Pubs sell fish and chips and beer at 1945 prices to celebrate VE Day
A patriotic pub sold fish and chips at 1945 prices on Thursday to celebrate the 80th anniversary of VE Day.
For one hour, The Bell Hotel in Winslow, Buckinghamshire, sold battered cod with chips and mushy peas for just 8p.
Landlord Phil Gomm, 63, was expecting to sell 150 servings of the traditional supper, and said the pub was 'well packed' ahead of lunchtime trading.
'When you look back at the Second World War, fish and chips was one of the main meals everyone had,' he said.
'The potatoes were a good quantity from the fields of Great Britain, and fish was an easy product to obtain. The Bell is subsidising the costs in good faith for those who gave their lives.
'It is us saying thank you for keeping Great Britain as Great Britain. Without those servicemen and women, we wouldn't be here today.'
He added: 'It is something that should never ever be put to the back burner and forgotten. We would hope that would prevent the nastiness and venom of wars in different nations today.'
'It needs celebrating'
In Ilkley, West Yorkshire, The Flying Duck's pub landlord, Gerard Simpson, 51, lowered the cost of its Wharfedale Brewery Gold beer to just 7p per pint.
The pub is selling the first 80 pints of the beer, which usually costs £4.80, at 1945 prices.
Gerard, whose 21-year-old son Harry serves in the Army, said he hoped pubgoers would give to charity 'generously'.
'The world would be completely different if it wasn't for today,' he said. 'As veterans pass away, it just seems to be getting forgotten on a year-by-year basis and it needs celebrating.
'I just hope people give generously and don't just give the seven pence, we're taking no money at all for the Gold today, and at the end of the day all the money's going into a collection pot for the Royal British Legion.
'The work they do is absolutely fantastic. My own son is in the British military and I just think it's important that there is a fund there to look after these veterans, whether they be old or young, whether they've got physical injuries or mental injuries.
'They also look after the families, I just think they do a fantastic job.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
New Tesla Model Y is a more chiselled, quieter version of mega-seller… it moves the game on for a tech-rich family motor
Rob Gill Published: Invalid Date, I'M struggling to keep up with Elon Musk and his on/ off bromance with Donald Trump. Are they buddies again? 6 6 6 Or still kicking lumps out of each other on X? One thing I do know is that Tesla sales are down eight per cent in Great Britainland. Some say it's because Musk backed Trump for President, followed by that awkward hand gesture at the inauguration. Some say it's the Chinese invasion. Maybe in part. But mostly it's due to Tesla halting production of the mega-selling Model Y at its Berlin gigafactory to tool up for the new one. Now everything is sorted and sales are likely to take off like a Space X rocket. Here are ten things you need to know about the new motor. 1. The old one was fugly. The world's best-selling car two years on the bounce, yes. But still fugly. That's sorted now. This new one is more chiselled. First glimpse at limited edition EV hitting UK in just weeks with slick new look It's like they've taken a photo of the Cybertruck to a surgeon and gone, 'This please'. The lower nose helps it slice through the air, adding a bit more range. 2. They've deleted the Tesla badge from the bonnet. Confident move. 3. But the biggest change is at the back. There's a new reflective lightbar which highlights T E S L A written out in full. Also, the rear diffuser sticks out more. So repair bills will be lower if you reverse into something you shouldn't. Which helps with insurance too. 4. The 'frunk' — front trunk — now has a plughole in it. So you can fill it with ice for summer barbecues. Or store muddy boots. 5. Cabin. The gear selector has moved to the big screen — like a Model 3. But they've kept the indicator stalk. Unlike a Model 3. The wrapround LED strip is new. The front seats will warm and cool your back. They didn't before. Other things. The seat bases are longer in the back. So they're more comfortable. There's a little entertainment screen to play arcade games. The front passenger seat moves forward at the touch of a button for limo-like legroom. 6. Sound. It's now much quieter in here which makes it feel more expensive. There's extra insulation. Acoustic glass. Redesigned door seals. All little details that add up. 7. The boot is a smidge smaller. But you'll never notice. I had to look it up. The seats now fold up and down automatically, where they only folded flat before. You had to push them back up. 8. The suspension has been tweaked so it rides better. Batteries and motors are unchanged. But improved regenerative braking tech adds more electrons. Every version should do 300 miles-plus, with the rear-wheel drive Long Range hitting 387 miles. There's talk of a bigger battery nudging 500 miles. 9. Price. The standard rear-drive Model Y starts at £45k, which is £2k more than before. Not bad. The all-singing all-wheel drive Long Range is £52k. 10. This isn't specific to Model Y but Tesla's Supercharger network blows everyone else out of the water. It's next-level good. Quick. Easy. No cards. No apps. And cheaper too. It doesn't really matter if you like Musk or not. If you want a minimalist, tech-rich family motor, Model Y moves the game on. 6 6 6
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Great British Energy's budget has been nuked
There was a weirdness in the government's welcome announcement earlier this week that Rolls-Royce SMR had been selected as preferred bidder to build the UK's first small modular nuclear reactors, and that £2.5bn of public money would be thrown behind the project. The government body backing the project was something called Great British Energy – Nuclear. This, it turned out, was the new name for Great British Nuclear, the unit set up in 2023 by the last government to oversee delivery of the nuclear programme. But why risk confusion with Great British Energy, Ed Miliband's publicly-owned company for investing, we thought, in renewables projects such as wind, solar and hydro with a side-mission to ensure that lots of the kit is manufactured in the UK? The confusion, it seems, was deliberate. The chancellor's spending review revealed that every penny of the £2.5bn for SMRs is coming from GB Energy's £8.3bn budget. That is 30% of the pot to SMRs in one gulp. One could argue, as Labour folk did, that nuclear and renewables are all part of the same low-carbon clean energy mix, so they go hand-in-hand and were always intended to do so. It's true that past descriptions of GB Energy's role have sometimes mentioned nuclear, but never as the headline act. It was never spelled out, for example, that the entirety of public support for SMRs would come from GB Energy's budget, which would be a relevant fact to mention if you were worried that the Tories had set up Great British Nuclear but not given it funding. It rather looks as if GB Energy's budget has been nuked by the Treasury. 'Labour will capitalise Great British Energy with £8.3bn over the next parliament,' said the manifesto and, strictly speaking, that pledge is still being honoured. It's just that GB Energy will be directing almost a third of its allocation to the nuclear body that we had previously regarded as a separate unit. But it does make GB Energy a strange beast if it is now the main government vehicle for investing in SMRs, a cutting-edge technology that tends to involve permanently big numbers and follow-on rounds of funding. GB Energy's initial adventures, note, have been low-key and local – funding for installing solar panels on schools and hospitals, for example. Worthy stuff, but a million miles away from the development of next-generation nuclear technology. GB Energy will be expanding into new and exciting areas later this year, say Labour insiders. We'll see what that brings. The company's core mission seems to be a work-in-progress.
The Guardian
8 hours ago
- The Guardian
Over a quarter of workers in Britain engage in hybrid working, ONS finds
Hybrid working has become the 'new normal' for more than a quarter of working adults in Great Britain, official figures show, but it remains out of reach for those in lower-skilled and lower-paid jobs. The proportion of people carrying out hybrid work – where they split their time between the office and another location, such as home – has risen gradually since March 2022, becoming the shift pattern for 28% of workers by the first three months of this year, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). In a sign of the revolution in the world of work sparked by the pandemic, the proportion of people who only work from the office has also declined over the same period, the survey of about 5,500 workers found. This 'indicates a shift from full-time, office-based work to the hybrid-working pattern' according to the ONS, which found that workers aged between 30 and 49 were the most likely to hybrid work. It also found that such shift patterns were 10 times more likely to be found among people with a degree or an equivalent level of education than for those with no qualifications. Hybrid working was also more common in higher income bands. It was available to 45% of workers with an income of £50,000 or more, compared with 8% of those who earned less than £20,000. Directors, managers and senior officials, as well as those in professional occupations were the most likely to hybrid work, along with those with childcare responsibilities. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Workers in industries such as retail, construction or hospitality were the least like to be able to work remotely at least some of the time. Those living in the least deprived areas of England were more likely to hybrid work than those in the most deprived areas, the ONS found. Workers living in deprived areas tend to have lower qualifications than those in less deprived areas, which limits their access to hybrid-working roles. Disabled people were also found to be less likely to hybrid work than non-disabled staff, partly because they were more likely to be in lower income bands. Hybrid and remote working 'was heralded as bringing in a new dawn of flexible and inclusive work', but remains out of reach for many, said Rebecca Florisson, the principal analyst of the Work Foundation at Lancaster University, a thinktank for improving working lives in the UK. 'To meet its aim of raising the labour market participation rate to 80%, the government should work with employers to provide access to flexible and inclusive working for those who are currently missing out,' she said.
