian country, a factor that did not present a barrier for men.
The Digital Gender Gaps dashboard, a data visualization project by Oxford University researchers, estimates internet use and mobile ownership by gender.
A study by two economists explores why the mobile phone gender gap matters and what we can do about it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
'He's gotta go': The MAGA right cheers Musk-Trump rift
The Donald Trump-Elon Musk alliance ended like it started, 11 months ago: two of the world's most influential men, on the social networks that they own, posting about each other. But on Thursday afternoon, as Musk mused on X about supporting Trump's impeachment, launching a third party, and exposing his supposed ties to Jeffrey Epstein, nationalist conservatives celebrated the self-exile of a tech billionaire they never trusted. Their man was in the presidency. A South African immigrant who posted cringe, dreamed of microchipped brains, and didn't understand the importance of halting mass immigration was going to become irrelevant. 'Trump is a hero, and Elon Musk is not,' former Trump adviser Steve Bannon said on the Thursday episode of his podcast. Musk's eight-figure support for Trump in 2024 was 'deal baggage,' and the deal had been completed months ago. 'Elon Musk is illegal, and he's gotta go, too,' Bannon said. 'Deport immediately.' Bannon told Semafor late last year that Musk 'wrote a quarter-of-a-f*cking-billion-dollar check when we had no money,' and helped execute a winning GOP strategy. But Musk, he added, was out of sync with a populist economic project more than a decade in the public spat with Trump began on Tuesday, when the former DOGE head began attacking the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, warning that it would 'bankrupt' the country. Democrats rubbernecked from the sidelines, happy to watch Musk make some of their arguments, skeptical that it would amount to anything. Pro-Trump conservatives were on surer footing. They saw the end of Musk's advocacy for policies that clashed with their vision, including visas for highly skilled immigrants and tax credits for electric vehicles. And they spied victory over the GOP's libertarian wing — down to a handful of congressional Republicans, and Musk — who were more worried about deficit reduction than immigration. 'Debt is an important issue,' the pro-Trump influencer Jack Posobiec wrote on X. 'But there is one issue that is more important than all others, and that is Immigration. This bill funds the Mass Deportations.' This faction of MAGA notched one victory before Trump took office. The day after Christmas, when he was slated to lead DOGE alongside Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy defended tech companies that 'hire foreign-born & first-generation engineers over 'native' Americans,' arguing that modern America didn't venerate the right skills or ethics. 'A culture that celebrates the prom queen over the math olympiad champ, or the jock over the valedictorian, will not produce the best engineers,' Ramaswamy wrote. Ramaswamy left DOGE just hours into the Trump presidency, launching a run for governor of Ohio that Trump would soon endorse. But his riff on American competitiveness, and the need for more smart immigrants, became infamous on the nationalist right. 'When an outsider comes here, gets in your face, and starts throwing definitions at you, and you gotta Google sh*t? We're not doing that,' said the comedian Sam Hyde in a livestream dedicated to Ramaswamy. 'You're getting called a slur.' Musk, who had taken Ramaswamy's side in the argument, kept his role in the administration. He was publicly supportive of moves taken to cut grants for Ivy League schools. But as he exited DOGE, and the administration ramped up efforts to bar foreign students from those schools, Musk did not weigh in. 'I think we want to stick to the subject of the day, which is spaceships, as opposed to presidential policy,' he told CBS News last week, when reporter David Pogue asked about the foreign student MAGA self-deportation isn't a total victory for any political faction. The Department of Government Efficiency remains in place; Democrats and liberal groups are still suing to undo its work. And the Musk/DOGE effort to demolish USAID fulfilled a basic nationalist project, pulling back resources for noncitizens and giving the money to Americans. (The agency's offices are being refitted for Customs and Border Protection.) But the long-term Trump project, which has been succeeding all year, is transforming the Republican Party from Reaganite national greatness to nationalism — more like Viktor Orban's Fidesz than George W. Bush's GOP. As progressives and ex-Republicans fret about foreign scientists fleeing the country, as they quote Emma Lazarus and Martin Niemöller, Trump's Republicans are raising tariffs and funding more border wall construction. How far would Trump go to punish Musk? Maybe not as far as Bannon, who wants the government to seize SpaceX and his citizenship. The punishment matters less than the policy, which is to stop seeing the national debt as an existential threat, and understand immigration as an existential threat. Who wins if Trump-endorsed Republicans run on that, and candidates backed by a Musk PAC talk about cutting the deficit? The ending to that story is even more predictable than the ending of this Rep. Ro Khanna, a personal friend of Musk, believed that he could be brought back to the Democratic Party after his fight with Trump. Few Democrats agreed, even though some were using Musk's 'disgusting abomination' language against the OBBBA. Ben Wikler, the chairman of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, said that the donors and voters who helped beat Musk's candidate in the state's supreme court race 'drove a chisel into a crack in the Republican Hoover Dam,' and got a 'historic villain, who is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people,' to slink out of politics. 'A few months ago, politicians in both parties were terrified about crossing Trump, because they thought Musk might fund a primary campaign against them,' Wikler told Semafor. 'He was Trump's No. 1 enforcer. Now, he's been pushed out of the palace, and he's responding by trying to burn the whole thing down.' Musk's approval rating with Democrats, he said, was 'somewhere between anthrax and the bubonic plague.' Oren Cass, whose American Compass hosted Vice President JD Vance this week, predicted the Musk story's ending back in February. 'The good news is that Trump has historically shown himself highly attuned to what is politically achievable and what is politically unwise, and he seems unlikely to allow DOGE to run wild beyond the point of diminishing returns,' he wrote. 'Musk has shown no such judgment. Which likely puts an expiration date on his time in the president's favor.
Wall Street Journal
17 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
No, AI Robots Won't Take All Our Jobs
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said last week that artificial intelligence could eliminate half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within five years and cause unemployment to skyrocket to as high as 20%. He should know better—as should many other serious academics, who have been warning for years that AI will mean the end of employment as we know it. In 2013 Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael A. Osborne of Oxford University produced a research paper estimating that 47% of U.S. employment was at risk of being eliminated by new technologies.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Stablecoin issuer Circle soars in public market debut
Shares of stablecoin issuer Circle soared in its NYSE debut today, a validation of crypto's newfound importance to the American financial system and a symptom of investors starved for new issuances during a long IPO drought. Trading in the stock was halting just seconds after it began after the stock, which had been sold last night to IPO investors for $31 a share, opened at $69 and soared to nearly $76. The $31 price was below where Circle was previously valued by private investors. In an interview off the NYSE trading floor with Semafor, CEO Jeremy Allaire said he worried that if the US doesn't create a trusted and useful digital dollar — something his company's main product, USD Coin, aims to be — it might lose the 'digital currency space race' to China, which has a formidable lead over the US with its digital yuan. 'The digital dollar should be the highest utility money in the world,' he said. 'We are believers in the strength and continued preeminence of the dollar in the global financial system, and in the internet financial system that's being built up.' It's the digital version of a broader debate about the future of the dollar, as the global economy fractures under trade and geopolitical tensions. It's also a politically expedient play for Allaire's company, which, as the Financial Times notes, is quite exposed to the whims of central banks. A rival stablecoin issuer, Tether, has also latched onto the US-China rivalry. Liz Hoffman: The House passed stablecoin legislation. What's your expectation for what happens in the Senate? Jeremy Allaire: The GENIUS Act had a bipartisan supermajority to get it to where it is, and we believe it's an excellent piece of legislation. This is part of an effort by policymakers and governments around the world to integrate stablecoins as an M1-like electronic money type in the financial system. It represents a tremendous opportunity to have more companies, more financial institutions, more technology firms, build on this breakthrough technology. Do you expect competition from the Trump family? Circle has always faced competition. The position we've been able to build as a licensed, regulated, global firm — we think those remain strengths, and we're very comfortable that we're going to continue to be the leader. Becoming a public company is significant in terms of enhancing trust, transparency, and accountability. Crypto is right on the cusp of going mainstream, but is still shot through with fraud and criminal-adjacent actors. Do you think you can fully drag it into the sunlight? We aren't focused on speculative trading or different types of digital assets. We're trying to improve the financial system by building a new, electronic form of the dollar, and ultimately other fiat electronic money, to make the global economic system more fair and integrated. We saw, in the birth and growth of the internet, a huge range of things that people thought were useful — some of which became fundamental to all of our lives and some of which don't exist anymore. Do you worry that if the US doesn't become the backbone of that global digital infrastructure that someone else, maybe the Chinese, will? I do. The digital dollar should be the highest utility money in the world. We're trying to cement in law a framework that assures that the United States … can win the digital- currency space race. We are believers in the strength and continued preeminence of the dollar in the global financial system, and in the internet financial system that's being built up. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
