Indian parents fight to clear name after child abuse conviction saw baby seized
An Indian couple are fighting to clear their names after the mother was jailed for child abuse.
Photo:
Supplied
An Indian family has spent six years battling government agencies to prove their innocence after Oranga Tamariki seized their 10-week-old baby in 2018 and sent the mother to prison for child abuse.
Their story has since been reported on Newsroom's Fractured podcast by investigative journalist Melanie Reid.
Zita and Ravi, who spoke on condition of anonymity, have spent the past six years navigating New Zealand's child protection and immigration systems in a bid to overturn an allegation that turned their lives upside-down.
Their ordeal started when their 8-week-old baby was taken to Starship Hospital in 2018, referred by their GP for suspected meningitis.
A CT scan revealed a non-depressed linear skull fracture and subdural haemorrhages - bleeding between the skull and the brain.
A full-body X-ray showed fractures in 18 ribs, as well as in the baby's left femur and tibia - 39 fractures in total.
Blood tests revealed extremely low levels of calcium and vitamin D.
Within 24 hours, hospital specialists concluded the injuries were non-accidental.
Baby K, as she is referred to, was hospitalised for 12 days before being placed in foster care.
In 2021, Zita was convicted of intentionally injuring her newborn daughter and sentenced to two years and seven months in prison.
Starship Hospital
Photo:
RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly
During the three-week trial, four Starship doctors testified that the injuries were consistent with abusive head trauma.
No medical experts appeared in Zita's defence, and she has consistently denied harming her child.
Meanwhile, Baby K was moved between four different foster homes.
Ravi, who has no criminal convictions, was repeatedly denied custody by Oranga Tamariki until April this year.
When Zita was released after serving most of her sentence, the state maintained custody of Baby K and began deportation proceedings against her.
Ravi, whose visa depended on his wife's, also faced deportation.
He is currently in the process of applying for an extension to his visa.
Zita came to New Zealand hopeful of a bright future but is now thinking of leaving after years of hardship and separation from her daughter.
"I came to New Zealand with so many dreams, but now I'm thinking of leaving," she said.
Zita said her dream of building a life in New Zealand had been shattered.
After spending two years in prison over what she and her husband claim was a miscarriage of justice, she is struggling to rebuild her life.
"Finally, I got a work visa in March, but the problem is I can't find a job because of my prison sentence," she said. "I just want my convictions overturned so I can live a normal life with my husband and daughter."
The couple now live apart due to financial hardship related to housing.
Zita lives with her brother, while her husband Ravi and their young daughter share accommodation with relatives.
"I've lost so much since it all began," Zita said. "I lost my daughter, my family, my father and the chance to live in New Zealand without fear."
Awaiting trial in 2019, Zita was informed that her father had died in India, but she was unable to attend the funeral because her passport was being held by the court.
Zita recalled her early days in prison with anguish.
"I didn't eat for weeks," she said. "I cried all the time."
Ravi, who came to New Zealand on a partner visa, was also facing immigration challenges.
The couple initially tried to to seek support from the Indian community but were disappointed by the results.
"We thought that because we were Indians, our people would stand by us," Ravi said. "Unfortunately, that didn't happen."
One exception was the Supreme Sikh Society, which provided a letter of support in 2023.
The two years that Zita spent behind bars were some of the hardest of Ravi's life.
"After the doctors were convinced we harmed our baby, the system took over and pointed fingers at us," he said.
"They created a narrative that there were problems between me and my wife, that we had injured the baby.
"But no one really told us how she got all those fractures - until the media brought in experts who finally explained it."
He believed they had been treated as outsiders by every government agency they encountered.
Meanwhile, their daughter had spent much of her life in foster care.
"She doesn't know anything about Indian culture," Zita said.
"We're trying our best to teach her Indian values and traditions," Ravi said.
The couple had repeatedly asked Oranga Tamariki to place their daughter with an Indian family or with their own relatives in New Zealand, but their requests were denied.
Zita and Ravi said they made a heartbreaking decision to terminate a second pregnancy in 2019, fearing Oranga Tamariki would remove the baby at birth.
Joris de Bres
Photo:
Supplied
Former Race Relations Commissioner Joris de Bres has been working with the couple for several years.
"We've been on a roller-coaster ride the whole time and it's only in the last month really that we've got to the point where there's some light at the end of the tunnel, but there were still challenges to overcome," de Bres said.
"They've been hounded by the police. They had their house bugged and they've been through a court case and the mother jailed. There's something wrong here."
De Bres believed that ethnicity played a role.
"I can attribute it to a degree of institutional racism and a general racial attitude within the state. You know, I was with the Race Relations Commission for 10 years, so I'm familiar with this situation," he said.
"If you're a new arrival from another country and your skin colour is different from that of the majority, you're already starting at a disadvantage - especially when dealing with the system and even some of the people within it."
Journalists Melanie Reid and Bonnie Sumner are behind Newsroom's investigative podcast, Fractured.
Photo:
Supplied
De Bres eventually contacted investigative journalists Melanie Reid and Bonnie Sumner.
Reid said the case was especially difficult.
"It's about someone accused of abusing a child, which makes it unpopular - and you're up against the medical fraternity," she said.
Over 18 months, Reid and her team obtained Baby K's medical records, including high-resolution 3D CT scans and X-rays.
They consulted four leading international specialists in genetics, neurosurgery, obstetrics and neuropathology from Canada, Norway, the Netherlands and the United States.
Each submitted a formal report.
Their collective conclusion: Baby K's injuries were likely related to complications during labour and severely low levels of vitamin D.
"One of the main takeaways from the podcast after two seasons is that you just have to keep going until you get that result," Reid said, "because there are so many points along the way where it gets too hard, and people just give up."
Sumner agreed.
"We couldn't figure out why Ravi couldn't see his daughter and there were so many injustices we could identify even before we started our investigation," Sumner said.
A year after Zita's release from prison, Oranga Tamariki began allowing Zita regular supervised access with her daughter.
In February, Newsroom unveiled that Zita's deportation had been cancelled after Associate Minister Chris Penk intervened.
In April, the Family Court in Auckland discharged any remaining orders relating to Baby K.
Restrictions on Baby K's travel were lifted, she was no longer in state care and custody was returned to her parents.
Zita and Ravi believed Oranga Tamariki had come to realise the parents might not have been at fault, a shift they attributed to media pressure and new evidence uncovered by Newsroom journalists.
"In the beginning, they told us we wouldn't get our daughter back until she was 18," Zita said. "They haven't admitted they got it wrong, but they've now granted us custody. So why did they make that decision?"
"Things slowly began to change after the podcast was released," Ravi said. "Oranga Tamariki started listening to us and tried to understand our culture, which was completely different from how they were in the beginning."
In May, the Fractured podcast announced that the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) had accepted Zita's submission for review, paving the way for a potential referral to an appeal court.
Reid said the young couple faced ongoing challenges in New Zealand.
"We got the medical experts, we got a lawyer on board and we made the application to the CCRC - but every step of the way was really tough," Reid said.
"It was tough for us, let alone what it was like for them. I think the podcast really shows what it's truly like when you're up against it and there's absolutely no hope at all."
In February, RNZ put the allegations to Starship Hospital.
Mike Shepherd, Te Whatu Ora's group director of operations for Auckland City Hospital, said the hospital could not comment on the specifics of the case "for a range of reasons."
"As always, we encourage patients and whānau to reach out to us directly if they have concerns about their or their loved one's care," he said. "Alternatively, people are welcome to contact the Health and Disability Commission for an independent review.
"We are confident of the expertise of our Starship Child Protection team and the work they do in conjunction with New Zealand Police and other relevant agencies."
For Zita and Ravi, a long road lay ahead, but the couple remained hopeful.
"I've lost so many years, and with the CCRC process, it will take even more time to get back to normality," Zita said.
"I'm not planning much because the last time I did, things didn't end well. My only dream is to live with my husband and daughter as a family."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
37 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Twelve-month prescription renewals: What you need to know
The government's plan will allow some patients to go longer between prescription renewals. Photo: 123RF In the annual flood of Budget coverage a few weeks back, one of the big announcements for the health sector was a move to allow 12-month prescription renewals from 2026. But how is it going to work and how will it affect your health services? RNZ is here to explain it all. The current maximum prescription length for most medicines is three months, but the government's new plan would extend that to 12 months for many medicines. This means that some patients will no longer need to visit their GP every three months to get their standing medication renewed. While some repeat prescriptions can be filled without a doctor's visit now by contacting their office, guidelines by the Medical Council of New Zealand on good prescribing practice say "patients receiving repeat prescriptions should be assessed in person on a regular basis" and repeats are given only with a doctor's discretion. In announcing the plan , Health Minister Simeon Brown said the current system "creates unnecessary barriers for patients on stable, long-term medications like asthma inhalers, insulin for diabetes, and blood pressure tablets. It means added costs for patients and more paperwork for health professionals, taking time away from patients with more urgent or complex needs". Medicines will still have to be dispensed every three months from pharmacies. "It's a win-win for patients and the health system - fewer avoidable hospitalisations, better health outcomes and reduced long term costs," Brown has said. Not until the first quarter of 2026. Luke Bradford of the Royal New Zealand College of GPs. Photo: supplied This is expected to mostly affect people on long-term medicines, the Ministry of Health said. The increased prescribing limit will also apply to oral contraceptives, which currently have a six-month prescribing limit. Royal New Zealand College of GPs medical director Dr Luke Bradford said that during consultation on the plan, the college had supported a six-month prescription renewal instead of 12. "We submitted on this and said 12 months is probably too long, six months would be reasonable." Dr Bradford said there would not be a centralised list of drugs that are part of the scheme and physicians will need to determine who benefits from 12-month renewals. "It's very much going to be a patient by patient situation and we can't put blanket rules across this. It depends on a whole raft of things but predominantly depends on conditions being managed." If you have multiple prescriptions for multiple conditions, you are far less likely to get 12-month renewals as a physician needs to monitor your ongoing health and possible interactions. "Prescribers will be responsible for determining the clinically appropriate prescription length and can prescribe for up to 12 months, or for shorter periods if they consider that most appropriate," a spokesperson for the Ministry of Health said. Controlled substances - which include opiates such as morphine and fentanyl - are not included. Controlled substances will not be included. Photo: 123RF/Steve Heap 2016 The Budget allocated $91 million over four years "to support this change". "It is expected this change will increase patients' access to medicines and therefore create a higher demand for medicines. Funding is required for the Combined Pharmaceutical Budget to meet the increased demand for medicines," the Ministry of Health spokesperson said. "The Budget includes $10m initial funding in the 2025/26 financial year, with outyear funding held in contingency, pending information gathered from the initial uptake." Some patients won't have to go to the GP quite as often, in theory. GP visits are charged differently from place to place and can run anywhere from $20 to $90 depending on the complicated calculation of fees at individual doctors' offices. The Ministry of Health has said that the average patient who renews prescriptions four times a year could save up to $105 a year on GP fees. It also has said the change could mean less time off work or school for appointments and it could make life easier for people in rural and remote areas who travel to get to their doctor. No. The $5 co-payment for most prescriptions - which was brought back under the current National-led government - will remain unchanged. And you'll still need to go back to the pharmacy every three months to have your prescriptions dispensed even if you're on a 12-month renewal from your doctor, Dr Bradford said. "There's some safety mechanisms built into this in that they're not going to dispense 12 months of medicines. People aren't going to suddenly have huge boxes of medicine at home." In a statement to RNZ, the Pharmaceutical Society of New Zealand said it cautiously supported the move, but had concerns. "PSNZ support the increased period in principle, but with some provisos - as always, it's the detail that will matter and we are waiting to receive that. "For example, there is currently no indication that funds to support the extra monitoring and counselling that may be required, when patients are picking up their medication every three months without any interacting with their general practice." If people visit their GPs less often, it will affect the income their practices receive. In its submission on the proposal , the Royal College said prescriptions account for between seven to 10 percent of practice revenue. "The financial impact on practices that rely on revenue from current prescription renewals could be substantial, e.g., one specialist GP calculated a $320,000 loss in a patient population of 14,500," that submission also reported. "There will definitely be an impact on that," Dr Bradford said. At the same time, it won't necessarily reduce the admin work needed. Doctors will still need to do the legwork with their patients to keep on top of ongoing records, tests and screening, he said. Health Minister Simeon Brown. Photo: RNZ / Nick Monro On its website, the Ministry of Health said the Medicines Regulations will need to be amended to increase the maximum length of prescriptions, and IT systems will need to be updated to allow this change. The Medicines Regulations 1984 will need to be amended. Pharmac will make changes to the Pharmaceutical Schedule, while Health NZ will work to support GPs, other prescribers and pharmacies with updating systems and the transition. The Pharmaceutical Society said it also would work to ensure the prescription plan changes go smoothly. "PSNZ will use this time to engage with officials to support a smooth transition and highlight any unintended consequences, particularly any changes in workload and financial pressures that this change could place on pharmacists and their teams," it said in its statement. General Practice Owners Association chair Dr Angus Chambers recently told RNZ that many patients with chronic conditions needed regular reviews by a doctor or nurse. "Just to leave someone for 12 months to have their diabetes deteriorate may well lead to more emergency department visits and hospital admissions." Everyone manages their conditions differently, Dr Bradford said, and no two cases are quite the same. "If you're on five different meds for diabetes you're going to need three-month checkups." In announcing the plan, Simeon Brown said it would give GPs a breather. "Instead of spending time on routine repeat prescriptions, they can focus more on supporting those with complex or deteriorating health needs." Dr Bradford said the current three-month renewals do give a "safety net" for physicians to keep on top of issues. "By taking that away we either say we've still got to do that or the pressure goes on GPs to do it anyway and have to sit their own reminders for those periods of time and follow it up in their hour of clinic time." "The majority of patients will be fine," but a visit to a GP involves a lot more than just checking off a prescription renewal box, Dr Bradford said. "The moment you come in we're watching how you're walking, we're looking at your body language and listening for cues and we're reminding you of the screening you haven't done. "Those things that happen because you come in and say, 'Oh, I'm just here for my asthma medicine, doc,' are at risk of being lost." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
37 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Te Tai Tokerau takes both top beef farming prizes at Ahuwhenua Trophy 2025 awards
Hūhana Lyndon, Tama Potaka and Pita Morrison on stage at the Ahuwhenua Trophy 2025 award ceremony. Photo: Tuwhenuaroa Natanahira Māori from Te Tai Tokerau were the big winners at the 2025 Ahuwhenua Trophy 2025 awards with both top prizes going to Northland farmers. The Northland-based Whangaroa Ngaiotonga Trust was awarded the 2025 Ahuwhenua Trophy for excellence in Māori sheep and beef farming, while Te Tai Tokerau farm manager Coby Warmington took out the 2025 Young Māori Farmer Award at a packed ceremony in Palmerston North on Friday. The Ahuwhenua Trophy dates back to 1933 and was established by Sir Āpirana Ngata and the Governor General at the time, Lord Charles Bledisloe. It remains one of the most prestigious and contested awards for Māori farming. At least 800 people gather for the Ahuwhenua Trophy 2025 award ceremony. Photo: Tuwhenuaroa Natanahira At least 800 people were at the event, including Te Arikinui Kuini Nga wai hono I te po, the Māori Queen, Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka and other Māori farmers and their whānau. The Whangaroa Ngaiotonga Trust's whenua is located near the east coast settlement of Whangaruru, north of Whangārei. Its cattle farm takes up about a third of the 1100 hectares of land owned by the trust. In 1952, the Department of Māori Affairs held a hui for the then-484 registered owners of the whenua. Despite only 70 being present and only 24 signing a resolution in support, the department went ahead with the consolidation of the whenua into a 'Land Development Scheme' disconnecting the people from the whenua for decades. The trust took back control of the whenua in 2020 with little-to-no farming know-how and no stock. Since then, it has transformed the whenua into a thriving bull-beef operation with around 1200 bulls. In her acceptance speech, Green MP and Whangaroa Ngaiotonga Trust co-chair Hūhana Lyndon said thanked her wider Ngāti Wai whānau and elders for their support. "Our tūpuna fought so hard to have the land returned and when you are unable to walk your whenua, when you have a tenant that would not let you on without supervision, our ability to take our land back was transformational." Ahuwhenua Trophy 2025 Award winner Pita Morrison accepting the supreme award. Photo: Tuwhenuaroa Natanahira Co-chair Pita Morrison thanked the whānau who travelled south to support the trust, and those who had passed on. "From the time of our founding tipuna, Manaia, who came to our whenua, our people have been here … if it was not for the strength that our tūpuna have given to us and our people we would not be here. "To our people that are here today, as the descendants of our old people, I thank you, mihi to you, on behalf of our trust and we are so proud to be here with you today," Morrison said. Ahuwhenua Trophy 2025 Young Māori Farmer Award winner Coby Warmington Photo: Tuwhenuaroa Natanahira It was a similar sentiment from Young Māori Famer Award winner Coby Warmington, 28, who thanked his wife Holly and his fellow finalists who he described as "obviously great farmers" but "even better people". Warmington (Te Mahurehure, Ngāpuhi) started working at Waima Topu Beef in January 2021 as a shepherd and general hand while the farm was starting a re-building phase and was promoted to farm manager only two years later, in March 2023. Each finalist received a $5000 scholarship, courtesy of Te Tumu Paeroa, The Office of the Māori Trustee, with the overall winner getting a total of $10,000. Warmington said he wanted to start implementing some of things he learned on his own farm in Waima. "I was supported by my employers to apply for the award and I just wanted to test my limits, socially. "It's been amazing, meeting all these great people and spending time with all these young Māori leaders. I'll never forget the experience." Te Tumu Paeroa lead Dr Charlotte Severne said the scholarship would likely be used to get more skills overseas. "It's for them to study and study further, that opportunity to put something into themselves. Studying is not cheap. "These ones have more qualifications than some who have entered the awards so they'll look at training offshore, maybe do a tour offshore. That's as good as any tohū, I think." Severne said. Māori development Minister Tama Potaka said whenua was an integral part of Māori identity. "For us its something that is enduring and perpetual, we won't let go of our whakapapa because it defines who we are. As a result, we do have to figure out how we use that as a foundation for our livelihoods, for jobs, for enterprise and for opportunities for our young people. "I had the great opportunity to grow up on a sheep and beef farm only 45 minutes away in a place called Rata, up Rangitīkei. We had amongst our families 150,000 to 160,000 sheep there in the 1900s. "Certainly for me it's, again, linking back to identity and whakapapa but also providing a platform for economic growth." Potaka said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
'Kick in the guts': Government knocks back most of Christchurch council's housing plans
Christchurch mayor Phil Mauger says the government's knock-back of the council's housing plans is a "kick in the guts". Photo: RNZ/Nathan Mckinnon The mayor of Christchurch says a government knock-back on it's three year battle to create a custom carve-out of national housing intensification rules feels like a "kick in the guts", but others are welcoming the certainty of the move. On Friday, Minister for Resource Management Act Reform Chris Bishop issued a final decision on 17 of 20 recommendations the city council had referred after rejecting recommendations from an independent panel on the council's plan to shape a bespoke Christchurch response to national housing density policy). Minister Bishop rejected the bulk of the council's proposals. In 2021, the then-government released its National Policy Statement on Urban Development, a plan to ramp up housing intensification across most urban areas but focused on the five high growth centres of Auckland, Hamilton, Tauranga, Wellington and Christchurch, amid bi-partisan support for the Resource Management (Enabling Housing Supply and Other Matters) Amendment Bill, though the National Party would later withdraw its backing . The bill contained Medium Density Residential Standards (MDRS), which detail what development can occur without the need for resource consent, public notification and consultation in the areas identified as most in need of housing intensification. Those rules were intended to apply across all residential zones in those identified cities, unless "qualifying matters" made intensification inappropriate. In 2022, the council voted to reject the standards , despite warnings a commissioner could be appointed . Instead, the council began several years of consultation, submissions and hearings on Plan Change 14 - its proposed changes to the district plan that would give effect to the Medium Density Residential Standards, but in a way it claimed better acknowledged the character and context of the city. The council temporarily halted the process following the last election, and was later granted an extension until the end of this year on some aspescts of the plan change. Minister Bishop declined a further extension request last month. The council's stance culminated in an Independent Hearing Panel (IHP), which reported back in the middle of last year. The council accepted the majority of the IHP's recommendations, which were incorporated into the district plan. But it rejected various aspects of the proposed plan, making twenty counter-recommendations that went to the Minister. The minister announced on Friday he had rejected 14 of the council's recommendations, accepted three and deferred his decision on three more. Minister for Resource Management Act Reform Chris Bishop has rejected the bulk of the council's proposals. Photo: VNP/Louis Collins The decision means some parts of the city will be zoned higher-density housing and taller buildings, while the council will not be allowed to use several different "qualifying matters" to refuse consents even in high density zones - most controversially, one that hinged on the impediment of sunlight and proposed the Garden City should get an exemption because its southern location meant sunlight angles differ. Bishop's announcement locks in changes for areas in and around the CBD, and the "town centres" of Riccarton, Hornby and Linwood, which will be zoned high density residential. Taller buildings will be allowed within 600 metres of shopping areas in some suburbs - 32m (around ten storeys high) for the Hornby shopping area, 14m for high density residential zones surrounding the shopping area, 22m (around six storeys) for Linwood's town centre, and 14m for high density residential zones around it. The council's bids to create qualifying matters on the basis of sunlight access, recession planes (a line or plane which limits how close a building can be to a property boundary), or by location - such as 'the City Spine' (major transport routes) or Riccarton Bush - also failed. Nor did the minster accept areas around Peer Street in Ilam or the Papanui War Memorial Avenues should be excluded from density rules or allowed special consideration. The council proposals the minister did accept were Local Centre Intensification Precinct - intensification around eight of the city's commercial centres, including Barrington, Prestons and Wigram; increasing the building height overlay for the former stock yards site on Deans Avenue (a prime spot adjacent to Hagley Park, currently used as car parking for the Christchurch Hospital shuttle service) to up to 36m; and allowing high density residential zoning for Milton Street (the site of the Milton St substation, which Fletchers plans to build 80 homes on). All other council alternative recommendations were rejected in favour of the hearing panel recommendations. The minister has deferred decision-making for the heritage listing for Daresbury - a historic home in Fendalton; Antonio Hall - a derelict historic home on Riccarton Rd; and Piko Character Area - a Riccarton residential neighbourhood made up of many original state houses from the 1930s - until the council decided on the underlying zoning. "In putting these decisions forward to the government, we obviously wanted to get all of our alternative recommendations approved. So to only have three of them get the tick is a kick in the guts," mayor Phil Mauger said. "This plan change has been a huge undertaking for our city, and we've said right the way through that we want to get the best outcome we possibly can. This doesn't feel like the best outcome. "To that end, we'll keep working hard as a council, and there are still major decisions yet to be made when it comes to housing density and planning across much of Christchurch, so watch this space." The decisions come into effect immediately and cannot be appealed to the Environment Court. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon New Zealand has one of the most unaffordable housing markets in the OECD. Urbanist collective Greater Ōtautahi welcomed the minister's decision. Chairperson M Grace-Stent said the decision finally brought some certainty after years of delays, decision making, submissions and hearing panels. "What we're most excited about is that Ōtautahi Christchurch is set up for the future, it has certainty around where it can grow and where it can continue to develop in the future." The decision will not mean apartment buildings spring up overnight, they said. "It's still going to be a slow developing process, just as our cities always continually change. This is just another step." The city also needed to turn its attention to improving public transport. "Ōtautahi Christchurch definitely needs a reevaluation of its transport system. We've been calling for the introduction of mass rapid transport across the city to support and facilitate the kind of growth and development that needs to happen, and to make sure that everyone has a choice about how they're getting around the city and aren't forced to just pick cars." Grace-Stent said the debate touched on ideas embedded in the national psyche about how and where New Zealanders live. They said the quarter-acre dream of a stand alone house on a large section is unsustainable and doesn't not always produce greater social outcomes. "Not everyone wants to live the exact same lifestyle - allowing more housing to be built allows people to make that choice for themselves. So if people want to be living on 1/4 acre block, they're allowed to, and if people want to be living in an apartment close to their friends and amenities and where they work, they also have that choice." They acknowledged that some medium and high density housing is not built to high standards, but said some of that was due to limitations of the current zoning process, which can mean the lowest bidder builds on these sites. "This is just the first step into assuring that everyone has a home that is liveable and that works for them, and is good quality. There also needs to be changes throughout the way that we are think about housing and building houses across the country," Grace-Stent said. The decisions, which come into effect immediately, are final and cannot be appealed to the Environment Court. The council has until the end of the year to decide on density rules for the rest of the city. It was unable to confirm by deadline how much it had spent fighting the density rules, but had budgeted for $7 million dollars between 2021 and the middle of this year. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.