OKC Thunder 'just gotta scrap' Game 3 from memory as Wolves make West finals a series
MINNEAPOLIS — If NBA benches had corners, Jalen Williams would've been tucked away in this one. With just over a minute left in Saturday's third quarter, the Thunder called the timeout that signaled its defeat. Williams' night, like the rest of the Thunder starters, was finished.
His teammates ejected from their seats. Williams sat frozen in the folding chair closest to the baseline, hunched over with his elbows on his knees. A towel sat atop his head, draping down to his shoulders. It sat just high enough to expose his empty stare.
Advertisement
A quarter stood between him and the bus ride away from the misery of Game 3. Away from a team he couldn't recognize.
Williams, like the rest of the Thunder starters, watched their 143-101 loss escape them far earlier than the point when he stared into oblivion.
Its origins lie somewhere in a peculiar first quarter.
Perhaps when Anthony Edwards, who stormed out to 30 points in 30 minutes while missing just five shots, collided with Williams, emerging with a ball he ferociously punched through the rim on the break. Or when Rudy Gobert blitzed Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, sprinting at Vince Wilfork-speed to the rack for free throws. When he missed the second shot, Edwards skied past SGA for a deflating offensive board.
Advertisement
MUSSATTO: Time for Thunder to live up to zero-zero mantra after Game 3 no-show vs Timberwolves
There were the shoving matches between Timberwolves forward Julius Randle and Williams, given a West finals hall pass by Josh Tiven and his officiating crew; Randle terrorized from their blind spot. Gilgeous-Alexander's eight-second violation — probably premature — wasn't fruitful.
Minnesota played with an urgency. Coal at its feet, gun at its head, gallon of water in its bladder without a bathroom nearby kind of urgency.
'Just fighting the human nature effect,' guard Alex Caruso said. 'We were up 2-0. They lose, they're down 3-0. History says — the numbers say it's pretty much a wrap. This was their Game 7. We didn't do a good job of answering that early.'
Advertisement
Frank young center Chet Holmgren called it an edge. A bloodthirst you could whiff. This feisty, foam-at-the-mouth energy that pushed Minnesota to blow up OKC's offense, stiffen its own defense, and push the Thunder off its block.
'Wherever they wanted to go, they got there,' Holmgren said. '... It's not an X's and O's thing. It's pretty simple.'
Minnesota dropped the most points by a Thunder opponent all season. The next most scored against OKC in the postseason was 121, Denver's output in its Game 1 comeback win. Its once 45-point deficit was also the largest of its season.
OKC and Minnesota's roles in the paint flipped. The Wolves' points there have increased with each game after scoring just 20 in Game 1. They scored 56 points on 62.2% shooting in the paint Saturday.
Advertisement
CARLSON: What can OKC Thunder learn from historic beatdown by Minnesota Timberwolves in Game 3?
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA - MAY 24: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander #2 of the Oklahoma City Thunder drives to the basket against Julius Randle #30 of the Minnesota Timberwolves during the first quarter in Game Three of the Western Conference Finals of the 2025 NBA Playoffs at Target Center on May 24, 2025 in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
The Thunder scored inside at will in Oklahoma City. Multiple 50-plus point games there this series, with bonkers efficiency in Game 2. It logged 42 in Game 3, with 18 of them coming in an inconsequential fourth quarter.
To add insult to identity crisis, OKC lost the turnover battle for the first time in these playoffs, 14-10, notable considering how quickly its steals and ball pressure had unraveled the Wolves through two games.
It all ballooned, a game sent out of hand by an urgent crew.
'We don't try to go out like that, I promise,' Gilgeous-Alexander chuckled.
Advertisement
The difficulty in matching that edge, of trimming Minnesota down by 1,000 Williams cuts or one of SGA's 10 speeds, lies in being unable to keep the Wolves from scoring. Minnesota's set defense was tougher than a popcorn kernel. Impenetrable, with the feedback sending OKC's ball handlers off their paths. The Thunder shot just 40.7% from the field, 31.8% from deep.
Gilgeous-Alexander finished with 14 points — his fewest points in any game this season — while shooting 4 for 13 and committing four turnovers in 27 minutes. Williams, after two games without turnovers, also coughed it up four times, posting just 13 points on 3-of-9 shooting.
Among the things that the fortune cookie likely didn't say: Terrence Shannon Jr. was arguably about as impactful as any Thunder player on Saturday.
The Timberwolves' rookie entered Saturday having scored six points throughout the postseason. In Game 3, he had nine points in his first four minutes alone, a stint worthy of a standing ovation.
Advertisement
Ajay Mitchell, who played the majority of his minutes in the fourth, tied SGA for a team-high 14 points.
TAKEAWAYS: OKC Thunder overwhelmed in Game 3 rout by Anthony Edwards, Timberwolves
At different times from the postgame podium, Holmgren and Williams uttered conflicting statements. Holmgren, a brutal self-critic who would prefer to face the ear-bleeding music, said, 'After a game like that, nobody's thinking 'just throw it away, scrap it.'' Williams, who made note that he lost by 60 points once at Santa Clara, said, 'You just gotta scrap it.'
What they agreed on: Saturday wasn't worth sticking around Target Center.
Advertisement
The Thunder's final bus time on the white board just outside the locker room showers read 10:50 p.m. Those times are typically meaningless, with players lacing their shoes and scrolling their phones well past then on other nights. Mostly wins, though not exclusive to them.
On Saturday, the room was vacated minutes before then. Not one player had the desire to linger in the filth of Game 3.
The Thunder could decide on its Monday fate from the hotel.
'We got punched in the mouth today,' Gilgeous-Alexander said. 'Next game, we're either gonna get back up or not, we'll lose a game. We have a decision to make.'
Advertisement
More: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is the 2024-25 NBA MVP. Here are 10 games that defined his season.
Joel Lorenzi covers the Thunder and NBA for The Oklahoman. Have a story idea for Joel? He can be reached at jlorenzi@oklahoman.com or on X/Twitter at @joelxlorenzi. Sign up for the Thunder Sports Minute newsletter to access more NBA coverage. Support Joel's work and that of other Oklahoman journalists by purchasing a digital subscription today at subscribe.oklahoman.com.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Wolves vs Thunder now a series after rout in Game 3 of West finals
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
26 minutes ago
- USA Today
Should the Boston Celtics take UNC guard Drake Powell in the 2025 NBA draft?
Should the Boston Celtics take UNC guard Drake Powell in the 2025 NBA draft? Should the Boston Celtics take UNC guard Drake Powell in the 2025 NBA draft? The North Carolina swingman might not have had the most productive freshman campaign at first glance (7.4 points, 3.4 rebounds, and 1.1 assists per 25.5 minutes per game with the Tarheels in 2024-25), but Powell has the upside and frame to become a starter-level wing at the NBA level with some skills to help a bit while he grows into a larger role. A fast, athletic guard with size and mobility, he still needs to figure out how to use his natural gifts on the defensive end of the court to maximum effect, and he's already pretty good. And while he hasn't been the most aggressive on the other end, at just 19 years old, he has time to develop his offensive game. Still a bit raw for what Boston might be after, his upside hints at a gamble worth taking for the Celtics if he ends up in their range. The hosts of the CLNS Media "How Bout Them Celtics!" podcast, Jack Simone and Sam LaFrance, took some time on a recent episode of their show to talk it over. Check it out below! If you enjoy this pod, check out the "How Bout Them Celtics," "First to the Floor," and the many other New England sports podcasts available on the CLNS Media network:
Indianapolis Star
30 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
How the Pacers plan to keep Game 4's disappointment from costing them Game 5 vs Thunder
OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla. -- At this stage of the season, Tyrese Haliburton said, simply moving on from defeat is not an option. The Pacers can't try to avoid the sting of what they gave away on Friday night in Game 4 of the NBA Finals when they entered the fourth quarter with a seven-point lead and seemingly all the momentum pushing them toward a 3-1 lead in the series. They were instead outscored 31-17 in the final period to lose 111-104, evening up the series heading toward a pivotal Game 5 in Oklahoma City on Monday night. Between Friday's game and Sunday's media availability, they had no choice but to relive it in excruciating detail. "I think once you get to the playoffs, I don't think it's so much about flushing things," Haliburton said. "You've really got to take every game, see where you did well and see where you can do better and learn from that. I think in the regular season, it's different. You play 82 games. You play a team in Game 10 that you don't see again until Game 60. So, all right, flush it and move on to the next. In the playoffs, it's different. You don't get the right to flush games. You have to learn from everything and watch film and see where you can get better." The Pacers have proven to be very good at that process, which is why they haven't lost two games in a row at any point in these playoffs and why they have a 14-6 record overall in the postseason. In each of the first three series en route to their Eastern Conference championship, they immediately followed a double-figure loss with a double-figure win, yet another data point that speaks to the resilience that has allowed the Pacers to go from being a 25-win lottery team in 2021-22 to an NBA Finals team just three seasons later. "When your back is against the wall, that's typically, I guess, when we show what we're made of," veteran center Myles Turner said. "That's typically where we get our best basketball." The Pacers' backs aren't against the wall quite yet with the series even, but to keep it from getting there they have to find a way to beat the team with the NBA's best regular season record at their place. They pulled it off in Game 1 with a late-game rally that culminated in Haliburton's game-winning jump shot with 0.3 seconds to go. However, the Thunder have lost just two home games in these playoffs and they were 35-6 in the regular season. Counting the regular season and playoffs, they have lost exactly one home game in each calendar month since November, which was the last time they lost two games in the same month. The Pacers' loss in Game 4 means they have to find a way to beat the Thunder a second time in June, either in Game 5 or Game 7 or both, and that will obviously require better offense than they had in the fourth quarter of Game 4. After starting the game on fire with a 35-point first quarter, they wilted in the fourth with 17 points on 5 of 18 shooting including 0 of 8 from 3-point range. It was their lowest scoring quarter since the Eastern Conference semifinals as they posted a horrendous efficiency figure of 0.70 points per possession. The Pacers were fairly guarded about pointing out what exactly went wrong in the period, but repeatedly mentioned the lack of tempo. "Keep playing fast," Turner said. "Keep playing with pace. That's how we play, and that's how we made our mark. It's not coming off our principles." Pacers coach Rick Carlisle noted that their lack of ability to play with pace on offense came in part because of issues on defense. They committed 10 fouls in the fourth quarter that led to 14 Thunder free throws and they also allowed four offensive rebounds that turned into eight second-chance points including a pair of put-back dunks by Thunder center Chet Holmgren. "The problems that hindered us in the fourth quarter were an inability to rebound the ball, unnecessary fouls," Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said. "Those things have us taking the ball out of bounds after they score or having to take it out after a free throw, and then they can really set their defense. Then the game becomes slower. Doing better in those two areas, the rebounding and the fouls, that will help us. But it's a challenge. They put a lot of pressure on you in the fourth quarter. They have got some great, great players that cause major problems." They also have to find a way to better involved one of their best players. All-Star forward Pascal Siakam scored 20 points in the game, but took just one field goal attempt in the fourth quarter and that came with more than 10 minutes remaining. Siakam led the Pacers with 20.2 points per game in the regular season and is averaging 20.6 points per game in the playoffs. He's a threat to score inside and out and is clearly the Pacers' best isolation scoring option because of his ability to score out of the post, either by turning and getting to the rim or hitting turnaround jumpers. "That can't happen," Carlisle said. "He is a guy that if we are not playing through him, he needs to touch the ball more." That's been driven into their heads for two days and on Monday they get a chance to apply it. Neither of the two teams involved in this series has lost back-to-back games in these playoffs and the Pacers are trying not to be the first.
New York Times
38 minutes ago
- New York Times
Efton Chism was the darling of the Patriots' spring. Now, can he make the team?
Editor's note: This is the first story in a 10-part series looking at the most intriguing New England Patriots players ahead of training camp. It's almost a little too on the nose that the Patriots player stealing headlines and turning heads in spring practices is an unheralded, undersized slot receiver from a small school. Advertisement But it's not hyperbole to say that no player did more to improve his standing on the depth chart than Efton Chism. To put it another way, when we came up with the idea for this series in which we'd zoom in on 10 important players ahead of training camp, Chism wasn't even in consideration. Now he's kicking it off. Mike Vrabel praised the 23-year-old as 'a talented player' who is dedicated and 'studied extremely hard.' The head coach noted that it doesn't take long to figure out which receivers quarterbacks trust — 'it's the ones they target,' he said. That clearly means Drake Maye already trusts Chism, given their work together this spring and the 50 catches Maye estimated Chism made. So as the hype train rolls on for the 5-foot-10 receiver, let's look at how Chism got here, what the future might hold and whether this might just be fool's gold in spring sessions that favor receivers. Chism didn't start playing football until eighth grade. Before that, he focused on baseball and basketball. But he quickly took to football. He and his family watched Eastern Washington games, which meant he was frequently watching Cooper Kupp as a kid. His level of comfort with the program is part of the reason he chose to attend college there. Chism broke out as a sophomore, notching 735 receiving yards and nine touchdowns in 13 games, while kicking off a streak of 53 straight games with at least one catch, a mark that broke Kupp's FCS record. He's a slick route runner who easily got open against defenders and led all of the FCS in catches last season with 120 in 12 games. Chism's chances of getting drafted were dampened when he ran a 4.71-second 40-yard dash, but he posted elite numbers in the short shuttle and three-cone drill, which speak to his shiftiness. After going undrafted, he had a number of suitors and signed with the Patriots on a deal that guaranteed him $234,000, a massive haul for an undrafted player. A week away from the draft and even in a deeper WR class, really excited to see where @EWUFootball WR Efton Chism lands. Elite short shuttle (4.06) and three cone (6.77) make up for perceived lack of top-end speed. Here's him as compared to Trent Taylor (5th round pick), Jeremy… — Eric Galko (@EricGalko) April 18, 2025 From the first practice, it was evident Chism was different. Typically, coaches are slow to elevate rookies. But by the time OTAs were halfway complete, Chism was already getting reps with Maye after starting with the third-team offense. He seems like a perfect fit for Josh McDaniels' scheme, which has always utilized shifty slot receivers. McDaniels' offense seems to make up for Chism's lack of top-end speed by having him find soft spots in the coverage and running a bunch of underneath crossing routes. Advertisement Now, it's worth noting that Vrabel wanted cornerbacks to pull up and not go for 50-50 balls during spring practices, but those practices still couldn't have gone much better for Chism. Even if Chism continues to play well in training camp, he has a long way to go to overtake DeMario Douglas on the depth chart. Douglas is the same kind of player as Chism but has more of a track record (he had 621 yards last season) and a lot more speed (he ran a 4.44-second 40). Given the nature of slot receivers, it's unlikely both Douglas and Chism would ever be on the field at the same time. So even if Chism looks more likely than not to make the team at this point, he's still likely to be stuck behind Douglas on the depth chart. Head coaches typically don't hand out the kind of praise in the spring that Vrabel did for Chism. Same for quarterbacks. That's a sign that Chism is more than just a spring darling who will get overwhelmed when the pads come on. If anything, it might be more impressive that Chism was so quickly making an impact in a McDaniels offense that has historically been difficult for rookie receivers to learn. Another reason for optimism is the lack of other options on the depth chart. We're still a long way from cutdown day, but in this rebuild, it seems like Chism brings more long-term potential than a veteran like Kendrick Bourne. Rookie receivers almost always struggle in the first few practices, but Chism's route running was so precise that he was quickly getting open. That could be an especially important trait if the Patriots offensive line struggles and Maye has to quickly get the ball out. As Vrabel stressed several times, OTAs and minicamp are really just a passing clinic. In that environment, shifty slot receivers should stand out. So with Chism, there are two legit concerns. The first is his speed. While he's great in short areas, you'd still like to have slot receivers with some speed — and Douglas is significantly faster. Julian Edelman ran a 4.52-second 40, which is meaningfully faster than Chism. (Edelman also tested much better than Chism in explosive drills like the broad jump and vertical jump.) Advertisement The other area of concern is Chism's durability. He stayed healthy in college, but the physicality in the NFL is a far cry from what he experienced at the FCS level. One of the ugly truths for undrafted guys is you have to stay healthy in training camp to have a chance, so that'll factor into Chism's odds of making the roster, too. In short, can Chism keep this up? If the 53-man roster were based solely on spring practices, Chism would be on the team. But things ramp up in a big way when the pads come on. Can he provide anything as a run blocker? Can he stay healthy? Does his lack of straight-end speed hurt him? Those are all fair questions and reasons to not just pencil Chism onto the roster. Besides, those spring sessions are tailor-made for a player like him. But at the same time, you couldn't have asked for much more than he provided this spring.
