Senate committee moves bill to raise property tax on windmills
Feb. 17—dbeard @dominionpost.com MORGANTOWN — A resurrected state Senate bill that would raise the property tax on windmills cleared the Senate Energy, Industry and Mining Committee on Monday, but not without bipartisan opposition.
SB 439 brings back to life a bill sponsored last year byt then-Energy chair Randy Smith, R-Tucker. Smith is now Senate president and SB 439 is sponsored by current Energy chair Chris Rose, R-Monongalia.
Wind turbines and towers are currently considered pollution control facilities and taxed as personal property at salvage value — 5 % of the original cost based on 79 % of the full value of the property. That 5 % figure depreciates annually. The legislation originated in 2001 and was updated in 2007.
SB 439 would change that to tax wind turbines and towers and the attached components as real property. A fiscal note with last year's bill said it would produce $6.1 million in additional annual revenue: $1.8 million for the General Fund, $2.5 million to the county schools and $1.8 million to the county commissions.
Chris Hall representing Clear Way Energy — a developer and owner of wind, solar, battery and natural gas projects — stood to oppose the bill. He noted that Clear Way has ongoing contracts with such companies as Toyota and Google to supply green power.
Clear Way has 1 gigawatt of wind power in operation and development, he said, with three wind farms in Mineral and Grant Counties, with a total $2.2 billion in current and planned investments, generating $8 million in state and local tax and lease payments.
The company, he said, is planning an $800 million repowering project at its Mount Storm facility in Grant Counti, that will produce $60 million in county taxes over the life of project. The tear-down and rebuild plan will result in 54 fewer turbines. It has received wide community support.
Another $400 million investment is planned for 2026 in Grant and Tucker counties, he said.
"This legislation here would endanger both of those projects, " he said, and undercut the state's reputation for being a stable, reliable business partner.
Hall cautioned bill supporters about changing state policies to react to changes in federal policy that fluctuate form administration to administration.
Sen. Rupie Phillips, R-Logan, noted that many windmill components come from foreign sources. "The bulk of it's not made in America, we know it."
He also said that the tax break isn't offered for coal projects. "In energy, we need to be fair and this isn't fair." Why not put money toward reliable clean coal technology instead of intermittent wind projects ?
Sen. Craig Hart, R-Mingo, raised the issue of companies using wind power to meet their green ESG — environmental, social and governance — requirements.
Hall responded that the motivation isn't the real issue. "We're providing a type of energy that's in demand." These project provide job and tax revenue.
Hart countered that coal makes more jobs. But Hall responded that green companies are investing in current and former coal communities and both types of power can co-exist. "We need every job we can get in West Virginia." They can't stop renewables but they can drive the investment to other states.
Sen. Joey Garcia, D-Marion, the sole Democrat on the committee, opposed the bill, citing jobs. Coal provides many jobs, but, "when those jobs have left, who else is coming ?"
Sen. Glenn Jeffries, R-Putnam, also opposed it, saing West Virginia has touted itself as an all-of-the-above energy state. This bill could drive out more than $1.2 billion in investment. Businesses look for stability.
Some of the conversation hovered around the proportion of wind power in West Virginia and the PJM regional grid. PJM has public policy and fuel economics are driving a capacity shift. Its current fuel mix is 48.4 % natural gas, 22.1 % coal and 18.1 % nuclear. In ht elast half of 2024, wind made up just 3.14 % of its fuel mix.
But new PJM interconnection requests reflect the new greener consciousness: 40 % are solar — 2, 200 projects in queue, totaling 109, 397 megawatts. There are 180 wind projects in queue, totaling 22, 012.6 MW. And there are 50 natural gas projects in queue, totaling 7, 566 MW.
The committee approved the bill in a voice vote. It heads next to Finance, where it died last year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Begich joins U.S. House Republicans in voting to claw back public broadcasting money
Rep. Nick Begich III, R-Alaska, speaks to the Alaska Legislature on Thursday, Feb. 20, 2025. At background are Senate President Gary Stevens, R-Kodiak (left) and Speaker of the House Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham (right). (Photo by James Brooks/Alaska Beacon) Rep. Nick Begich, R-Alaska, joined congressional Republicans in a 214-212 vote Thursday to claw back $1.1 billion in previously approved federal funding for public broadcasting, including tens of millions of dollars intended for radio and TV stations in Alaska. The clawback, formally known as a rescission vote, was requested by President Donald Trump and does not take effect unless also approved by the U.S. Senate within 45 days. The rescission would be enormously significant for Alaska's public broadcasters, particularly those in rural Alaska. High Country News has reported that many of Alaska's rural public radio stations are heavily dependent upon funding from the federal government. A rescission would be even more significant than a budget cut, because it would instantly affect funding that has already been approved and included in local budgets. If Congress were to cut budgets going forward, stations might have at least some time to adapt. Stations on St. Paul Island, in Unalakleet, Sand Point and Talkeetna are among those that receive more than 70% of their funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the federally funded agency targeted by Thursday's vote. Stations in Sitka, Ketchikan, Petersburg and Haines are among those that receive at least a third of their support from the CPB. At KUCB-FM in Unalaska, the station would instantly lose nearly half of its funding and would have to eliminate original programming. The same would take place at KYUK-FM in Bethel, which stands to lose almost 70% of its revenue. On June 6, Alaska Public Media published a listing of knock-on effects, including the loss of the only local reporters in many rural parts of the state. Even in the state's urban centers, the funding loss would have devastating effects. KNBA-FM in Anchorage could have to stop production of National Native News and Native America Calling, two nationally syndicated programs that broadcast Alaska Native and American Indian news. In Juneau, the loss of funding would affect Gavel Alaska, the public broadcasts that cover legislative hearings in the state Capitol and elsewhere. Begich, in a written statement, said the rescissions package is 'a necessary step for restoring fiscal responsibility in our nation.' During his election campaign last year, Alaska's lone member of the U.S. House of Representatives said reducing the national deficit was a priority. He recently voted for a bill that increases the national debt by an estimated $2.4 trillion. In Thursday's statement, Begich said that 'while rural communities have in the past been indirectly supported through state-sponsored media, we must acknowledge how far we have come in terms of connectivity since the birth of radio more than 120 years ago. Alaskan residents have embraced today's pervasive cellular, satellite, and wireline technologies, connecting rural communities to critical information and resources in rich and compelling ways. Importantly, however, emergency management funding from these budgets that is directed to rural communities has been preserved.' In addition to the impact on public broadcasters, the rescissions package eliminates billions of dollars in foreign aid. 'This rescissions package primarily targets ideologically-shaped foreign spending at USAID. Under both the Obama and Biden Administrations, USAID funding was misused to promote political and socially left policies abroad. This package helps refocus our support in ways that are consistent with America's core values, rather than promote the agendas of international bureaucracies and ideological NGOs,' Begich wrote. 'America has been built on principles of freedom of expression, self-determination, sovereignty, personal responsibility, and limited government. This package supports those values by rescinding $9.4 billion from programs that do not reflect the will of the taxpaying public,' his statement said. A poll commissioned by PBS earlier this year found that 65% of the public believes the public broadcaster is either adequately funded or underfunded. In the Senate, a simple majority vote will be needed to approve the rescissions package. Republicans occupy 53 seats in that chamber and Vice President J.D. Vance would cast any tiebreaking vote, meaning that four Republicans would have to oppose the funding reduction for it to fail. U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, has said she supports funding public broadcasting. U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, while critical of NPR, has supported public broadcasting, particularly in rural Alaska. Trump has said that the rescissions request is the first of several that the White House budget office plans to submit. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Significant' expansion of nuclear waste compensation now in Trump's megabill
For years, Republican Sen. Josh Hawley has been the face of a fight in Congress to reauthorize and expand access to the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA), which provides compensation to individuals exposed to nuclear waste. Now, Hawley has announced a breakthrough: reauthorization and expansion of the program in the Senate's version of the "One Big Beautiful Bill." If the Senate's version of the bill is finally adopted, it will include in it the largest expansion of the program since its inception in 1990, allowing individuals in regions of Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky and Alaska, as well as the already-qualified "downwinders" exposed to nuclear radiation from the testing of the atomic bomb, to be compensated for exposure to toxic waste. In an exclusive phone interview with ABC News Thursday night, Hawley called the inclusion of the RECA provisions in the Senate's version of the megabill advancing President Donald Trump's legislative agenda a "huge step forward" in the fight to secure compensation for individuals affected by nuclear exposure. MORE: 5 possible changes that could hold up Trump's 'big beautiful bill' in the Senate "This will be, if we can get the Big Beautiful Bill passed, this will be a huge huge victory," the Missouri Republican said during the phone call. The proposed reauthorization of RECA will be included in the Senate Judiciary Committee's portion of the reconciliation package. In addition to expansion and reauthorization, the proposal also allows for claims to be used for increased levels of atmospheric testing and adds uranium mine workers who worked in the mines from 1971-1990 to be eligible for benefits under the bill. "There will be more to do," Hawley said. "But this is a very very significant expansion." Hawley has been engaged in attempting to reauthorize RECA for several years. Some of his constituents in St. Louis are affected by nuclear waste from the Manhattan Project that is currently stored in the West Lake Landfill in Bridgeton, Missouri. One of those constituents is Dawn Chapman, who lives within miles of the West Lake Landfill and whose son and husband both suffer from autoimmune diseases as a result of exposure to the toxic waste near their home. Chapman has been to Capitol Hill several times over the last few years to advocate for families like hers. "Tonight, we know we are not alone," Chapman told ABC News Thursday. "With the help of Sen. Hawley and our community members as well as our other bipartisan REA family, we have been able to turn the lights back on, and make RECA bigger to cover more communities." For those affected by nuclear exposure, Hawley said he hopes this moment shows that the country is standing beside them. "I think it really is an incredible sign that the country is with them," Hawley said. "I think now this is a measure of vindication. It is a measure of appreciation." MORE: What to know about the national debt debate surrounding Trump's megabill The Senate has twice passed an expansion and reauthorization of RECA with bipartisan support, but the bill has failed to gain traction in the House, in part due to concerns about the very high price tag originally estimated by the Congressional Budget Office. That price tag has been refuted by proponents of the bill, and they've taken steps to modify it to lower the cost. With further review and with programs set to sunset in 2028, the price tag should, Hawley said, fit well within the funds allocated to the Judiciary Committee to craft their portion of the reconciliation package. The CBO has not yet scored this portion of the package. The Senate will still need to maneuver these provisions through the Senate's procedural rules test as well as the finnicky Senate GOP conference, but Hawley said Majority Leader John Thune has been an ally in including the RECA language in the package. Thune's support could be critical to keeping the language in the bill. "It would not be in this mark were it not for him and his commitment to putting it into reconciliation. He has been a terrific partner," Hawley said. House Speaker Mike Johnson has also conveyed that he "wants to pass the RECA bill," Hawley said. Inclusion in the bill would make it difficult for House Republicans to reject RECA provisions, given that the package is massive and includes many other GOP priorities. Hawley said he has spoken with Trump about the move to include this legislation in the tax and immigration bill. "He's been very involved in everything, and he and I have talked about the RECA program before on many occasions, we are glad for his involvement in all of this," Hawley said of his conversations with Trump. 'Significant' expansion of nuclear waste compensation now in Trump's megabill originally appeared on
44 minutes ago
Hawley says his effort to expand nuclear waste compensation program will be included in Trump's megabill
For years, Republican Sen. Josh Hawley has been the face of a fight in Congress to reauthorize and expand access to the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA), which provides compensation to individuals exposed to nuclear waste. Now, Hawley has announced a breakthrough: reauthorization and expansion of the program in the Senate's version of the "One Big Beautiful Bill." If the Senate's version of the bill is finally adopted, it will include in it the largest expansion of the program since its inception in 1990, allowing individuals in regions of Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky and Alaska, as well as the already-qualified "downwinders" exposed to nuclear radiation from the testing of the atomic bomb, to be compensated for exposure to toxic waste. In an exclusive phone interview with ABC News Thursday night, Hawley called the inclusion of the RECA provisions in the Senate's version of the megabill advancing President Donald Trump's legislative agenda a "huge step forward" in the fight to secure compensation for individuals affected by nuclear exposure. "This will be, if we can get the Big Beautiful Bill passed, this will be a huge huge victory," the Missouri Republican said during the phone call. The proposed reauthorization of RECA will be included in the Senate Judiciary Committee's portion of the reconciliation package. In addition to expansion and reauthorization, the proposal also allows for claims to be used for increased levels of atmospheric testing and adds uranium mine workers who worked in the mines from 1971-1990 to be eligible for benefits under the bill. "There will be more to do," Hawley said. "But this is a very very significant expansion." Hawley has been engaged in attempting to reauthorize RECA for several years. Some of his constituents in St. Louis are affected by nuclear waste from the Manhattan Project that is currently stored in the West Lake Landfill in Bridgeton, Missouri. One of those constituents is Dawn Chapman, who lives within miles of the West Lake Landfill and whose son and husband both suffer from autoimmune diseases as a result of exposure to the toxic waste near their home. Chapman has been to Capitol Hill several times over the last few years to advocate for families like hers. "Tonight, we know we are not alone," Chapman told ABC News Thursday. "With the help of Sen. Hawley and our community members as well as our other bipartisan REA family, we have been able to turn the lights back on, and make RECA bigger to cover more communities." For those affected by nuclear exposure, Hawley said he hopes this moment shows that the country is standing beside them. "I think it really is an incredible sign that the country is with them," Hawley said. "I think now this is a measure of vindication. It is a measure of appreciation." The Senate has twice passed an expansion and reauthorization of RECA with bipartisan support, but the bill has failed to gain traction in the House, in part due to concerns about the very high price tag originally estimated by the Congressional Budget Office. That price tag has been refuted by proponents of the bill, and they've taken steps to modify it to lower the cost. With further review and with programs set to sunset in 2028, the price tag should, Hawley said, fit well within the funds allocated to the Judiciary Committee to craft their portion of the reconciliation package. The CBO has not yet scored this portion of the package. The Senate will still need to maneuver these provisions through the Senate's procedural rules test as well as the finnicky Senate GOP conference, but Hawley said Majority Leader John Thune has been an ally in including the RECA language in the package. Thune's support could be critical to keeping the language in the bill. "It would not be in this mark were it not for him and his commitment to putting it into reconciliation. He has been a terrific partner," Hawley said. House Speaker Mike Johnson has also conveyed that he "wants to pass the RECA bill," Hawley said. Inclusion in the bill would make it difficult for House Republicans to reject RECA provisions, given that the package is massive and includes many other GOP priorities. Hawley said he has spoken with Trump about the move to include this legislation in the tax and immigration bill. "He's been very involved in everything, and he and I have talked about the RECA program before on many occasions, we are glad for his involvement in all of this," Hawley said of his conversations with Trump.
