British banking giant issues crucial warning to ALL customers over worrying message that could drain your account
Read on to find out how to spot a fraudulent message
BE AWARE British banking giant issues crucial warning to ALL customers over worrying message that could drain your account
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
BRITS are being cautioned over a worrying message that could leave them out of pocket.
A major UK bank has issued a warning on how to stay vigilant against scammers.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
Barclays has revealed a key sign to spot fraudulent messages
Credit: Reuters
Barclays has revealed a key sign to look out for to spot illegitimate messages from a bank.
One customer has contacted Barclays over social media to confirm if the SMS they had received was real.
The message read: "BARCLAYS: Your OTP code to approve a debit of 3733.50 to AVIVA is 44346. If you did NOT do this call us on 0330 133 0198 Ref: BR45."
The number which sent the text had a "+447" prefix.
The customer posted a screenshot of the message with a caption: "Is this a legit number for you to use to contact people?"
Barclays responded: "I can assure you that we would never text from a number that is +44."
The bank has also asked if the customer was a client of Aviva.
"If not, then this would certainly seem to be a scam text in my opinion. If you would like to make sure that your account is safe then you can certainly give a call to our fraud team on 0800 3891 652 and their lines are open 24/7 for you."
In response, the customer confirmed that they had never interacted with AVIVA.
Scammers frequently pose as representatives of banks or other respectable organisations in order to send SMS and emails to victims.
FBI Issues Urgent Warning: Delete Scam Texts Immediately to Protect Your Information
They frequently contain a link to a fraudulent website where victims are tricked into giving away their personal or banking information.
If you are worried a fraudster is trying to con money out of you, dial 159 or report it to Action Fraud.
Many banks have created a helpline with an easy-to-remember number that can be used to assist.
HOW TO REPORT A SCAM
If you think you have been a victim of a scam, you should report it as soon as possible.
There is no guarantee you'll get your money back, but banks will often compensate you if you can show you did not know the money would leave your account.
You can forward scam emails to report@phishing.gov.uk.
If you notice a website that doesn't look quite right, you can also report it to the National Cyber Security Centre by visiting www.ncsc.gov.uk/section/about-this-website/report-scam-website.
You should also contact your provider and report it to Action Fraud, which will give you a crime reference number.
You can do this online by visiting actionfraud.police.uk or by calling 0300 123 2040.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Shell ‘in talks to acquire BP'
Shell is said to be in talks to buy BP in a landmark deal which would unite Britain's two major oil and gas giants. The FTSE 100 group, led by chief executive Wael Sawan, is in early-stage discussion with BP's leadership in a deal which would create a £210bn giant, the Wall Street Journal said. A Shell spokesman did not deny the report. They said: 'As we have said many times before, we are sharply focused on capturing the value in Shell through continuing to focus on performance, discipline and simplification'. The talks are said to be at a preliminary stage, but BP is said to be open to the prospect of merging with Shell. BP shares rose 8pc after the report, hitting $32 (£24) per share. BP is led by chief executive Murray Auchincloss and is valued at £58bn, while Shell is the larger of the two with a market cap of £152bn. A deal would mark one of the largest takeovers in British history and create a new UK oil champion to compete against larger American groups such as Exxon Mobil and Chevron. However, such a move would be politically sensitive across the world and require the support of multiple governments, including Sir Kier Starmer's administration, and global regulators. Oil groups have been struggling to transform their operations in a world of net zero and a crackdown on fossil fuels. BP has suffered more than most after a decision to move aggressively towards green energy backfired. The strategy was drawn up by former boss Bernard Looney but has since been dropped under Mr Auchincloss, who has moved back to oil and gas. Elliott, the hedge fund, is a major investor in BP and has been pushing the group to improve its performance. BP was approached for comment.
The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
US officials forced to share bald JD Vance meme by denying tourist's claim he was denied entry over photo
Customs and Border Protection has confirmed that, no, agents did not stop a Norwegian traveler who showed them a meme of a bald Vice President JD Vance. 'Fact Check: FALSE,' the CBP wrote on X. 'Mads Mikkelsen was not denied entry for any memes or political reasons, it was for his admitted drug use.' And no, the agency is not referring to Danish actor Mads Mikkelsen, but rather the similarly named 21-year-old who was denied entry at Newark Liberty International Airport on June 11. The story circulating online — first in Norwegian newspaper Nordlys and then picked up by British tabloids — claims that during Mikkelsen's encounter with the Department of Homeland Security, agents took his phone and found a meme depicting Vance as a bloated, smooth, bald man staring off into the distance. Mikkelsen claims that the officials threatened to fine him $5,000 or send him to prison for five years if he refused to provide them with his phone password. The tourist ultimately agreed to hand over his information, allowing agents to look through his phone. He says that's when they saw the meme. After the agents looked through his phone, he said he was denied entry to the United States and was sent back to Norway. The reports picked up enough steam in headlines and on social media to justify CBP putting out a statement denying parts of the story. Homeland Security deputy secretary Tricia McLaughlin called the story 'false' and 'BS' in a post on X. Like the CBP announcement, she insisted that Mikkelsen was denied entry after admitting to using drugs. Mikkelsen does acknowledge that he was questioned about his use of drugs during the incident. He said DHS agents saw a second photo on his phone, which was a wooden pipe that he'd made for himself. The agents also reportedly asked him about drug smuggling, terror plots, and right-wing extremism, and Mikkelsen claims he was forced to provide the agents with a blood sample. While Mikkelsen and CBP may not agree on what precisely caused his denial of entry to the country, both agree that there was an encounter. One question we do not have an answer to is why Mikkelsen was targeted in the first place for heightened scrutiny. President Donald Trump has effectively turned the entire federal government into an immigration enforcement agency and given DHS the flexibility to treat every foreign-born individual visiting the United States like a probable criminal threat. In April, DHS announced its agents would begin screening immigrants' social media accounts for so-called 'antisemitic activity,' which under the Trump administration could mean anything from neo-Nazi sentiments to voicing opposition to Israel's war in Gaza. All student visa applicants must now change the privacy settings on their social media profiles to 'public.' A recent State Department cable directs diplomats to review social media profiles for 'any indications of hostility towards the citizens, culture, government, institutions or founding principles of the United States.' In recent months, reports of increased denials, detentions, and heightened scrutiny of visitors by DHS agents have made headlines. In one instance, a French researcher was denied entry after customs agents found a 'personal opinion on the Trump administration's research policy' on his phone. The denial earned a public scolding by a French minister. Last week, an Australian writer was sent back to Melbourne after DHS agents in Los Angeles questioned him over his views on the Israeli treatment of Palestinians. The general political tension and instability dovetailing with heightened security screenings have led several nations — including China, Denmark, and Finland — to issue travel warnings advising its citizens to consider if a trip to the United States is worth the risk of harassment or violence.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
I guarded Lucy Letby during her first night in prison - this is what she's really like
A former prison officer whose job it was to watch Lucy Letby during her first night in prison has opened up about his experience. Dave, who used to work at Styal Prison in Cheshire, revealed that he thought she was a 'very, very strange character'. The former British neonatal nurse was convicted of murdering seven infants and attempting to murder seven others at the Countess of Chester Hospital between June 2015 and June 2016. Letby, who is from Hereford, was arrested in July 2018 and later sentenced to life imprisonment with a whole-life order. Her trial revealed a disturbing pattern of harm inflicted on vulnerable babies under her care. Speaking on the Shaun Attwood True Crime podcast, Dave revealed Letby was kept in a segregation unit and he was tasked with 'constant watch'. He said: 'It was her first night and she has got her whole-life tariff now but it was her first night on remand. She had come from court that day and had been charged. 'I turned up, sat down on the segregation and the first thing that sort of hit me, you see her in all these photographs, this normal looking blonde woman, and I was surprised at how sort of dishevelled she looked. 'She didn't have blonde hair, brown hair, she just looked sort of drained. It was night time, I think she might have asked me what time it was at one point. There might have been a few words exchanged, not much.' Dave later noted that he was struck by how calm she appeared on her first night in prison. He explained: 'I was sat watching, thinking if I had have been accused of this I'd be climbing the walls I'd be saying ''Let me out I've not done this.'' 'But it was almost as if it was just a bit of a burden to her, just a bit like, ''I'm here, what time is it? What's happening?'' 'She was a very, very strange character, [that] is my opinion of her,' he added. He revealed that Lucy was only kept in the prison he worked in for a matter of days before she was moved elsewhere. Dave added that he wasn't sure if the other inmates knew that Letby was even in the same prison with them. He claimed the female offenders would 'not have treated her well' if they had been aware of her presence, given that her crimes involved infants. Letby still maintains her innocence of the crimes that she has previously been found guilty of. She insists she has never harmed any baby in her care. Last month, a leading barrister called for the Lucy Letby case to be referred back to the Court of Appea l because her convictions are 'almost certainly' unsafe. Adam King, who prosecuted the Just Stop Oil climate protesters, is the latest respected figure to raise questions about the case against Letby. Since the nurse lost her appeal last year, a mass of evidence undermining the prosecution's case has been gathered by her new legal team, raising questions about the claim she was on duty for every suspicious incident and about the testimony of the main prosecution witness, Dewi Evans. Doubts have also been raised about the tests which purported to show Letby used various techniques – including insulin poisoning and injecting air into veins – to murder already sickly babies. Contradictory and incoherent notes written by Letby in post-arrest therapy sessions were also presented as a confession – even though she strongly denies murder. Letby's barrister Mark McDonald presented a 698-page report from 14 world-leading experts to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which deals with potential miscarriages of justice. The report concluded that the babies died from poor care, prematurity and natural causes. Since her conviction, dozens of doctors, nurses, statisticians, law experts and scientists have come forward to criticise the way in which evidence was presented to the jury. They include Lord Sumption, a former judge at the Supreme Court, who said he believes Letby is 'probably innocent'. Last week, Nigel Farage added his voice to growing concerns about the safety of Lucy Letby's murder convictions, saying that he is 'getting more and more doubts'. The Reform UK leader was responding to an article in the Daily Mail by Sir Jeremy Hunt, who was Health Secretary when the babies died at the Countess of Chester Hospital. Sir Jeremy called for an urgent re-examination of the case, saying: 'If Letby really did kill seven babies in their cots and attempted to kill seven more, no punishment short of the death penalty is too harsh. 'But if they were caused by professional shortcomings, we need to know why. 'More than anything else, we need to make sure other families don't have to go through the same tragedy.' He added that he had noted the findings of the international panel of paediatric specialists and neonatologists, and had also read a 'wide range of expert concerns about the conduct of the criminal case'. Sir Jeremy said: 'Taken together... this analysis raises serious and credible questions about the evidence presented in court, the robustness of expert testimony and the interpretation of statistical data.' Mr Farage told GB News: 'I'm just beginning to get more and more doubts about that issue.'
