‘Significant challenges' in use of AI within UK screen sector
Other issues highlighted by the British Film Institute (BFI) report include the safeguarding of human creative control, the fear of jobs being lost as positions are replaced through the use of AI, and investment in training in new skills.
High energy consumption and carbon emissions, and the risks to creative content around biased data, are also described as being of concern.
The report, which has been carried out in partnership with CoSTAR universities Goldsmiths, Loughborough and Edinburgh, analyses how the screen sector is using and experimenting with rapidly evolving generative AI technologies.
It warned that the 'primary issue' was the use of copyrighted material – such as hundreds of thousands of film and TV scripts – in the training of generative AI models, without payment or the permission of rights-holders.
'This practice threatens the fundamental economics of the screen sector if it devalues intellectual property creation and squeezes out original creators,' the report said.
But it added that the UK's strong foundation in creative technology – as it is home to more than 13,000 creative technology companies – means that the UK screen sector is well positioned to adapt to the technological shift.
The report – titled AI in the Screen Sector: Perspectives and Paths Forward – said generative AI promises to democratise and revolutionise the industry, with the BBC, for example, piloting AI initiatives.
Meanwhile, projects such as the Charismatic consortium, which is backed by Channel 4 and Aardman Animations, aim to make AI tools accessible to creators regardless of their budget or experience.
It said this could empower a new wave of British creators to produce high-quality content with modest resources, though concerns about copyright and ethical use remain significant barriers to full adoption.
The report sets out nine key recommendations it suggests should be addressed within the next three years to enable the UK screen sector to thrive in using AI.
ADVERTISEMENT
These include establishing the UK as a world-leading market of IP licensing for AI training, and embedding sustainability standards to reduce AI's carbon footprint.
It also calls for structures and interventions to pool knowledge, develop workforce skills and target investments in the UK's creative technology sector, while it urges support for independent creators through accessible tools, funding and ethical AI products.
The BFI's director of research and innovation, Rishi Coupland, said: 'AI has long been an established part of the screen sector's creative toolkit, most recently seen in the post-production of the Oscar-winning The Brutalist, and its rapid advancement is attracting multimillion investments in technology innovator applications.
'However, our report comes at a critical time and shows how generative AI presents an inflection point for the sector and, as a sector, we need to act quickly on a number of key strategic fronts.
'Whilst it offers significant opportunities for the screen sector such as speeding up production workflows, democratising content creation and empowering new voices, it could also erode traditional business models, displace skilled workers, and undermine public trust in screen content.
'The report's recommendations provide a roadmap to how we can ensure that the UK's world-leading film, TV, video games and VFX industries continue to thrive by making best use of AI technologies to bring their creativity, innovations and storytelling to screens around the globe.'
Professor Jonny Freeman, director of CoSTAR Foresight Lab, said: 'This latest CoSTAR Foresight Lab report, prepared by the BFI, navigates the complex landscape of AI in the screen sector by carefully weighing both its transformative opportunities and the significant challenges it presents.
'The report acknowledges that while AI offers powerful tools to enhance creativity, efficiency, and competitiveness across every stage of the production workflow – from script development and pre-production planning, through on-set production, to post-production and distribution – it also raises urgent questions around skills, workforce adaptation, ethics, and sector sustainability.'
CoSTAR is a £75.6 million national network of laboratories that are developing new technology to maintain the UK's world-leading position in gaming, TV, film, performance, and digital entertainment.
Last month stars including Sir Elton John, Sir Paul McCartney and Sir Ian McKellen, wrote a joint letter to Sir Keir Starmer, urging the Prime Minister to introduce safeguards against work being plundered for free.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Challenge of AI is to bridge the culture gap between its creators and custodians
'I have a growing sense that everything I've learned over the last 30 years has led me to this place and to this moment.' That was how Jony Ive – former chief design officer at Apple and the creative mind behind the iPhone, iPad and the iMac – described his latest chapter: the announcement that OpenAI is acquiring his AI hardware venture, io, in a deal reportedly worth $6.5 billion (€5.7 billion). The pace and scale of developments in AI is now staggering. The OpenAI/io deal is just one high-profile example in a surge of breakthroughs. Google has released a suite of new AI-powered tools. Elon Musk's xAI launched a new version of its Grok chatbot. And the United States announced its $500 billion 'stargate' project to boost national AI capabilities. These examples underscore just how rapidly AI is advancing, not only in terms of technical capacity but also in how it is embedding itself into the fabric of our daily lives. READ MORE What makes the OpenAI/io acquisition particularly significant isn't just the companies involved – though OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, is the front-runner in generative AI. It signals a new phase, where AI moves beyond software into physical products and spaces. [ Can Jony Ive replicate the Apple magic at OpenAI? Opens in new window ] Ive's design ethos, combined with OpenAI's technological muscle, reflects a belief in a future where AI is not just a tool; it's a companion. It's a bold bet, underwritten by deep expertise. On the other side of the Atlantic, in an altogether different setting, another AI moment was unfolding. The new Oireachtas convened its first committee on AI . The committee's formation reflects growing awareness of AI's impact on employment, public services and democratic processes. Chairman Malcolm Byrne has acknowledged both the opportunities and risks of AI, distinguishing himself from the doom-laden narratives often found in public debate. He has emphasised AI's potential to transform public services, foster innovation and unlock new industries. The committee is tasked with exploring these dynamics, gathering expert input and making legislative and policy recommendations. How the committee's work unfolds will be telling, especially given how complex the AI landscape is and how difficult collaboration between governments, regulators and innovators can be. Two cultures, one challenge What's already clear is that those building AI and those trying to govern it often come from two very different cultures. Technologists like OpenAI's Sam Altman operate in an ecosystem defined by velocity, capital and exponential thinking. They believe that AI will reshape every sector – not if, but when. With access to some of the world's best minds and deep-pocketed investors, they operate on timelines measured in months, not years. Politicians, by contrast, are bound by public accountability, consensus and election cycles. Where technologists see exciting possibilities, politicians often see risk: to trust, to jobs, to social cohesion – and to their own positions. Take education. AI's rise is generating genuine concern: attention spans, cheating and institutional readiness are all under scrutiny. In Ireland, reforms to Leaving Certificate English and accounting syllabuses, incorporating oral, creative writing and applied assessments – tangible responses to this new reality – are now likely delayed by 12 months, partly due to concerns about operational preparedness. [ Teachers are being bullied into accepting reforms that will damage education Opens in new window ] Where AI's creators focus on what's possible, policymakers tilt towards the permissible. As Tony Blair noted in his book, Leading, regulation 'gives the illusion of control'. Reform, on the other hand, requires courage, stepping into the unknown, taking risks and trusting systems outside your direct line of command. This tension isn't theoretical. It's a practical, crystallising conundrum. If AI does even half of what its creators claim it will, we're on the cusp of a societal shift not seen since the Industrial Revolution. Among the most difficult questions being asked are: will entire job categories be replaced?; does it ultimately trigger a move from earned income to universal basic income?; what happens to purpose, identity, and mental health when work is no longer central to daily life? These aren't questions Silicon Valley is built to answer. Nor are they easily resolved in parliamentary committee rooms. But they must be answered. While concerns about unchecked AI adoption are valid, the technology also offers transformational solutions, especially in areas where urgency and complexity collide, such as infrastructure and healthcare. Take the UK, where AI is already being deployed in the NHS to speed up diagnostics, triage patients more efficiently and shorten waiting times. In infrastructure, the UK's Planning Inspectorate is trialling AI to process applications faster and address bottlenecks in housing approvals. These examples show AI's real potential to cut through bureaucratic delays, meet recruitment challenges and improve public delivery, something most citizens would welcome. With Ireland facing growing pressure on State services and a push to drive the digital economy, AI presents both a significant risk and a powerful opportunity. Excessive caution risks stagnation, innovation unchecked risks exclusion. Bridging the gap AI isn't waiting. The decisions we make now on how we design, govern, implement and evolve with this technology will shape not just the future of work, but the future of meaning. How we arrive at them need not be binary. It's not about rejecting change, it's about understanding its implications. Silicon Valley hasn't always earned the benefit of the doubt, so caution is both reasonable and responsible. Technologists will need to understand the human, ethical and societal implications of what they're building. For their part, policymakers will need to engage more proactively, beyond regulation, to reform and reimagine public systems and business operations. Civil society will need to be involved. Can the culture gap between AI's creators and its custodians can be bridged? Like everything with AI, we won't have to wait long to find out. Dan Pender is a business founder, public relations consultant and former government adviser.
Irish Independent
7 hours ago
- Irish Independent
‘Significant challenges' in use of AI within UK screen sector
Other issues highlighted by the British Film Institute (BFI) report include the safeguarding of human creative control, the fear of jobs being lost as positions are replaced through the use of AI, and investment in training in new skills. High energy consumption and carbon emissions, and the risks to creative content around biased data, are also described as being of concern. The report, which has been carried out in partnership with CoSTAR universities Goldsmiths, Loughborough and Edinburgh, analyses how the screen sector is using and experimenting with rapidly evolving generative AI technologies. It warned that the 'primary issue' was the use of copyrighted material – such as hundreds of thousands of film and TV scripts – in the training of generative AI models, without payment or the permission of rights-holders. 'This practice threatens the fundamental economics of the screen sector if it devalues intellectual property creation and squeezes out original creators,' the report said. But it added that the UK's strong foundation in creative technology – as it is home to more than 13,000 creative technology companies – means that the UK screen sector is well positioned to adapt to the technological shift. The report – titled AI in the Screen Sector: Perspectives and Paths Forward – said generative AI promises to democratise and revolutionise the industry, with the BBC, for example, piloting AI initiatives. Meanwhile, projects such as the Charismatic consortium, which is backed by Channel 4 and Aardman Animations, aim to make AI tools accessible to creators regardless of their budget or experience. It said this could empower a new wave of British creators to produce high-quality content with modest resources, though concerns about copyright and ethical use remain significant barriers to full adoption. The report sets out nine key recommendations it suggests should be addressed within the next three years to enable the UK screen sector to thrive in using AI. ADVERTISEMENT These include establishing the UK as a world-leading market of IP licensing for AI training, and embedding sustainability standards to reduce AI's carbon footprint. It also calls for structures and interventions to pool knowledge, develop workforce skills and target investments in the UK's creative technology sector, while it urges support for independent creators through accessible tools, funding and ethical AI products. The BFI's director of research and innovation, Rishi Coupland, said: 'AI has long been an established part of the screen sector's creative toolkit, most recently seen in the post-production of the Oscar-winning The Brutalist, and its rapid advancement is attracting multimillion investments in technology innovator applications. 'However, our report comes at a critical time and shows how generative AI presents an inflection point for the sector and, as a sector, we need to act quickly on a number of key strategic fronts. 'Whilst it offers significant opportunities for the screen sector such as speeding up production workflows, democratising content creation and empowering new voices, it could also erode traditional business models, displace skilled workers, and undermine public trust in screen content. 'The report's recommendations provide a roadmap to how we can ensure that the UK's world-leading film, TV, video games and VFX industries continue to thrive by making best use of AI technologies to bring their creativity, innovations and storytelling to screens around the globe.' Professor Jonny Freeman, director of CoSTAR Foresight Lab, said: 'This latest CoSTAR Foresight Lab report, prepared by the BFI, navigates the complex landscape of AI in the screen sector by carefully weighing both its transformative opportunities and the significant challenges it presents. 'The report acknowledges that while AI offers powerful tools to enhance creativity, efficiency, and competitiveness across every stage of the production workflow – from script development and pre-production planning, through on-set production, to post-production and distribution – it also raises urgent questions around skills, workforce adaptation, ethics, and sector sustainability.' CoSTAR is a £75.6 million national network of laboratories that are developing new technology to maintain the UK's world-leading position in gaming, TV, film, performance, and digital entertainment. Last month stars including Sir Elton John, Sir Paul McCartney and Sir Ian McKellen, wrote a joint letter to Sir Keir Starmer, urging the Prime Minister to introduce safeguards against work being plundered for free.
Irish Times
15 hours ago
- Irish Times
Young people and AI
Sir, – In one of his first speeches as pope, Leo XIV outlined his priorities for his papacy. Interestingly, one of these is the challenges posed by artificial intelligence (AI). The pope believes that AI is a threat to 'humanity, justice and labour'. He said that this was one of the key reasons for him choosing the name Leo XIV. He had spoken previously about the impact of the industrial revolution on workers' rights. We are now arguably going through another 'industrial revolution' of sorts. Before, it was concerns that machines would replace people and take their jobs. Now it's the same but with AI. We adapted before and we can adapt again; not by trying to beat AI by being robots but by fully embracing our humanity – the qualities that set us apart from AI, qualities like our emotions, our ability to connect and build strong, trusting relationships and our ability to empathise. READ MORE If we are fully human, if we stop trying to beat AI at its own game, AI can never truly replace us, never truly do away with the need for real, human people in the workforce and in society. As a young person, I'm often asked the question, 'what do you want to be when you grow up?' Whatever answer I give, the response is usually: 'Oh, that job will be done away it; AI will be doing it in the future.' But I remain hopeful, faithful that I will be needed in society. And that AI can't replace humans if we are truly human, fully ourselves. – Yours, etc, TESS LIFFEY, Birr, Co Offaly.
