
Patients with leprosy face lasting stigma in Ethiopia
Tilahun Wale not only lost his right foot to leprosy -- a disease that still affects thousands in Ethiopia -- he also lost his family.
"My family abandoned me. They blocked my number and refused to speak to me," said Tilahun, 46, a farmer in Ethiopia's populous Oromia region, who contracted leprosy around 10 years ago.
Ethiopia, a country of some 130 million people in northeastern Africa, officially eliminated leprosy as a public health problem in 1999, after case numbers dropped below one in 10,000.
But some 2,500 infections are still recorded there each year, according to the United Nations World Health Organization (WHO), which lists leprosy as one of the 20 "neglected" tropical diseases.
In Ethiopia, a highly religious country, leprosy is often perceived as a divine punishment.
Caused by the bacteria Mycobacterium leprae, the contagious infection attacks the skin and peripheral nerves, with potentially serious after-effects, including physical deformities.
The disease was declared eliminated as a health problem globally in 2000, according to the WHO.
But leprosy is still present in more than 120 countries worldwide, with nearly 200,000 cases reported each year, despite being curable and with treatments that can prevent disability if applied early.
Haile Kairos developed the disease as a child.
"I noticed the appearance of lumps on certain parts of my body," said the 35-year-old, hiding the effects of leprosy on his legs with a blanket.
There is still a stigma, he said, recalling the disgust and avoidance he has faced.
Ethiopian society "doesn't have enough information about the disease", he said.
The Alert Hospital in the capital Addis Ababa specialises in leprosy and treats dozens of patients at a time.
It was originally founded as a leper colony in 1934 away from residential areas, but the city has expanded to surround it.
- 'Stigma has diminished' -
Perceptions of the disease are only slowly evolving, said Solomon Getahun, project manager at International Leprosy Mission, an NGO that provides medical assistance to patients and raises awareness.
It organises discussions in communities across Ethiopia, bringing together people with the disease to explain the challenges they face.
The NGO also offers microcredit to patients, most of whom struggle to find employment.
Atale Mekuriyaw, 70, works at a centre where a dozen people with the disease, mostly women, make rugs, traditional clothing and jewellery.
The modest salary "helps us provide for our families", she said.
AFP | Amanuel Sileshi
For every kilo of raw cotton she weaves, she earns between 100 and 150 birr (around 75 cents to $1.15).
"Coming here and spending time like this is important to us. It's better than staying at home," added Atale, who has suffered from leprosy since childhood and says she feels less discriminated against today.
"In the past, people used to say: 'Don't go near her!' But today, thanks to access to medication, the stigma has diminished," she said.
The WHO has praised Ethiopia's progress in treatment and care.
But the recent drastic cuts in aid announced by the United States and other Western countries could undermine the efforts.
AFP | Amanuel Sileshi
The WHO said last month it was cutting its budget by a fifth after the United States -- previously its biggest source of funds -- said it would no longer contribute.
That is a potential problem for Alert Hospital, where preventative medicines have been supplied by the WHO.
Shimelis Gezahegn, the hospital's director, said the Ethiopian authorities had promised "a backup plan".
He added that it was vital they step in to continue work on treatment and eventual eradication of the disease.
But "there could be some problems," he said.
dyg/jf/er/rlp/jhb
By Dylan Gamba
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
3 hours ago
- The South African
New breast cancer genes found in black South African women
Wits University researchers have identified two new breast cancer genes in black South African women. This discovery marks a major step in understanding how the disease affects African populations. Genetic factors play a role in roughly 30% of breast cancer cases in South Africa. This highlights the urgent need to invest more in genomic research focused on African ancestry. One of the lead researchers, Dr Mahtaab Hayat, said the discovery marks a major step toward identifying unique risk factors in African women. 'These genes have not been associated with breast cancer before,' she said. 'They could help explain part of the disease burden we see in black communities.' Breast cancer is the second most common cancer in South Africa and the most common cancer among women globally. The World Health Organisation (WHO) reported that breast cancer diagnosed 2.3 million women in 2022 and killed 670 000 of them. The WHO's Global Breast Cancer Initiative aims to reduce global breast cancer mortality by 2.5% annually. Potentially preventing 2.5 million deaths between 2020 and 2040. For many in South Africa, especially in rural areas, delayed diagnosis and limited healthcare access remain major barriers to survival. Wits University researchers believe their findings may pave the way for more targeted screening and prevention programmes tailored to the needs of African women. They hope that, through more research and greater public awareness, early detection will become a reality even in South Africa's most remote communities. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
Nearly one in five South Africans lack access to safe sanitation, KwaZulu-Natal households still struggle to fetch water
More than one-third (35,8%) of households in KwaZulu-Natal without piped water in their dwellings or on site took more than 30 minutes to fetch water. Image: Oupa Mokoena Independent Newspapers KwaZulu-Natal continues to face significant challenges in providing basic water and sanitation services to its residents, with new data revealing that many households still spend over 30 minutes fetching drinking water. In addition, nearly one in five South Africans still share sanitation facilities. This is according to the 2024 General Household Survey (GHS) released by Statistics South Africa. The survey found that 35.8% of households in KZN without piped water in their dwellings or on site took more than 30 minutes to fetch water, highlighting ongoing difficulties with access in the province. While 83.3% of households in KZN had access to at least a basic level of drinking water, this is still lower than national leaders such as the Western Cape (99.8%) and Gauteng (99.6%). The GHS also showed that provinces like KZN, Limpopo (86.4%) and the Eastern Cape (87.8%) recorded the highest reliance on surface water, a key indicator of limited or unsafe access. The report distinguishes between levels of water access using what the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) calls the 'water ladder.' The highest level is 'safely managed' water available on premises, when needed, and free of harmful contamination. Basic water requires a collection time of less than 30 minutes; anything longer is considered 'limited.' Nationally, more than two-thirds (67.8%) of households that fetch their water do so in under 30 minutes, but 5% spend over an hour, underscoring the severity of the issue in specific communities, especially in rural areas. The situation is further complicated by sanitation challenges. The survey shows that only 76.3% of South Africans had access to safely managed sanitation services in 2024, those that are improved, not shared, and where waste is treated. Despite being a more urbanised province, Gauteng had the lowest access to safely managed sanitation at 66.1%, while the Eastern Cape (85.3%), Mpumalanga (84.7%), and the Northern Cape (84.4%) topped the list. Nationally, 19.9% of South Africans shared sanitation facilities, but this figure was much higher in urban areas (31.9%) compared to rural areas (13.2%). Urban informal settlements often lack the infrastructure for private toilets, and multiple households are forced to share, creating hygiene and dignity concerns. Interestingly, rural areas surpassed urban areas in access to safely managed sanitation, with 79.6% compared to 74.6%, largely due to space availability for household-level improved facilities, even if they are basic. The GHS explains that, under Sustainable Development Goal 6.2, a sanitation service is only considered safely managed if it is improved, not shared, and waste is properly treated, either on-site, via off-site treatment after collection, or through a sewer system. Only 46.2% of households nationally had sanitation facilities inside their homes, while 3.1% relied on facilities outside their yards. These figures reflect the ongoing infrastructure gaps, particularly in under-resourced or overcrowded areas. THE MERCURY


Daily Maverick
5 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Restructuring global health – WHO faces major challenges as foreign aid reductions take toll
While the immediate effects of the US cuts in health aid are being felt primarily by the Global South, the associated risks extend worldwide. Last week, global leaders gathered for the World Health Assembly in Geneva to address the reality that the global health landscape is being reshaped by dramatic shifts in funding, priorities, and leadership. Chief among these is the United States' decision to slash foreign aid and withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO). Despite spending only 0.24% of its gross national income on foreign aid, the United States has been the largest donor to global health programmes, providing one-third of the international assistance in global health. This is not just a US issue – other countries have also signalled reductions in foreign health aid, and Argentina also recently announced it will withdraw from the WHO. These dramatic shifts have forced the WHO to plan a reduction in staff by nearly 50%, triggering massive restructuring. Non-government organisations (NGOs) are laying off large numbers of staff worldwide. While other donors and philanthropies are stepping in, they cannot fill the void alone. Meanwhile, the shock to the system is already resulting in lives lost. According to the WHO, countries such as Haiti, Kenya, Lesotho, South Sudan, Burkina Faso and Nigeria may run out of HIV antiretroviral medications within months. The Africa CDC's director-general, Dr Jean Kaseya, warned in March that 'two to four million additional Africans are likely to die annually' as a result of the aid cuts. T The continent now faces a $12-billion shortfall in healthcare financing. Substantial impacts will be felt across the globe, from Afghanistan to Lao PDR, in many low- and middle-income countries. While the immediate effects of these cuts are being felt primarily by the Global South, the associated risks extend globally. When countries become overwhelmed by preventable infections, they will lose the ability to detect and contain pathogens with epidemic potential that could cross borders in days. The current situation carries serious implications for global security as well as health. A new era needs to begin with a roadmap for sustainable domestic funding by individual nations, a strategic view of the role of WHO, and a coordinated plan among major donors. Governments must take the lead in reshaping their health budgets to reflect urgent needs while navigating competing priorities. Donors, NGOs, and multilaterals can support this shift if they embrace flexible, trust-based funding models tailored to local strategies. African health financing The desire to create long-term sustainability is apparent in the Africa CDC's strategic plan to transform health financing, which focuses on domestic resource mobilisation, diversifying funding sources, optimising health fund management and using evidence-based data for efficient resource allocation. The plan calls for member countries to meet the Abuja Declaration target of spending at least 15% of national budgets on health and explores innovative ideas such as solidarity levies and mobilising Africa's $95-billion in annual diaspora remittances. Nigeria's Basic Health Care Provision Fund, which dedicates 1% of revenue (about $150-million annually) to primary care, is a promising example. Any effort to reform global health infrastructure must prioritise resilient, widely accessible primary healthcare. Since the Alma-Ata declaration of 1978, we've known that primary care is the foundation of 'Health for All'. Doing so will not only reduce the impact of chronic and endemic infectious diseases, but also serve to enable systems that quickly identify when infectious disease outbreaks of concern appear. As the WHO recalibrates, it must assess realistically the current situation and focus on its most important core functions for the future: setting global standards, responding to emergencies and coordinating transnational responses. Routine programme implementation should be handled by individual countries, NGOs, and the private sector. The WHO can no longer afford to take on the management of basic health functions within countries. Instead, it needs to focus on maintaining surge capacity to meet needs during health emergencies and facilitate cooperation in transboundary issues. The WHO needs to prioritise doing fewer things better. Now is also the time for new global coalitions, agreements and leadership among non-government actors. The Gates Foundation has reaffirmed its commitment to address emerging challenges. Philanthropies must align their efforts to successfully cooperate, identify priorities and gaps, reduce duplication and maximise impact. Meanwhile, the private sector has a vital role to play in connecting national health priorities to new markets, innovations and partnerships. Global health needs a multisector coalition of the willing right now that is felicitous, innovative, able to learn from past mistakes and adapt to meet the world's current needs and prevent future crises. The time for action is now – the consequences of inaction are too great, and the lives lost are both predictable and preventable. DM Mitchell Wolfe is Senior Associate at the Center for Strategic Studies, Washington, DC; Nahid Bhadelia is Associate Professor at the Boston University School of Medicine; and Wilmot James is Professor and Strategic Advisor to the Pandemic Center at Brown University's School of Public Health and a former Member of Parliament (South Africa).