Prosecutors drop charge against man who Rep. Nancy Mace accused of assaulting her at the Capitol
Prosecutors this week decided not to pursue an assault charge against a man whom Rep. Nancy Mace accused of having "physically accosted" her at the U.S. Capitol in December.
According to a filing Tuesday with D.C. Superior Court, prosecutors dropped the lone charge against James McIntyre, a foster care advocate. Mace, R-S.C., had accused McIntyre of "aggressively" shaking her arm up and down at a Dec. 10 event celebrating 25 years of the Foster Care Independence Act. He had pleaded not guilty, court filings showed.
The D.C. District Attorney's Office, which was prosecuting the case, did not respond to a request for comment on why it decided to drop the charge of assaulting a government official.
A spokesperson for Mace's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday night. But the congresswoman defended and repeated her assault claims in a statement to The Imprint, which first reported on dismissal of the case.
'When a man can physically assault a woman in the halls of Congress, with impunity, it sends an appalling message to every woman in America. If it can happen here, it can happen anywhere,' Mace said. 'I filed charges, and they were inexplicably ignored. But I will not be. I will not back down. I will not be intimidated. And I sure as hell won't stay silent.'
An attorney for McIntyre declined to comment.
Mace had told officers after the encounter that McIntyre 'began to aggressively and in an exaggerated manner shake her arm up and down in a hand shaking motion" that left her arm flailing for 3-5 seconds, according to an incident report. The report noted that Mace had described to officers feeling "intimidated and unable to pull away when she tried.'
Elliott Hinkle, an eyewitness who had attended the event, had disputed Mace's account, saying they shook hands, 'and James says, 'Trans youth are also foster youth, and they need your support.' And then sat down.'
Mace denied help from paramedics when it was offered, according to the incident report. She said later that night on X that she was 'physically accosted" at the Capitol by "a pro-tr*ns man.'
The next day, Mace shared an image of herself with her right arm in a sling. She repeated the allegations against McIntyre on X in January, saying she was "assaulted by a pro tr*ns man a few weeks ago and am still in physical therapy for my injuries. I know firsthand how the Left is capable of doing real physical harm."
Mace has a record of using anti-trans rhetoric.
In November, she introduced a measure to bar lawmakers and House employees from 'using single-sex facilities other than those corresponding to their biological sex.' She said the legislation was a direct response to Rep. Sarah McBride of Delaware's election as the first openly transgender member of Congress.
'I'm absolutely 100% gonna stand in the way of any man who wants to be in a women's restroom, in our locker rooms, in our changing rooms," Mace told reporters at the time. "I will be there fighting you every step of the way.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump parade sparks pushback with No Kings and peril: Happy birthday?
That's true even though the June 14 parade itself turned out to be a damp and relatively low-key affair. Thousands of spectators lined a stretch of Constitution Avenue in an off-and-on drizzle to applaud a slow-moving procession of troops, tanks, drones, a robot dog and a real dog marking the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. At the end, they joined in a rendition of "Happy Birthday" for the president, who happened to be turning 79 years old. "Every other country celebrates their victories," Trump said at the start of his brief speech, defending his controversial decision to stage the parade. "It's about time America did, too." But the parade may prove to be less consequential than the "No Kings" marches it sparked. In the biggest and broadest protests of his second term, millions of Americans in about 2,000 communities gathered to object to his assertion of unprecedented presidential powers, which critics say violate the Constitution. Photographs of protesters across the country filling plazas and marching across bridges were reminiscent of scenes from historic debates over the Civil Rights Movement, the Vietnam War and more. After an aggressive start by the 47th president that has shaken up the federal government and the nation's global alliances, Saturday may have signaled the start of a new chapter of his tenure. That is, a new chapter of pushback amid a sense of growing peril. Flummoxed in Congress, organizing back home The pushback to Trump has been slow in starting as congressional Democrats, outnumbered in both chambers, continue to struggle to devise the strongest message and most effective tactics to use against the Republican president. There was no repeat of the immediate and massive demonstrations in Washington that marked his first inauguration, in 2017. In contrast, the "No Kings" rallies were deliberately local and light on policy prescriptions beyond support for democracy's guardrails and opposition to Trump's hardline approach to deporting immigrants in the country illegally. The sense of peril was underscored by a flood of violent and alarming news through the day. A manhunt was underway in Minnesota for the suspect in the assassination of a state legislative leader and her husband. Another state legislator and his wife were wounded in a separate attack. A hitlist of Democratic officials and abortion-rights advocates and a sheaf of papers labeled "No Kings" was found in the back seat of the suspected gunman's car. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the Democrats' 2024 vice-presidential nominee, called the persistence of political violence a "precipice moment" for the nation. Meanwhile, Iran launched ballistic missiles at Israel, and Israel responded with a new wave of attacks on Iran in a spiraling conflict that would risk drawing the United States into a regional war. So much was happening, and so fast, that Saturday's news overshadowed Thursday's political conflagration, when federal law-enforcement agents forced California Sen. Alex Padilla to the ground and handcuffed him after he tried to interrupt a press conference by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. The bristle of force, in DC and LA The day seemed to bristle with the display of force and the threat of its use. In Washington, dozens of 70-ton Abrams tanks rolled down the tree-lined avenue while 50 military helicopters flew overhead, the biggest public display of U.S. military hardware outside of war in memory. The official route was bookended by the capital's revered sights, beginning at the Lincoln Memorial and ending just past the White House, with the Capitol visible ahead. "Time and again, America's enemies have learned that you threaten the American people, soldiers are coming for you," Trump said in an eight-minute speech delivered in the twilight between the parade and the fireworks. "Your defeat will be certain, your demise will be final, and your downfall will be total and complete." The reaction by critics of the parade - mostly on grounds that it seemed more suitable for a dictatorship than a democracy - had been sharpened in recent days by the president's deployment of U.S. Marines as well as Army National Guard troops to Los Angeles in the wake of immigration protests. He acted over the objections of the city's mayor and the state's governor. The protest in Philadelphia was estimated by police at nearly 100,000. In Chicago, protesters marched past Trump Tower. In Atlanta, one sign showed the Statue of Liberty weeping and another displayed a demand familiar from Trump campaign rallies: "Lock Him Up!" In Los Angeles, some marchers carried an oversized Constitution, and others inflated a 20-foot balloon that depicted Trump as a baby in a diaper. In Nanuet, New York, a hamlet in the Lower Hudson Valley, more than 1,000 protesters lined a central intersection known as the "Four Corners." "People think people have given up," said Ciara Sweeney of nearby Pearl River, holding a hand-painted sign showing Trump behind bars. "That's not true." The protests were mostly peaceful, and many had a celebratory air. However, police in Los Angeles and in Atlanta dispersed chemical irritants to control the crowds. In Culpepper, Virginia, police arrested a man who they said accelerated an SUV into a crowd of protesters, hitting at least one person. 'Trump saves America' There was a festive vibe on the National Mall before and during the parade, too. But the mood of the mostly pro-Trump crowd wasn't as energized as the capital's last military parade, in 1991, after the triumphant end of the first Gulf War. When Trump spoke, many in the crowd rallied, but some already left through the security fences and barriers that surrounded the area. The president spoke for eight minutes, less than usual, and he stuck to a script praising the Army's history. Unlike his appearance at Fort Bragg a few days earlier, when he had ridiculed former President Joe Biden by name, Trump didn't veer into his favored political tropes. Some of the president's supporters found it an apt coincidence that Trump's birthday fell on the date of the Army's founding in 1775, as the Revolutionary War was beginning. They cited his support for a muscular military. At the protests, too, there were reminders of the revolution, where the "No Kings" slogan has its roots. In Philadelphia, a protester in colonial dress carried a sign quoting John Adams: "Liberty Once Lost Is Lost Forever." It was in Philadelphia that the Continental Congress voted to create an Army after battles against the British crown in Lexington and Concord. As Ralph Waldo Emerson famously wrote in a poem memorializing those opening conflicts, "Here once the embattled farmers stood / And fired the shot heard round the world." Contributing: Gary Stern, Nancy Cutler
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Senate keeps provision for curbing court orders in Trump bill
Some fellow Republicans in the narrowly divided Congress have said they would oppose the bill over the provision or that it would be removed through a parliamentary maneuver. But its inclusion in the Senate draft reflects the support of leadership to include and defend it. Legislation would require litigants to post bonds before courts could enforce orders The provision would require judges to collect bonds from litigants challenging the government before blocking policies through injunctions or temporary restraining orders. Without a bond, the provision would prevent judges from enforcing their orders through contempt proceedings. Judges have always been able to collect bonds in civil lawsuits, essentially to ensure that defendants are reimbursed if they eventually win their cases. But judges traditionally don't collect bonds in cases against the government because the disputes are over policy rather than money like in a lawsuit between two businesses. Trump and his Republican allies would like to change that. He signed a memo in March directing the Justice Department to ask for bonds in all civil cases against the administration. Judges have temporarily blocked dozens of his policies. If the legislation were enacted, it would undo those blocks until judges set bonds. Bonds could reach trillions of dollars in cases against government Judges could set a nominal bond of $1, according to legal experts. But if they set a larger bond that litigants couldn't afford, judges wouldn't be able to enforce their orders and the Trump administration could ignore them, experts said. In February, U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan refused a request from Trump's White House Office of Management Budget to require a bond from the National Council of Nonprofits when she blocked the government from freezing all federal grants. She said it could have required trillions of dollars because that was how much was at stake in the case but that OMB would suffer no monetary damage from the case. "The court declines," Alikhan wrote. Some GOP lawmakers opposed the provision they weren't aware was in House-passed bill If the Senate changes the legislation, the House would have to vote on the bill again. Some GOP lawmakers have voiced opposition to the provision at raucous town halls. Rep. Mike Flood, R-Nebraska, said May 27 he was unaware of the provision and didn't support it when he voted for the bill. The House approved the bill on a 215-214 vote, so any potential loss of support could hurt the bill's chances. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, said May 30 the bond provision "will not be" in the Senate-approved bill because she expected it to be removed by the parliamentarian under a rule requiring everything in the legislation to have an impact on the budget.
Daily Mail
18 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Top Republican previews big Trump-backed crypto move that could usher in a windfall of cash for the nation
A top House Republican is looking forward to passing major crypto reform later this year following the passage of President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill. Sitting in the House Whip's office, Minnesota Republican Tom Emmer revealed to the Daily Mail that Congress will move full steam ahead on multiple crypto bills later this summer or early this fall. When asked what he is most 'excited' about on the upcoming legislative calendar, Emmer immediately answered 'the digital asset stuff.' Emmer named the CLARITY Act, STABLE Act and GENIUS Act as a trio of crypto legislation that he wants passed by the end of this year. Taken together, these bills seek to regulate stablecoins - cryptocurrencies designed to have stable values linked to assets like the U.S. dollar or gold - an industry that could soon be worth trillions. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testified this week about the Trump administration's commitment to stablecoin legislation backed by the U.S. dollar that will supercharge a worldwide market. Though that won't come until after the Congress passes the multi-trillion-dollar Trump-backed Big Beautiful Bill Act, which could soon get a vote in the GOP-controlled Senate. That measure contains provisions to cut tax on tips or overtime and reforms to Medicaid and SNAP, and Emmer believes it will be signed into law by Independence Day - a self-imposed deadline congressional Republicans are desperate to meet. 'I'm more than confident that we will pass it and get it to the president's desk on or before July 4,' Emmer said confidently, though some in the Senate have called that timeline unlikely. The White House and Congress have been pushing this year to open the U.S. markets up to wider stablecoin adoption, hoping that foreign countries would seek to invest in American crypto over foreign digital currencies. The CLARITY Act seeks to set the regulatory foundation for the U.S. crypto market, aiming to protect consumers while boosting innovation; the STABLE Act zeroes in on stablecoins, requiring banks to fully back them with reserves and to submit monthly audits; and the GENIUS Act mirrors the Stable Act in the Senate, expanding rules to both banks and non-banks for issuing stablecoins. Trump's crypto czar David Sacks said passing the GENIUS Act would unlock 'trillions of dollars of demand for our Treasuries practically overnight.' Already the CLARITY Act has cleared the House Financial Services Committee and will next receive a full House floor vote. Emmer also forecasts a vote for Stable Act. 'The Senate should be sending over their GENIUS Act anytime soon, if they don't, so be it,' Emmer said. The GENIUS Act has hit some turbulence in the Senate as Democrats have take issue with the Trump family's foray into crypto - and specifically stablecoins - this year. 'The launch of a stablecoin directly tied to a sitting President who stands to benefit financially from the stablecoin's success is an unprecedented conflict of interest presenting significant threats to both our financial system and our democracy,' Sens. Elizabeth Warren Jeff Merkley wrote in a joint letter this week. World Liberty Financial, the Trump family's crypto venture, has already struck deals to issue stable coins, including one with a partner in the U.A.E. worth $2 billion. Getting these bills passed shouldn't be too difficult, Emmer reasoned, since crypto interests lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. 'I mean digital assets is fun because it's not a partisan issue,' he told the Daily Mail. 'When it comes to digital assets, it's nameless, faceless, genderless.' But there are still powerful interests aligned against passage. Some regional banks fear that wide use of stablecoins could undermine their market share in the financial industry. Meanwhile, financial reform groups believe the legislation would permit Big Tech firms to act as private banks with unregulated currencies.
