logo
Bove confirms POLITICO report on his harsh management style

Bove confirms POLITICO report on his harsh management style

Politico5 hours ago

With President Donald Trump's July 4 deadline drawing near, Senate Majority Leader John Thune told POLITICO on Tuesday night he believes the Senate is 'on a path' to start voting on the megabill Friday.
But he's got several fires to put out first. For one, he's under immense pressure to water down the Medicaid provisions the Senate GOP is counting on for hundreds of billions of dollars worth of savings.
Speaker Mike Johnson is warning in private that Senate Republicans could cost House Republicans their majority next year if they try to push through the deep Medicaid cuts in the current Senate version, according to three people granted anonymity to describe the matter.
That comes as Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) cautions GOP senators that those same cutbacks could become a political albatross for Republicans just as the Affordable Care Act was for Democrats.
'[Barack] Obama said … 'if you like your health care you can keep it, if you like your doctor we can keep it,' and yet we had several million people lose their health care,' the in-cycle senator told reporters Tuesday. 'Here we're saying [with] Medicaid, we're going to hold people harmless, but we're estimating' millions of people could lose coverage.
GOP leaders are trying to ease concerns by preparing to include a fund to help rural hospitals that could be harmed by the reductions, even as Thune insisted Tuesday 'we like where we are.' Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who's been pushing for the fund, said while that 'helps lessen the impact,' she remains 'concerned about the changes in the funding for Medicaid in general.'
The other drama hanging over the bill are several imminent, critical rulings from Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough. Several committees that already have rulings in hand are due to release revised text as soon as this morning, according to a person familiar with the plans. And Republicans could know as soon as Wednesday whether MacDonough will clear major parts of their tax package.
As of late Tuesday, the parliamentarian had not yet ruled on provisions linked to the so-called current policy baseline, an accounting maneuver that zeroes out the costs of $3.8 trillion of expiring tax cuts, according to two people granted anonymity to disclose the private discussions.
Make no mistake: Adverse rulings could send Republicans back to the drawing board on making their tax plan permanent or otherwise force them to go nuclear and override or ignore MacDonough altogether. There's uncertainty from all sides about how that would play out, given the gambit has never been tried before with tax legislation.
This much is already clear: With the tax package in flux and Medicaid savings under threat, GOP leaders have a major math problem on their hands. And House fiscal hawks are watching to see, regardless of the accounting method, whether the Senate sticks to the budget deal they agreed to with Johnson earlier this year.
What else we're watching:
— Bove on the Hill: Senate Judiciary lawmakers will convene the first blockbuster judicial hearing of the second Trump administration later Wednesday, where they will grill Emil Bove, a top Justice Department official and former criminal defense lawyer for Trump who has a shot at a lifetime appointment on the federal bench. Some even see him as a potential future Trump Supreme Court nominee.
— Vought testifies on rescissions: OMB Director Russ Vought will testify in front of the Senate's full bench of appropriators Wednesday afternoon to justify the White House's request for $9.4 billion in cuts of previously approved money. Expect pointed questioning from various Republicans on the panel, including Collins, who has publicly opposed cuts to PEPFAR, the HIV and AIDS foreign aid program.
— Iran briefings incoming: Senators will have a postponed briefing on the situation in Iran on Thursday, after which Democrat Tim Kaine (Va.) is aiming to call a vote on his resolution seeking to block further U.S. military action against Iran. On the House side, Speaker Johnson said that members will now be briefed Friday. Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Tuesday there had been no Gang of Eight meeting yet.
Jordain Carney, Meredith Lee Hill and Hailey Fuchs contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nestle says it will remove artificial dyes from US foods by 2026

time13 minutes ago

Nestle says it will remove artificial dyes from US foods by 2026

Nestle said Wednesday it will eliminate artificial colors from its U.S. food and beverages by the middle of 2026. It's the latest big food company making that pledge. Last week, Kraft Heinz and General Mills said they would remove artificial dyes from their U.S. products by 2027. General Mills also said it plans to remove artificial dyes from its U.S. cereals and from all foods served in K-12 schools by the middle of 2026. The move has broad support. About two-thirds of Americans favor restricting or reformulating processed foods to remove ingredients like added sugar or dyes, according to an AP-NORC poll. Both California and West Virginia have recently banned artificial dyes in foods served in schools. On Sunday, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas signed a bill requiring foods made with artificial dyes or additives to contain a new safety label starting in 2027. The label would say they contain ingredients 'not recommended for human consumption' in Australia, Canada, the European Union or the U.K. The federal government is also stepping up its scrutiny of artificial colors. In January, days before President Donald Trump took office, the U.S. regulators banned the dye called Red 3 from the nation's food supply, nearly 35 years after it was barred from cosmetics because of potential cancer risk. In April, Trump's Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency would take steps to eliminate synthetic dyes by the end of 2026, largely by relying on voluntary efforts from the food industry. Nestle has pledged to remove artificial dyes before. Early in 2015, the company said it would remove artificial flavors and colors from its products by the end of that year. But the promise didn't hold. Nestle said Wednesday it's been removing synthetic dyes from its products over the last decade, and 90% of its U.S. portfolio doesn't contain them. Among those that do is Nesquik Banana Strawberry milk, which is made with Red 3. Nestle said Wednesday it wants to evolve with its U.S. customers' changing nutritional needs and preferences. 'Serving and delighting people is at the heart of everything we do and every decision that we make,' Nestle's U.S. CEO Marty Thompson said in a statement.

Trump's war on the courts intensifies
Trump's war on the courts intensifies

Politico

time17 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump's war on the courts intensifies

Presented by Bayer Welcome to POLITICO's West Wing Playbook: Remaking Government, your guide to Donald Trump's unprecedented overhaul of the federal government — the key decisions, the critical characters and the power dynamics that are upending Washington and beyond. Send tips | Subscribe | Email Sophia | Email Irie | Email Ben| Email Kyle President DONALD TRUMP's administration is in a full-blown war with the federal courts, with the fate of American governance on the line. That's the only way to read the increasingly confrontational, bare-knuckle tactics that the administration is deploying against the judiciary — and the steady, pointed resistance from judges. On Tuesday night, the Justice Department filed an unusual lawsuit against the entire bench of the federal district court in Maryland — where dozens of cases against the administration are pending — over a blanket, automatic two-day pause on deportations in cases brought by detained immigrants. A department spokesperson said the lawsuit was intended to 'rein in unlawful judicial overreach.' In an increasingly pointed Supreme Court showdown with immigration advocates, Solicitor General JOHN SAUER labeled a federal district judge's order reimposing restrictions on the deportation of eight men to South Sudan a 'lawless act of defiance.' Advocates for the men say the fight is even larger than their clients: It is about whether the high court will countenance the administration's defiance of the courts altogether. While the justices ruminate, skirmishes between the courts and the administration are proliferating and intensifying. In the most high-profile case of all, the criminal prosecution of KILMAR ABREGO GARCIA, a magistrate judge in Texas ripped the Justice Department for allegations that 'defy common sense' and relied on flimsy evidence. In another prominent legal showdown, a federal judge ordered the release of pro-Palestinian activist MAHMOUD KHALIL after determining that his continued detention was an unconstitutional attack on free speech. But even in cases that are off the national radar, judges are expressing shock and dismay at mass deportation tactics that stretch the bounds of the law and Constitution: The clearest distillation of this clash of co-equal branches comes in Trump's attempt to place a staunch loyalist onto the Philadelphia-based bench of the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. After leading Trump's defense in three criminal cases, EMIL BOVE has become Trump's brashest Justice Department enforcer. He has directed purges of purportedly disloyal prosecutors and attacked the integrity of those who refused to follow orders to drop DOJ's corruption case against New York City Mayor ERIC ADAMS or who participated in the investigation of the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol. A day before Bove's confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, a former Justice Department attorney alleged that Bove spearheaded a drive to sidestep adverse court orders in crucial deportation cases. Those allegations were at the center of Democrats' questions today for Bove, who pledged to be an impartial interpreter of the law, despite his track record as a pro-Trump bulldog. Attorney General PAM BONDI, who will have a role in reviewing the whistleblower complaint against Bove, told senators today that she would 'run through a wall for Emil Bove.' And after testifying, she filed into the Senate Judiciary hearing room to catch the end of Bove's confirmation proceedings. Minutes after it ended, Bondi issued a statement slamming courts that had ruled against Trump, saying their orders were 'designed to halt his agenda.' But the courts so far seem undeterred. This afternoon, a judge rejected DOJ's argument to keep Abrego behind bars while he awaits trial on immigrant smuggling charges in Tennessee. The judge, WAVERLY CRENSHAW, JR., said DOJ's position — that DHS might deport Abrego if he is not detained on his criminal charges — 'defies logic,' since the Trump administration controls both agencies. 'If the Government finds this case to be as high priority as it argues here, it is incumbent upon it to ensure that Abrego is held accountable for the charges in the Indictment,' Crenshaw said. 'If the Department of Justice and DHS cannot do so, that speaks for itself.' MESSAGE US — West Wing Playbook is obsessively covering the Trump administration's reshaping of the federal government. Are you a federal worker? A DOGE staffer? Have you picked up on any upcoming DOGE moves? We want to hear from you on how this is playing out. Email us at westwingtips@ Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe! POTUS PUZZLER Which former president was buried with a copy of the Constitution under his head? (Answer at bottom.) Knives Out LAKE MAKES HER CASE: KARI LAKE, senior adviser to the U.S. Agency for Global Media, today defended the Trump administration's dismantling of the agency and its independent outlet Voice of America, where more than 600 full-time staffers received termination notices last week, telling the House Foreign Affairs committee that USAGM 'is not needed.' Democratic lawmakers questioned whether Lake was qualified to lead the agency due to her repeated false claims that Trump did not lose the 2020 presidential election and that she did not lose her own gubernatorial and Senate races in 2020 and 2024, respectively. 'I can't imagine how people fighting for democracy today around the world could trust someone who so shamelessly lied about her own election,' said Rep. GREG STANTON (D-Ariz.). One House Republican expressed concern related to the conflict between Israel and Iran, which prompted the agency's Farsi-language service to be hastily called back to work. 'I worry about the U.S. government's ability to win in the information domain during the next crisis, which could be just around the corner,' said Rep. YOUNG KIM (R-Calif.). Agenda Setting EVERY SINGLE STATE: Ahead of the Office of Management and Budget Director RUSS VOUGHT's testimony before the Senate Appropriations Committee this afternoon on the $9.4 billion rescissions package, Vice Chair Sen. PATTY MURRAY (D-Wash.) released a map of the 1,500 local radio and TV stations that would lose funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Some Republicans including Sen. MIKE ROUNDS (R-S.D.) have raised concerns about public broadcasting cuts. 'UNNECESSARILY CHAOTIC': Sen. MITCH McCONNELL, the longest-serving party leader in Senate history, sharply criticized how the administration has executed its plan to root out government waste, our HASSAN ALI KANU writes in. 'There's plenty of absolute nonsense masquerading as American aid that shouldn't receive another bit of taxpayer funding, but the administration's attempt to root it out has been unnecessarily chaotic,' McConnell said to Vought. 'In critical corners of the globe, instead of creating efficiencies, you've created vacuums for adversaries like China to fill.' McConnell has been sharply critical of some of the Trump administration's foreign policy moves, chiefly on its handling of Ukraine. But his comments today raise new questions about his support for the administration's rescissions package. PAGING DR. CASSIDY: The newly formed vaccine advisory committee chosen by HHS Secretary ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR. announced today that it would review childhood vaccines and shots not studied in more than seven years, our SOPHIE GARDNER and DAVID LIM report. The decision by the new group, tasked with reviewing the childhood immunization schedule, could open the door to changes on how and when children are vaccinated. The chair of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices said the committee would maintain existing working groups tasked with examining vaccines and that new work groups will also be established. MORE ON VACCINES: Kennedy announced today that the U.S. will withdraw financial support for Gavi, a global organization that helps purchase vaccines for children in poor countries, NYT's STEPHANIE NOLEN reports. Kennedy accused the group's leaders of having 'ignored the science' in immunizing children globally. Kennedy argued that Gavi's leaders had been selective in their use of science to support vaccine choices and said that the U.S. would not deliver on its $1.2 billion pledge to support the program until it changed its processes. Gavi's leaders rejected the suggestion that its vaccine purchases were driven by anything other than scientific evidence. In the Courts WIN FOR UNIONS: A federal judge in San Francisco today blocked Trump's executive order seeking to terminate the collective bargaining rights of workers whose unions have opposed and sued the administration, Hassan writes in. Judge JAMES DONATO's order restores the status and rights of about 950,000 federal workers at 21 agencies who are represented by the American Federation of Government Employees and four other unions, according to the AFGE. Trump sought to abruptly revoke collective bargaining rights from much of the public sector in March, relying on a law that allows agencies to be excluded from coverage if the president determines their primary function is national security work. But Donato held that the White House's own statements are fairly clear that at least part of the motivation is unlawful 1st Amendment retaliation. Trump's anti-union policies have survived a separate challenge before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which temporarily revived the executive order last month in a case brought by the National Treasury Employees Union. THE WHOLE GANG'S ON BOARD: Almost two dozen Democratic attorneys general are challenging the Trump administration's argument for cutting billions of dollars in federal grant funding for states and other recipients, POLITICO's E&E News' NIINA H. FARAH reports. The new lawsuit, filed in Massachusetts federal district court on Tuesday, is the latest challenge to the administration's 'slash-and-burn campaign' to freeze congressionally mandated funding for an array of programs. The lawsuit does not ask the federal court to restore canceled grant funding, unlike previous, pending challenges. Instead, it asks for a judge to weigh in on the administration's reliance on a clause in a 2020 regulation that says agencies can cancel grant funding that 'no longer effectuates … agency priorities.' WHO'S IN, WHO'S OUT (BIG) BALLS TO THE WALL: The infamous EDWARD CORISTINE, the 19-year-old DOGE staffer known as 'Big Balls,' has left his government role, WIRED's JAKE LAHUT, MAKENA KELLY, VITTORIA ELLIOTT and ZOË SCHIFFER report. 'Edward Coristine resigned yesterday,' a White House official told WIRED. Coristine received full-time employment status at the General Services Administration late last month, but as of Tuesday, his Google Workspace account with GSA was no longer active. His name no longer appears on a White House contact list of current DOGE employees on the federal payroll maintained by a senior administration official. Coristine, according to another former DOGE staffer, 'was one of a small group of technologists who were highly trusted within DOGE and deployed across multiple federal agencies, and given multiple federal laptops,' WIRED writes. What We're Reading The Self-Deportation Psyop (The Atlantic's Nick Miroff) U.S. Textile Makers, Feeling Forgotten by Trump, Hope Boom Days Are Ahead (NYT's Alan Rappeport) A Military Ethics Professor Resigns in Protest (The Atlantic's Tom Nichols) POTUS PUZZLER ANSWER Former President ANDREW JOHNSON was buried in 1875 with a copy of the Constitution under his head and his body wrapped in an American flag, according to the National Park Service.

Reflecting on Same-Sex Marriage Ruling a Decade Later
Reflecting on Same-Sex Marriage Ruling a Decade Later

New York Times

time17 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Reflecting on Same-Sex Marriage Ruling a Decade Later

Times Insider explains who we are and what we do and delivers behind-the-scenes insights into how our journalism comes together. A little after 10 a.m. on June 26, 2015, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy started summarizing his majority opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges from the Supreme Court bench. Six and a half minutes later, after reviewing the details of the case and reflecting on history, culture and politics, he announced the court's ruling. 'The court now holds that same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry in all states,' Justice Kennedy said. 'No longer may this liberty be denied to them.' I was downstairs, in the court's press room. As soon as the justice began talking, court personnel handed out copies of the 98-page decision, which included five opinions. Reporters rushed to their cubicles to skim it. Just three years before, initial reports from CNN and Fox News mistakenly said that the Supreme Court had struck down the heart of the Affordable Care Act. In the marriage case, I wanted to be fast — but I definitely wanted to be right. I had covered the court for The New York Times since 2008, collaborating with a series of superb editors. That year, I was working closely with Jill Agostino, an unflappable colleague in the paper's Washington bureau. We spent weeks preparing draft articles anticipating various outcomes. I asked her not long ago what she remembered about that morning. 'You called me directly when you got the decision, and you had read through enough of it in a hurry, but of course we were both so terrified of making a mistake,' she wrote in an email. 'We wanted to be quick, but not too quick. You said, '5-to-4 upholding … ' and then you paused, and then you said: 'Yes, upholding same-sex marriage. Go ahead and send it.'' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store