
No US-Iran nuclear talks in Muscat on Sunday, says Oman
The new round of Iran–US talks, scheduled to be held in Muscat on Sunday, will no longer take place, Oman has announced.
The cancellation follows Israel's strikes on Iranian nuclear and military sites, which killed several top generals. Tehran responded with a barrage of missiles.
Despite the escalation, Washington was still hoping talks with Tehran over its nuclear programme could continue, although the Israeli attacks have cast serious doubt over the prospects for diplomacy.
'The Iran–US talks scheduled to be held in Muscat this Sunday will not now take place,' Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi posted on X on Saturday.
'But diplomacy and dialogue remain the only pathway to lasting peace,' he added.
Iran, for its part, has called continued negotiations with the US 'unjustifiable' in light of the current escalation.
On Saturday, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas that Israel's attacks were 'the direct result' of US support.
The talks had aimed to prevent military escalation by pushing Iran to give up uranium enrichment and abandon any ambitions of developing a nuclear weapon.
For weeks, US President Donald Trump remained publicly optimistic about striking a deal, while also warning of dire consequences if Iran failed to comply.
But Israel's strike targeting Iranian military leaders and nuclear sites has now rendered the diplomatic process all but irrelevant. Still, Mr Trump insisted that Iran 'may have a second chance' to return to the table.
Esmaeil Baghaei, the spokesperson of Iran's Foreign Ministry, accused Washington of enabling the Israeli attacks that killed senior Iranian commanders and dozens of civilians.
'It is inconceivable for Iran — and indeed for anyone in the world — that the Zionist regime could have carried out such a reckless and aggressive act of war without the co-operation, co-ordination, or at the very least the conscious green light of the US,' he said.
'We hold the US government responsible for the consequences of this unlawful and reckless act by the Zionist regime.'
The IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors passed a resolution on June 12 declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations — the first such move in nearly 20 years. Tehran denounced the resolution as 'clearly designed to produce a crisis' and announced plans to open a new uranium enrichment site.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump says he, Putin agreed Israel-Iran conflict 'should end'
US President Donald Trump said he and Russian President Vladimir Putin had agreed in a phone call on Saturday that the conflict between Iran and Israel "should end." "He feels, as do I, this war in Israel-Iran should end, to which I explained, his war should also end," Trump said on Truth Social, referring to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.


Sharjah 24
9 hours ago
- Sharjah 24
Oman announces cancellation of Iran-US nuclear talks
Diplomacy remains the pathway to peace Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi stated on X that "The Iran US-talks scheduled to be held in Muscat this Sunday will not now take place," emphasizing that "diplomacy and dialogue remain the only pathway to lasting peace."


The National
9 hours ago
- The National
Starmer sends fighter planes to Middle East after Iran threatens UK
Keir Starmer said on Saturday that the UK would deploy more RAF jets to the Middle East after Iran threatened to target British, French and US bases if the countries help stop strikes on Israel. The UK's Prime Minister said further military assets are being deployed to provide 'contingency support' across the region amid escalating hostilities between the two long-time foes. Additional refuelling aircraft have been sent to the region from UK bases and more fast jets will be sent over. The UK already has RAF jets in the Middle East as part of Operation Shader. Speaking to reporters travelling with him on a visit to Canada, Mr Starmer declined to rule out intervening in the conflict entirely but made clear he would continue pressing for de-escalation and said the 'intense' developments over the weekend would be discussed in detail at the G7 summit. 'These are obviously operational decisions and the situation is ongoing and developing and therefore I'm not going to get into the precise details, but we are moving assets, we've already been moving assets to the region, including jets, and that is for contingency support across the region. So that is happening,' he said. 'Our constant message is de-escalate, and therefore everything we're doing, all discussions we're having are to do with de-escalation.' Asked whether he would rule out UK involvement, he said: 'I'm not going to get in to that.' Britain last announced it had deployed fighter jets in the region in last year, when the government said British aircraft had played a part in efforts to prevent further escalation. It comes after Iranian state media said Tehran had warned it would target US, UK and French bases in the region if the countries help Israel thwart Iran's strikes, according to reports on Saturday. Both the UK and the US have insisted they were not involved in the Israeli strikes and that the country acted unilaterally. Mr Starmer would not be drawn on whether the UK was given notice of Israel's attack after reports that the country was not forewarned following the Government's decision to sanction two far-right Israeli ministers last week. 'In relation to Israel, I had a good and constructive discussion with Prime Minister Netanyahu yesterday, and that included discussions about the safety and security of Israel, as you would expect, between two allies,' he said. Asked if Britain had been told in advance of Israeli's military plans, the Prime Minister said: 'I'm not going to go into what information we had at the time or since. 'But we discuss these things intensely with our allies. But I'm not going to get into precisely what we knew, because it's a constant flow of information between our allies, and between us and the US.'