logo
SWAT Team Robot Successfully Dismantles Black Man

SWAT Team Robot Successfully Dismantles Black Man

The Onion6 hours ago

LUBBOCK, TX—Saying the threat posed too great a risk to the life of its officers, the Lubbock Police Department confirmed Thursday its SWAT team had deployed a robot that succeeded in dismantling a potentially dangerous Black man.
A spokesperson for the department, which reportedly received dozens of calls from individuals claiming to have seen a Black man at a crowded downtown bus shelter, stated that a perimeter was established and the area was promptly evacuated. Law enforcement officials explained that in situations where a Black man is detected and cannot be destroyed by conventional police methods, the protocol is to send in a tactical robot.
'We get plenty of false alarms and hoaxes, but if there's a real chance we're dealing with an actual Black man, we'll always prioritize the safety of our personnel and call in the unmanned unit,' SWAT team commander Lt. Wyatt Hayes said of the robot that, with the aid of sensors mounted on its manipulator arm, could be operated at a distance of more than 1,000 feet from the Black man. 'It's our obligation to keep our officers out of harm's way if we can, and we're fortunate to have the technology that enables us to do that.'
'But what's important right now is that residents remain calm,' Hayes added. 'This is exactly the kind of threat police train for.'
As it advanced toward the target on its dual, tanklike treads, the robot assessed the scene with its camera and confirmed that an actual Black man was in fact present. According to police, the robot then began transmitting critical visual information to the specialist who would guide it throughout the delicate dismantling operation.
'You might think you're well outside the radius where a Black man can do you any harm, but you don't truly know what you're up against until you're in there,' said Sgt. Roland Meyer, visibly perspiring as he remotely extended the robot's arm and carefully guided its gripper claw into position. 'In this line of work, it's impossible to be too cautious.'
'But the public is counting on us to protect them from this kind of thing,' Meyer continued. 'At the end of the day, we just want the people we serve to feel safe in this community.'
Officers eyed a nearby monitor anxiously as Meyer rotated the robot's gripper and, once the appropriate angle had been achieved, began the dismantling procedure. After several tense minutes of precision maneuvers, the Black man was successfully neutralized and a relieved Meyer flashed a thumbs-up to a round of applause.
With no further risk from the Black man, police reopened the area to the public. While some locals returned and quickly resumed their day, others said they weren't ready to go back yet.
'I'm grateful to the police, but it's still unsettling to know there was a Black man in my very own neighborhood,' said Darlene Hoover, a resident of a nearby apartment building who told reporters she would probably stay with friends several miles away for the time being. 'For all I know, there could be one in a restaurant or at the park or the supermarket. I just don't know if I'll ever feel comfortable here again.'
The dismantling follows an incident last month in which a Black man was spotted on a plane at Lubbock International Airport but was successfully detonated by police just before takeoff.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man formerly on death row can't serve 2 life terms at the same time, Tennessee Supreme Court rules
Man formerly on death row can't serve 2 life terms at the same time, Tennessee Supreme Court rules

Hamilton Spectator

time3 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Man formerly on death row can't serve 2 life terms at the same time, Tennessee Supreme Court rules

MEMPHIS, Tenn., (AP) — A Tennessee judge did not have the authority to give Pervis Payne, who was formerly on death row, concurrent sentences of life in prison after ruling that he was intellectually disabled and could not be executed for two 1987 killings, the state Supreme Court said Monday. The court's ruling said a Memphis judge lacked the jurisdiction to give Payne two life sentences to run at the same time rather than one after the other. The concurrent sentences allowed Payne to be eligible for parole in 2026 — 30 years earlier than if the sentences were consecutive. The Supreme Court did not issue the consecutive life sentences for Payne in its ruling. Instead, it returned the matter to the trial court in Memphis for further proceedings. Payne had been on death row for the killings of a woman and her 2-year-old daughter. In January 2022, Judge Paula Skahan sentenced Payne to concurrent sentences of life with the possibility of parole after ruling in November 2021 that his death sentences must be vacated because he was intellectually disabled. The case has drawn national attention from anti-death-penalty activists and included the involvement of the Innocence Project, which argues for the use of DNA testing in cases claiming wrongful conviction. DNA tests failed to exonerate Payne. Skahan's ruling that Payne should be removed from death row was based on a Tennessee law passed earlier in 2021 that made prohibiting the execution of intellectually disabled people retroactive to past cases. Before the 2021 law, Tennessee had no mechanism for people to reopen a case to press an intellectual disability claim. Executions of intellectually disabled people were ruled unconstitutional in 2002, when the U.S. Supreme Court found they violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Payne, 58, was convicted of first-degree murder for the killings of Charisse Christopher and her 2-year-old daughter, Lacie Jo, who were repeatedly stabbed in their Millington apartment and left in a pool of blood. Christopher's son, Nicholas, who was 3 at the time, also was stabbed but survived. Payne, who is Black, has always maintained his innocence. He told police he was at Christopher's apartment building to meet his girlfriend when he heard the mother, who was white, screaming and tried to help. He said he panicked when he saw a white police officer and ran away. During his murder trial, prosecutors said Payne was high on cocaine and looking for sex when he killed Christopher and her daughter in a 'drug-induced frenzy.' Prosecutors said the evidence overwhelmingly pointed to Payne as the killer. However, evidence presented by two experts showed Payne was intellectually disabled, while Payne's supporters said he had taken significant steps in his rehabilitation while serving three decades in prison. It was not immediately clear Monday when Payne would be eligible for parole under the Supreme Court's decision. A hearing must be set to address the new ruling. Payne's lawyer, Kelley Henry, has pushed for Payne's full exoneration. 'Pervis Payne remains incarcerated for a crime he did not commit,' she said in an email Monday. 'We will continue to fight for his freedom and to bring him home to his family.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Man formerly on death row can't serve 2 life terms at the same time, Tennessee Supreme Court rules
Man formerly on death row can't serve 2 life terms at the same time, Tennessee Supreme Court rules

San Francisco Chronicle​

time3 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Man formerly on death row can't serve 2 life terms at the same time, Tennessee Supreme Court rules

MEMPHIS, Tenn., (AP) — A Tennessee judge did not have the authority to give Pervis Payne, who was formerly on death row, concurrent sentences of life in prison after ruling that he was intellectually disabled and could not be executed for two 1987 killings, the state Supreme Court said Monday. The court's ruling said a Memphis judge lacked the jurisdiction to give Payne two life sentences to run at the same time rather than one after the other. The concurrent sentences allowed Payne to be eligible for parole in 2026 — 30 years earlier than if the sentences were consecutive. The Supreme Court did not issue the consecutive life sentences for Payne in its ruling. Instead, it returned the matter to the trial court in Memphis for further proceedings. Payne had been on death row for the killings of a woman and her 2-year-old daughter. In January 2022, Judge Paula Skahan sentenced Payne to concurrent sentences of life with the possibility of parole after ruling in November 2021 that his death sentences must be vacated because he was intellectually disabled. The case has drawn national attention from anti-death-penalty activists and included the involvement of the Innocence Project, which argues for the use of DNA testing in cases claiming wrongful conviction. DNA tests failed to exonerate Payne. Skahan's ruling that Payne should be removed from death row was based on a Tennessee law passed earlier in 2021 that made prohibiting the execution of intellectually disabled people retroactive to past cases. Before the 2021 law, Tennessee had no mechanism for people to reopen a case to press an intellectual disability claim. Executions of intellectually disabled people were ruled unconstitutional in 2002, when the U.S. Supreme Court found they violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Payne, 58, was convicted of first-degree murder for the killings of Charisse Christopher and her 2-year-old daughter, Lacie Jo, who were repeatedly stabbed in their Millington apartment and left in a pool of blood. Christopher's son, Nicholas, who was 3 at the time, also was stabbed but survived. Payne, who is Black, has always maintained his innocence. He told police he was at Christopher's apartment building to meet his girlfriend when he heard the mother, who was white, screaming and tried to help. He said he panicked when he saw a white police officer and ran away. During his murder trial, prosecutors said Payne was high on cocaine and looking for sex when he killed Christopher and her daughter in a 'drug-induced frenzy.' Prosecutors said the evidence overwhelmingly pointed to Payne as the killer. However, evidence presented by two experts showed Payne was intellectually disabled, while Payne's supporters said he had taken significant steps in his rehabilitation while serving three decades in prison. Payne's lawyer, Kelley Henry, has pushed for Payne's full exoneration. 'Pervis Payne remains incarcerated for a crime he did not commit,' she said in an email Monday. 'We will continue to fight for his freedom and to bring him home to his family.'

Diddy Trial Takes Turn After Judge Makes Jury Decision
Diddy Trial Takes Turn After Judge Makes Jury Decision

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Diddy Trial Takes Turn After Judge Makes Jury Decision

Sean "Diddy" Combs is currently under trial as he faces several federal charges including racketeering and sex trafficking. The rapper and music industry titan could potentially face life in prison if convicted on all counts. The 24th day of the trial has begun, and a significant change has been made that could affect the outcome of the proceeding. The judge in the case has elected to dismiss a juror, a decision that Diddy's team questioned earlier in the trial. Juror No. 6 has been dismissed in the case, just days after Diddy's team explored the potential for a mistrial. Diddy's legal team wrote a letter to the judge, explaining that dismissing the juror could be considered discrimination. According to the defense, the juror is a 41-year-old Black man, and the team argued that his dismissal could discourage other minorities from willfully participating in the legal process. The judge cited transcripts from the selection process which show inconsistencies in the juror's description of where they live and with whom. The juror initially said that he lived with his partner and child in the Bronx, but then explained that he moved in with a woman and her child in New Jersey but stays at his aunt's home in the Bronx during the work week. "The changing answers and inconsistency give the court worry about deception and lying,' the judge said, according to CNN. He also noted that he took the weekend to consider the defense's claims of potential discrimination, but remained firm in his choice. The judge approached the bench on Monday and followed through with his decision to dismiss the juror. Juror No. 6 was replaced by the first alternate, and the judge explained that race was not a factor in that choice. 'It would be improper to let the race of the juror and the alternate juror factor into the proper course here all," the judge said on Monday morning. The alternate juror is a is a 57-year-old man from Westchester County, New York who lives with his wife and two children. He's also a manufacturing architect with a master's degree in engineering. The previous juror noted that he was a hip-hop fan, while the new juror says he's simply heard allegations levied against Combs through media coverage on the radio. We'll see if the change in jurors has an effect on the outcome of the case. Diddy Trial Takes Turn After Judge Makes Jury Decision first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 16, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store