Prince Harry makes veiled attack on Trump and Musk
The Duke of Sussex has launched a veiled attack on Donald Trump and Elon Musk, criticising the 'sickness in leadership' in politics and tech.
Prince Harry made an unannounced appearance at the Upfront Summit in Los Angeles on Thursday evening when he warned that 'basic morals and empathy' have been 'abandoned in favour of power and control'.
His speech at the annual event hosting more than 1,000 investors, entrepreneurs and leaders in tech, came just hours after Sir Keir Starmer met Mr Trump at the White House, delivering a handwritten invitation from the King.
The Duke told the audience that he had 'never been allowed to vote' and so was not 'cornered by a belief in blue or red'.
But he added: 'Now this would be a great time to talk about how a sickness in leadership across sectors – from politics to tech – can have a detrimental effect on millions, if not billions, of people.
'When service to others is sacrificed for personal gain. When basic morals and empathy are abandoned in favour of power and control. But I'm not gonna get into all that now.'
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have long campaigned against the perils of social media, warning that children are 'force-fed' mindless content by powerful tech companies that 'refuse to change'.
Prince Harry has previously suggested that social media users were being exploited for what was nothing more than a 'human experiment'.
During a visit to Colombia last August, he appeared to criticise Mr Musk, the owner of X, when he railed against the false information allowed to circulate online shortly after the UK riots that followed the Southport killings.
'What happens online within a matter of minutes transfers to the streets,' he said.
'People are acting on information that isn't true. It comes down to all of us to be able to spot the true from the fake. In an ideal world, those with positions of influence would take more responsibility.'
On Thursday, the president accepted the King's double invitation for a visit to Scotland followed by an 'unprecedented' second state visit.
But while Mr Trump has heaped praise on both the Prince of Wales and his 'wonderful' father, the King, there is no love lost with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
Before marrying into the Royal family, Meghan described him as 'misogynistic' and 'divisive'.
Earlier in February, the president ruled out deporting Harry from the US over claims of historic drug-taking, insisting he had 'enough problems with his wife', who he said was 'terrible'.
His remarks represented a dramatic volte-face on his earlier position, when he said he would not 'protect' the Duke as he had 'betrayed the Queen'.
Ahead of the 2020 presidential election, the Duke and Duchess prompted a spat when they appeared to back Joe Biden over Mr Trump, urging American voters to 'reject hate speech, misinformation and online negativity'.
The Duke's latest appearance came as it emerged that he and Meghan had hired a former American Idol talent manager as their chief communications officer.
Meredith Maines replaces Ashley Hansen, who has become the latest in a long line of high profile departures from their team.
Ms Hansen parted ways with the couple last October, shortly after stepping back to set up her own firm, of which they were briefly clients.
Ms Maines, who started her career at Google, appears to be a fan of the Royal family, admitting on social media in 2011 that she had obsessively watched 'eight hours' of the Prince and Princess of Wales's wedding coverage.
In his speech, the Duke suggested that he no longer considered the charity work he undertook as a full-time working royal the best way to deliver change.
'The way that I answer the question of how we invest in our shared future is different now living in the US, to when I was living in the UK,' he said.
'Why? Because before I moved, so much of my life revolved around charity.
'Since then, while my charities remain a core part of my life's work, I've also been focusing on upstream solutions and prevention, driven by decisions and investments that address problems before they require fixing.'
The Duke insisted that he had approached 'everything' in his life 'through the lens of service'.
He revealed that he had spent the last five years quietly investing in companies that align with his values and take a long-term approach to societal problems.
'Too often, social media and tech companies have built products that place engagement over safety,' he said.
'I've seen first-hand how technology can bring people together, but more often how it can divide and harm them – especially our children.'
The Duke said that every business decision should reflect a commitment to serving others, adding that his vision for the future involved companies designed 'not just for profit'.
'After all, if we carry on at this rate, even the most profitable companies will exist in a world of smoke and rage,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
AP PHOTOS: Brazil's Cavalhadas festival celebrates the Holy Spirit
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
'We're happy to have this fight': Trump administration leans into California protests
President Donald Trump's immigration agenda has met a groundswell of opposition in Los Angeles, the country's second-largest city. At least 56 people have been arrested so far in massive protests against the administration's immigration raids in the city Friday. The demonstrations have spilled over onto one of the region's largest freeways, and federal authorities are facing criticism after they arrested, and apparently injured, a prominent labor leader. In response, the White House has threatened to arrest California's governor and mobilized Marines to support National Guard troops in defending federal property — even though state officials say they don't want the assistance and are now suing the administration. For the White House, this scene — Trump battling a blue state over his signature issue — is a win. It's a nationally watched saga of the sort that has long defined his career: a made-for-TV moment. 'We're happy to have this fight,' a White House official said, emphasizing that politically, the administration sees it as a winning issue. Democrats and immigration activists have broadly blasted the Los Angeles operation as illegal and inhumane and insisted that it's all about politics — and not about sound public policy. 'This Administration's actions are not about public safety — they're about stoking fear,' former Vice President Kamala Harris, a Los Angeles resident who ran against Trump last year, wrote in a statement. But Trump allies argue that it's simply Trump carrying out the hard-line immigration agenda that was the centerpiece of his campaign. NBC News spoke with four White House officials, in addition to other Trump supporters, who requested anonymity to speak candidly. 'This is what America voted for, period,' a Trump adviser said. 'This is the America First focus that got the president elected and is driven by nothing else than what he promised American voters.' 'Look at the violence, the attacks on law enforcement,' the adviser added. 'If Democrats want to support that, let them. This is why we win elections and they do not.' Trump advisers also pointed to the fact that the president's immigration policies continue to get high marks in most public polling. A CBS/YouGov poll conducted just before the Los Angeles immigration raids found that 54% of respondents approved of the administration's ' program to deport immigrants illegally.' Those numbers help clarify why the administration and more broadly congressional Republicans are politically comfortable leaning into support of the raids over vocal opposition from critics — and a persistent threat of legal challenge. 'I know there's no question places like California have thumbed their nose at the American people and decided they want to be a sanctuary for criminals,' Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said Monday, adding, 'I think he's exercising exactly what he said he'd do and what people elected him' to do. Trump advisers say the president also points to the fact that he got more votes in California in 2024 than in his previous campaigns, even though he still badly lost the heavily Democratic-leaning state. The administration's response to the protests does seem to have one eye on the reaction in conservative media, a space increasingly dominated by pro-Trump influencers. Some of those influencers have been posting from the protests — most notably Phil McGraw, a well-known Trump supporter better known as 'Dr. Phil,' who embedded with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents during the Los Angeles raids, as he did during similar immigration raids in Chicago this year. The Trump adviser, asked about McGraw's involvement, said: 'This is an important moment in American history. People have a right to see it in a way not unfairly skewed by a biased mainstream media.' The adviser wouldn't elaborate on how McGraw, whose presence was first reported by CNN, was able to have front-line access to the federal immigration operations. A spokesman for McGraw didn't respond to a request for comment. Republicans more broadly also see the fight as a political winner and say Democrats are functionally taking the bait on an issue in which polling has given Trump an advantage. 'I think it is a symptom of how far left this party has done when you have major Democrats standing on the side of illegal aliens that are torching vehicles,' Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis told Fox News on Monday. 'It is one of the reasons the Democratic Party is struggling so much nationally,' he added. Matthew Bartlett, a Republican strategist and former Trump administration official, said the raids shouldn't be a surprise because immigration is a 'legitimate issue' the voters have signaled they care about. 'There is no political upside in defending or denying the images of burning cars, rioters and looting and the destruction,' he said of Democrats. 'A feeling that things have spun out of control in California and that government can't effectively govern. … It has changed the conversation from illegal immigration to a breakdown in society.' Still, there has been some disagreement — at least in public messaging — about how far to push in going after California Democrats, a break between what may be politically popular with the base and what's politically realistic. The clearest example centers on the Trump administration's authorizing the deployment of National Guard troops over the opposition of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have argued that inserting National Guard troops will inflame tensions and potential violence — a response that has led Trump to signal he would consider arresting Newsom if he were to continue what the administration considers to be his interference. 'I would do it if I were Tom,' Trump said, referring to his 'border czar,' Tom Homan. 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity. But I do think it would be a great thing.' While detaining Newsom would no doubt please Trump's MAGA base, White House officials privately say it's not currently in the cards. 'It's not being actively planned or considered,' a senior White House official said. 'But anyone who breaks federal law puts themselves at risk of being arrested. That's just a basic fact.' A second White House official said that if either Newsom or Bass, a former Democratic congresswoman, do something at odds with federal immigration law, they could be detained. But the official also acknowledged that the optics of arresting California officials amid an immigration fight they believe most Americans support could backfire with some Republican voters because, at the moment, it doesn't appear they have actually broken any immigration laws. The official said there isn't some grand strategy to deploy National Guard troops in blue cities across the country; the administration is simply waiting to see whether other protests get out of control. Meanwhile, Newsom has leaned into the threats, practically daring the administration to arrest him rather than focusing on the protesters. 'He's a tough guy. Why doesn't he do that? He knows where to find me,' Newsom told MSNBC on Sunday. Referring to Homan, he added: 'That kind of bloviating is exhausting. So, Tom, arrest me. Let's go.' On Monday, California sued the Trump administration, arguing that Trump's federalizing the state's National Guard is 'unlawful.' 'Let me be clear: There is no invasion. There is no rebellion,' Democratic state Attorney General Rob Bonta said. 'The president is trying to manufacture chaos and crisis on the ground for his own political ends. Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the president's authority under the law — and not one we take lightly. We're asking a court to put a stop to the unlawful, unprecedented order.' Trump supporters have lined up behind him, with some even offering to head to Los Angeles to help, despite having no law enforcement experience. 'Preparing to deploy … to Los Angeles,' vocal Trump supporter Benny Johnson said on X. He followed up with a post to his 3.7 million followers showing him wearing military-style gear with his name on it. The increasingly contentious political fight over Los Angeles, administration officials admit, is no longer about just deporting those with criminal records, which was Trump's main pitch to voters on the campaign trail. On Monday, an MSNBC host asked Homan whether everyone ICE has arrested as part of the Trump administration's immigration efforts had criminal records, and he had a blunt response. 'Absolutely not,' he said.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump, Musk and the end of a bromance
It started with a tweet. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' wrote Elon Musk. Donald Trump's tax and spending bill was a 'disgusting abomination'. What followed was a remarkable – and remarkably public – feud between the world's richest man and the US president: insults were traded, threats were made, shares in Musk's publicly traded companies plummeted. It was quite the turnaround for the pair. Last year, Musk had given Trump's re-election campaign more than $280m in donations. And only two weeks ago, when Musk stood down from his position in Trump's administration, the two were still insistent that their relationship was good. Yet even then, as the Guardian's global affairs correspondent Andrew Roth reports, there were signs of tension. And as he tells Michael Safi, they were about more than a clash between two big egos, but over the future direction of the Maga movement itself.
