Signal app used by Trump officials previously prompted scrutiny in Harris County
The Brief
The editor-in-chief of The Atlantic came out on Monday to allege he was included in a group chat on Signal with top national security officials.
Back in 2022, Greg Groogan reported that some Harris County officials were users on the app.
According to the Attorney General, the Texas Public Information Act dictates institutionalizing transparency for the taxpayer and for citizens to inspect or copy government records.
HARRIS COUNTY, Texas - The editor-in-chief of The Atlantic came out on Monday to allege he was included in a group chat on Signal with top national security officials.
Back in 2022, political reporter Greg Groogan did a report on the app supposedly being used by some Harris County officials.
The backstory
Back in 2022, Groogan reported Harris County officials Commissioner Adrian Garcia, Commissioner Rodney Ellis and Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo were users on the app.
"I have Slack, I have Signal, I have WhatsApp. I haven't used them in years," Hidalgo said in the previous report. "I do not have governmental conversations on Signal."
FOX 26 legal analyst Chris Tritico offered his thoughts at the time: "It troubles me, on many fronts that they would even have it on their phone. Troubles me on many fronts because the appearance of impropriety is enough for the public to lose faith in these officials. They need to be able to explain how this is not a problem."
FOX 26 previously detected Signal accounts connected to the personal phones of political figures such as Troy Nehls, Dan Crenshaw and Randy Weber, who are all members of the Republican Party.
Why you should care
In a state where people are guaranteed by law to get full access to public information and much of what's happening within our government, there is a real growing concern that 21st century technology has created fail-safe measures for elected officials to operate in secret.
According to the Attorney General, the Texas Public Information Act dictates institutionalizing transparency for the taxpayer and for citizens to inspect or copy government records. It also provides that governmental bodies may withhold government records from the public in specific instances.
Since TPIA'S passage in 1972, many elected officials and others in public service have sought to keep secrets and conduct business in the shadows, an "end run" on transparency aided by rapidly advancing technology.
Dig deeper: Signal app war plan leak broke the law, Texas expert says
Dig deeper
This week, Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg detailed a discussion that happened over the Signal messaging app hours before strikes on Iran-backed Houthi-rebels in Yemen ordered by U.S. President Donald Trump.
It's an app that can be used for direct messaging and group chats as well as phone and video calls.
Signal uses end-to-end encryption for its messaging and calling services that prevents any third-party from viewing conversation content or listening in on calls.
In other words, messages and calls sent on Signal are scrambled and only the sender and recipient at each end will have the key to decipher them.
Signal's encryption protocol is open source, meaning that it's freely available for anyone to inspect, use or modify. The encryption protocol is also used by another popular chat service, social media company Meta's WhatsApp platform.
Encryption on Signal is turned on by default, unlike another popular messaging app, Telegram, which requires users to turn it on and does not make it available for group chats.
Signal has features that are found on other messaging apps. It allows users to host group chats with up to 1,000 people and messages can be set to automatically disappear after a certain time.
What they're saying
Encryption experts at the University of Houston tell FOX 26, the Signal App is nearly impossible to hack, which means government officials, at all levels, have the capacity to communicate in an unrecorded "black box", but are essentially breaking the law each time they do so.
"We kind of have the worst of both worlds here - the lack of transparency by the use of that app, while on the other hand, spilling the beans to the news media in advance of an attack, exactly what was going to happen, when it was going to happen and who it was going to happen to," said Aleshire.
The Source
The information in this article comes from previous FOX 26 reporting, legal and technology experts and the Associated Press.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge upholds dismissal in Rockingham County defamation suit; plaintiff plans appeal
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, N.C. (WGHP) — A Wake County judge upheld his motion to dismiss a former Rockingham County commissioner's defamation lawsuit following allegations of a potential conflict of interest involving the presiding judge, according to attorneys familiar with the case. On May 16, Judge Hoyt G. Tessener sided against former Rockingham County Commissioner T. Craig Travis in his 2024 defamation suit against former Commissioner Don Powell and sitting commissioners Mark Richardson and Kevin Berger, son of North Carolina State Sen. Phil Berger (R-Rockingham), as well as Rockingham County Republican Party Chair Diane Parnell, the North Carolina Conservatives Fund, Atlas Political Consulting LLC and GOPAC Inc. Travis's legal team filed a motion to set aside the dismissal on May 22, expressing the belief that the deciding judge had a conflict of interest due to alleged connections to Speaker of the House Tim Moore and Senate President Phil Berger (R-Rockingham County). Although the court's formal written order has not been made available in the North Carolina eCourts system as of Monday, attorneys for both the defense and the plaintiff confirmed that the judge upheld his dismissal at a May 30 hearing. Rockingham County commissioners, other defendants seek protective order in defamation lawsuit An attorney for the defendants, W. Ellis Boyle, said, 'The Court got the right answer and acted completely properly as expected of a judicial officer. Plaintiff's claims never had any credibility and were always a vehicle for an improper lawfare attack against political foes. Lawyers should not countenance such abuses of the legal process deploying sleight of hand.' Alicia Jurney, an attorney for Travis, pushed back on claims that she and fellow attorneys Kimberly Bryan and Stephanie Jenkins acted improperly. 'Any assertion that Ms. Bryan, Ms. Jenkins, or I acted improperly is false,' Jurney said. 'We have fully complied with the Rules of Professional Conduct. Every document filed on behalf of Mr. Travis has been well grounded in fact, supported by the law, and in good faith in pursuit of Mr. Travis's defamation claims against the defendants.' Travis's legal team plans to appeal the dismissal and the order upholding it. Boyle told FOX8 that the court announced sanctions against the plaintiff for placing otherwise unattainable discovery into a defamation claim; Jurney, however, tells FOX8 that the judge said he would take the recommendation under advisement and that the court had not followed up with any further communication regarding sanctions, which she says would have no basis. FOX8 is working to obtain further details from Wake County court. In the original lawsuit, Travis, an outspoken opponent of a proposed casino in Rockingham County, says he chose not to run for reelection to the Board of Commissioners in 2022 due to his belief in term limits. However, in 2023, he said that multiple citizens, who also opposed the casino, reached out to him and inspired him to run again. Developer tied to casinos eyes Rockingham County land as NC lawmakers consider another new gambling law Ultimately, Travis came in fourth in the Republican primary and did not advance to the general election with the top three vote-getters. He garnered 5,506 votes, three votes short of Kevin Berger's 5,509. In the lawsuit, Travis alleges that his loss was due to defamation by the defendants. 'When the plaintiff campaigned on his opposition to the pro-casino measures supported by the incumbent Commissioners and opposed by the majority of residents of Rockingham County, the defendant Commissioners sought to discredit him by publishing defamatory statements to voters in the 2024 Republican primary election,' the lawsuit said. The lawsuit lays out Travis's belief that Kevin Berger and other members of the board acted inappropriately in their attempts to bring a casino to Rockingham County, including closed-door meetings that would violate North Carolina statute and multiple donations from lobbyists and officials associated with In a motion filed to issue a protective order against Travis after the plaintiff filed multiple subpoenas in quick succession, the defendants stated, 'Although the Complaint characterizes this action as a defamation lawsuit against county commissioners, it opens with a 17-page story about the alleged politics and lobbying surrounding the legalization of casinos in North Carolina, and no connection to any purported defamation.' Travis claims that the defendants' campaign messages and social media posts about his candidacy rose above typical political mudslinging due to his opposition to the casino proposition. 'The false statements made about Mr. Travis in the False Attack Ads, Facebook posts, email, and other communications described herein constitute more than the mere vituperation and name-calling that is characteristic of political campaigns and protected by the First Amendment,' the lawsuit said. 'These false statements were made with actual malice and intended to harm Mr. Travis's reputation in Rockingham County by lowering Mr. Travis in the estimation of potential voters in the 2024 Board of Commissioners election through deliberate deception and deterring them from supporting his campaign.' 'I call it deception,' North Carolina landowner expresses regret over making deal after learning about casino plans According to the suit, a clip of Travis speaking was deceptively edited to remove context so that it would falsely appear that Travis intended to raise taxes in Rockingham County. Mailers allegedly accused Travis of opposing budget increases for the Rockingham County Sheriff's Office, which the former commissioner said was not true. GOPAC filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, in which they wrote that they 'did not make any of the statements alleged in the Complaint in Craig Travis v. P. Kevin Berger et al. It did not send the text messages or mailers referenced in the Complaint.' Beginning on Feb. 8, 2022, and continuing through March 5, 2024, the lawsuit said, 'Defendant [Donald] Powell falsely stated to many people that Mr. Travis had vandalized his vehicle.' Those claims include an alleged accusation that Travis ripped the valve stems out of the tires on Powell's vehicle, which was not true, according to the suit. The lawsuit alleges that Kevin Berger, Powell, Richardson and Parnell told others that Travis had stolen campaign signs for the other candidates running for the Board of Commissioners. In a filing submitted in support of a motion to dismiss, the defendant's legal team argued that Travis's lawsuit repeatedly accuses individuals of making defamatory comments but does not state to whom those comments were made. The lawsuit does not identify individuals to whom Powell allegedly told that Travis had ripped out the valve stem or to whom Kevin Berger, Powell and Richardson allegedly told that Travis had stolen campaign signs. According to the filing, Parnell allegedly said on Facebook, 'When you do not see signs for [Powell], [Kevin Berger], Ben Curtis and [Richardson], they have been stolen. Signs put out at 5 and gone by 8… signs replaced… and the 'dark side' is out there again… stealing campaign signs…' The suit claims that Parnell's Facebook friends and followers would recognize that she was using 'the dark side' to refer to Travis based on Parnell's previous statements on her Facebook page, in private messages and in personal conversations. Removing campaign signs that were placed legally is a . The defendants argue that the accusations described in the lawsuit do not meet the legal standard for defamation. Camp for special needs children among plaintiffs in lawsuit against Rockingham County over casino rezoning Travis states in the lawsuit that these statements and accusations, which he says are false and stem from his opposition to the casino project, contributed not only to his loss in the primary but also to a loss of his good reputation within Rockingham County. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Wall Street Journal
9 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Trump-Musk Feud and the Deeper Republican Rift
The alliance between Donald Trump and Elon Musk was always likely to be about as durable as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, the 1939 deal Nazi Germany struck with the Soviet Union days before invading Poland. I won't extend the analogy too far for obvious reasons of taste, except to say that deals rarely last when they are made for short-term advantage between two parties with outsize ambitions but divergent characters. The more important question is: Does this split signal something fundamentally awry in the MAGA coalition? What does the quick disillusionment of the Republican Party's most prominent convert mean for the president and the party's wider fortunes? On the face of it, not much. For one thing, the rupture seems mainly personal. In some respects the MAGA movement is a personality cult. Mr. Musk wasn't that personality. The Tesla and SpaceX boss is a brilliant but mercurial man whose pathologies can lead him to dark places, as we have learned more since the breakup. Even in this White House, it seems, some decorums can't be breached. But Mr. Musk's rising animus seems also to have been based on a belated realization that the returns from his alliance were heavily asymmetric. As an example of Mr. Trump's facility for one-sided deal making, it can hardly be bettered. What Mr. Musk gave—in campaign money, in good publicity for the Department of Government Efficiency's assault on wasteful spending, in lost value for Tesla, and in his own diminished personal wealth and reputation—wasn't close to matched by whatever he was supposed to be getting in return. At least the Soviets got a chunk of Poland and the Baltic states before Barbarossa ended the relationship.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Georgia GOP's attempt to block Brad Raffensperger from running as a Republican may go nowhere
ATLANTA (AP) — Georgia's Republican Party says Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger should not be able to run under the party's banner anymore, but the party's chairman says the attempt to kick out the state's chief election official is going nowhere. Delegates voted overwhelmingly at the state GOP convention on Saturday in Dalton to adopt a series of resolutions, including one declaring the party shall not 'take any action to allow Brad Raffensperger to qualify as a Republican' for future elections. The resolution shows the deep hostility many Republican activists have toward Raffensperger following his refusal to help Donald Trump overturn his 2020 election loss in Georgia. Alex Johnson chairs the Georgia Republican Assembly, a group that tries to influence the party. He said Raffensperger has been 'generally ignoring and disrespecting' the party, including attempts to change the election system, and that Republicans should be allowed to divorce Raffensperger. 'He doesn't listen to anything that the Republican party has asked him to do,' Johnson said Monday. 'He is hostile and has been hostile towards our presidential nominee and now a person who is president.' But party Chairman Josh McKoon told reporters after the convention ended that while the resolution 'presents the sense of the convention on what should happen,' state law requires the party to allow Raffensperger to run as a Republican. 'I don't really see a way for the Georgia Republican Party to decline someone the opportunity to qualify,' McKoon said. Spokespeople for Raffensperger did not immediately respond to requests for comment Monday. The two-term secretary of state has said he's considering running for governor or U.S. Senate in 2026. Georgia has no party registration and its primary elections allow anyone to vote in the party nominating contest of their choice. That means it can be hard to tell who is truly a Republican or a Democrat. Some Republicans favor a system of voter registration by party and primaries that allow only party members to vote. They also say party officials should decide which candidates should be allowed to run as Republicans. The Georgia Republican Party's executive committee voted in January to expel former Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan after Duncan endorsed Democrat Kamala Harris for president. The committee voted to ban Duncan from party events and said it would not qualify Duncan to run as a Republican in the future. But the party in 2023 rejected an attempt to ban ideological traitors from primary ballots. Last year, judges blocked attempts by a county party in northwest Georgia to act as gatekeepers for local candidates. In a ruling regarding Catoosa County, the state Supreme Court did not get to the heart of the dispute over whether parities can create rules for qualifying candidates in primary elections beyond those found in Georgia law. Those who push that point of view claim being forced to qualify everyone who signs up violates their freedom of association under the U.S. Constitution. 'You can't force a Baptist church to ordain a Buddhist or a Muslim to be a Baptist minister,' said Nathaniel Darnell, president of the Georgia Republican Assembly. 'By the same token, you can't force somebody who is counteracting the Republican principles and objectives to be Republican.' A federal judge rejected that argument, but some Catoosa County Republicans have appealed the case. The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has not yet ruled. Republicans in Chattooga and Pickens counties passed similar rules. Those who want to act as gatekeepers generally are seeking to move the party to the right. The state convention on Saturday, for example, called for repealing both the state income tax and local property taxes. Those who hold a different view say primary election voters should decide who's a true Republican. U.S. District Judge Billy Ray, a former chair of the Gwinnett County Republican Party, wrote that a party's associational rights are not 'absolute' and voters should decide primaries when he rejected the Catoosa County case now on appeal. 'Trying to limit who can run in a primary seems inconsistent with the purpose of a primary to start with,' Ray wrote in a footnote. 'Perhaps the Catoosa Republican Party doesn't believe that the citizens of Catoosa County can for themselves intelligently decide which candidates best embody the principles of the Republican Party.'
