A Show of Unity May Be the Best That NATO Can Hope For at Summit
NATO opened a high-level meeting on Tuesday against the backdrop of one war in the Middle East overshadowing another on the military alliance's doorstep. A tentative cease-fire between Israel and Iran is expected to dominate discussions, while Russia's invasion of Ukraine might muster merely a mention.
But NATO has other things to worry about at its annual summit of alliance leaders in The Hague, the Netherlands — namely, maintaining a unified front amid an internal spat over defense spending.
The new cease-fire, announced by President Trump late Monday, could rally NATO states toward a common goal. It also provides Mr. Trump the opportunity to take a victory lap at the brief gathering, which is designed to avoid diplomatic disruptions over his defense spending demands.
'Counter-intuitively, this could have a positive effect on the NATO summit,' said Liana Fix, a Europe expert at the Council on Foreign Relations.
At the least, Ms. Fix said, the new American role in Israel's enduring conflict with Iran could distract from 'escalation on other issues' at the NATO meeting, which wraps up Wednesday.
Yet exhaustive efforts by Mark Rutte, NATO's affable secretary general, to keep the summit sweet as well as short are far from assured.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
34 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump is testing how far presidential immunity will go to save him millions
A federal appeals court will weigh a question important to Donald Trump on Tuesday morning: Can presidential immunity save him $83.3 million? In January 2024, a jury ordered Trump to pay the millions in defamation damages for his many attacks on the writer E. Jean Carroll, where he disparaged her as a liar and insulted her appearance after she accused him of sexually assaulting him in the 1990s at a Bergdorf Goodman department store near Trump Tower in Manhattan. According to a Forbes estimate, Trump's net worth is $5.2 billion. It's boomed since he won the 2024 presidential election thanks to his ownership of Truth Social and numerous crypto investments. The Carroll verdict is about 1.6% of his estimated worth. Before the trial, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Trump had forfeited the right to argue he had presidential immunity in the civil case because he waited too long to bring it up. But last year, the Supreme Court adopted a more robust conception of presidential immunity — one that protects presidents from criminal cases. That broader, more sweeping view should also cover Trump in the Carroll case and wipe away the massive jury award, the president's lawyers now argue. "Presidential immunity — even if it could be waived at all, which is not the case — cannot be inadvertently forfeited," Trump's lawyers argued in their appeal brief for the Carroll case. Carroll took Trump to trial twice Carroll's first defamation lawsuit against Trump, filed in 2020, was stalled for years in courts in New York and Washington, DC, because it concerned comments Trump made while he was still president. The Justice Department argued at the time that Trump was immune from the lawsuit because of the Westfall Act, a law that protects government employees from legal action for statements they make as part of their job. After completing his first term in office, Trump continued to attack Carroll on social media and at campaign rallies. Carroll filed a second lawsuit against Trump in November 2022, alleging defamation as well as sexual abuse. That second lawsuit, unencumbered by questions of presidential immunity, went to trial in 2023 in Manhattan federal court. In May of that year, the jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation and ordered him to pay Carroll $5 million. After the trial for the second lawsuit was over, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals cleared the way for a second trial over the first lawsuit, agreeing with a lower court that Trump had waived the right to argue that he had presidential immunity because he brought it up too late. The Justice Department — then under the Biden administration — also dropped its position that Trump's statements about Carroll were part of his presidential duties, writing in a court filing that "sexual assault was obviously not job-related." Carroll's first lawsuit finally went to trial in January of 2024. After not showing up to the first trial, Trump briefly testified in the second. Because another jury had already found Trump liable for defamation for calling Carroll a liar over her sexual abuse claims, the jury in the second trial only had to decide how much Trump would pay in additional damages for statements he made while he was president, as well as other insults he had hurled at Carroll since the conclusion of the first trial. They settled for $65 million in punitive damages, $7.3 million to compensate Carroll, and $11 million to help repair her reputation — a total of $83.3 million. Trump invoked the Supreme Court's recent immunity decision Trump's appeal brief calls the case "a miscarriage of justice" and says the Second Circuit got it wrong. "Presidential immunity shields from liability President Trump's public statements issued in his official capacity through official White House channels," they wrote in a brief. Carroll's attorney Roberta Kaplan argued in her own brief that presidential immunity — like all other forms of immunity in the American legal system — can be waived. "If there were ever a case where immunity does not shield a President's speech, this one is it," she wrote. "Donald Trump was not speaking here about a governmental policy or a function of his responsibilities as President. He was defaming Carroll because of her revelation that many years before he assumed office, he sexually assaulted her." John Sauer, who argued the immunity case on Trump's behalf before the Supreme Court, also filed appeal briefs in the Carroll case. In September, Sauer urged the Second Circuit in an oral argument to toss the jury verdict against Trump in the first Carroll trial, in part because it featured testimony from other women who said Trump sexually abused them. The court upheld that verdict earlier this month. Sauer is now serving as the Justice Department's solicitor general in the second Trump administration. And on Wednesday, the court denied a motion from the Justice Department to take over Trump's defense. Court filings indicate Justin D. Smith, a Missouri-based attorney at Sauer's former law firm, will argue against Kaplan at Tuesday's hearing. Smith didn't respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. In two of Trump's other high-profile appeals, Trump has retained the Big Law firm Sullivan & Cromwell. They're fighting a half-billion-dollar civil fraud judgment against the Trump Organization as well as a Manhattan jury verdict that found Trump guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business documents as part of the Stormy Daniels hush-money scandal. In the criminal case, Sullivan & Cromwell — which argued their appeal before the Second Circuit earlier this month — also leans heavily on the Supreme Court's immunity decision. In that case, Trump's lawyers said additional arguments should be held in federal courts, not state courts, which would make future decisions easier to appeal directly to the Supreme Court.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jimmy Fallon Says He Knows Why Trump Called Iran Strike ‘Operation Midnight Hammer'
Jimmy Fallon said Monday on 'The Tonight Show' that he had the lowdown on why the United States' bombing of Iran nuclear sites was called 'Operation Midnight Hammer.' 'It was named after Trump's favorite Stormy Daniels movie,' the late night host quipped. 'It honestly sounds like a little inappropriate, but it wasn't the only name ― the idea that Trump had,' Fallon continued. The comedian segued to a bit in which a pretend Trump offered alternatives such as 'Operation Nighttime Bang' and 'Operation Joint Force Joystick.' Fallon of course was playing off Trump's alleged dalliance with porn star Daniels and his subsequent conviction for trying to conceal hush-money payments to her. As for Saturday's mission in Iran ordered by Trump, it piggybacked on Israel's attacks against Iran to thwart the country's nuclear capabilities. Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran on Monday, but that appeared to be broken by Tuesday morning. Fast-forward to 2:08 for Fallon's 'Midnight' madness: Fallon Has Brutal Guess About Who'd Join 'Les Mis' Cast In Dodging Trump Jimmy Fallon Makes Shocking Admission About His Obsession With Getting On 'SNL' Jimmy Fallon's Takeaway From Trump's Jet Gift Is Like No Other
The Hill
38 minutes ago
- The Hill
Massie: ‘I have the Trump antibodies'
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said Monday that he isn't bothered by President Trump's latest push for his ouster after the lawmaker criticized the U.S. strikes against Iran, claiming he's grown immune to the president's attacks. 'In some sense, I have the Trump antibodies,' Massie said in an interview with MSNBC's 'All In with Chris Hayes.' He added, 'There are a few people here who are consistent and don't sway in the wind when it's your president or somebody else's president, and I'm just trying to be consistent here in this case.' In their latest skirmish, Trump urged his 'Make America Great Again' (MAGA) movement to ostracize the Kentucky Republican after he blasted the president for sidestepping Congress to order airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities Saturday. Massie called the move unconstitutional. 'MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague!' the president wrote Sunday in a post on Truth Social. 'The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I'll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard.' 'MAGA is not about lazy, grandstanding, nonproductive politicians, of which Thomas Massie is definitely one,' he added. Trump and Massie have been feuding over the president's agenda-setting 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' which the Bluegrass State lawmaker voted against when it narrowly passed the House last month. Massie countered that he's just trying to stay true to his beliefs. 'I'm more of an ideologue than a populist, I'll admit that, but at least if you're an ideologue, you know what your ideas are, and with populism, you can blow in the wind,' he told Hayes. 'I'm worried that in the first six months here, we've already sort of gone astray of what was one of the basic principles of putting America first.' The congressman, a libertarian-leaning engineer and inventor, wears a digital badge that constantly keeps track of the federal debt in real time, but he recently joked on social media that he should reprogram it 'to display the number of milliseconds that have elapsed since [Trump] has tweeted at me last.' Trump's team reportedly has been mulling potential challengers for Massie, who was first elected in 2012 and is seeking a seventh term next fall. He easily won reelection last year, fending off two primary challengers in Kentucky's ruby red 4th Congressional district. The GOP lawmaker also faced MAGA world backlash near the end of the president's first term in 2020 after he opposed the sweeping COVID-19 aid package early in the pandemic. Trump ultimately endorsed Massie in 2022.
