logo
South Africa faces alarming drop in HIV testing rates linked to US funding withdrawal

South Africa faces alarming drop in HIV testing rates linked to US funding withdrawal

Daily Maverick18-05-2025

In the wake of the withdrawal of US Pepfar funding for South Africa's HIV/Aids programme, there has been an alleged decline in HIV viral load testing across the country. One HIV expert described the situation as 'frightening but expected'.
Over March and April this year, there has been a significant decline in viral load testing for HIV in South Africa — a phenomenon that would appear to be linked to the recent withdrawal of United States funding for HIV programmes through the US President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (Pepfar).
The drop in viral load testing is shown in alleged National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) data analysed by National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), as part of the laboratory service's surveillance function it provides to the national Department of Health. The information was shared with Daily Maverick by a source who chose to remain anonymous out of concern for professional backlash.
At a national level, the data indicates that viral load testing for HIV was up 1% in March 2025 compared with March 2024. However, a comparison of the number of viral load tests conducted in April 2024 and April 2025, respectively, shows that testing dropped by 11.4% between the two periods, from 594,596 to 526,908.
In certain population groups, including pregnant women, infants and young people between 15 and 24 years of age, the decline in viral load testing rates has been more severe.
Daily Maverick reached out to the NICD about the data, but was told the institute was 'unable to authenticate [the] document and therefore cannot comment on its contents'. When sent a follow-up with specific questions about drops in viral load testing numbers across different population groups, the NICD referred the query to the laboratory service.
The laboratory service told Daily Maverick it would not be commenting on the situation, adding: 'Please speak to the national Department of Health.'
Daily Maverick asked the department to confirm the decline in HIV viral load testing and comment on the reasons behind it. The department responded that it was 'dangerous' to comment on data with an unknown source, and asked about authentication by the laboratory service. It did not respond to any specific questions about the alleged decline in HIV viral load testing.
A recent Reuters report appears to have been based on the same data as that seen by Daily Maverick.
Declining HIV viral load testing
According to the data, the population group that has seen the largest drop in HIV viral load testing when comparing records for April 2024 and April 2025 is pregnant women, with the number of tests declining from 14,121 to 11,111 (-21.3%) between the two periods.
Viral load testing for young people aged 15 to 24 dropped by 17.2%, from 40,227 in April 2024 to 33,305 in April 2025. Testing for infants using PCR (polymerase chain reaction) tests dropped by 19.9%, from 48,312 in April 2024 to 38,689 in April 2025.
Three health experts within the HIV sector that Daily Maverick spoke to about the data said that the decline in viral load testing was probably linked to the recent withdrawal of Pepfar funding for HIV/Aids programmes by the US, which has resulted in layoffs for 8,061 health workers across 27 high-burden HIV/Aids districts in South Africa.
Since US President Donald Trump announced the suspension of foreign development spending in January, funding cuts by the United States Agency for International Development (USAid) have pushed key Pepfar-funded programmes and facilities to close their doors in South Africa and around the world.
Pepfar funding made up R7.9-billion of South Africa's R46.8-billion HIV/Aids programme, according to Minister of Health Dr Aaron Motsoaledi.
'Frightening but expected'
HIV viral load testing for people taking antiretrovirals allows health workers to gauge whether the patients are taking their treatment correctly, and whether that treatment is suppressing the virus effectively.
Professor Francois Venter, a Wits University clinician researcher, noted that South Africa followed 'world-class guidelines' for HIV care, which required people to be tested annually once they had been established on antiretrovirals.
'It's an incredibly important quality measure of your programme, your viral loads — the number that have been taken relative to the number of people on treatment, and then what those viral loads are showing. When they start dropping like this, you start losing that quality control measure, and it starts demonstrating that something severe is happening within the programme,' said Venter.
'The fact that [the drop in viral load testing] is happening across all the provinces suggests that there's a systemic, wide thing that's gone wrong here… There's something across the board that's happening here that's fundamentally affected the programme, and the only thing that makes sense is withdrawal of the Pepfar funding and support.'
Professor Glenda Gray, a South African physician, scientist and activist specialising in the care of children and HIV medicine, described the data as 'frightening but expected'.
'If you're not going to have the people in place to do the [HIV] testing and the counselling and triaging to care, if you don't have those people who are following up on people who have missed their visits, or who are looking to see who needs viral load testing, the wheels will come off,' she said.
'I think that's… what the [Pepfar] implementing partners did… They were the part of the programme that added the quality that is needed for the ability to do [HIV] testing and counselling and retention in care and triage into programmes to get antiretrovirals. If you take that away, you will rapidly see the loss of quality of your programme.'
The data seen by Daily Maverick also showed a drop in viral suppression rates among pregnant women and 15 to 24-year-olds.
For the general population at a national level, viral suppression rates were shown to have dropped by 3.4% between March 2024 (77.2%) and March 2025 (74.6%). There was a drop of only 0.2%, year-on-year, between April 2024 and 2025.
In this data, viral load suppression was defined as patients with less than 50 copies/ml, which meant their viral load was not detectable in testing.
Lynne Wilkinson, a Gauteng-based public health specialist in the HIV/Aids sector, explained that viral load suppression rates were more difficult to interpret when fewer tests were done, as suppression was only being measured among those coming into health facilities to be tested.
'If your number of viral load [tests] goes down, you're not taking viral loads for a whole group of people. Now, who are those people? [Maybe] they're coming in, they're at the clinic, they're taking their treatment but the healthcare worker doesn't have the capacity because she's overburdened. Or you're not having [a viral load test] taken because you're not actually at the clinic,' she said.
Concerns around vulnerable populations
A decline in viral load testing for pregnant women would be a 'big problem', said Gray, as there was a 'direct correlation between viral load and perinatal transmission'.
'If women… aren't getting [HIV] tested, or if they're not getting on to care, they will transmit, and they will transmit during pregnancy, labour, delivery and postnatally. So, you'll start to see a reversal in control of paediatric HIV,' she said.
For the infant population, a decline in HIV testing means infants might only be diagnosed once they are already in hospital for other conditions like pneumonia and TB, according to Gray.
'When you're an infant [with HIV], and you get sick and you land up in hospital, it means that you're already immunocompromised. And so basically, kids will start treatment later; some kids may never get on to treatment, and die,' she said.
Need for action
In recent months, many health experts and activists have been vocal about the need for the South African government to produce a clear emergency plan to address the loss of US funding for the HIV/Aids programme in South Africa.
'The Department of Health, senior people — including the minister — all said, 'No, this is going to be fine,' and it's not fine. It's unravelling, and they can reverse it, but they're going to have to acknowledge there's… a problem, and… simply throwing a whole lot of money at the problem is not going to solve it,' said Venter.
'You're going to have to have a plan for how you're going to replace what was an incredibly efficient service that was in place.'
Venter said that the crisis caused by the loss of the Pepfar funding was 'fixable', if the response was swift and purposeful.
'It's not something that's going to be resolved by some international white horse coming over the mountain with lots and lots of money. It's not going to come from a donor. It's not going to come from anywhere other than within the Department of Health, with the help of lots of experts,' he said.
'They're not going to solve it by themselves. If they think they can solve it by themselves, by just bunkering down, they are going to fail, and it's going to be… another Aids tragedy, 20 years after the last one.'
On Thursday, 15 May 2025, Motsoaledi assured South Africans that the country's HIV/Aids programme was not at risk of collapsing due to the withdrawal of US funding.
Speaking at a media briefing in Pretoria, he listed steps taken by the Department of Health to address the loss of aid, including:
A sensitisation training programme for healthcare workers on the barriers affecting access to healthcare by key populations, which had reached 1,012 clinicians and 2,377 non-clinicians in seven provinces.
The establishment of 'roving teams, specifically for patient monitoring and data capturing', by eight provinces in which Pepfar was active.
Weekly meetings between the Department of Health and provincial health departments to verify reports around HIV counselling and testing.
Moving the files of 63,322 HIV patients from key populations to alternative public health facilities after the Pepfar-funded clinics they relied on closed down.
Numerous meetings with potential donors about additional funding to fill the gap left by Pepfar.
According to Motsoaledi, there is currently no plan to absorb the 8,061 health workers who lost jobs due to the Pepfar cut into the public health system, though he described them as 'people of interest' in the Health Department's talks with potential funders and the National Treasury.
At the media briefing, a Reuters reporter asked Motsoaledi about the alleged drop in viral load testing across the country.
'If viral load testing has dropped, does it mean the collapse of the [HIV/Aids] campaign by any stretch of the imagination? No. We expected that some of these problems would occur, but we are sitting with them every day. Simply because a problem is occurring, to go and announce that the HIV/Aids programme has collapsed, it's wrong, and I will remain believing that it's wrong,' said Motsoaledi in his response.
'I want to state it very clearly that I've never said everything is fine… All I said is that it's wrong to say the… HIV/Aids programme in South Africa is collapsing, because it's not.' DM

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It's the ‘Donald disease' that's making us sick
It's the ‘Donald disease' that's making us sick

Mail & Guardian

time8 hours ago

  • Mail & Guardian

It's the ‘Donald disease' that's making us sick

US President Donald Trump. 'Hello, sis. How are you? I hope you're fine. I mean, I'm not.' A lot has been going on out there, he told Bhekisisa in the voicemail, one of the many we recently received. 'You know, I'm a gay guy. I have sex with other men, without wearing condoms now, because when I try to fetch them from my local clinic, I'm told I get judged and told I want too many. You know what's happening in our industry.' We will call him Nkosi. Because he has sex with men and because his industry is sex work and because no one in the small community where he lives knows that he is gay or what he does for work. He even has a 'girlfriend' so people will think he's straight. Sex work has always been a dangerous profession. But ever since the administration of US President Donald The World Health Organisation says gay and bisexual men like Nkosi's chance of contracting HIV through sex That is what makes sex workers, as well as gay and bisexual men, what researchers call a ' But the Gone, too, are their health workers specially trained in how to work without discrimination. Gone is their tailor-made HIV treatment and testing services; their specialised mental health support and the condoms and lubricants they handed out for protection against HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. Gone are Preventive medicines like the daily pill are called 'So, sometimes I don't have PrEP,' says Nkosi. 'A partner can tell me he is on PrEP, but I don't trust that. Because where is he getting PrEP? Where am I going to get it? The black market? 'I don't know if it is even the real thing. Is it a counterfeit? Lube? That's another thing — you use everything, anything, as long as it's got jelly in it. The last time I did that I had an itchy penis for a week.' Nkosi calls the domino effect of the Trump administration's decision to pull funding 'the Donald disease because it is being caused by this guy, one man'. 'It's like crossing the freeway every day the way we're living now. One day, I know I'm gonna die.' What's with key populations? When Health Minister But why is there so much focus on these communities? 'Even the most self-interested people should be heavily invested in treatment and prevention of these populations,' says Francois Venter, who heads up the health research organisation, 'There's no clean, magical division between key populations and general populations. It's a Venn diagram of married men sleeping with sex workers, of drug-using populations interacting with your ostensibly innocent kids, gay men with your straight-presenting son, all needing HIV prevention and treatment programmes.' Although we have medicines like PrEP to prevent people from getting infected with HIV and antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) for HIV-infected people, which, if taken correctly, Studies, for example, show that getting people to use the anti-HIV pill, also called oral PrEP, each day, Moreover, the Some of the 1.1 million choose not to start treatment, but an even larger proportion, who do go on treatment, Pepfar programmes That's why having lost at least half of those workers — The difficulty with state clinics and key populations Government clinics are mostly Stigma and discrimination in public clinics — doled out by security guards, cleaners, health workers and patients in waiting rooms — keep people away from HIV treatment and prevention. Motsoaledi Because funding cuts mean already understaffed government health clinics now have even fewer staff, many people with HIV, or those wanting PrEP, have to travel further for treatment or wait in long queues. Here are some of their stories — we collected them via voice notes with the help of health workers who worked for Pepfar programmes that have now been defunded. Female sex worker: 'My child is going to be infected' 'Yoh, life is very hard. Since all this happened, life has been very, very hard.' 'I have tried to go to the public clinic for my medication. But as sex workers, we are not being helped. We are scared to go to the government clinic to treat sexually transmitted infections because we are seen as dirty people who go and sleep around. 'We even struggle to get condoms. We are now forced to do business without protection because it is only our source of income and it's the way that we put food on the table. My worry now is that I am pregnant and my child is going to be infected because I'm not taking my ARVs, and I have defaulted for two months now.' Transgender woman: 'The future is dark' 'I'm a transgender woman. My pronouns are she.' 'When the clinic closed, I was about to run out of medication so I went to the government clinic in my area. I introduced myself to the receptionist and the lady asked me what kind of treatment I was taking. I told her ARVs and that I'm virally suppressed [when people use their treatment correctly the virus can't replicate, leaving so little virus in their bodies that they can't infect others], so I can't transmit HIV to others. 'The lady told me that they can't help me and I need to bring the transfer letter. I told her that the clinic is closed so I don't have the transfer letter. I asked to speak to the manager and the manager also refused to help me. The manager! How can she let someone who is HIV-positive go home without medication? 'I had to call one of my friends and she gave me one container. If you're not taking your medication consistently, you're going to get sick, you're gonna die. And the future? The future is dark.' Migrant farm worker: 'Lose my job? Or risk my health?' 'When we were told that the clinic was closed, I was actually in another town trying to get a seasonal job on the farms. But when I went to the nearest clinic, I was told that I needed to get a transfer letter. So I ended up sharing medication with friends. But then their medication also ran out. 'Then I got a job on the farm. Before the mobile clinics came to the farms and we had our clinical sessions there. The nurse was there, the social worker was there. Now we went to the clinic and spent the whole day there because we had to follow the queues. 'And because our jobs were not permanent jobs, you know, you just get a job if you apply by the gate. So if you are not there by the gate on that day, then the boss will automatically think that you are no longer interested in the job, so they employ someone else. 'I went to the government clinic and asked to get at least three months' supply. But the clinic said no because it was my first initiation so I had to come back. So I went back to the farm to see if I could still have my job. I found that I was no longer employed because they had to take up someone else. 'What am I going to do? If I go to the clinic, I stand a chance of losing my job. If I stay at my job, I am at risk of getting sick.' Transwoman: 'I'll just stay home and die' 'Accessing treatment is difficult because of the long queues. Even that security guard keeps on telling me to go away when I ask for lubricants and he tells me every time there's no lubricants. 'We need the trans clinic back. I need to speak to somebody, a psychologist. On Tuesdays we had our psychologist come in, and the doctor. But now I don't have the funds to go and see even a psychologist. 'It is bad. It is super bad. I don't know when I last took my meds. Another friend of mine just decided, oh, okay, since the clinic is closed and I no longer have medication, I'll just stay home and die.' *These stories were edited for length and clarity. This story was produced by the . Sign up for the .

Witkoppen Clinic sees efficiency gains after Novartis donation of medical equipment
Witkoppen Clinic sees efficiency gains after Novartis donation of medical equipment

The Citizen

time14 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Witkoppen Clinic sees efficiency gains after Novartis donation of medical equipment

Witkoppen Clinic and Novartis South Africa have partnered to improve healthcare services in the surrounding community. This collaboration has enabled the clinic to acquire essential resources, including 44 brand-new chairs, 20 scanners, and three air conditioning units, significantly enhancing patient care and operational efficiency. Sbonga Shange, business development assistant at Witkoppen Clinic, emphasised the partnership's shared purpose, saying: 'This partnership is not just about donations; it is about shared purpose, unwavering support, and a shared belief that every patient deserves quality care and comfort, coupled with dignity.' Also read: Witkoppen Clinic launches Winter Warmer Campaign to support underserved communities The partnership has already shown positive results, with the clinic supporting 11 287 patients in the first quarter of 2025, thanks to improved efficiency gained through newly acquired resources. 'Through the generous donation from Novartis, we have been able to address some of the key requirements for the clinic – resources that will not only improve the daily experiences of our patients but also enhance the efficiency of our healthcare services and processes,' said Shange. 'The 20 vital-signs scanners are already revolutionising our administrative flow. Used by our vitals team, clinicians, and pharmacy personnel, these devices have reduced paperwork and processing time by five minutes per patient, allowing for a faster, smoother, and more efficient service that directly benefits our patients.' Also read: Local Rotary Club supports Witkoppen Primary School Shange added that, with the addition of the new air conditioning units, 'our administrative section has become a more pleasant environment for both staff and patients. This improvement enhances not just comfort but also supports better infection control measures, ensuring a healthier and more hygienic space for all.' Novartis South Africa is committed to improving patient access to innovative medicines, and building research capabilities in the country. In 2017, the company signed a memorandum of understanding with the South African Medical Research Council and the Department of Science and Technology to boost clinical trials and research capabilities. Read more: Community called to get flu shots at Witkoppen Clinic Witkoppen Clinic is a non-profit healthcare organisation that provides comprehensive primary healthcare and social welfare services to over 7 000 patients monthly, addressing various health needs, including HIV, TB, and non-communicable diseases. Follow us on our Whatsapp channel, Facebook, X, Instagram, and TikTok for the latest updates and inspiration! Have a story idea? We'd love to hear from you – join our WhatsApp group and share your thoughts! At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!

Electronic death registration is a win-win for SA — let's make it happen
Electronic death registration is a win-win for SA — let's make it happen

Daily Maverick

timea day ago

  • Daily Maverick

Electronic death registration is a win-win for SA — let's make it happen

Several studies have flagged problems with South Africa's death registration processes. To address it, a critical first step is to replace our paper-based process with an electronic one. A recent report by the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) highlights the underreporting of HIV in official mortality statistics. Official cause of death statistics are based on what doctors write on death notification forms. As part of the process of death registration, medical practitioners are required by law to provide information about the medical conditions resulting in each death. Multiple studies have identified concerns about the quality of the information provided by doctors and the Department of Health has been urged in a policy brief to address them as it clearly undermines the quality of data used by our government for health planning and resource allocation. The recently reported study found extensive underreporting of HIV as a cause of death. Only 28% of deaths that occurred in a national sample of public sector hospitals where the medical record had clear clinical indications of HIV, had HIV specified on their death notification form. Aside from ensuring that medical certification of the cause of death is part of the medical training curriculum, and that additional training is provided during internship periods, another key issue to address is that many doctors are reluctant to record HIV/Aids as a cause of death due to concerns about maintaining patient confidentiality. In 2014, a self-sealing section was added to protect information about cause of death on the death notification form, but this has clearly not had the desired effect. Following the deaths of at least 22 children from contaminated food in 2024, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced that the Department of Health would develop an electronic system for recording causes of death as one of several responses to the emergency. The move to an electronic system offers a strategic opportunity to address the challenge around confidentiality and promises a lot more. It allows for secure, institution-based data management that protects confidentiality, encourages accurate reporting and strengthens the integrity of vital statistics. Benefits of this digital transition will include: Improved data quality and confidentiality, encouraging accurate reporting of sensitive conditions like HIV/Aids; Automated validation checks, reducing certification errors at the point of data entry; Real-time access to mortality data, enabling rapid public health responses; and A platform for quality assurance and feedback, currently not possible in the paper-based system. Ultimately, moving away from a paper-based process of death registration will reduce the administrative burden and improve efficiency across the system. This presents a timely and valuable opportunity to collaborate across departments, including health, home affairs and Statistics South Africa, to modernise the country's civil registration and vital statistics system. We are at a pivotal moment for such coordinated policy action. Investing in a robust electronic system for cause-of-death certification will strengthen South Africa's public health planning, improve disease surveillance and increase accountability. The long-term returns – through faster, more reliable data – are substantial for both governance and health outcomes. It is a win-win. DM Dr Pam Groenewald and Professor Debbie Bradshaw are with the South African Medical Research Council's Burden of Disease Research Unit. Note: Spotlight previously reported on the issues discussed in this opinion piece. That reporting included the sentence: 'In the meantime, routine mortality data from Stats SA should clearly be taken with a pinch of salt.' That sentence may have been construed as reflecting Groenewald and the SAMRC's views. Groenewald has asked us to clarify that it does not. She points out that Stats SA is obligated to process the data it receives and the quality issues stem from what doctors report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store