Illegal shops set up along Galleria Market Road, NGT serves notice to govt agencies in Gurgaon
Gurgaon: National Green Tribunal (NGT) has initiated proceedings against CPCB, HSPCB, deputy commissioner, MCG commissioner and others over illegal commercial activities and environmental violations on a plot of land along the road leading to upscale Galleria market in in Sector 27.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Shops, eateries and workshops have been set up illegally on the land by private respondents without obtaining approvals, including land-use clearance, building plans or environmental consents, a complaint filed by local resident Shiv Kumar Dubey said.
Dubey, who claimed the unauthorised operations were causing severe pollution and endangering public health, filed the application under sections 14, 15 and 18 of the NGT Act, 2010, highlighting "rampant violations" in areas situated near Hamilton Court and Galleria Market.
The plots in question include khasra numbers 446/1/1, 446/1/1/3, 458, 459 and 460.
Saying the matter raises critical environmental concerns, the NGT bench — comprising Justice Arun Kumar Tyagi and expert member Dr Afroz Ahmad — on May 30 directed issuance of notices to the concerned respondents, asking them to submit replies before the next hearing on July 4.
The complaint alleges these establishments engage in activities such as the illegal use and sale of diesel generator (DG) sets, open dumping and burning of waste, untreated sewage discharge and unregulated use of heavy vehicles.
These operations, he says, have severely degraded air quality and increased noise pollution in the area.
An inspection carried out by DHBVN (Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam) on Feb 21 had confirmed illegal electricity connections and unauthorised power resale by two landlords. Following this, the electricity supply was disconnected, but the accused parties allegedly continued operations using DG sets in violation of environmental norms.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Dubey, who works in the vicinity, said on Wednesday the pollution from construction materials, vehicular dust and untreated waste has led to serious health issues among residents and workers. He claims that several complaints made to civic and environmental authorities since August 2024 have gone unanswered.
The petitioner has sought immediate sealing of illegal operations, penalties on violators, cancellation of licences and a zoning audit to assess the scale of damage. He also invoked Article 21 of the Constitution, saying the right to a clean environment is an essential part of the right to life.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 hours ago
- First Post
Can JD Vance be the next Trump?
US Vice President JD Vance has stayed away from the Trump-Musk showdown. Also, it is not the first time his name has come up for consideration for a possible successor to Trump read more From calling Donald Trump the 'greatest president ever' to 'he should be impeached', Elon Musk's relationship with the Republican leader is on thin ice after the duo engaged in a very public feud. When a right-wing commentator, Ian Miles Cheong, said on X, 'President vs Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him,' Musk agreed and said, 'Yes.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Late on Thursday, Trump and Musk took to Truth Social and X, respectively, to engage in a war of words that has now turned into a full-blown bashing of each other. Both individuals claimed things that could become controversial. The president has floated the idea of ending government subsidies and contracts for the companies run by Elon Musk as a way of saving money. Can Vance fill in Trump's shoes? Interestingly, US Vice President JD Vance has stayed away from the Trump-Musk showdown. Also, it is not the first time his name has come up for consideration for a possible successor to Trump. Although the president has expressed his desire to run for a third term, something that is not permissible under the US Constitution, Trump last month broke his silence on his potential successor. In an interview with MSNBC, Trump said, 'You look at Marco, you look at JD Vance, who's fantastic,' after he was asked what gives him confidence that his MAGA movement will continue once he's out of office. 'You look at — I could name 10, 15, 20 people right now just sitting here,' he added. Also, three people in Rubio's orbit who spoke with NBC News, cognizant of Vance's higher rank in the line of succession and of polling that reinforces his higher standing among Republican voters, see Vance as having the right of first refusal on the Republican nomination in 2028. Musk wants to form a new party Musk has put forth the idea of creating his own political party following his formal exit from the White House. He began an online poll on X, asking, 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?'
New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Two cops dismissed for role in Hyderabad drug trafficking case
TIRUPATI: Tirupati Armed Reserve Constables M. Guna Sekhar (ARPC 1501) and P. Ramachandra (Armed Head Constable 1425) have been dismissed from service for their involvement in a major drug trafficking case registered under the Kukatpally Police Station limits in Hyderabad. Guna Sekhar, who was on casual leave from May 31 to June 9, was arrested on June 4 in Crime No. 725/2025. He faces serious charges under the NDPS Act, including Sections 8(c) r/w 21(c), 25A, and 29, which relate to possession, trafficking, and conspiracy involving commercial quantities of narcotics and precursor chemicals. Investigations revealed that both constables maintained close links with drug smugglers and facilitated the transport of narcotics using insider knowledge. Their dismissal orders were issued under Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution and Rule 25(11) of the APCS (CC&A) Rules, 1991, which permits termination without a full inquiry when it is not reasonably practicable. Guna Sekhar's dismissal was ordered late Wednesday night by Tirupati SP V. Harshavardhan Raju, IPS, while Ramachandra's order followed on Thursday. The SP's report termed Guna Sekhar's conduct as gross misconduct, involving moral turpitude and a breach of integrity, in violation of Rule 3(1) of the AP Civil Services Conduct Rules, 1964. The report also cited national security concerns and the risk of interference with evidence and witnesses as reasons to forego a departmental inquiry.
Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
Construction cannot happen near protected sites without ASI's permission: Karnataka HC
The Karnataka High Court ruled Monday that construction activities cannot be carried out near protected sites within a particular radius without the permission of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) as prescribed by the law. The order was passed by Justice M Nagaprasanna in response to a petition filed by a resident of Mangalore. The Mangalore resident had come into possession of a property after a partition suit in 1993. After subsequent challenges and appeals to the same, he was allotted a share of 8.8 cents of land in the Thota village of the Mangalore taluk. In 2023, the City Corporation granted permission to construct a house with an approved plan. After the construction reached a certain stage, ASI issued a stop notice on the grounds that the construction was within 150 metres of the Mangala Devi Temple, a protected monument. The resident approached the High Court with the petition after his representation for a no-objection certificate (NOC) was denied. The court stated in its order, 'It is to be noticed that framers of the Constitution were conscious of the need to shield the monuments and places of historic importance from spoliation and disfigurement… It is the obligation of the State to protect every monument of historic interest.' The petitioner's counsel stated that there was no impediment in granting the NOC as the construction was in the regulated area rather than at a distance where construction was prohibited. He stated that, as per images from Google Earth, it was at a distance of 151 metres from the temple. It was also submitted that the ASI estimate of 64 metres using Google Earth was erroneous, and the petitioner was doing a renovation that was permitted under the law (by bringing down and rebuilding an older construction). The State counsel argued that the constructed property was indeed at a distance of 64 metres where construction is prohibited. The counsel also said that the construction done so far should not have been sanctioned without an NOC from ASI. The bench also did not accept the claim of 151 metres distance, and said, 'It is deliberately shot from a different angle and enlarged so that the distance would change. The respondents (ASI) have placed a Google Earth image taken by them, which clearly depicts that the property which is being constructed is within 64 metres of the protected monument…. The statute clearly bars any kind of new construction, but permits only repair and minor renovation.' Apart from directing the petitioner not to go ahead with the construction, the court also ordered a departmental inquiry against the erring officers who granted permission for the construction contrary to the law.
