As Black New Yorkers Move Out, N.Y.C. Politics May Be Reshaped
For the better part of the 35 years that she lived in Brooklyn's East New York neighborhood, Dorinda Pannell made affordable housing her top — if not singular — mission.
A lifelong Democrat, tenant leader with East Brooklyn Congregations and avid voter, Ms. Pannell, 75, known to her neighbors in the Linden Houses as 'Miss P,' spent years organizing her fellow residents to push for better housing conditions. She even took her fight to City Hall to give a speech about it.
Now she is following New York's mayoral primary closely, hopeful that the city's next leader will do more for the millions of New Yorkers experiencing housing insecurity, particularly longtime Black and Latino residents who say that good-quality, affordable places to live are more and more elusive.
But she will not be voting in the primary or be able to see for herself how the next mayoral administration affects her community. For the last five years, Ms. Pannell has lived in Hampton, Va., where she can be closer to her son, obtain better health care and enjoy what she believes is a higher quality of life and lower cost of living.
'I'm still sad that I had to leave, you know?' she said, pointing to the organizing work she felt she had to put on hold. When it came time to move, she added, 'I never cried so hard.'
Ms. Pannell is one of the hundreds of thousands of Black New Yorkers who over the last decade have made the excruciating choice to leave the city they've called home for generations.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US House Passes Accredited Investor Bill
You can find original article here Wealthmanagement. Subscribe to our free daily Wealthmanagement newsletter. A bill changing the accredited investor definition has cleared one congressional hurdle, paving the way for expanded investor access into the private markets. On Monday, the House of Representatives passed the 'Fair Investment Opportunities for Professional Experts Act,' sponsored by Financial Services Committee Chairman French Hill (R-Ark.). The bill passed in an overwhelming 397-12 vote. Hill originally introduced the bill in 2023 and 2024, during prior sessions of Congress when Republicans did not hold both houses (or the White House). During a FINRA conference this spring, Hill said there was a 'bipartisan consensus for broadening who is an accredited investor' and what opportunities should be available to non-institutional clients. Unlike retail investors, accredited investors can access private markets, including hedge funds and private equity funds. Institutional investors are allowed in the space, but currently, retail investors must hit wealth thresholds to qualify (at least $200,000 in annual income or more than $1 million in net worth). Hill's bill hopes to change that by expanding the accredited investor definition in the 1933 Securities Act to include individuals with 'certain licenses, education or job experience' beyond wealth and income thresholds. While threshold supporters claim it protects middle-class investors from risky private markets, its critics argue the rule means retail investors have missed out on a drastic expansion of private markets. Hill's bill was one of two launched in the GOP-controlled House of Representatives. U.S. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) co-sponsored legislation directing the SEC to create a test (administered by FINRA) that retail investors could take to qualify as accredited investors. That bill cleared the Financial Services Committee and is on the congressional calendar (though this doesn't mean a vote on it is assured). Banrion Capital Management CEO Shana Orzyk Sissel didn't expect much immediate impact if the bill passes the Senate and is signed into law by President Donald Trump, as the more the accredited investor definition is expanded, 'the less it means anything.' 'The definition of accredited investor keeps moving, and many asset managers and advisors are confused about exactly who qualifies, so that will be another learning curve as well if this passes,' she said. Sissel expected that many asset managers would stick with non-registered products due to the cost of creating new funds specifically for accredited investors who couldn't meet the minimum requirements placed on those products (even if the wealth threshold changes for the definition). 'Some advisors could create feeder funds for their accredited investor clients that then feed into alts products, but that can come with significant expense,' she said. In the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, Congress asked the SEC to examine the threshold's applicability consistently (and whether the annual income and net worth thresholds established in 1982 still make sense today). The commission voted to expand the definition in 2020 to allow individuals to qualify if they had certain professional designations or credentials (and also qualified SEC- and state-registered advisors). However, the monetary thresholds remained unchanged, although new SEC Chair Paul Atkins has previously emphasized the importance of expanding investor access to private markets. Sissel stressed that even if the bill passes, advisors should tread carefully, as their fiduciary duties still apply, and understand how to build portfolios, including alts, that make sense for clients' risk tolerance. 'Many alts aren't complicated, but depending on their structures, liquidity constraints and other risks need to be communicated appropriately so investors have a clear set of expectations,' she said. 'There are some (asset) managers with very good marketing teams, but have bad products out there, so sifting through all the noise is important.'
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stocks down with eyes on Mideast, dollar hit by Trump Fed comment
Most stocks fell Thursday and oil rose as traders kept a nervous eye on the Iran-Israel ceasefire, while the dollar dropped after Donald Trump said he had a handful of candidates to succeed Federal Reserve boss Jerome Powell, fuelling rate cut bets. Uncertainty over the US president's trade war was also keeping sentiment subdued, with most countries still not reaching deals with Washington to avert the reimposition of steep tariffs ahead of a July 9 deadline. With a shaky peace between Iran and Israel holding for now, Trump said he would hold nuclear talks with Tehran next week, even after insisting that US strikes had set its atomic programme back "decades". "We may sign an agreement. I don't know," he told reporters. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian had said Tuesday his country was willing to return to negotiations but that it would continue to "assert its legitimate rights" to the peaceful use of nuclear energy. Crude prices, which tanked Monday and Tuesday after the ceasefire was announced, edged up for a second day, though gains were capped by the possibility that OPEC and other key producers will lift output. "While the Israel-Iran conflict is now de-escalating, we still believe that geopolitical risks remain where the ceasefire could easily fall apart," wrote Kai Wang, Asia equity market strategist at Morningstar. "While this possibility remains elevated, we do not believe that there would be a restriction on oil supply even under a re-escalating scenario. Given that oil has retreated to preconflict price levels, we believe that any future increase in oil price is likely to be short-lived." Equity markets were mostly down, with Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sydney, Singapore, Seoul, Jakarta and Wellington in the red but Tokyo and Taipei in positive territory. That came after a tepid lead from Wall Street, where the Nasdaq was the standout after chip titan Nvidia shot up more than four percent to a record high, giving it a market valuation of around $3.76 trillion. That makes it more valuable than Microsoft, Apple and other tech giants. The dollar held losses after Trump's latest salvo against Powell and suggestion that he was already lining up his replacement. Since returning to the White House the president has constantly hit out at the Fed boss for not cutting rates, questioning his intelligence and stoking worries about the bank's independence. "I know within three or four people who I'm going to pick," he told reporters after a NATO summit. "I mean he goes out pretty soon fortunately because I think he's terrible," Trump said of Powell, whose term ends in May next year. Trump added that Powell was "average mentally" and had "low IQ for what he does". The Wall Street Journal reported that the Republican was considering making an announcement in September or October, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, economic adviser Kevin Hassett and former Fed governor Kevin Warsh among the contenders. Trump's remarks came days after Powell told lawmakers the bank needed to see the impact of the president's tariffs on the economy before making a move. "Trump's nomination will amp up the pressure, to the point where we could have a shadow Fed chair before Powell steps down in May next year," said National Australia Bank's Rodrigo Catril. "We think it's fair to suggest that the pressure on Powell to cut rates will increase, and that's adding to selling pressure on the dollar." - Key figures at around 0230 GMT - Tokyo - Nikkei 225: UP 1.1 percent at 39,349.85 (break) Hong Kong - Hang Seng Index: DOWN 0.6 percent at 24,334.44 Shanghai - Composite: DOWN 0.1 percent at 3,451.62 Euro/dollar: UP at $1.1685 from $1.1656 on Wednesday Pound/dollar: UP at $1.3692 from $1.3664 Dollar/yen: DOWN at 144.74 yen from 145.32 yen Euro/pound: UP at 85.34 from 85.26 pence West Texas Intermediate: UP 0.5 percent at $65.23 per barrel Brent North Sea Crude: UP 0.4 percent at $67.92 per barrel New York - Dow: DOWN 0.3 percent at 42,982.43 (close) London - FTSE 100: DOWN 0.5 percent at 8,718.75 (close) dan/dhc Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNN
33 minutes ago
- CNN
The Trump administration is suing Minnesota over breaks in higher education for immigrant students
Minnesota became the latest state Wednesday to face a lawsuit from the Trump administration seeking to force it to give its high school graduates who entered the U.S. illegally as immigrants the same lower tuition rates reserved for in-state citizens. The U.S. Department of Justice's lawsuit also seeks to strike down a law that allows the same immigrant students to receive scholarships covering part or all of their tuition under the state's North Star Promise program. The department filed its case in federal district court in Minnesota, naming Democratic Gov. Tim Walz and Democratic state Attorney General Keith Ellison as defendants, along with the state's Office of Higher Education. The Justice Department has filed similar lawsuits this month against policies in Kentucky and Texas. Last week, a federal judge in Texas blocked that state's law giving a tuition break to students living in the U.S. illegally after the state's Republican attorney general, Ken Paxton, said he supported the legal challenge. Walz's office said it is reviewing the lawsuit 'to better understand what this means for the state.' The lawsuit argued that Minnesota is 'flagrantly violating' a federal law that prevents states from providing a benefit in higher education to resident students living in the U.S. illegally if U.S. citizens cannot receive the same benefits. States generally set higher tuition rates for out-of-state students. Also, President Donald Trump issued executive orders in February directing federal agencies to see that public benefits do not go to immigrants living in the U.S. illegally and to challenge state and local policies seen as favoring those immigrants over some citizens. The lawsuit argues that the Republican president's orders enforce federal immigration laws. The lawsuit also argues that Minnesota's policies discriminate against U.S. citizens. 'No state can be allowed to treat Americans like second-class citizens in their own country by offering financial benefits to illegal aliens,' U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. The Justice Department's lawsuit in Minnesota noted the cases filed earlier this month in Kentucky and Texas but did not mention any other states as potential targets of litigation. However, in discussing the Texas case, Bondi has suggested more lawsuits might be coming. Last year, Florida ended its tuition break for students living there illegally, but at least 21 states have laws or policies granting them, in addition to the University of Michigan system, according to the National Immigration Law Center, which favors them. Those states include Democratic-leaning ones such as California and New York, but also GOP-leaning ones like Kansas and Nebraska. According to the center, at least 16 states allow the immigrant students to receive scholarships or other aid to go to college. Supporters of the state tuition breaks argue that they don't violate federal law if they provide the same rates to U.S. citizens in the same circumstances — meaning they are residents of the state and graduates of one of its high schools. Generally states have imposed other requirements. For example, Minnesota requires male students to have registered with the U.S. Selective Service System and all students to be seeking legal resident status if that's possible. Backers of the laws also argue that the students generally were brought to the U.S. illegally by their parents, often when they were far younger, and are as much a part of their local communities as U.S.-born students. Also, they contend that such immigrants tend to be motivated high achievers.
