logo
They built YouTube: Former execs recall the pirate early days, pivotal wins, and big headaches over its 20 years

They built YouTube: Former execs recall the pirate early days, pivotal wins, and big headaches over its 20 years

At first, YouTube was seen as 'Google's first failed acquisition.'
Shishir Mehrotra, formerly YouTube's chief product officer — and now CEO of Grammarly — said the company faced adversity early on, initially perceived as "Google's first failed acquisition" following the companies that would become Google Maps and Android.
"Grainy videos didn't really make sense in the Google ecosystem," Mehrotra said. He likened early employees to "pirates" who believed deeply in their mission.
One idea that helped Mehrotra land the job was a pitch for "skippable ads" — a pricier format where advertisers would only pay when an ad wasn't skipped. But the sales team hated the idea because of the name, and it didn't ship for years — until a product manager suggested the name TrueView.
"It went from zero to a billion dollars in about 18 months," Mehrotra said — "one of the fastest-growing products in Google history."
Another one of his proudest leadership moments came at a company offsite in 2012, when he said YouTube was struggling for relevance and purpose. To combat the stagnation, he set a lofty goal of 1 billion hours of daily watch-time, which "reverberated through Google" until it was surpassed in 2017.
Now-defunct YouTube Originals was like 'a square peg in a round hole.'
Susanne Daniels, YouTube's former global head of original content, looks back proudly at the content output during her tenure — from Doug Liman's "Impulse" and " Cobra Kai" to collaborating with YouTubers Liza Koshy and Joey Graceffa on original series.
YouTube Originals went through several strategies — including subscription and ad-based models, and a pivot from scripted to unscripted programming in 2019, Variety reported — before dissolving in 2022.
Daniels said she found the number of pivots frustrating, and said the biggest challenge was that YouTube operates as a technology company rather than a media business. Its success as a distribution platform for user-generated content meant it didn't necessarily need to play the long game of original content.
"YouTube Originals was a square peg in a round hole — constantly having to pave roads where there already should have been — from production issues to business deal issues and everything in between," she said. "We never had the support system internally nor the resources we needed to succeed — not to mention a crushingly limited budget for production and marketing."
But Daniels said she was inspired by her team and felt she could have made YouTube Originals a valuable asset with more support.
"It was definitely a unique and rewarding experience in many ways," she said.
A YouTube spokesperson said that while Originals served to turbocharge its content ecosystem, the creator community has now evolved to produce increasingly sophisticated content.
The company is still in the business of original content, the spokesperson argued, by investing directly in its community of creators and artists.
The late CEO Susan Wojcicki was 'the definition of calm in the storm.'
Malik Ducard — currently the chief content officer at Pinterest — last served as YouTube's global head of learning, social impact, health, family, and film & TV.
During his time, he also spearheaded initiatives for underrepresented communities, like the $100 million #YouTubeBlack Voices Fund, which gave seed funding and other resources to Black creators.
Ducard said that during his time at YouTube, he felt lucky to be in the orbit of late CEO Susan Wojcicki.
She was "the definition of calm in the storm," Ducard said, given that there were many "heightened moments at YouTube and there was never a heightened Susan."
"She was always steady on the wheel and someone that people sought out for guidance," he added.
And YouTube's investment in educational and family content — including YouTube Kids, which Ducard's then-five-year-old son was one of the first users to test — was part of Wojcicki's "push to really see that YouTube has a responsible place in the world."
YouTube's copyright tools seemed counterintuitive, but became the norm.
Entrepreneur and investor Hunter Walk served as director of product management at parent company Google.
At YouTube, his proudest achievement was "nailing the shift to mobile," he told BI, which required overstaffing the mobile division ahead of its maturity and contending with the fact that "some notable executives at Google tried to kill our deal to be a default app on the iPhone."
One of the biggest challenges was building YouTube's copyright tools. Rather than removing copyrighted content, Content ID lets rights holders choose to keep it up and monetize. It was a counterintuitive strategy at the time that took some convincing.
"If they understood this was basically fans doing their distribution work for them, we could leave it up, monetize it, and everyone would profit," Walk said. "Fortunately, over time, it came to be viewed this way by the majority of media companies."
Serving as YouTube's first creator liaison could feel like flying too close to the sun.
Matt Koval was an early YouTuber hired by Google in 2012 to compile best practices for creators that the company could use as scalable resources.
"Back then, it sounded crazy that YouTube creators would become Google employees," he said.
Eventually, Koval was named YouTube's first creator liaison, serving as a conduit between those inside and outside the company. The idea came from Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, inspired by the success of search liaison Danny Sullivan, Koval said.
In navigating various controversies, Koval felt he was able to "land" his explanations. But it could be a tricky line. The biggest backlash came when he sought to explain YouTube's decision to eliminate the dislike button, which trolls were using to target marginalized groups.
"Google security got involved" in the face of personal threats, Koval said. And while the fervor eventually subsided, he said the role could occasionally feel like flying too close to the sun.
Early struggles to moderate children's content led to one employee's departure.
As the mother of a 10-year-old who dreams of becoming a content creator, Rachel Melby said she's been reflecting on her time at YouTube amid a slew of documentaries about the perils of family vlogging.
"It's kind of radical to think that there was a time when people were not incentivized by money to create content and put it out into the world," she said.
Melby, the former global lead for influencer and celebrity partnerships, said struggles around kids' content moderation led to her departure. At the time, YouTube was contending with controversial family vloggers accused of exploiting their children for profit, she said.
"It just became too hard for me to sit and have these conversations about kids," she said.
Melby recently helped her son post his first YouTube video, but she's ensuring he proceeds with caution.
"It's just one part of our life," she said. "I don't want it to be all-consuming."
A YouTube spokesperson said the company has always tried to ensure the safety of children and families and has adjusted its products and policies accordingly.
YouTube Spaces helped 'humanize' its scale, but probably don't make sense today.
Kathleen Grace arrived at YouTube through its acquisition of Next New Networks, along with Relles and former TikTok COO Vee Pappas. She said the company felt like a startup at the time, like "Google's punk rock little brother."
During her tenure, Grace helped open YouTube's first Spaces: free production facilities and networking hubs across the globe. The aim was to "humanize the scale of the company," and seed a community in Los Angeles, New York, London, and Tokyo.
YouTube shuttered the Spaces during the pandemic, and Grace said she's not sure they make sense in today's world, where social video has become increasingly lightweight, and the need for community has shifted as more people want to be creators.
"It's just a different era," she said. "You don't feel as lonely."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

OpenAI chairman's career advice? Remember what Eric Schmidt told Sheryl Sandberg about joining Google.
OpenAI chairman's career advice? Remember what Eric Schmidt told Sheryl Sandberg about joining Google.

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

OpenAI chairman's career advice? Remember what Eric Schmidt told Sheryl Sandberg about joining Google.

Bret Taylor, the chairman of OpenAI, believes that if you have the chance to attach yourself to success, you shouldn't let ego get in the way. "I think this is the quote I always heard, was Eric Schmidt to Sheryl Sandberg: 'If someone offers you a seat on a rocket ship, don't ask what seat,' you know? I like that philosophy of life," Taylor said on an episode of "Grit." At the time, Sandberg, who would famously later become Facebook's chief operations officer, was deciding whether or not to join a different tech company: Google. Google was a tiny fraction of the size in 2001, with fewer than 300 people. Eric Schmidt had recently been brought on by cofounders Sergey Brin and Larry Page to be CEO. Sandberg talked about her conversation with Schmidt during a speech to Harvard students. "So I sat down with Eric Schmidt, who had just become the CEO, and I showed him the spreadsheet and I said, this job meets none of my criteria," Sandberg recalled. "He put his hand on my spreadsheet and he looked at me and said, 'Don't be an idiot. Get on a rocket ship. When companies are growing quickly and they are having a lot of impact, careers take care of themselves. If you're offered a seat on a rocket ship, don't ask what seat. Just get on.'" Sandberg did end up taking the job, and joined as the general manager of Google's business unit, which had four people at the time. "I do think, especially in Silicon Valley, there's just unique moments, and you just have to be self-aware and aware of the market," OpenAI's Taylor said. Beyond being ready to jump at opportunity wherever it comes knocking at your door, remaining broadly flexible is also important, he added. "Most of the unhappiest people I know are rigidly following a plan and not observant of their own happiness or observant of the opportunities around them," Taylor said. "I actually think that a big part of life is recognizing when there's a unique opportunity that you didn't plan for, and asking yourself the question, ' Should I change my plans? ' Whether that's in your personal life or your professional life." Taylor's own career spans Big Tech and startups alike — from leading the team that helped create Google Maps and acting as co-CEO of Salesforce, to founding his own AI company, Sierra. "The idea of sitting on the sidelines, and drinking a mai tai on a beach, doesn't give me joy at all," he said. "I want to build." Just as Taylor was leaving Salesforce, ChatGPT was released. After a conversation over lunch with his cofounder, Clay Bavor, Taylor said the decision to start Sierra was set. But even if he wasn't heading this particular company, he added, he would still be working in an adjacent sphere. "I would be building open source software if not running a company right now, because I just want to work in the technology and help shape it," Taylor said. "Because it's the most exciting technology of my memory, and I want to play a part in shaping how we all use it." That's another key piece of Taylor's personal philosophy: being as involved as possible in shaping the trajectory of the world. "There's this Alan Kay quote: 'The best way to predict the future is to invent it.' And that is like, my operating principle," he said. "I want to impact the future, and I want to help invent it."

Nintendo Switch 2 gets disassembled — Nvidia chip gets its close-up
Nintendo Switch 2 gets disassembled — Nvidia chip gets its close-up

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Nintendo Switch 2 gets disassembled — Nvidia chip gets its close-up

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The Nintendo Switch 2 is only just launching, and someone has already torn it down. YouTube channel ProModding has opened up the new handheld console, showcasing the new Nvidia chip, as well as taking a microscope to examine all the circuits. The teardown starts with screws on the bottom of the system and behind the kickstand. It ends up toher screws are on the colored covers on each side of the system, where you attach the Joy-Con controllers. With screws and clips out of the way, the back cover comes right is a lot of metal shielding, but ProModding dispatched that with a few screws after removing the removing the cooler and disconnecting the battery, the motherboard came out. After prying off more shielding and removing the thermal paste, the new Nvidia chip was unveiled. The GMLX30-A1 name on the chip is similar to leaks posted back in 2024. Image 1 of 2 Image 2 of 2 If you want to see every IC on the board, you're in luck. ProModder goes over the whole board with a the exception of the screws on the sides of the device, this doesn't seem like a very arduous teardown. That being said, you probably shouldn't open your own Switch 2, as you may void your warranty or damage your console. Recently, Nintendo of America updated its End User License Agreement to note that you can't "bypass, modify, decrypt, defeat, tamper with, or otherwise circumvent any of the functions or protections of the Nintendo Account Services, including through the use of any hardware," and that if you do, Nintendo may "render... the applicable Nintendo device permanently unusable in whole or in part." So if you open it to make a change, you may be risking the possibility of your system working at will likely have a more specific repair manual for its technicians. But until the launch tomorrow, June 5, we can watch modders on YouTube do their thing. Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

AI on phones feels too much like homework — and Apple should use iOS 26's redesign to fix that
AI on phones feels too much like homework — and Apple should use iOS 26's redesign to fix that

Tom's Guide

time2 hours ago

  • Tom's Guide

AI on phones feels too much like homework — and Apple should use iOS 26's redesign to fix that

Tech companies, especially the ones that make and sell phones, have been telling us how important AI is for several years, and offering a range of new AI-powered features that promise to make our lives easier. But despite promising that, it seems a bunch of those companies forgot the most important thing about new features — making sure people can actually find and use them. As someone who's spent a great deal of time reviewing new phones, nothing irritates me more than being told about new AI features and then having to do a bunch of research to figure out how to access them. Even Apple, a company that has made its own AI suite a lot more transparent, is guilty of this in some regard. And since iOS 19 (or iOS 26) is set to redesign the entire Apple ecosystem, WWDC 2025 is a chance for the company to make AI feel less like homework and transform it into something a lot simpler and more intuitive. I'll preface this with an admission that not all AI features are difficult to find. If it involves going through some kind of voice assistant, like Google Gemini or Siri, then AI capabilities are literally only a voice prompt away. Similarly AI photo editing features, like Google's Magic Editor, have long been available in photo gallery apps, like Google Photos or Apple's equivalent. But at the same time, considering all these features have been around for quite some time, their location and functionality have already been ingrained into our collective memories. Plus, once you know about one of those features, you can often find similar ones in the same spot. Or in the case of voice assistants, physically ask it about the kind of things it can do. There's also a bunch of AI working in the background that the user doesn't actually need to initiate. All that processing that happens to your photos? AI has a hand there, just as it does in helping translate foreign languages for you. We've also seen AI applied to software that helps manage the battery and displays, to help phones run more smoothly and efficiently. None of this is the flashy AI that gets promoted in keynote speeches or TV commercials. It's the boring stuff that makes your phone run and perform better, without you even realizing what's going on. But if a company is trying to add some fuel to the AI hype train, the focus ends up on the new and showy AI features that look and sound good. The problem is phone makers haven't put much consideration into helping users find the darn things. One good example I've found in this area are specialist translation apps — ones that do more than Google Translate. Samsung's Interpreter Mode is the one I've noticed this with most recently, offering the ability to translate two-way conversations happening in two different languages. I know that it exists, Samsung has talked about it at great length, but looking at a Galaxy S25, it's nowhere to be seen. It's not in the app drawer, nor the home screen, nor is it one of the default apps in the Quick Settings menu. Instead you either have to use the search bar to find Interpreter Mode, or change the Quick Settings features to include it — which isn't ideal when you only have 6-8 slots to choose from. The more I think about Galaxy AI features Samsung has talked about, the more I realize that I also have no idea where they are. The same is true for Apple Intelligence, Google Gemini and the countless other AI features that have been added to smartphones in recent years. I made a point of criticizing this in my review of the Xiaomi 15 Ultra, but the problem is a lot more widespread than that — and it's like phone makers don't realize this is a complete hindrance. In the days when new AI features weren't all that common, this probably wouldn't be so bad. Users get the time to get to grips with new features as they arrive, and by the time the next big software update comes around it'll be second nature. But the sheer number of new AI features being added to phones, and with little communication on how they work, makes this much more difficult. The distinct lack of official guidance on how to use new AI features is definitely getting in the way of me wanting to use them — and I doubt I'm the only one who feels that way. If phone makers really care about us using AI features more regularly, then this needs to change. I've often spoken about my severe lack of interest when it comes to using AI on phones, and a big part of that is due to the fact it's usually so difficult to find any of the new features. Back in the day, Apple would proudly declare that "it just works," with die-hard fans parroting that line for several years. But when your new smartphone comes with homework, it certainly isn't passing the intuitiveness test with a particularly good grade. Apple's not the only party guilty of this, but with WWDC set to majorly shake up how Apple software works, be it on iPhone, Mac or another Apple product, it's in a position to try and help users use Apple Intelligence without doing a thesis-load of research first. Who knows, maybe making AI actually intuitive can help make up for all its AI missteps over the past year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store