logo
Operation Sindoor: Meet Col Sofiya Qureshi and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh leading Modi Govt's military messaging

Operation Sindoor: Meet Col Sofiya Qureshi and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh leading Modi Govt's military messaging

Indian Express07-05-2025

On Wednesday morning, as Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri took his seat at the National Media Centre in the heart of the capital to brief the media on India's retaliation to the Pahalgam terror attack, he was accompanied by two unfamiliar faces – Wing Commander Vyomika Singh of the Indian Air Force and Colonel Sophiya Qureshi of the Indian Army. The significance of the Union government choosing two women officers from the armed forces to disclose details of 'Operation Sindoor' was not lost on anyone.
During the briefing, Qureshi addressed the media in Hindi, explaining the selected terrorist targets destroyed through precision attacks, while Singh followed with the same information in English. The briefing lasted 25 minutes – coincidentally, the same duration as 'Operation Sindoor' itself.
In contrast, on September 29, 2016, after the surgical strikes carried out in response to the Uri attack, the Indian government had chosen Lieutenant General Ranbir Singh, then Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) of the Indian Army, to brief the media. Similarly, after the Balakot airstrikes on February 26, 2019, the responsibility of briefing the media was given to then Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale.
So, who are the two women that the Modi government chose to disclose details of 'Operation Sindoor'?
Who is Colonel Sofiya Qureshi?
An officer of the Army's Signal Corps, the 44-year-old Colonel Sophiya Qureshi was one of 11 women officers whose achievements were highlighted by the Supreme Court in its landmark 2020 judgment on gender parity in the Army's top positions. The judgment dismissed the government's arguments against granting women command appointments and specifically acknowledged the accomplishments of these 11 female officers. 'Women officers of the Indian Army have brought laurels to the force,' the Supreme Court noted, and Qureshi was among those recognized.
Colonel Qureshi holds the rare distinction of being the first woman officer to lead an Indian Army contingent in a major multinational military exercise. In February and March of 2016, then a 35-year-old Lieutenant Colonel, she led the Indian Army's 40-member contingent in a multinational exercise.
The Multinational Field Training Exercise (FTX) – Exercise FORCE 18 involved ASEAN Plus countries and was the largest ground forces exercise ever conducted on Indian soil at the time. It was based on the themes of 'Humanitarian Mine Action' and 'Peacekeeping Operations'.
Colonel Qureshi also served in the United Nations Peacekeeping Operation in Congo in 2006 and has been associated with peacekeeping operations for over six years. Her leadership in the exercise came after being selected from a pool of peacekeeping trainers. When asked about leading the contingent, she said, 'I feel proud, of course.' Her message to young women in the armed forces was: 'Work hard for the country and make everyone proud.'
During that time, the Army Commander of the Southern Command, the late General Bipin Rawat, who later became the Army Chief and India's first Chief of Defence Staff, praised her. He remarked, 'In the Army, we believe in equal opportunity and equal responsibility. There is no difference between male and female officers. She was chosen not because she is a woman but because she has the abilities and leadership qualities to shoulder the responsibility.'
Colonel Qureshi holds a postgraduate degree in Biochemistry. She hails from Vadodara, Gujarat, and comes from a family with a strong military tradition—her grandfather served in the Army, and her father was an Army religious teacher. She joined the Indian Army through the Officers Training Academy in 1999 and is married to Major Tajuddin Qureshi of the Mechanised Infantry.
Who is Wing Commander Vyomika Singh?
A helicopter pilot in the Air Force, Singh was commissioned into the IAF on December 18, 2004, as part of the 21st Short Service Commission (Women) Flying Pilot Course and was promoted to the rank of Wing Commander on December 18, 2017. Specializing in helicopter operations, she has logged over 2,500 flying hours on Chetak and Cheetah helicopters. In 2021, she participated in a tri-services all-women mountaineering expedition to Mt. Manirang, one of the highest peaks of Himachal Pradesh, nestled at the border of Kinnaur & Spiti districts, demonstrating her resilience and dedication.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Eliminate the vile: US lawmaker tells Pakistan to act against Jaish-e-Mohammed
Eliminate the vile: US lawmaker tells Pakistan to act against Jaish-e-Mohammed

India Today

time20 minutes ago

  • India Today

Eliminate the vile: US lawmaker tells Pakistan to act against Jaish-e-Mohammed

In a strong message to Pakistan, US Congressman Brad Sherman has urged Islamabad to act decisively against the terror outfit Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), calling it a 'vile' group responsible for heinous acts, including the 2002 murder of Wall Street Journal journalist Daniel a Pakistani delegation led by former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari in Washington on Thursday, Sherman said Pakistan should do 'all it can to eliminate this vile group and combat terrorism in the region.'advertisementThe meeting comes as MPs, led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, are also visiting Washington to brief American interlocutors on 'Operation Sindoor' following the recent Pahalgam terror attack. India has blamed the attack on Pakistan-backed terrorists and has reiterated its zero-tolerance stance toward cross-border terrorism. In a post on social media platform X, Sherman said, 'I emphasised to the Pakistani delegation the importance of combatting terrorism, and in particular, the group Jaish-e-Mohammed, who murdered my constituent Daniel Pearl in 2002.' He added that Pearl's family still resides in his California district.I emphasized to the Pakistani delegation the importance of combatting terrorism, and in particular, the group Jaish-e-Mohammed, who murdered my constituent Daniel Pearl in 2002. Pearl's family continues to live in my district, and Pakistan should do all it can to eliminate this— Congressman Brad Sherman (@BradSherman) June 5, 2025advertisementTerrorist Omar Saeed Sheikh was convicted of orchestrating the 2002 kidnapping and murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel JeM, a UN-designated terrorist group, has long been accused of orchestrating deadly attacks in India, including the 2019 Pulwama suicide bombing that killed 40 Indian security didn't stop at terrorism. The Congressman also raised concern over the state of religious minorities in Pakistan, stressing that 'Christians, Hindus and Ahmadiyya Muslims must be allowed to practice their faith and participate in the democratic system without fear of violence, persecution, discrimination, or an unequal justice system.'The US lawmaker also called for the release of Dr Shakil Afridi, the Pakistani physician who helped the CIA locate Osama bin Laden by running a fake polio vaccination campaign. Afridi was arrested in 2011 and sentenced to 33 years in prison.'Freeing Dr. Afridi represents an important step in bringing closure for victims of 9/11,' Sherman told the delegation.

Road to justice for the Bengaluru XI
Road to justice for the Bengaluru XI

New Indian Express

time26 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Road to justice for the Bengaluru XI

To blame any of the victims would be perverse beyond belief, dealing the unkindest of cuts to the families of those who lost their lives. Yet, it is with deepest sadness that it must be recorded that what happened was not the city's 'defect' or a sporting negligence—it was an Indian tragedy. Repeatedly, when crowds gather, for one cause or another, tragedy unfolds; yet, as a collective, we learn nothing. There is no doubt that the events of Wednesday afternoon have shaken Indian society's consciousness, but not so much that it will act as a deterrent. Not so much that there will be any changes of consequence when it comes to developing infrastructure that can safely handle large crowds, spontaneous surges of people or exuberant gatherings. Not thoroughly enough to force people in power to pause and get to the bottom of why something that should never have happened occurred. A probe has been ordered, arrests may be made, officials suspended and monetary compensation promised. This is a templated response. You can transpose the name of the team or sport, the venue, or the occasion with a religious gathering, a clamour to board a train—and the story would remain depressingly the same. They dare not say it aloud, but there will be a few who will look at the episode and think that only 11 people died. In India, it's not a number of fatalities that triggers righteous outrage. In 2005, at least 258 died in Satara, Maharashtra during a pilgrimage. In 2013, more than 115 were killed in a bridge collapse in over the Godavari in Andhra Pradesh. In 2024, the official count in Hathras, Uttar Pradesh was 121; the trigger was a tent collapse. In sports, globally, the numbers are equally terrifying: 300 in Peru at a football game in 1964, 93 in Nepal in 1988, and 126 in Ghana in 2001. In terms of numbers, the Hillsborough tragedy of 1989 where 97 people lost their lives at the FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest in Sheffield is probably the most high-profile, not least because the victims' families banded together to mount a protracted campaign for justice. It took 27 years for the UK courts to charge those responsible In India, with the judicial system so overburdened that even the simplest of disputes can take decades to resolve, who knows when, if ever, those responsible for the events of Bengaluru 2025 will be brought to book.

Vijay Mallya relates how he told Arun Jaitley he was flying to the UK before he left India
Vijay Mallya relates how he told Arun Jaitley he was flying to the UK before he left India

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Vijay Mallya relates how he told Arun Jaitley he was flying to the UK before he left India

TOI correspondent from London: Fugitive liquor tycoon Vijay Mallya has told a podcast, in a rare interview, that he told the late former finance minister Arun Jaitley that he was about to fly out of India to London before he left for the airport in March 2016. At the time there was supposed to be a CBI lookout circular (LOC) issued against him. Mallya told 'Figuring Out with Raj Shamani' he was not aware of any LOC against him, nor that it had been downgraded by the CBI from detaining him to informing immigration of authorities of his travel plans. He told Shamani that certain TV anchors and the Indian govt want to see him in 'jail clothes, eating jail food' in Tihar and spending the rest of his life behind bars. 'If that is what is inevitable, what options do I have? It might be inevitable, I'm not an astrologer. I will fight my way in court.' He said: 'I told FM Arun Jaitley before leaving for the airport and then I flew from Delhi to London on the way to Geneva for a meeting which was fixed months ago. I told the then finance minister because I went from Parliament to Delhi airport. When this news hit the media, once again, it created a storm. People went running to Mr Jaitley. He denied meeting me. A Congress MP saw us and then said to the media 'No, I saw them together'. Mr Jaitley had to retract his statement and say 'Yes, yes I met him but only while walking — it was a fleeting meeting'.' 'I never said I went to Mr Jaitley's office, sat in front of him, had tea with him. All I said is I told the finance minister while leaving, I'm going to London and going to Geneva for a meeting, please tell the banks to sit across the table and settle with me. How long does this once sentencetake? You see the way he denied it, and then when a Congress MP pointed out his mistake that he saw us, he quickly changed.' He also said he had always planned to go back to India but his Indian passport was revoked. In the four-hour podcast Mallya also said he would be prepared to return to India. 'If I have the assurance of a fair trial and assurance of dignified existence in India, I will think about returning to India seriously. ' He then reminded Shamani of the judgment in the Sanjay Bhandari case which found 'Indian detention conditions a violation of Article 3 of the ECHR (European Convention on Human Rights)', which may mean he could not be extradited now. When asked why he had not gone already as he had lost his extradition battle in the courts, the 69-year-old said: 'My stay in England is fully legitimate. There is more than the particular case you are referring to. There are ongoing proceedings in this country. It's one of the legal battles I am fighting,' he said. This suggests he may have applied for asylum.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store