
Judge rules 'Jay Baker'-related records lawsuit against city of Santa Fe may proceed
A state district judge Tuesday ruled a lawsuit against the city of Santa Fe over public records tied to pseudonymous Facebook gossipmonger "Jay Baker" can move forward, despite the city's motion seeking dismissal of the case.
Attorney Ken Stalter — who had represented a plaintiff in a similar civil case — alleges the city failed to release all Baker-related records in response to his request.
Baker is known for stirring the pot with scathing social media assessments — some of them libelous — about local officials, candidates for public office and others. Posts on the character's popular Facebook account drew an ethics complaint in 2023 accusing him of buying digital ads during the municipal election criticizing City Council candidates in violation of campaign finance laws. This prompted the city to spend more than $5,000 on an investigation aimed at discovering the identity of the person or people behind the controversial posts.
A Santa Fe resident's request for public records related to the ethics complaint — and the fruitless search for Baker's true identity — led to a lawsuit alleging, like Stalter's complaint, the city hadn't turned over all documents tied to the request. The city agreed to a financial settlement with that plaintiff.
Assistant City Attorney Kevin Nault argued in court Tuesday that Stalter was acting in "bad faith" because he had filed multiple records complaints against the city, including some mirroring those of clients he has represented.
Stalter's complaint should be thrown out in part because he improperly named the city as the defendant instead of naming the records custodian, as required by law, Nault said.
He argued Stalter's request to amend the complaint to name the custodian as the defendant should be denied.
Stalter's attorney, David Demic, argued Tuesday it was "legal fiction" the records custodian was separate from the city, which would ultimately represent her. He also argued Stalter should be allowed to amend the complaint and have it decided on its merits rather than the technicality.
"It does not matter if Mr. Stalter brings one claim, 15 claims or 100 claims," Demic said, adding what matters was the merits of each case.
Judge Bryan Biedscheid ruled in favor of Stalter, denying the city's motion to dismiss the suit, and granted Stalter's motion to amend the complaint.
Other issues raised by the parties could be explored as the case moves forward, the judge said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stars, stitches and stripes: Africa's top shots
A selection of the week's best photos from across the African continent and beyond: Unpacking the South African land law that so inflames Trump On the hunt for Tiger, the fugitive linked to illegal gold mine where 78 died Inside the world's worst country to give birth Go to for more news from the African continent. Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica Focus on Africa This Is Africa

Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Highlands to see increased LMPD patrols after Memorial Day weekend crowd shuts down street
Louisville Metro council member Ben Reno-Weber is promising changes to policing habits in the Highlands neighborhood after hundreds of people swarmed Bardstown Road near Grinstead Drive early May 25, blocking traffic and causing disturbances in the area. In a May 29 news release, Reno-Weber condemned the group's activity, which resulted in Louisville Metro Police having to clear the street. "The behavior we witnessed by groups of people in our district this weekend was completely unacceptable," the statement reads. "Blocking traffic, preventing emergency vehicles from passing through and disturbing neighbors trying to sleep is not how we celebrate a holiday weekend in the Highlands." LMPD received a call reporting the crowd and people doing burnouts in the street at around 3:20 a.m., spokesperson John Bradley said. When officers arrived, they found several hundred people in the vicinity fully blocking the area. A Facebook video shows people surrounding a car with a man standing up through the sunroof, saying, 'We can't move.' The group dispersed willingly when police arrived and no violence occurred, Bradley said. The road was cleared by 4:10 a.m. Many bars surround the area where the crowd broke out, including Highlands Tap Room, Chill Bar Highlands, Atomic Sound Club & Game Yard and The Hub Louisville, some of which are open as late as 4 a.m. on the weekends. "We welcome everyone to enjoy the Highlands for its legendary hospitality, amazing food, and great vibe, but we expect that enjoyment to be responsible and respectful," Reno-Weber said in his statement. Reno-Weber said he is working with LMPD to assign a detail squad to Bardstown Road on Friday and Saturday nights to "saturate the area during times when large gatherings are most likely." LMPD announced at a Highlands Commerce Guild meeting that the department will be taking additional steps to increase police presence and deter crime in the Highlands neighborhood, including closing and limiting access to some parking lots, installing more surveillance cameras and working directly with local business owners to prevent trespassing. LMPD said it encourages business owners affected by local disturbances to file a Trespass Enforcement Request Form, which authorizes officers to address trespassing without an on-site complaint. 'We have seen a significant drop in crime and revival of business in this area over the last two years by focusing on hot spots, partnering with neighbors, and working closely with LMPD and [Alcoholic Beverage Control],' Reno-Weber said in the release. 'Hopefully this incident is the spark we need to take that to a new level.' Residents and businesses are encouraged by LMPD to report suspicious activity to 574-LMPD (5673) or online. Reach reporter Molly Gregory at msgregory@ This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: Bardstown Road incident sparks action from Metro Council, LMPD

Miami Herald
34 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Patterson questioned about intentions, feelings for poisoned victims
June 6 (UPI) -- The prosecution in the Erin Patterson mushroom murder meal trial went another round with Patterson Friday to prove she purposely invited her estranged husband Simon's family over to her house for a meal in order to kill them. Patterson has maintained that she asked Simon's parents Don and Gail Patterson, and his aunt and uncle Heather and Ian Wilkinson, over for that meal, a lunch of beef Wellington, to her home in Australia in August of 2023 to tell them about a cancer diagnosis. She has since admitted she misled them about having cancer but instead had really invited them to her home to discuss her plans to have weight-loss surgery. Don and Gail died later that week, as did Heather, from the ingestion of poisonous death cap mushrooms, which prosecutors allege Erin purposely put in their lunch. Ian was sickened and hospitalized but survived. Prosecutor Nanette Rogers alleged in her opening statement Friday that Patterson did not consume death cap mushrooms at the lunch, but pretended to have been sickened as a cover-up and that was "why we say she was reluctant to receive medical treatment for death cap mushroom poisoning." Rogers put forth to Patterson that she not only had allegedly invited the victims over to kill them with a death cap-laced meal, but had furthermore prepared an extra poisoned meal in case Simon, who had declined his invitation to dine that day, changed his mind and came to eat. Patterson testified Tuesday that she had only eaten a small portion of the beef Wellington lunch because she was deep in conversation and later had vomited up the food because she also ate cake and has a history of binging and purging. Patterson also testified that she went to the hospital after the meal but discharged herself against medical advice, which prosecutors used to suggest that she was not sickened by the food. The prosecution then alleged Patterson purposely didn't feed the poisoned meal to her kids, which was why she didn't have them medically assessed. Rogers also mentioned messages Patterson allegedly sent to her Facebook friends, and to Don, Gail and Simon. "You had two faces, a public face of appearing to have a good relationship with Don and Gail," she said to Patterson. "I suggest your private face was the one you showed in your Facebook message group." Rogers went back through messages Patterson ostensibly wrote about Don and Gail, which were laced with expletives and allegedly mentioned she wanted "nothing to do" with them. She also suggested that Patterson had not shown any concern for Simon's parents, never asking how they felt after learning they were initially sickened. "Incorrect," Patterson said. Rogers then asked, "And you never asked how Heather was going, and I assume you disagree?" "Correct," Patterson replied. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one of attempted murder in the case. She will take the stand again Tuesday. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.