logo
Q&A released on potential changes coming to New Mexico State Fairgrounds

Q&A released on potential changes coming to New Mexico State Fairgrounds

Yahoo01-04-2025

Video: Coverage of the fair in 2024.
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) — Bernalillo County released an update on the future of New Mexico's state fair Tuesday morning. The new details come after Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham spoke in late 2024 about potentially moving the state fair, and upgrading the fairgrounds.
Take a look at the questions and answers provided by Bernalillo County below:
The county says this is the State of New Mexico's decision.
Full Response: 'It is state-owned land and ultimately the State of New Mexico's decision. The state's General Services Department released a $500,000 request for proposal (RFP) on March 6 for professional consultants to propose a master plan that will form the baseline for determining the area's future, including the location of the fair and any new improvements to the site. The state's General Services Division will select the consultant that will form the master plan.'
The state says, 'there is substantial potential to increase the usage of the State Fairgrounds on a year-round basis.'
Full Response: 'State Sen. Mimi Stewart (D-Albuquerque), whose district includes the State Fairgrounds, also has advocated significant revitalization of the area to include 'a mixed-use, mixed-income, walkable, green space-filled neighborhood.' She sponsored Senate Bill 481, which passed both the state House and Senate during the just-ended legislative session and is awaiting the governor's signature. If signed into law, it will create a State Fairgrounds District and form a mechanism to finance redevelopment in the area, based on the findings in the master planning process.'
This bill, sponsored by state Sen. Mimi Stewart, forms the 'State Fair District.'
Full Response: 'This district would encompass the existing fairgrounds and any contiguous land acquired subsequently, aiming to revitalize the area through economic development initiatives. The bill includes provisions for a property tax levy and authorizes the issuance of up to $500 million in bonds to finance infrastructure projects within the district. ​SB 481 names the district board members as the following seven elected officials or their designees: the governor; the state senator, state representative, county commissioner and city councilor from the area; the mayor and a representative community member selected by the governor. This board will appropriate funding for the district.'
The Expo site is in Bernalillo County, as opposed to Albuquerque.
Full Response: While the land is owned by the state, the Expo New Mexico site is technically not in the City of Albuquerque but in the unincorporated area of Bernalillo County. For any private development on the land, developers could seek permitting either through the city or the county.
Request-for-proposal submissions are due April 18.
Full Response: 'They will be reviewed and scored by a committee selected by the state's General Services Department. The contract is scheduled to be awarded by May 9, per the state website.'
Bernalillo County is not aware of a specified location at this time.
Full Response: 'The state approved the governor's capital outlay request for funding in House Bill 450 in the amount of $14 million for 'EXPO NM Fairgrounds Infrastructure Improvements and site acquisition.' Bernalillo County, however, is not aware of a named location or vision for the future of the annual State Fair.'
It would allow some tax revenue to stay in the district for developing infrastructure.
Full Response: 'The district would allow for certain tax revenue (state GRT, gaming revenue, and property tax) from the defined 'district' – in this case, the area of the current fairgrounds – to stay in the district to finance its infrastructure development – such as for roads, water/sewer and community facilities. The district would need the approval of the state Board of Finance, New Mexico Finance Authority and the state Legislature to issue bonds, which then could expedite development. District funds would be controlled by a specially created body of elected officials or their designees.'
Those chances will be announced once a master-plan developer is chosen.
Full Response: 'Further opportunities will be scheduled after a master-plan developer is selected and can field questions in the setting of a public meeting. The potential contractors have been encouraged to consider data-driven economic analysis and community engagement in forming the master plan.'
A finalized plan is expected to be available by early 2026.
Full Response: 'Upon selection of a developer for the master plan in May, public engagement, including in-person public meetings, will follow through the summer. A draft of the master plan is expected by fall, and a finalized plan should be available no later than early 2026. A budget and construction timeline then would be determined by the District Board.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House Republicans warn Senate not to touch SALT deal
House Republicans warn Senate not to touch SALT deal

The Hill

time9 minutes ago

  • The Hill

House Republicans warn Senate not to touch SALT deal

Moderate House Republicans from high-tax blue states are warning senators that they will not give the 'big, beautiful bill' a final stamp of approval if they change their proposal for the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap. The shot across the Capitol came shortly after Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters the upper chamber would likely tweak the SALT provision in the mammoth measure, one of several alterations. The House bill raises the SALT deduction cap to $40,000 — quadruple the $10,000 deduction cap in current law. A group of moderates in the House from New York, New Jersey and California has said they would not support the package unless it included substantial SALT relief. Those members are now warning that any changes to the provision could prevent the bill from passing the House once it is sent back from the Senate. 'If the Senate unwinds the House's $40K SALT deal, it's like digging up buried radioactive waste—reckless and sure to contaminate the whole One Big Beautiful Bill,' Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.) wrote on X. 'Best to leave it alone.' He elaborated on his comments later, telling reporters he would encourage the Senate to keep their deal in place. 'The reason I've chosen that analogy is because the House took four months to get to where we could finally compromise, negotiate and settle on bill language as it relates to SALT and other interlocking and related provisions. So the Senate to disrupt that is to undo a lot of that painful work, to rip off some scabs, and to essentially restart the very painful process that we went through for four months,' he said. 'I would advise them to keep the bill intact. I respect the senators' prerogatives to exercise their constituents' priorities, but we worked really hard to get to the compromise bill that we got to, and it'd be a shame to have to restart.' Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), another member of the group, was more concise: 'Let's be clear — no SALT, no deal.' 'If the Senate changes the negotiated number of $40,000 — it will derail final passage of the bill,' Lawler wrote on X. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who was a key player in brokering a SALT deal in the House, said he spoke with members of the Caucus on Wednesday, shortly after Thune signaled changes to their provision, and plans to make their case to the Senate. 'I just talked to my SALT Caucus on the floor and I'm gonna go communicate to the Senate, again, it's a very delicate thing, we have to maintain the equilibrium point that we reached in the House,' Johnson told reporters. 'And it took almost a year to get to that point so I don't think we can toss that off.' Asked if there is wiggle room around the $40,000 deduction cap, the Speaker was coy: 'I'm about to find out; we'll see.' The SALT deduction cap was always expected to be a battle in the Senate. While a number of vulnerable Republicans in the House care deeply about SALT, Senate Republicans don't even have members from New York, New Jersey or California. The issue came up for Senate Republicans at a conference-wide meeting on Wednesday, where some were itching to lower the cap but wary of gumming things up for Johnson. 'Our goal isn't to create a problem for the House, but we also know the Senate will put its mark on the bill,' said Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.). One Senate Republican indicated that some senators favor forcing the House SALT backers into supporting a lower ceiling. But they believe the easiest path is for the upper chamber to swallow its pride and defer to Johnson. 'It may be easier to say than do,' the Senate GOP member said. 'It would just screw the whole bill.' This senator said even lowering the ceiling from $40,000 to $30,000 could be risky since it might lead some of the House Republicans to vote against the bill. But the senator also suggested the SALT Republicans in the House could be bluffing. 'Is that enough to get you, because otherwise you say, 'I'm going to vote against the bill and for a $4 trillion tax increase as a Republican,'' the member continued. 'That's original sin there.' While Thune is signaling that the chamber will likely change the SALT provision, Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) — a former House member and key liaison between the two chambers — is saying the opposite. 'It was a hard fight over there,' Mullin said, pointing to its roughly $300 billion cost. 'It's a big number, but it was something they had to do to try to get the bill passed. We don't want to do something that would cause it not to pass.' 'The body here is going to work its will,' he continued. 'I would be a little [skeptical] about doing too much with SALT.' House Republicans in the SALT Caucus are warning they aren't bluffing. 'I wouldn't bet against a couple of salty Republicans, including a couple of salty New Yorkers,' LaLota said. 'I wouldn't bet against us.' Pressed on if the Senate should take the SALT Caucus' comments as a signal that the House will not pass a bill with a lower deduction cap, LaLota responded: 'That would be reasonable for them to consider that.' Rep. Young Kim (R-Calif.), another member of the SALT Caucus, expressed confidence. 'The leadership is working and talking to the Senate on a regular basis and I'm very confident much of what we passed in the House will still be there,' Kim said. 'So I'm not gonna comment on how I'll be voting for it till I see the package that comes back to us.' 'We're already working to ensure that everything that we pass in the House is still kept in the Senate version,' she added. Asked if there was any wiggle room on their SALT deal, LaLota said: 'I'm eager to see what they actually come back with. I don't know why anybody would logically want to disrupt something that was the result of a lot of hard work, pain, heartache and ultimately compromise,' he added. When a reporter pointed out that his comments were not a firm no, he responded: 'I would love them to increase it. That would be a great idea if they came to us with $50,000, I would endorse it right away.'

Senate panel targets Biden-era green programs
Senate panel targets Biden-era green programs

The Hill

time14 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Senate panel targets Biden-era green programs

The Big Story The Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee released text for its portion of the Trump agenda policy bill that Republicans are trying to get across the finish line, becoming the first Senate panel to do so. © Greg Nash The EPW text appears similar to provisions passed by the House. It's not one of the committees that deals with thorny issues like Medicaid or energy tax credits that are more likely to undergo changes in the upper chamber. Like the House version of the bill, the text released by Senate Republicans on Wednesday repeals numerous green programs passed by the Democrats in 2022. This includes a $20 billion program that seeks to provide financing for climate-friendly projects and a $3 billion program that provides grants for underserved communities that want to fight air pollution and climate change. It also repeals other grant programs related to air pollution monitoring and reducing air pollution at schools — as well as a program that seeks to charge oil and gas companies for their excess methane emissions. Like the House version, the Senate bill also includes a provision criticized by Democrats as 'pay-for-play' that allows companies to pay for expedited reviews of energy or other infrastructure projects. And it seeks to repeal a Biden-era regulation that's expected to push the auto market toward selling more electric vehicles. The ultimate text could still change as the parliamentarian has to decide which programs can actually be passed through reconciliation – a process by which the Senate can pass legislation with a simple majority instead of the 60 votes it usually needs to advance bills. Read more at Welcome to The Hill's Energy & Environment newsletter, I'm Rachel Frazin — keeping you up to speed on the policies impacting everything from oil and gas to new supply chains. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect the energy and environment sectors now and in the future: Duffy threatens to pull California's high speed rail funding The Trump administration notified California officials Wednesday that federal funding for the state's massive high-speed rail project is at risk of being pulled after a four-month review concluded the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) has 'no viable path' to complete the project on time or on budget. Padilla puts blanket hold on Trump EPA nominees Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) is expanding his efforts to hold up President Trump's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) nominees in response to the Senate's move to revoke his state's electric vehicle mandate. Canadian wildfire smoke reaches northeast US Canadian wildfire smoke is reaching the northeastern part of the United States, with multiple National Weather Service (NWS) offices saying they are experiencing issues with the smoke. In Other News Branch out with a different read from The Hill: South Florida meteorologist warns viewers NWS staff shortages will impact his hurricane forecasts A South Florida meteorologist warned viewers that National Weather Service (NWS) shortages will impact his forecasts. What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets touching on energy issues, the environment and other topics: Trump's Permitting Boss Aims to Deliver on AI Data Center Plans (Bloomberg Law) White House proposes shutting down chemical safety agency (The Washington Post) On Tap Upcoming news themes and events we're watching: What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: Trump calls for scrapping debt limit President Trump doubled down Wednesday on calls to scrap the nation's debt ceiling, pressing for bipartisan action to abolish it and finding common ground with Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.). Read more Haley on Trump call with Putin: 'A backhanded slap to all of our allies' Former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley (R) sharply criticized President Trump on Wednesday for suggesting Russia could play a mediating role in nuclear negotiations with Iran. Read more Opinion in The Hill Op-ed related to energy & environment submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you tomorrow!

Pulled NASA nomination blindsides space community: ‘Major blunder'
Pulled NASA nomination blindsides space community: ‘Major blunder'

The Hill

time19 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Pulled NASA nomination blindsides space community: ‘Major blunder'

The aerospace community was caught off-guard this week by President Trump's withdrawal of tech entrepreneur Jared Isaacman's NASA nomination. Announced days before the Senate's likely confirmation of Isaacman, the withdrawal sparked a swirl of rumors and concerns, as budget cuts loom and NASA stretches into its sixth month without a leader. Trump, in a social media post over the weekend, offered few details but said his decision was made after a 'thorough review of prior associations.' One space policy executive called the reasoning 'complete bull—-.' 'That's like the worst excuse in the world,' said the executive, who was granted anonymity to speak freely about withdrawal. Isaacman's nomination had already advanced through the Senate Commerce Committee in a 19-9 vote and was expected to hit the full floor this week. When reached for comment Wednesday, he told The Hill he is 'grateful' for the support from the space community. The White House also did not offer specifics, stirring further frustration. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt briefly addressed the decision in a briefing Tuesday, telling reporters Trump 'wants to ensure all of his nominees are aligned fully with the America first mission of this administration.' 'I was frankly gobsmacked,' Mark Whittington, an author who studies space, politics and policy, told The Hill. 'Jared Isaacman is well-regarded by just about everybody.' While Isaacman — a billionaire entrepreneur and commercial astronaut — was not originally considered a contender for the role, observers said the aerospace community was largely open to his new perspective at the agency. 'People who follow the space program think he would be perfect for NASA administrator, and I can see no reason why this is happening,' Whittington said. Rumors quickly circulated over the weekend that the decision might have something to do with Isaacman's ally, Elon Musk, who stepped down from his role leading Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) last week. Two sources close to the White House suggested Isaacman's ties to Musk may have also contributed to his removal as the pick to lead NASA. Musk, the sources said, rubbed many people in the administration the wrong way. And with his official departure from government, Isaacman lost a strong ally in the White House. Isaacman worked alongside Musk at SpaceX to fund the company's first private spacewalk, and he was one of four astronauts aboard the Polaris Dawn flight last year. 'Now six months of hard work later, just days short of a confirmation vote, and it's all thrown away because he bought two flights to space from Elon Musk? Are you f—ing kidding me?' said one Republican space policy expert. 'It looks like the Waste, Fraud and Abuse Caucus was bigger than we thought.' Isaacman acknowledged the timing of the decision this week, telling the 'All In' podcast he received a phone call Friday informing him the president decided to 'go in a different direction.' Friday marked Musk's last day as a special government employee leading DOGE for the White House. 'It was a real bummer,' Isaacman said, adding, 'It was certainly disappointing. But the president needs to have his person that he counts on to fulfill the agenda.' 'I'm not…play[ing] dumb on this. I had a pretty good idea,' he added. 'I don't think the timing was much of a coincidence that there were other changes going on the same day and it was obviously a little bit of a disappointment.' Pressed on whether he was referring to Musk, Isaacman said, 'Obviously there was more than one departure that was covered on that day.' 'There were some people that had some axes to grind, I guess, and I was a good visible target,' he continued, adding, 'I just want to be overwhelmingly clear — I don't fault the president at all.' 'I don't blame an influential adviser coming in and saying, look, here's the facts, and I think we should kill this guy and the president's got to make a call and move on,' he said, 'I think that's exactly kind of how it went.' Isaacman sidestepped questions over whether his nomination withdrawal was a 'shot at Elon,' telling the 'All In' podcast that people 'can draw their own conclusions but I think the direction people are thinking on this seems to check out to me.' Isaacman has given to Democrats during recent campaign cycles, including Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), a retired astronaut. But also donated to a few Republicans. A White House official pointed The Hill to Isaacman's donations in recent years to PACs linked to Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.), along with the hundreds of thousands of dollars he donated to other Democratic campaigns since 2010. But various space observers emphasized that reports of these donations first circulated in January. Six months later, they are frustrated the donations are abruptly being used against the tech entrepreneur. 'It was well-known that, like a lot of businessmen, he [Isaacman] donated to both parties and that came up in the vetting process…I'm sure that Trump knows about it or he should have known about,' Whittington told The Hill. 'All of a sudden, six months later, he says, 'I'm shocked, shocked' that Jared Isaacman gave money to Democrats,' he added. Isaacman echoed this, stating his donations were 'not a new development,' and described himself as a moderate who is 'right-leaning' and supportive of Trump's agenda. The space industry now anxiously awaits a new nominee; no name has emerged as a clear frontrunner. The need to pass the 'Trump loyalty test' could eliminate several good candidates, the first space policy executive suggested. 'I know you got to have partisan people in a lot of these agencies but for space, the community is generally bipartisan and more scientific or technical,' they told The Hill. The process to push a new nominee through the Senate could take months, stoking alarm among observers over the steep potential NASA budget cuts. Under Trump's proposed 2026 budget, NASA's funding would be cut by nearly 25 percent in what would be the largest single-year cut at the agency. Musk expressed concerns over proposed funding cuts to NASA in April but said he could not participate in those conversations as SpaceX is a major federal contractor. Space observers are concerned the cuts will pass through Congress with little opposition. 'When the budget needs to be mulled over and chewed over by Congress, they really need somebody at NASA to explain things to them,' Whittington explained. 'Otherwise, Congress is just going to do what it wants, and I think [it] really goes against the White House's interest if they want to control space policy. This is a major blunder, whatever way you look at it.' A spokesperson for NASA said the agency will 'continue to relentlessly pursue' Trump's America First agenda under acting administrator Janet Petro. 'The @NASA workforce is committed to serve and eagerly awaits President Trump's new nominee to head the agency, leading us toward our 'manifest destiny in the stars,'' NASA spokesperson Bethany Stevens wrote on X. It comes amid an already tumultuous time at NASA as it faces workforce and infrastructure challenges as a result of both DOGE cuts and years-long budget declines. 'NASA lost its mojo, they don't know how to solve complex, interdisciplinary problems efficiently, they don't know how to put together the right teams to solve those problems, they lost the ability to do that,' said Charles Camarda, a retired NASA astronaut. Camarda, who recently released a book on NASA's culture challenges, explained NASA has lost its 'research culture' over the years as funding continues to be cut for applied research. 'Right now, we are technically drained. We don't have the expertise, and we're not raising new researchers and engineering researchers,' he said. Brett Samuels contributed reporting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store