Voter turnout exceeds 79%, highest in 28 years
More than 79 percent of eligible voters had cast their ballots by the time polls closed on Tuesday, marking the highest turnout since the 1997 presidential election, according to the National Election Commission.
The polls were open between 6 a.m. and 8 p.m. on Election Day — two hours longer than usual, as stipulated for early elections. Including last week's two days of early voting, 35,240,416 out of 44,391,871 eligible voters cast their ballots, amounting to 79.4 percent, the NEC reported. The turnout was 2.3 percentage points higher than during the same period in the 2022 presidential election.
By region, Gwangju posted the highest turnout at 83.9 percent, while Jeju Province recorded the lowest at 74.6 percent. Seoul reported 80.1 percent turnout.
South Korea marked its highest voter turnout in 1987 at 89.2 percent — the same year direct presidential elections were introduced under the reforms of the 1987 Constitution. The last time turnout exceeded 80 percent was in 1997, when 80.7 percent of voters participated and opposition leader Kim Dae-jung defeated ruling party candidate Lee Hoi-chang.
Turnout then steadily declined, falling as low as 63 percent in 2007. It only rebounded to 77.1 percent in 2022, when then-candidate Yoon Suk Yeol defeated Lee Jae-myung, who was this election's front-runner.
The June 3 election was held to fill the leadership vacuum triggered by the impeachment and removal of former President Yoon, following his controversial declaration of martial law on Dec. 3, 2024.
Of all eligible voters, 34.74 percent cast their ballots in early voting last week on Thursday and Friday — the second-highest early voting turnout recorded in a presidential race, just behind the 36.93 percent logged in the 2022 presidential election. The early turnout figure also includes overseas, absentee and onboard voting.
After the polls closed, ballot boxes were transported to counting centers, where vote counting began immediately.
The NEC projected that 70 to 80 percent of votes would be counted by midnight, likely providing a clear indication of the winner. In the closely contested 2022 election, Yoon emerged as the clear winner at around 2 a.m. the next day. In the 2017 election, Moon Jae-in's lead was evident as early as 10 p.m. on election night.
Detailed turnout information is available on the NEC's official website at info.nec.go.kr.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
Probe bills into Yoon, wife pass National Assembly
Presidential office says 'there is very little reason' to veto them The ruling Democratic Party of Korea-controlled National Assembly on Thursday passed contentious bills mandating special counsel probes into charges and scandals surrounding former President Yoon Suk Yeol and his wife, Kim Keon Hee. Three probe bills reintroduced by the Democratic Party were approved during a parliamentary plenary vote held in the afternoon. One pushes to launch a permanent special counsel to investigate 11 charges tied to Yoon's failed martial bid in December; another seeks to mainly investigate Kim's alleged inappropriate interference in the People Power Party's candidate nomination process in previous general and by-elections as well as her luxury bag scandal; the third looks into the allegations that the Yoon administration interfered in the military's investigation into a young Marine's death in 2023. All three bills were passed in a 194-3 vote with one abstention, in a package deal. The move came a day after President Lee Jae-myung, who was the Democratic Party Chair, was sworn into office. He won Tuesday's early election, securing 49.42 percent of the vote against his rival and People Power Party candidate Kim Moon-soo, who saw 41.15 percent. Lee was highly likely to approve and endorse the bills, as an official at the presidential office said, 'there is very little reason' to veto them, with all three 'receiving People's support,' in a press briefing after the plenary vote. People Power Party, which became the main opposition party on Wednesday, highlighted its party line against the passage of the bills ahead of the plenary vote. The majority of the party lawmakers boycotted all three votes. All three bills passed on Thursday had previous versions that were scrapped by former President Yoon's veto power. The bill mandating a permanent special counsel investigation against Yoon will look into 11 different charges tied to his martial law bid, including insurrection and military mutiny. The previous versions of the bill were vetoed and scrapped twice. The latest version expanded the scope of the charges from six to 11. Special counsel candidates will be nominated by the Democratic Party and the minor liberal Rebuilding Korea Party, from the parliament's side. The bill also eases regulations to access presidential archives. It lowers the threshold from the current approval needed from two-thirds of lawmakers or from a high court chief judge to three-fifths of the Assembly or permission from a district court chief judge. The bill concerning the first lady will look into her alleged role in a stock manipulation scandal as well as the inappropriate acceptance of a luxury bag from a Korean-American pastor and election-related scandals involving political broker Myung Tae-kyun. An amendment passed alongside the bills expands the scope of the number of assistant special prosecutors from four to seven and raises the cap on dispatched prosecutors from 40 to 60.
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
How much is enough to raise a child in South Korea?
We asked 6 young parents about realistic, necessary costs of parenthood South Korea's dwindling birth rate has become something of a global curiosity and a national crisis, making frequent headlines. Yet behind the statistics lies a quieter, more personal calculus — one that plays out in the homes of young adults weighing whether to have a child. More often than not, the key factor is cost. So how much do young parents — or would-be parents — believe it takes to raise a child in South Korea today? And what feels realistic, or essential? To find out, we spoke with six parents in their 30s living in Seoul and surrounding areas. Here's what they had to say. 'Need more to be a better mother, daughter' Cho Min-jung, a mother of two daughters, ages 2 and 4, living in Gyeonggi Province, wishes she could spend around 3 million won ($2,200) per child monthly. 'If I had more money, I think I'd travel more with my kids. For those once-in-a-lifetime experiences, I'd probably make the decision more easily,' she said. For now, she is grateful for the simpler joys. 'They're happy just running around Yuldong Park,' she said. 'But they'll grow up, and things will change. They can't spend forever just running around, blowing dandelions.' Cho also hopes to give more back to her own mother, who currently lives with her and looks after the children while Cho works. She pays her mother 1 million won a month for the help, which she said is far less than the 2 million won a babysitter would typically charge for just one child. 'If I had more money, I'd pay my mom more,' she said. 'I'm really a bad daughter.' Lee Eun-ji, a mother in Seoul raising a 3-year-old girl, said the ideal amount to spend on raising a child would be one parent's salary. For her, that's about 4 million won a month. 'Every meaningful childhood experience comes with a cost,' she said. She recalled feeling guilty when she learned that other parents were able to enroll their children in Montessori programs, which focus on self-directed learning and hands-on activities. 'I wanted that kind of exposure for my child, but it costs 500,000 won for just 12 classes. It was too much,' she said. Instead, she began taking her daughter on weekend outings. But even those are not cheap. 'A trip to Lotte World (amusement park in Seoul) followed by dinner can easily cost more than 100,000 in a single day,' she said. 'Child's needs change, but cost don't shrink' 'If I were to provide everything I want for my child, I'd need about 5 million won a month,' said Park Na-hyun, the mother of a 4-year-old son, living in Seoul. She explained that as children grow, the types of expenses change, but the financial burden remains constant. For example, when her son was an infant, Park's husband worked in a city far from Seoul during the week, leaving her to manage child care on her own. To cope, the couple hired a live-in babysitter from Monday to Thursday, which cost nearly 4 million won per month. Now that their child is older, the spending has shifted. 'Now, we don't have a babysitter since my mother-in-law is helping take care of him. Clothing and toys come to just under 1 million won a month. Piano and swimming lessons add another 350,000 to 400,000,' she said. 'And I feel like the financial pressure is only going to grow from here.' Park plans to enroll her son in an English immersive preschool that charges 2.5 million won a month. Once he starts kindergarten, she also plans to hire a babysitter for after-school care, since classes usually end before she finishes work. 'Really, the more, the better' Asked about the costs of raising his 3-year-old son, Choi Jun-seo did not hesitate. He began itemizing what he considered to be the ideal monthly budget. 'The babysitter costs 1.8 million won a month. For clothing, it would be nice to have about 200,000 won. Food comes to around 500,000. Toys and education are about 250,000. And for experiences like kids' cafes or shows? Maybe another 250,000,' he said. Altogether, his estimate totaled approximately 3 million won per month. 'It would also be good to have an extra 300,000 set aside, for insurance or maybe a pension plan for my kid,' he added. 'Really, the more, the better.' 'Manageable for now, but worried about what's ahead' For Kim, the father of an 8-month-old baby, the cost of parenting feels manageable for now. 'I don't need much,' he said. 'Right after the birth, we spent a lot on baby supplies, but these days we probably spend around 1 million won a month.' That amount covers everything his child currently needs, including formula, baby food, diapers and other basic essentials. But Kim is already looking ahead and worrying. 'I think the real financial burden will start around age 5, when my son begins English-language preschool,' he said. "An extra 2 to 3 million won would be needed." Even so, Kim plans to send his son to one. 'I used to be against the idea,' he said. But after spending time with other moms and dads, he changed his mind on the notion that everyone else seems to be planning to send their kids to English-language preschool before elementary school. 'I mean, I don't expect my kid to be at the top of the class, but I don't want him to be at the bottom either. I worry all the other kids will already speak English, and mine won't. I'm afraid he'll fall behind.' Han, an elementary school teacher and the mother of a 6-year-old son, describes herself as a relatively frugal parent. 'It's hard to pinpoint the ideal amount to spend,' she said. 'You could spend endlessly, but you can also spend moderately and still be fine. I'd say around 2 million won.' Her son attends a private kindergarten that costs 400,000 won a month. He also takes piano lessons twice a week and art lessons once a week. These academies each cost about 130,000 to 150,000 won a month. Han doesn't feel guilty about not doing more, but she understands why some parents might. 'I get it,' she said. 'It feels like most moms are doing so much for their kids, and if you're not, you feel like you're in the minority. So it's natural to compare.' For now, the financial strain feels manageable. 'I really want to say that it's not overwhelming,' she added. 'I'm pregnant with my second child right now, which I think proves the point.'
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Is foreign appetite for housing a threat to Korea?
Residential properties owned by foreign nationals surpass 100,000 in 2024 Foreign nationals are increasingly entering the housing market, and their growing presence is beginning to raise questions about the future of housing access, investment behavior and regulatory oversight. Over the past three years, the number of homes owned by foreign buyers has steadily increased, rising by 4 to 6 percent every six months. Recently, the trend reached a new milestone. As of late December, foreign nationals owned more than 100,000 housing units in South Korea — the first time the figure has crossed that threshold since the government began tracking it in 2022, according to data from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Though these properties comprise only about 0.5 percent of South Korea's roughly 20 million housing units, the uptick has prompted questions about whether some purchases are being made for investment purposes rather than for residential use. Regulatory gaps for non-residents have also been a point of discussion. The available data provides a broad snapshot but leaves out key details. It does not distinguish between buyers who reside in Korea and those who may be investing from overseas. Nor does it track the motivations behind purchases — whether for long-term living, rental income or speculation. Foreign residents who have stayed in Korea for more than 90 days now number over 2 million, suggesting that, proportionally, foreign ownership remains relatively modest. Still, patterns within the data reveal some concentration. Chinese nationals accounted for the largest share of foreign-owned homes, followed by US and Canadian citizens. The capital region is by far the most popular area for foreign buyers. Nearly three-quarters of all foreign-owned homes are located in the greater Seoul area, with more than 23,000 properties situated within the city itself. Most foreign homeowners — about 93 percent — own just one home. However, a small number hold multiple properties, including 461 individuals who own five or more units, which some see as a potential sign of investment activity. As the trend continues, policymakers and analysts are watching closely, not because the numbers are overwhelming, but because of the broader implications — from housing availability to the effectiveness of existing oversight mechanisms. Dodging the rulebook Some argue that foreign nationals may have an easier time acquiring real estate in South Korea by securing financing from lenders in their home countries, a strategy that could allow them to bypass Korea's stringent loan regulations. Certified transcripts — documents required when purchasing land or housing in Korea — show instances of foreign buyers acquiring high-end properties at record-high prices, often paid in full with cash. 'Foreigners take out loans from overseas banks to purchase housing here, distorting the local real estate market,' said Kwon Dae-jung, a professor of real estate at Sogang University's Graduate School. Others, however, argue that the practice is likely limited in scope, as obtaining loans for overseas property purchases can be difficult. 'Securing a loan in a foreign country to buy residential property in Korea would not be easy, unless the buyer is extremely wealthy,' said an official at a local real estate investment firm. 'Even in commercial real estate, offshore investors usually prefer to finance through local banks. For residential housing, cross-border financing tends to be even more difficult.' Foreign nationals are subject to the same borrowing limits at Korean banks as local citizens, including regulations based on loan-to-value and debt-to-income ratios. Still, completely closing off regulatory loopholes remains a challenge. While Korea imposes heavier taxes on multi-homeowners, enforcing these rules among foreign nationals can be challenging, particularly in identifying household members living abroad. Calls for tightened grip Regulatory efforts to manage demand from foreign homebuyers in Korea continue to gain traction, with some measures targeting Chinese nationals — the largest group of foreign property owners in the country. In May, Rep. Ko Dong-jin of the ruling People Power Party proposed a bill that would introduce a permit system for foreign nationals seeking to purchase property in the greater Seoul area. Citing the principle of reciprocity, Ko argued that Chinese nationals' access to Korean real estate should be limited, pointing out that South Koreans face similar restrictions when attempting to purchase property in China. Ko's proposal is part of a broader, bipartisan push by lawmakers in recent years to tighten regulations on foreign ownership. Other initiatives have included calls for higher acquisition taxes and stricter property-related rules for non-Korean buyers. However, none of these measures have passed the legislative threshold. Legal experts argue that regulating property purchases by nationality could violate the constitutional principle of reciprocity. Despite the legal challenges, authorities are continuing their efforts to monitor and respond to growing concerns. On Monday, Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon ordered a comprehensive investigation into real estate transactions involving foreign nationals. He called for a full review of foreign ownership patterns and proposed additional safeguards to prevent potential market distortions or what he described as 'reverse discrimination' against Korean citizens. Although there is currently no conclusive evidence that foreign homeownership is driving instability in the housing market, officials remain wary. 'The government has to figure out a way to strengthen measures to track down foreign purchases of local residential properties. Otherwise, the rising foreign demand will drive up further market distortion," Kwon said.
