After St. Isidore ruling, Walters calls to support other legal fights in favor of state-funded religious schools, with a caveat
OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) — Although the U.S. Supreme Court has shut the door on Oklahoma's plan to launch a taxpayer-funded religious charter school, State Superintendent Ryan Walters says he will spare no expense to keep the legal fight in favor it, and similar fights, going—so long as the religion involved is one that meets certain 'criteria.'A 4-4 deadlock decision from the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday leaves in place a prior Oklahoma Supreme Court ruling, which said launching the St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual Charter School would violate both the state and federal constitution.It would have been the first school of its kind in the nation.At a special-called news conference on Thursday, Oklahoma State Superintendent Ryan Walters said this fight in support of allowing the state to fund a religious school is nowhere close to being over.'Citizens' rights have been trampled,' Walters said. 'The Supreme Court has got it wrong. I believe this decision is antithetical to the religious freedoms in our U.S. Constitution.'Oklahoma's Republican Attorney General Gentner Drummond feels just the opposite.'I'm relieved that we continue to have freedom of religion in the United States,' Drummond told News 4 after the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on Thursday.
United States Supreme Court decides St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School case in split 4-4 vote
Be his disagreement with the state's top law enforcement officer, as it may, Walters says he's going to keep pushing onward.'We will continue to move forward to find any kind of avenue possible for this school and others like it to exist in Oklahoma,' Walters said.News 4 asked whether he believes the legal fight will be worth the costs to Oklahoma taxpayers, Walters said, 'Oh, absolutely. I don't think you can put a price on religious liberty.'Because the U.S. Supreme Court deadlocked, it didn't issue a formal ruling either way on the St. Isidore case.
That means, the Oklahoma State Supreme Court's earlier decision, which found the state constitution clearly bans taxpayer funding of religious schools, gets to stay in place.
Walters sees a way around that.'We're also looking at a potential amendment to the state constitution,' Walters said. 'We should be crystal clear that funds can be spent for religious purposes.'The only way to amend the state constitution is through a statewide vote.
In 2016, nearly 60% of Oklahoma voters rejected a proposed constitutional amendment that would have allowed the state to fund religious institutions.Even if voters were to reject the idea again, Walters said he would continue fighting to allow publicly-funded religious schools through other means.'What we've been looking at today are: What are the other ways that we can get this back to the Supreme Court?' Walters said.Thursday's deadlock happened because U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney-Barrett recused herself from the St. Isidore case because she is a longtime friend of a lawyer who represented St. Isidore.
Heated exchange as SCOTUS hears arguments on nations first religious charter school
But if a similar lawsuit, potentially one from a different state, eventually reaches the court, Coney-Barrett could take part in the ruling.Walters said he'd be open to supporting other states in such a lawsuit.
'Yes, we would,' Walters said. 'I mean, if it's a similar situation. Again, I'd need to see the specifics.'
When News 4 asked Walters whether he would support a similar lawsuit involving an Islamic charter school, Walters did not give a direct yes or no answer.
'You're really wanting to get me on that one, aren't you?' Walters said. 'You're really wanting to get me to answer that one. Look, in our state, it's very clear. In our state, the criteria have to be met for you to be a charter. I'm not going to speak outside of Oklahoma, where, again, I've told you some states have some bizarre rules.'He continued by saying it would depend on the state and whether the school met the kind of criteria Oklahoma looks for in charter applications, such as a track record, community support, and academic outcomes.News 4 pressed Walters again about whether he would support an Islamic charter school in another state.
Walters said, 'Well, that wouldn't meet our criteria. So I'm going to support what would meet Oklahoma's criteria. Our criteria has been very, you know, put together in the sense of—if you have that track record, if there's a history there, if you had the community support. And again, we haven't seen that here.'In a statement Thursday, Governor Kevin Stitt echoed Walters' calls to pursue further action and possibly bring a similar case back before the U.S. Supreme Court.
'This 4-4 tie is a non-decision,' Stitt wrote. 'Now we're in overtime. There will be another case just like this one, and Justice Barrett will break the tie. This is far from a settled issue. We are going to keep fighting for parents' rights to instill their values in their children and against religious discrimination.'
Attorney General Drummond, who argued the case before the Oklahoma Supreme Court and led the state's fight to stop the plan, has long-warned that allowing Oklahoma to fund one religious school could open a Pandora's box, arguing if the state can fund one religious school, it would have to fund every religious school, including institutions like the Satanic Temple.
Drummond celebrated the U.S. Supreme Court's split decision in an interview with News 4 on Thursday.
'I think it's remarkable. It's a great win for Oklahoma,' Drummond said. 'Every family can choose when to worship, with whom to worship and how to worship, and the state will not be involved in creating religion.'
News 4 will continue to monitor whether any new cases are filed.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Whataboutism Is Rotting Our Brains, Our Consciences, and Our Politics
BEFORE WE CAN ADEQUATELY RESPOND to the frontal assault Donald Trump has launched on our way of life, we need to grapple with whataboutism. It is destroying our capacity to make rational judgments. In the face of an unprecedented defiance of law, tradition, and the Constitution, too many of us find ourselves so mired in polarized thinking that we can't see straight. Humans have always been beguiled by black-and-white thinking. Something is either good or bad. You are either with us or against us. Greek or barbarian. Saved or damned. Sigmund Freud coined the term 'Madonna/whore complex' to describe the mindset of men who relegate women into one of two categories: pure or sullied. A related error in logic is called 'tu quoque' (you too), a form of the ad hominem fallacy because it attacks the person rather than disproving their argument—which should sound familiar to anyone who's lived through the past few years of American politics. The tendency to engage in polarized thinking is hardly new, and yet, it seems that we've regressed in recent years. We live in an age of overflowing information and knowledge, and yet we seem more inclined now than in the recent past to succumb to whataboutism. It's perfectly clear why Trump and his many enablers rely on whataboutism. It's the easiest deflection. What is the proper response to Trump's iniquitous treatment of women? What about Bill Clinton? How can one evaluate his pardons of the January 6th insurrectionists? What about all those who rioted in protest of George Floyd's murder and were never prosecuted? (They were.) Was Trump's refusal to return highly classified documents a serious breach? What about Joe Biden keeping files in his garage? (Biden returned them when asked.) Is Trump corrupting the rule of law with his pardons of friends, donors, and political allies? What about Joe Biden's pardons of Hunter and his entire family? We don't do whataboutism at The Bulwark. We don't have partisan loyalties or ulterior motives. We just tell you what we really think. Join us. This game can be played endlessly, and it has been played aggressively for the past decade. It's important to dwell on the consequences. Some people who are caught in a lie, betrayal, or other transgression admit their guilt and seek to repair the damage. That's how mature people and societies stay civilized. Truly depraved people don't take that route. Trump uses whataboutism not just to change the subject or disarm the accuser ('tu quoque' was pretty much the theme of the 2016 presidential race) but also to breed cynicism. If 'everybody does it' then it's unfair to hold him accountable. And because people who constantly transgress can't function with the knowledge that they are immoral, they must believe—and teach—that everyone is just as corrupt as they are; that the standards themselves are flawed or at least universally flouted. Does a mafia don tell his daughter that he's a criminal, or does he explain that the world is composed of killers and losers and that you must choose one or the other? Though Americans are sometimes perceived as idealistic, there are other strains in our character that demagogues can tap into, such as cynicism about politics. A line perhaps inaccurately attributed to Mark Twain has been a staple of after-dinner speeches for more than 150 years: 'America has no native criminal class, except Congress.' Or as a more modern wag put it: 'Politics comes from the Greek 'poly' (many) and 'ticks' (small, annoying bloodsuckers).' A certain amount of skepticism about politicians is healthy. But cynicism is corrosive because it invites the very thing it scorns. Once you elect a sociopath and agree with his jaundiced view that everyone is corrupt, you've lost any chance of upholding basic values. If you treasure honesty, integrity, the rule of law, and decency, you must be prepared to reject whataboutism and to risk mockery by insisting that no, not everybody does it, and we don't want to accept the kind of society in which that is assumed. As David Frum outlined in the Atlantic: Nothing like this has been attempted or even imagined in the history of the American presidency. Throw away the history books; discard feeble comparisons to scandals of the past. There is no analogy with any previous action by any past president. The brazenness of the self-enrichment resembles nothing seen in any earlier White House. This is American corruption on the scale of a post-Soviet republic or a postcolonial African dictatorship. Trump's corruption is so off the charts (a Qatari luxury jet, hundreds of millions in memecoins and tokens, bidding wars to dine with him as his club) that it defies comparison. Through the memecoin, anyone anywhere for any reason can put hundreds, or thousands, or millions of dollars directly into Trump's pocket. Not into a campaign fund, not into a political party, but into the hands of the president. And as we witnessed on his Middle East trip, eager foreign leaders and businessmen are lining up to do so. Vietnam, hoping for relief from tariffs, is in talks to help Trump build a luxury golf course. Due almost entirely to his crypto holdings, Trump has, by one estimate, doubled his net worth in just four months. Share The Constitution could not be clearer. Article I, Section 9 reads: 'No title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign state.' Are we so cynical that we cannot summon outrage at a flagrant disregard for our founding document? In keeping with the current grab-everything-that-isn't-nailed-down ethos, the Trump administration announced last month that it was disbanding the Justice Department unit devoted to ferreting out crypto crime, and the Securities and Exchange Commission dropped an investigation into one of Trump's largest donors—the one who donated top dollar (or memecoin) to have dinner with Trump at his country club outside D.C. Yes, Biden's pardons of his family were grubby, but they were a few pebbles compared with Trump's avalanche of corruption. The current president is signaling with his pardons that anti-democratic violence is encouraged if undertaken on his behalf, and that no action, not even murder, is beyond redemption if you are in his camp. He has pardoned a corrupt thief who happened to be the son of a big donor, granted a 'FULL AND Unconditional Pardon' to a Virginia sheriff who was convicted of selling government offices but who was redeemed by his Trump loyalty. The family of Ashli Babbitt, who violently stormed the Capitol and was shot by police, received a generous payout from the Trump-controlled government. Murderers, politicos on the take, swindlers, thieving reality TV stars, gangsters—all have been pardoned by Trump in the past few weeks. If you're a Trump supporter, you have an honest-to-goodness get-out-of-jail-free card. The Department of Justice's watchword is no longer 'Equal Justice Under Law,' but, in the words of Ed Martin, Trump's newly minted pardon advisor, 'No MAGA left behind.' We must disenthrall ourselves from the whataboutism mindset. There are honorable politicians. There are honest businessmen. There are police and soldiers and teachers and programmers and athletes and judges of integrity. Millions of Americans are appalled and deeply embarrassed by the kakistocracy we've elevated. Hold on to that outrage. It's the road back from this disaster. Share
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Texas lawmakers pass medical marijuana bill that includes chronic pain
A bill expanding Texas' medical marijuana program is headed to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's desk. The latest version was negotiated by members of the Texas House and Senate, including several lawmakers representing parts of Tarrant County. A compromise version of House Bill 46 advanced on Sunday, June 1, as negotiated in a conference committee made up of lawmakers from both chambers. It includes a number of recommendations from supporters of medical marijuana on how to improve the program, called the Texas Compassionate Use Program. The bill's measures include: Permitting satellite locations where dispensing organizations can securely store medical marijuana for distribution. Currently the products can only be stored overnight at an organization's main location, creating distribution challenges. Requires the state to have 15 dispensing organizations. At least three are required now, according to the Texas Department of Public Safety. Allows inhaling medical marijuana as an aerosol or vapor. Smoking is still not allowed. It also expands qualifying medical conditions to include: A condition that causes chronic pain. A traumatic brain injury. A terminal illness or condition that requires hospice or palliative care. The version that passed out of the House in May also included glaucoma, degenerative disc disease and spinal neuropathy, and included language specifically folding veterans into the program. The bill defines chronic pain as 'pain that is not relieved with acute, post-surgical, post-procedure or persistent non-chronic pain treatment and is associated with a chronic pathological process that causes continuous or intermittent severe pain for more than 90 days and for which a tetrahydrocannabinol is a viable method of treatment.' The Senate's version had included language that would have required patients to be on an opioid for 90 days before qualifying for the medical marijuana program. That requirement wasn't acceptable to the House, said Rep. Ken King, a Republican from Canadian who authored the bill. 'While we were not able to find agreement on degenerative disc disease, glucoma, spinal neuropathy and veterans, we believe with the new definitions of chronic pain, most of these patients will be covered,' King said. Tony Tinderholt, an Arlington Republican, who was a member of the conference committee, maintained that veterans are covered under the bill. 'The veterans out there watching need to know that the Texas Compassionate Use Program has been protected,' Tinderholt said. The expansion comes as Texas is positioned to ban consumable TCH products, like the delta-8 and delta-a gummies, vapes and drinks that can be found at stores and gas stations across Texas. The ban was a top priority of Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who on May 28 held a news conference blasting the THC products. Members of the hemp business community have called for new regulations, like age restrictions, and better enforcement of existing regulations, rather than a ban of the products. The Texas Hemp Business Council has called on Abbott to veto the legislation.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump ally Senator Graham pushes for new sanctions against Russia ahead of G7 Summit
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a longtime ally of US President Donald Trump, has announced his intention to push for the introduction of new sanctions against Russia ahead of the G7 summit, which will take place from 15 to 17 June in Canada. Source: Bloomberg Details: In a joint statement with Democrat Richard Blumenthal, he stressed that the sanctions should be imposed by mid-June to send a clear signal to China and other countries helping the Kremlin circumvent international restrictions. "By the G7 summit, we hope to have sanctions put in place – in coordination with Europe – to deliver an unequivocal message to China," they said after talks in Paris with French officials. Graham and Blumenthal noted that their sanctions bill against Russia, which provides for the introduction of a 500% tariff on imports from countries that buy Russian energy resources, has been supported by 82 senators. "Russia indiscriminately kills men, women and children. It's time for the world to act decisively against Russia's aggression by holding China and others accountable for buying cheap Russian oil that props up Putin's war machine. If you want this war to end, push China to help end it," Graham wrote on X (Twitter). Quote from Bloomberg: "It's still unclear whether Trump, who has been pushing for a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, is ready to embrace tougher action against Moscow. But in recent days, Trump has been expressing new frustration with President Vladimir Putin." [N.B. Ukrainska Pravda doesn't recognise Putin as president – ed.] Details: Graham and Blumenthal also held a phone conversation with French President Emmanuel Macron. "We assured President Macron and his team that we believe Putin is playing games regarding peace and is actually preparing for a military offensive in the late summer or early fall," they said. Background: Graham expects the upper house of Congress to begin considering new large-scale sanctions against Russia as early as this week due to the lack of progress in achieving a ceasefire in Ukraine. As for the lower house of Congress, whose consent will also be needed to approve the new sanctions, Graham said there are "House members that are ready to move in the House, and you'll see congressional action". The senators have regularly issued threats of what they describe as "bone-crushing" sanctions against Russia, although these have not yet been implemented. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
