Hegseth authorizes voluntary departure of military dependents from across Middle East amid rising tensions
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has authorized the voluntary departure of U.S. military dependents from locations across the Middle East, a major move as tensions spike across the region.
A U.S. defense official told Fox News on Wednesday: "The safety and security of our service members and their families remains our highest priority and U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) is monitoring the developing tension in the Middle East. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has authorized the voluntary departure of military dependents from locations across the CENTCOM AOR."
The authorization affects U.S. bases throughout the CENTCOM area of responsibility, which includes key flashpoints like Iraq, Syria, Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates.
It, however, mainly affects dependents who live in Bahrain near the U.S. Navy base.
Here's How Many Us Service Members Are Spending The Holidays Away From Home Deployed Overseas
Bahrain has a higher population of U.S. military dependents than other countries in the area.
Read On The Fox News App
No U.S. uniformed service members in the Middle East will be evacuating, two U.S. defense officials told Fox News.While the Department of Defense (DOD) has not cited a specific threat, the move comes as Iran-backed militias increase activity and regional instability grows.
A U.S. official confirmed to Fox News that the head of U.S. Central Command, General Michael Kurilla, postponed a Thursday morning testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee on Capitol Hill due to rising tensions in the Middle East.
Us Forces Target Houthi Weapons Storage Facilities In Yemen Over The Weekend: Centcom
"CENTCOM is working in close coordination with our Department of State counterparts, as well as our Allies and partners in the region to maintain a constant state of readiness to support any number of missions around the world at any time," the official added.While voluntary departures aren't rare, they typically kick in when a security environment worsens. U.S. doctrine, such as JP 3‑68, explicitly provides for the voluntary departure of command-sponsored dependents at government expense whenever threats rise.Original article source: Hegseth authorizes voluntary departure of military dependents from across Middle East amid rising tensions
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
20 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump didn't want Israel to strike Iran. They did it anyway
In the hours before Israeli warplanes carried out an attack on Iran early Friday, raising fresh fears of all-out war in the region, President Donald Trump made clear it was an outcome he hoped to avoid. 'I don't want them going in because, I mean, that would blow it,' he said, referring to his diplomatic efforts to curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions. The fact Israel went in anyway – without any US involvement, and against the president's publicly stated wishes – now thrusts Trump into one of the biggest tests of his young presidency. By his own telling, the strikes risk scuttling his attempts at diplomacy with Tehran, even as his top envoy was preparing to depart for Oman for another round of talks this weekend. It casts a pall over his already tense relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with whom he has sharply disagreed for months and whom he urged as recently as this week to hold off on a strike. And it presents him another global conflict without any easy resolution, this one with tens of thousands of US troops potentially caught in the regional crossfire. Trump will now find himself caught between competing crosscurrents from within his own party. Many Republicans were quick to offer their support to Israel on Thursday, including Sen. Lindsey Graham – a longtime Iran hawk – who wrote on X: 'Game on.' Yet Trump has never quite adopted that strain of his party's foreign policy, particularly in his second term. His administration is stacked with officials, starting with his vice president, who take a deeply skeptical view of US military involvement abroad without express American interests on the line. Trump offered no signals in the immediate aftermath of the attacks that he was prepared to use American military assets to help defend Israel from expected Iranian reprisal, as his predecessor Joe Biden did when Israel and Iran exchanged fire last year. Without American assistance, Israel's air defenses could be unable to withstand a major Iranian onslaught. The focus of public messaging from the US administration was instead on protecting American personnel in the Middle East, and warning Iran not to drag the US into the fray. Still, for all the complicated dynamics for Trump to now sort through, the attack hardly came as a surprise to the president and his team. Even as he was speaking from the East Room on Thursday, the president and his aides were aware the strikes were likely coming soon, sources said, despite Trump's repeated attempts at urging Netanyahu to hold off. As the strikes were getting underway, Trump was appearing on the South Lawn at a congressional picnic. He returned to the West Wing afterward to huddle with top officials, according to a White House official and other sources. Afterward, a terse statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio sought to put distance between the US and any role in the attack. 'Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' read the statement, which was distributed by the White House. 'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense. President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners,' Rubio continue. 'Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel.' Devoid of even boilerplate language offering support for Israel and its defense, the statement made clear: this would be Israel's conflict, not Trump's.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Alex Padilla disputes Trump administration's account of his forcible removal at a DHS event
Sen. Alex Padilla disputed the White House's account of the events surrounding his forcible removal from a news conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in Los Angeles on Thursday, pushing back against key details about what exactly preceded his handcuffing by federal law enforcement agents. Both the White House and Noem said Padilla, D-Calif., failed to identify himself to security, yelled and lunged toward Noem. "This man burst into the room, started lunging towards the podium, interrupting me and elevating his voice, and was stopped, did not identify himself, and was removed from the room,' Noem said in an interview on Fox News. 'The way that he acted was completely inappropriate." Padilla denied all of Noem's characterizations in his first interview after the incident — on MSNBC with NBC News' Jacob Soboroff. "That's ridiculous. It's a lie but par for the course for this administration," Padilla began. "They said I wasn't wearing my pin. My polo says 'United States Senate,'" Padilla said. "There was no threat. There was no lunging. I raised my voice to ask a question, and it took what, maybe, half a second before multiple agents were on me." The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Noem held a news conference in Los Angeles related to ongoing immigration raids across the city that have triggered volatile protests. Padilla, who was attending a nearby briefing, interrupted Noem's remarks, which he characterized as increasingly inaccurate and partisan, before he was forcibly removed from the event, put down on the ground and handcuffed by FBI officers, resulting in widespread backlash from Democrats. Padilla called the degree of force FBI agents used against him 'excessive' and an 'overreaction' because of his view that he wasn't 'threatening in any way.' He highlighted that because Noem's event was taking place in a federal building, he underwent a security screening and was escorted by federal agents at all times. Despite that, Padilla said, he was shoved out of the room by several agents, forced onto the ground and handcuffed. He complied with all of the agents' orders, he said, because of lessons he learned from his upbringing in the majority-Latino San Fernando Valley. 'Where I grew up, you know what happens if you don't obey law enforcement. So I began to go on my knees to the extent that they would let me,' Padilla said. 'I kept repeatedly asking themselves, 'Why am I being detained?' No answer. 'Why am I being detained?' No answer. 'Why am I being detained?' No answer.' Democrats have widely condemned the incident, with former Vice President Kamala Harris, Padilla's Senate predecessor, calling it a "stunning abuse of power" and Rep. Adriano Espaillat, D-N.Y., the head of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, calling for the arrest of the agents involved. 'We want a fast and full investigation on the assault of Sen. Alex Padilla. That's what we want. We want those people that assaulted him to be looked at and to be arrested,' Espaillat said, adding that the Hispanic Caucus is 'fully behind' Padilla. FBI leadership has defended the actions of the officers amid the backlash, noting that Padilla was in plainclothes and not wearing a security pin and accusing him of resisting law enforcement officers. "Our FBI LA personnel responded in support of Secret Service completely appropriately. We stand by them and appreciate their swift action," a spokesperson for the bureau said on X. Former Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best, an NBC News contributor, said that the situation was 'unfortunate' but that she believed the officers 'had an obligation to respond' and acted appropriately. 'Their job is to make sure that no one causes harm to the secretary,' Best said. 'If the security detail hadn't acted in a situation like this, I think they would have been in hot water." Padilla said that after federal agents removed his handcuffs, he was invited to meet with Noem for 'a few minutes,' an opportunity he said he accepted in order to question her about Trump's decision to authorize the deployment of several thousand National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines to Los Angeles in response to protests over immigration raids. She did not appear conciliatory during the meeting, he said. 'You'd think she might have started the meeting with an apology for what happened? Of course not,' Padilla said. In the hours after the incident, Padilla has sought to tie his interaction with law enforcement agents to the ongoing immigration raids in Los Angeles, speculating that if federal personnel can use excessive force against a senator, they might use similar force when pursuing nonviolent immigrants. 'If they're willing to do this to a United States senator representing the state of California, just imagine how it's going with their immigration enforcement on the streets when they show up at restaurants and are trying to detain a cook or outside a Home Depot trying to detain a day laborer,' he said. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UWEC professor fined for election day incident
EAU CLAIRE — The UW-Eau Claire professor who confronted college Republicans and flipped over a table set up to support a Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate settled a disorderly conduct charge with a $295 fine, court records show. Jose Alvergue, 45, Eau Claire, paid the fine Wednesday, the same day as it was issued. The incident took place on election day in April, amid a tense race for the state supreme court. While technically nonpartisan, the candidates clearly lined up with political parties in their bids for the open seat. Brad Schimel, a former state attorney general, was the Republican-backed candidate. He lost to Susan Crawford, who had the backing of the state's Democrats. The college Republicans had set their table up to support Schimel's candidacy. Alvergue initiated the confrontation, approaching and asking why the table was close to a polling place. Like most states, Wisconsin bans campaigning near polling locations. The buffer area in Wisconsin is 100 feet, and the table was apparently in compliance with that requirement. After speaking with the students Alvergue flipped over the table and walked off. He was identified after the students posted video showing him walking across the campus quad and the ground around their table littered with campaign items. UWEC confirmed placing Alvergue on administrative leave after the incident drew attention, though it did not mention him. He was stripped of his position as chair of the university's English department. Alvergue remains listed as a faculty member on the UWEC website as an associate professor.
