logo
Two New England energy companies in surprising alliance with fossil fuel lobby, undercutting climate targets

Two New England energy companies in surprising alliance with fossil fuel lobby, undercutting climate targets

Boston Globe16-03-2025

Advertisement
In Massachusetts, a state that's set aggressive climate targets, cooperation and buy-in from utilities is a pillar of how the state plans to get there. That makes it 'incredibly troubling' that both Eversource, one of the state's largest gas and electric utilities, and Avangrid, offshore wind developer and the parent company of Berkshire Gas, became members of the alliance last year, said Kyle Murray, Massachusetts program director for the advocacy group the Acadia Center.
In response to questions from the Globe, both New England utilities defended their decision to join the alliance. They also noted that the costs for their membership are being covered by shareholders — not ratepayers. Neither company would disclose how much they pay the alliance as members.
Eversource spokesperson William Hinkle said the company joined through its New Hampshire operating company and that it did so with an eye toward the alliance's 'diversified approach to renewable energy development' including offshore wind in the Gulf of Maine.
At Avangrid, company spokesperson Leo Rosales said the company joined because 'we support their efforts to advocate for greater transparency and consumer education on energy bills.' He added that 'a membership does not reflect the company's endorsement of an organization's entire platform.'
Both companies have been vocal supporters of the clean energy transition in New England and played key roles in guiding new climate-friendly policies. Eversource even
Advertisement
So,
the decision to join the Consumer Energy Alliance perhaps illustrates how complicated the business of energy is in the United States, with utilities operating across state lines and adhering to different laws and objectives.
'At a time when we know we need to be transitioning off of fossil fuels as soon as is practicable, these companies have instead opted to join with a group dedicated to frustrating that aim, and indeed directly at odds with some of the positive initiatives that these companies have been advancing in the Northeast' like geothermal networks, offshore wind transmission, and more, Murray said.
The Consumer Energy Alliance was launched in 2006 by HBW Resources, a lobbying group that represents the fossil fuel industry.
The alliance has done some advocacy for offshore wind, including
Bryson Hull, a spokesperson for the alliance and vice president of strategic/crisis communications at HBW Resources, said via email that the alliance is proud of the work it has done across the country to 'defend Americans' freedom to choose the energy they want and need,' including supporting wind.
Advertisement
But critics argue that limited efforts to bolster offshore wind are essentially a 'fig leaf for Consumer Energy Alliance's main operation.' The alliance's
said Itai Vardi, a research and communications manager at the investigative research organization Energy and Policy Institute.
As of 2020, the alliance had roughly 10 ongoing local and state campaigns to improve the optics around natural gas, according to a document obtained by the Energy and Policy Institute, repeatedly resulting in controversy.
In 2023, the group was investigated by the Ohio attorney general's office after
said a contractor was to blame and
A recent
But here in the Northeast, the group has been largely quiet after an earlier plan to raise the profile of gas appears to have failed.
Advertisement
That plan, presented by the alliance at a gas industry conference in 2019, included highlighting the 'extreme costs of winter home heating' and continuing its '
Despite
those efforts,
Massachusetts went on to pass climate bills to move past fossil fuels, and many New England states did as well.
Some local supporters of clean energy worry that with Trump back in the White House, the alliance may see an opening to again try to take aim at New England's climate policies. And having support from two local utilities adds wind to its sails.
Avangrid's involvement with the alliance also goes deeper than just membership — Avangrid chief executive Pedro Azagra also joined the board of the National Hispanic Energy Council, which was formed with support from the alliance. The National Hispanic Energy Council has vocally opposed California's
Elizabeth Turnbull Henry, president of the Environmental League of Massachusetts, said she hopes that, as members, Eversource and Avangrid will 'use their power to moderate and improve' the Consumer Energy Alliance platform.
If not, she said, 'joining creates a credibility problem.
'
Sabrina Shankman can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Washington Post editorial admits colleges must take 'strenuous action' to restore free exchange of ideas
Washington Post editorial admits colleges must take 'strenuous action' to restore free exchange of ideas

Fox News

time23 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Washington Post editorial admits colleges must take 'strenuous action' to restore free exchange of ideas

Harvard may win its legal battle against the Trump administration, but the fight to restore confidence in higher education as defenders of the "free exchange of ideas" would still be far from over, The Washington Post editorial board wrote on Tuesday. "In the past decade, trust in higher education has dropped precipitously. Ten years ago, a robust majority of Americans told Gallup they had a 'great deal' or 'quite a lot' of confidence in higher education; today, only one-third of Americans say the same," the editorial stated, highlighting similar concerns over an uptick in those who say they have "very little" or "no" confidence in higher education. That percentage rose to 32% from 10% a decade ago. Such discontent with higher education has created opportunities for Republicans to seize on the trend and "attack the foundations of academic independence," the board argued. A cocktail of problems, ranging from free speech concerns to rising costs and lower returns on investment, was said to have fed into the growing distrust. In one corner, conservative faculty members have reported self-censoring due to fear of how others might respond to their opinions. The Post argued this isn't isolated to one group, however, and that left-wing voices are also choosing to stay quiet when controversial topics are discussed. "In an academic community in which 'diversity statements' are required of new hires (and professors can be denied jobs merely for criticizing them), university administrations and disciplines issue official statements embracing social justice causes, journal editors apologize for or withdraw papers that offend the left, and conservative professors are becoming an increasingly endangered species, even moderates or those on the center-left can reasonably wonder what they're allowed to say, and universities can seem drastically out of step with mainstream society," the editorial said. The editorial board went on to say that institutions of higher education lack a solid foundation to demand that the government respect their "academic freedom" unless they demand the same from their own teachers and leaders. "The worst of this political fever might be behind us, but academia will have to take strenuous action to restore its reputation as defenders of the free exchange of ideas…" "Renaming the diversity, equity and inclusion office will not suffice; they need to foster a campus environment in which the frank discussion of ideas is the core value. If they do not, they will find the public yawning as conservative attacks intensify and courts struggle to contain the damage," the Post's editorial board continued.

About 100 National Endowment for the Humanities employees laid off, union says
About 100 National Endowment for the Humanities employees laid off, union says

USA Today

time24 minutes ago

  • USA Today

About 100 National Endowment for the Humanities employees laid off, union says

About 100 National Endowment for the Humanities employees laid off, union says About 2/3 of National Endowment for the Humanities employees were laid off Tuesday. The agency plans to issue half of the number of grants next year Show Caption Hide Caption Active-duty marines deployed for Los Angeles anti-ICE protests President Donald Trump is sending in active-duty Marines to assist law enforcement with immigration protests in Los Angeles, California. Approximately two-thirds of the staff at the National Endowment for the Humanities will lose their jobs when their "reduction in force" goes into effect June 10, according to their union, the American Federation of Government Employees Local 3403. "A major agency restructuring is underway without the appropriate planning needed to ensure the continuity of operations," the local said in a statement. "These drastic changes … represent an existential threat to those institutions and individuals who rely on support from NEH to research, preserve, and interpret our shared heritage. The agency's employees were not part of the lawsuit that currently has other reduction in force efforts on hold. The National Endowment for the Humanities did not respond to a request for comment. Less than 60 employees are expected to remain. The agency has a $207 million budget to fund humanities programs such as history, law, literature, philosophy, and linguistics. In early April, NEH terminated more than 1,000 existing grants, including one for the National History Day competition and grants for state humanities councils in all 50 states. The agency has already quietly posted that roughly half of its funding opportunities will not be offered in the next fiscal year or will no longer be offered at all. Among the grants that the agency will no longer offer next year are awards specifically for faculty at Hispanic-serving institutions, tribal institutions, training for K-12 and higher education teachers and studies on endangered languages and the experiences of war. The preserved grants include projects for the country's 250th anniversary, including a statue garden of famous Americans.

Average Credit Card Debt Is Up By More Than a Quarter: What That Means for Americans' Wallets and the Economy
Average Credit Card Debt Is Up By More Than a Quarter: What That Means for Americans' Wallets and the Economy

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Average Credit Card Debt Is Up By More Than a Quarter: What That Means for Americans' Wallets and the Economy

This decade's historically high inflation rate has pushed more Americans to use credit cards to pay the bills — and many are now delinquent on their payments. If these trends continue, it could bode ill for both personal finances and the U.S. economy, experts say. Read More: For You: The average U.S. credit card debt per borrower rose to $6,371 during the first quarter of 2025, according to TransUnion's latest credit industry insights report. That represents a 26% increase from an average of $5,026 during the first quarter of 2022, when inflation was headed for its highest rate in four decades. GOBankingRates unpacks what these findings mean for Americans' wallets and the economy. On the bright side, the 2025 average credit card debt was up only 2.5% from a year earlier — a slowdown from the annual increases reported in 2024 (8.5%) and 2023 (14%). Total balances across all consumer credit products — including mortgage, auto and personal loans — rose by about 28% from Q1 2020 to Q1 2025. However, when adjusted for inflation, balance growth was closer to 3%. The TransUnion analysis also found that inflation-adjusted balances for consumers declined in real dollar terms across the majority of credit risk tiers from 2020 to 2025. These are positive signs in terms of the rate of debt growth. But it's still worrying that Americans continue to pile up debt in an otherwise decent economic environment where wages are rising and unemployment remains low. Consider This: 'As consumers grapple with rising costs and high interest rates, recent studies have revealed an increased reliance on credit products to help make ends meet,' TransUnion noted. This has been a particular problem for subprime borrowers, according to Michele Raneri, a TransUnion vice president and head of U.S. research and consulting. 'This demographic has likely felt the impact of higher costs most acutely,' Raneri said in a press release. 'But for other risk tiers of borrowers, their card balance growth has been less than the rate of inflation, indicating that many consumers may have further borrowing capacity.' Subprime and low-income borrowers are also more likely to be delinquent on their credit card payments, according to a recent report from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRED). That report, released on May 9, found that the share of people 30 days delinquent on their credit card debt has 'trended upward' since the first half of 2021. But it's more notable in the lowest-income areas than in the highest-income areas. Between the second quarter of 2021 to the first quarter of 2025, their delinquency rates grew by 63% and 44%, respectively. While the pace of delinquency rate growth has slowed since the start of 2024, the fact that it continues to grow at all could signal trouble in the months ahead. 'Delinquency rates, including credit card delinquency rates, may anticipate recessions and provide insight into future U.S. economic conditions,' the FRED report noted. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 Warren Buffett: 10 Things Poor People Waste Money On 10 Cars That Outlast the Average Vehicle This article originally appeared on Average Credit Card Debt Is Up By More Than a Quarter: What That Means for Americans' Wallets and the Economy

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store