Appeals court sides with Trump on National Guard deployment in LA
The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has sided with President Donald Trump after California Governor Gavin Newsom sued his administration for deploying 4,000 National Guard troops during mass anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles that erupted earlier this month.
'We conclude that it is likely that the president lawfully exercised his statutory authority' by deploying the Guard, the appeals court wrote in a ruling late Thursday.
The judges cited a federal law allowing the federalization of the Guard when 'the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.'
Additionally, the judges wrote that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth notifying the Adjutant General of the California National Guard, 'likely satisfied the statute's procedural requirement that federalization orders be issued 'through' the Governor.'
The appeals court order indefinitely blocks a previous order from U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer.
Breyer ruled last Thursday that Trump's actions 'were illegal—both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.'
'He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith,' the judge wrote.
The Trump administration quickly appealed Breyer's order, prompting the appeals court to temporarily pause the ruling the same night Breyer handed it down.
During a previous hearing before Breyer, an attorney for California claimed the Trump administration was attempting a 'dangerous expansion of executive power' with its deployment of the Guard.
Trump's team argued that the president rightfully used his powers as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, and it communicated its orders to the state official responsible for the Guard.
At one point in the hearing, Breyer suggested political leaders making decisions without checks and balances were more like the king against whom the 13 colonies revolted during the American Revolution.
'That's the difference between a Constitutional government and King George,' Breyer said, per Politico. 'It's not that a leader can simply say something and it becomes it.'
The Independent's Alex Woodward contributed reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vogue
12 minutes ago
- Vogue
Lynn Loves Jewelry: Multicolored Creations to Show Up for Pride Month
It's Pride Month! In 1978, Harvey Milk, the first openly gay man to win elected office in the United States, urged the artist Gilbert Baker to create a flag that would celebrate the diversity of the LGBT community. (If Milk's name rings a bell at the moment, it may be because in a viciously reactionary but hardly surprising development, the Trump administration has moved to strip his name from the US naval ship Harvey Milk, bestowed in honor of the Navy veteran and San Francisco politician who was assassinated in 1978.) The rainbow flag had humble beginnings: Thirty volunteers helped Baker hand-dye and stitch the first two in the top-floor attic gallery of the Gay Community Center in San Francisco. The design has undergone several revisions since, but the most common version is composed of six stripes, with the colors red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and violet. Which brings us to the exquisite rainbow-hued jewelry we feature here. You might think that wearing multicolored baubles is a trivial way to commemorate a historic human rights struggle, but think about it—maybe your watermelon tourmaline ring or dazzling dripping earrings will provoke a conversation about the Stonewall uprising, that night 56 years ago that gave birth to the modern LGBTQ+ movement? Here is how the eminent author Edmund White, who passed away earlier this month, described the Stonewall rebellion: 'Up till that moment we had all thought that homosexuality was a medical term. Suddenly we saw that we could be a minority group—with rights, a culture, an agenda.' Rights, a culture, an agenda—what could be more important this year than fighting fiercely to defend and extend those freedoms? Among our suggestions this month, we feature Eden Presley's Believe in Love pendant—a flying piggy with pavé rainbow sapphire wings. Before Stonewall, the idea that a gay rights movement could even exist—let alone flourish—was as likely as an airborne porker. But as Representative Sarah McBride, the first trans member of Congress has observed, 'Change always seems impossible until it's inevitable.' Happy Pride. Rings Bracelets Earrings Necklaces
Washington Post
19 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Olympic president Kirsty Coventry starts work with strong IOC and challenges for Los Angeles Games
GENEVA — The world Kirsty Coventry walks into Monday as the International Olympic Committee's first female and first African president is already very different to the one she was elected in three months ago. Take Los Angeles, host of the next Summer Games that is the public face and financial foundation of most Olympic sports. The city described last week as a 'trash heap' by U.S. President Donald Trump is preparing to welcome teams from more than 200 nations in July 2028. Most of the 11,000 athletes and thousands more coaches and officials who will take part in the LA Olympics will have seen images of military being deployed against the wishes of city and state leaders. A growing number of those athletes' home countries face being on a Trump-directed travel ban list — including Coventry's home Zimbabwe — though Olympic participants are promised exemptions to come to the U.S. Several players from Senegal's women's basketball team were denied visas for a training trip to the U.S., the country's prime minister said. A first face-to-face meeting with Trump is a priority for the new IOC president, perhaps at a sports event. Welcome to Olympic diplomacy, the outgoing IOC president Thomas Bach could reasonably comment to his political protégé Coventry. The six Olympic Games of Bach's 12 years were rocked by Russian doping scandals and military aggression, Korean nuclear tensions , a global health crisis and corruption-fueled Brazilian chaos . Still, Coventry inherits an IOC with a solid reputation and finances after a widely praised 2024 Paris Olympics, plus a slate of summer and winter hosts for the next decade . Risks and challenges ahead are clear to see. For the two-time Olympic champion swimmer's first full day as president Tuesday she has invited the 109-strong IOC membership to closed-doors meetings about its future under the banner 'Pause and Reflect.' 'The way in which I like to lead is with collaboration,' said Coventry, who was sports minister in Zimbabwe for the past seven years, told reporters Thursday. Many, if not most, members want more say in how the IOC makes decisions after nearly 12 years of Bach's tight executive control. It was a theme in manifestos by the other election candidates , and the runner-up in March, IOC vice president Juan Antonio Samaranch , will lead one of the sessions. 'I like people to say: 'Yes, I had a say and this was the direction that we went,'' Coventry said. 'That way, you get really authentic buy-in.' In an in-house IOC interview, Coventry also described how she wanted to be perceived: 'She never changed. Always humble, always approachable.' That could mean more member input, if not an open and contested vote, to decide the 2036 Olympics host. Coventry's win was widely seen as positive for the ambitions of India, and its richest family, to host the Summer Games that will follow Los Angeles in 2028 and Brisbane in 2032. Nita Ambani, the philanthropist wife of industrialist Mukesh Ambani, has been an IOC member since 2016 and helped promote India's Olympic bid in Paris last year. She and Coventry are seen as being close, and the 2036 hosting award is among the biggest decisions pending. 'It is an open question,' Coventry told reporters Thursday. 'For me as a president I need to be able to remain neutral.' Qatar is bidding for the Summer Games for a fourth time and Saudi Arabia also is interested. A regional Middle East bid could be a political and logistical solution. A Bach legacy is the policy of fast-tracking well-connected bidders into exclusive negotiations toward a rubber-stamp vote by IOC members. At some point in Coventry's presidency, Russia could possibly return fully to the Olympic family. It is unclear exactly when less than eight months before the 2026 Winter Games opening ceremony in Milan. Russian athletes have faced a wider blanket ban in winter sports than summer ones during the military invasion of Ukraine. Even neutral status for individual Russians to compete looks elusive. Vladimir Putin offered 'sincere congratulations' on Coventry's election win, with the Kremlin praising her 'high authority in the sporting world.' However, there seems little scope for the IOC to lift its formal suspension of the Russian Olympic Committee imposed in 2023 because of a territorial grab in sports administration. Four regional sports bodies in eastern Ukraine were taken under Russian control. Coventry said she will ask a task force to review IOC policy relating to athletes from countries involved in wars and conflicts. The first Summer Games under a female presidency will be the first with a majority of athlete quota places for women. Another task force is promised to look at gender eligibility issues, after the turmoil around women's boxing and two gold medalists in Paris. The new World Boxing governing body said last month it will introduce mandatory sex testing. Coventry often states the importance of 'Olympic Values,' which include gender parity, inclusion and inspiring young people through sports. 'That is something that we can never, never, never compromise. And we have to be proud of that.' The top-tier Olympic sponsor program might have peaked in Paris with 15 partners earning the IOC more than $1.6 billion in cash and services over the past two years. The sponsor slate is down to 11 after all three Japanese sponsors and US tech firm Intel did not renew, though a major new backer from India is all-but promised. Total revenue was $7.7 billion for 2021-24, including $3.25 billion of broadcasting revenue in 2024. It helps fund the Olympic Channel media operation in Madrid and about 700 staff in Lausanne. Salary and staff costs topped $250 million last year. Though the future broadcasting landscape is hard to predict, the IOC has said $7.4 billion already is secured through 2028, and $4 billion for the 2033-36 commercial cycle. That sum was topped up in March with a foundational $3 billion deal. NBC renewed for two more Olympics through the 2034 Salt Lake City Winter Games and the 2036 Summer Games that look destined for Asia. The IOC also has a 12-year deal with Saudi Arabia through 2036 to host a video gaming Esports Olympics, though the launch is delayed until at least 2027. ___ AP Olympics:
San Francisco Chronicle
19 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump can keep control of National Guard in L.A., court rules
President Donald Trump appears to have acted legally in taking control of the California National Guard and sending thousands of its soldiers to the streets in Los Angeles to combat immigration protesters and protect government property, a federal appeals court ruled, allowing the troops to remain in action. Under legal standards that require 'deference' to the president's decisions, it is 'likely' that Trump 'lawfully exercised his statutory authority' based on a law that 'authorizes federalization of the National Guard when the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States,' the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said in a 3-0 ruling late Thursday. The panel consisted of two Trump appointees, Judges Mark Bennett and Eric Miller, plus Judge Jennifer Sung, appointed by President Joe Biden. The ruling extends an order the court issued June 12 blocking a decision earlier that day by U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer of San Francisco that found Trump had acted illegally and ordered removal of 4,000 National Guard troops from Los Angeles streets. Trump said he took action after violent protests against workplace raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents injured officers and destroyed federal property. A lawsuit by Gov. Gavin Newsom contended, and Breyer agreed, that local and state police had conditions under control. But the appeals court said there was enough evidence of violence to support Trump's decision, under the deferential standards of federal law. The day before the president issued his order, 'there is evidence that … protesters threw objects at ICE vehicles trying to complete a law enforcement operation, pinned down several (federal) officers defending federal property by throwing 'concrete chunks, bottles of liquid, and other objects,' and used 'large rolling commercial dumpsters as a battering ram' in an attempt to breach the parking garage of a federal building,'' the panel said, quoting court filings by the Trump administration. 'Federal property has been damaged and federal employees have been injured,' the court said. 'The Constitution assigns the power to 'call forth the Militia' to Congress, and Congress has delegated portions of that power to the President.' Federal law also requires a president who wants to take control of a state's National Guard to issue any such orders 'through' the state's governor. California's lawsuit contended the law gives Newsom authority to decide whether to federalize the guard, and that Trump had failed to consult with the governor or seek his approval. But the appeals court said the president had complied with the law by notifying California's adjutant general, the guard's commanding officer, who reports to Newsom. The panel rejected one of the Trump administration's arguments — that courts had no authority to determine the legality of the president's orders because the case raised political questions that are immune from judicial review. But the court said the administration's overall position was supported by an 1827 Supreme Court case, Martin v. Mott, that said a member of the New York state militia could be prosecuted for refusing President James Madison's order to join U.S. troops in the War of 1812. Under that ruling and subsequent cases that followed it, the panel said, 'we must give a great level of deference to the President's determination' that conditions in Los Angeles justified calling up National Guard troops. Breyer held a brief hearing Friday and told lawyers for the state and the federal government to file arguments by Monday on an issue not addressed by the appeals court: the possible application of the Posse Comitatus Act, an 1878 federal law that generally forbids the use of military troops for civilian law enforcement. It could be used to challenge the Trump administration's decision to send 700 U.S. Marines to join the National Guard troops in Los Angeles. While Breyer acknowledged that the 9th Circuit panel had rejected his order to remove the National Guard from the city streets, he said those commissions are normally limited to 60 days, and asked the opposing lawyers for arguments on whether and how that time period could be extended. 'The President is not a king and is not above the law,' the governor said. 'We will press forward with our challenge to President Trump's authoritarian use of U.S. military soldiers against citizens.' Attorney General Rob Bonta, whose office represents Newsom in the suit, said the ruling was disappointing, but 'this case is far from over.' In Los Angeles, 'our state and local law enforcement officers responded effectively to isolated episodes of violence at otherwise peaceful protests and the President deliberately sought to create the very chaos and crises he claimed to be addressing,' Bonta said in a statement. 'While the court did not provide immediate relief for Angelenos today, we remain confident in our arguments and will continue the fight.' The court's decision was criticized by the leader of a religious advocacy group, People Improving Communities through Organizing, which is taking part in protests against immigration raids. 'Regardless of what three judges say about the legality of unleashing the National Guard on peaceful protestors, its immorality was affirmed the moment President Trump made this decision,' said Joseph Tomás McKellar, executive director of PICO in California, in a statement. 'While we respect the rule of law, we'll keep fighting until these inhumane immigration raids stop.'
