Scenes from Panthers' non-celebration as juggernaut team heads to third straight Stanley Cup Final
RALEIGH, N.C. – In 1996, when the Florida Panthers won their first Eastern Conference championship in only their third year of existence, sticks and gloves launched high into the air from a bunch of grizzled, bearded, ecstatic third-year expansion castoffs.
They gleefully — and rightfully – celebrated after upsetting Mario Lemieux, Jaromir Jagr, Petr Nedved and the mighty Penguins. They not only touched the Prince of Wales Trophy, they paraded it around the Igloo, posed for pictures on the ice and partied on their charter to Denver for the Stanley Cup Final.
Advertisement
And then Joe Sakic, Peter Forsberg and Patrick Roy swept them fast and painfully.
Wednesday night was not like 1996. Heck, it wasn't even like 2023.
After rallying for a 5-3 victory to knock off the Carolina Hurricanes and advance to the Stanley Cup Final for a third consecutive season, the Panthers celebrated like this was Game 53 of 82 during the regular season.
They slowly skated to Sergei Bobrovsky to tap his mask. They shared a couple hugs, a few high-fives, then quickly skated to center ice for a nondescript handshake line to show respect for their 10th victim of the past three years. Coach Paul Maurice, who in the first round arranged with Toronto Maple Leafs counterpart Craig Berube to avoid the handshakes because in Maurice's opinion that should be time for the players, did the same with Rod Brind'Amour.
And after they didn't touch — for the second year in a row — the prize awarded for winning the Eastern Conference, there was no loud, triumphant music when the locker room door swung open five minutes later.
In fact, it was eerily quiet. Barely even smiles. Almost like they lost.
But, of course, they hadn't.
For a franchise that not too long ago hadn't even won a playoff round in a quarter-century, winning the Eastern Conference has become old hat for these Panthers.
It's a tradition at this point 🤭 #StanleyCup pic.twitter.com/O4yLPTMe15
— NHL (@NHL) May 29, 2025
They have larger aspirations, and that's to repeat as Stanley Cup champions, starting next week when the puck drops against either the Edmonton Oilers (for the second year in a row) or the Dallas Stars.
'I remember a few years ago, it felt like such an accomplishment from where we were at one point,' Matthew Tkachuk said.
This time?
'It's all business, and we've got a bigger goal in mind,' Tkachuk said.
Advertisement
And that should be a terrifying thought for the Oilers, who are up 3-1 in the Western Conference final, or Stars.
The Panthers reminded everybody Wednesday night just what type of juggernaut they are.
Down 2-zip? Looking like, in Maurice's words, they didn't even deserve to make the playoffs? Playing slow? Looking low on energy? Serving up, in Maurice's words, pizzas?
No problem at all. No panic whatsoever. The Panthers, in multiple players' words, were calm between periods.
'We're comfortable in these situations,' Panthers newcomer Brad Marchand said. 'The guys in this room have been here in many different situations and been up and down. And when you've been through it before and you've gone all the way, you see the different way that momentum swings can happen throughout a game and how you can take advantage of that. We knew it would take one shot.'
And that it did.
First Tkachuk scored a power-play goal. Thirty seconds later, he took a hit to make a play and Sam Bennett set up Evan Rodrigues' tying goal — his first of the playoffs — after Maurice made one simple switch: flipping left wingers Rodrigues and Carter Verhaeghe by moving Rodrigues onto the Bennett-Tkachuk line and Verhaeghe onto the Aleksander Barkov-Sam Reinhart line.
THE CATS HAVE CLAWED THEIR WAY BACK 😼
Two goals in 30 seconds makes it a 2-2 game! #StanleyCup
🇺🇸: @NHL_On_TNT & @SportsonMax ➡️ https://t.co/4TuyIATi3T🇨🇦: @Sportsnet or stream on Sportsnet+ ➡️ https://t.co/4KjbdjVctF pic.twitter.com/Zhhb2T9aF9
— NHL (@NHL) May 29, 2025
Four minutes after that, Marchand set up Anton Lundell for the go-ahead goal.
But even after Seth Jarvis tied the score in the third period to erupt Lenovo Center, the road-warrior Panthers once again didn't roll over.
Less than four minutes later, Barkov — whose pinch on the power play in the second led to Tkachuk's goal — powered himself behind the net, fended off Dmitry Orlov as the defenseman draped himself all over him, escaped, cut to the front of the net and served up a beauty pass for Verhaeghe, the NHL's most clutch playoff performer.
Advertisement
And in his latest ginormous moment, Verhaeghe roofed a perfect shot for his third series-clinching goal.
'I just tried to protect the puck,' Barkov said. 'Had Carter on the back door, by himself, so you want to give the puck to him in these moments.'
THE PANTHERS HAVE THE LEAD ONCE AGAIN 😱
What an insane play from Barkov to set up Verhaeghe! #StanleyCup
🇺🇸: @NHL_On_TNT & @SportsonMax ➡️ https://t.co/4TuyIATi3T🇨🇦: @Sportsnet or stream on Sportsnet+ ➡️ https://t.co/4KjbdjVctF pic.twitter.com/1XuEyL2zX2
— NHL (@NHL) May 29, 2025
Seriously, what a play and pass by Barkov.
'That was nice, huh?' Rodrigues said. 'It speaks to who he is as a person. He's so even-keeled, doesn't get too high, doesn't get too low. And just when games get intense and very emotional, he's able to play his game and just do the right things over and over again, and then his talent just shines. He's just all-world, all skill, all talent, and it just comes out.'
And seriously, what a shot by Verhaeghe … yet again.
The man they call 'Swaggy' has scored 32 career playoff goals – 12 of which have been game-winners – in 86 games.
'He knows where to go on the ice to make himself dangerous every shift, and it just doesn't seem like pressure gets to him at all or the moment in the game,' Marchand said. 'And he's an incredible shooter. He's a shot-first guy. And when you have that mentality, you put more pucks to the net, the more opportunity you're gonna get. And he just buries his head and shoots it as hard as he can every time he's in that slot.'
And yet when the final buzzer sounded to send Florida to its latest championship round, nobody – not even the new guys – jumped for joy.
Nothing. It was just like a win in February.
'It's not our first rodeo with this,' Tkachuk said.
We know what we came for. pic.twitter.com/16ZbRPID1V
— x – Florida Panthers (@FlaPanthers) May 29, 2025
'We haven't accomplished anything yet,' Marchand added. 'You could just see the guys have been here before, and we're excited that we got through the round, but that's where it stops. The toughest team that we're going to face is coming up next. And if you don't do the job there, you didn't win anything.
Advertisement
'So, yeah, we're excited, but it's just like any other round. There's a huge job to do moving forward, and we have to prepare for that now.'
In 2023, the Panthers went to Stanley Cup Final and lost.
In 2024, the Panthers went to the Stanley Cup Final and won.
They liked that a lot better.
'There's one team that's happy at the end of this thing,' Sam Reinhart said. 'We're well aware of that. We've gone through both sides of it. You've got to enjoy this. You've got to enjoy every game, every win, every series win, but we know there's a tremendous amount of work left out there.'
(Photo of the Florida Panthers celebrating victory:)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
The Deal: Magic Johnson
In this episode of The Deal, Alex Rodriguez and Jason Kelly talk with Magic Johnson, the iconic point guard for the Los Angeles Lakers. In their conversation, taped in front of a live audience at the Milken Global Conference, Johnson reveals what he's learned from his 'greatest deal,' becoming part of the Washington Commanders ownership group. He also explains why pitching himself as a partner to the Starbucks board was the hardest thing he's ever done, and how much it meant to win an Olympic gold medal alongside Michael Jordan and Larry Bird.
Fox News
27 minutes ago
- Fox News
'You can't serve on Facebook': Military spouse calls Americans to act on Flag Day
All times eastern Special Report with Bret Baier FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: Trump attends 'Les Misérables' premiere at Kennedy Center
Forbes
27 minutes ago
- Forbes
We Need To Rethink How We Recommend Women On LinkedIn, Study Says
Reviewers use different words to recommend men and women on LinkedIn (Photo Illustration by Sheldon ... More Cooper/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) New research reveals that women are typically seen as concrete thinkers—task-oriented and detail-focused—while men are more often viewed as thinking more abstractly, focusing on strategy, vision, and the big picture. These beliefs about men and women even appear in LinkedIn recommendations, and they could have significant consequences for who gets hired, who gets promoted, and who is assigned the most menial tasks. The researchers conducted six studies to investigate whether people tend to associate men with abstract thinking, such as big-picture ideas and strategy, and women with concrete thinking, which is more focused on details and execution. In nearly every study, the same pattern emerged: women were seen as more concrete, and men as more abstract. The authors explain why this is a problem: 'When decision-makers perceive women as more concrete than men, they might pigeonhole women into administrative tasks that are low in status and power. If this is the case, then beliefs that women are more concrete than men could perpetuate gender inequality, with women being relegated to low-construal, low-status tasks more often than men because people believe they will execute these tasks more effectively.' Previous research shows that people who exhibit abstract thinking skills are perceived as having more power, are more likely to be regarded as experts and have greater potential for growth than those who are more concrete thinkers. In one of the studies, researchers analyzed written recommendations on the LinkedIn profiles of more than 500,000 professionals. They focused exclusively on the recommendation text, not the endorsed skills section. All of the profiles included in the study had at least one recommendation. The team then examined how often words associated with concrete thinking (such as 'detail' or 'exact') appeared compared to words reflecting abstract thinking (like 'visionary' or 'theoretical'). In the LinkedIn recommendations, women were once again more likely to be described with concrete terms, while men were more likely to be characterized with abstract terms. The researchers used different methods to analyze the text. First, they found women had 13% greater odds of being described with only concrete terms, and men had 22% greater odds of being described with only abstract terms. In a separate analysis, they found that words like 'detail,' 'details,' and 'exact' were more likely to appear near feminine pronouns, while abstract terms such as 'philosophical,' 'theoretical,' 'visionary,' 'vision,' 'farsighted,' and 'forward-looking' were more likely to appear near masculine pronouns. To be sure that these differences weren't simply a reflection of the kinds of jobs men and women tend to hold, the researchers controlled for both occupation and industry. They also eliminated profiles of professionals in executive roles, which tend to involve abstract thinking and are often held by men. In other words, women weren't being described as more concrete just because they worked in more detail-oriented roles. The stereotypes persisted even when comparing men and women in the same jobs. In other studies included in the research paper, participants were asked to describe fictional individuals based on brief profiles, and the same pattern emerged: men were described as more abstract, while women were described as more concrete. In one test, participants even linked 'concreteness' with women and 'abstractness' with men more quickly than the reverse, revealing that this bias likely occurs subconsciously. It's possible that one person can possess both abstract and concrete thinking abilities. In one of the six studies, women were rated higher than men on both concrete and abstract traits, but they were still seen as more concrete than abstract. And men were still rated more abstract than concrete. So, even when women are described as having abstract qualities, they're still seen as more concrete than abstract overall. It's important to note that the studies provide no evidence to suggest that women are actually more concrete thinkers or that men are more abstract. Instead, they show that people believe this to be true. Because women are often perceived as better suited for detail-oriented work, they may be more frequently assigned to those roles. Over time, doing this kind of work repeatedly can build expertise, reinforcing the stereotype and creating a self-fulfilling cycle that keeps women in support roles and men in strategic ones. So, the next time you write a LinkedIn recommendation, consider whether your compliments might be inadvertently reinforcing gender stereotypes. Even well-meaning words like 'detail-oriented' may subtly shape how others perceive someone's capabilities.
