Ecuador passes controversial laws to fight organized crime
Ecuador's Intelligence Law would expand the authority of the Strategic Intelligence Center, allowing it to collect personal data, conduct wiretaps and carry out raids without a court order. That law and another measure face review by reviewed by Constitutional Court before taking effect. Photo by Carlos Duran Araujo/EPA-EFE
SANTIAGO, Chile, June 16 (UPI) -- President Daniel Noboa's administration won legislative approval for two key laws aimed at strengthening its response to rising organized crime and violence in Ecuador.
However, the limited debate surrounding the passage of the Intelligence Law and the National Solidarity Law has drawn criticism.
Noboa has defended both laws as essential tools to fight drug trafficking, but some legal experts disagree with the measures.
"Even if Noboa's actions are well-intentioned, both laws must be reviewed to ensure the fight against drug trafficking doesn't violate the Constitution," legal expert Pablo Encalada said.
The Intelligence Law aims to combat organized crime, protect civilians and support economic recovery in violence-plagued areas.
But Ana Belén Cordero, Ecuador's former secretary for Anti-Corruption Public Policy, called the law authoritarian.
"It violates every principle of the rule of law by granting enormous power to the head of the intelligence system, bypassing prosecutors and judges," she said.
The new law also would expand the authority of the Strategic Intelligence Center, or CIES, allowing it to collect personal data, conduct wiretaps and carry out raids without a court order.
The National Solidarity Law would create a legal framework for Ecuador's national intelligence and counterintelligence system. It allows funds seized from drug traffickers to be transferred to security forces without oversight or reporting requirements.
"It makes sense for the state to have confidential funds for intelligence operations, but there must be accountability to the National Assembly on how those resources are used," Cordero said.
The law would allow security forces to receive real estate, equipment and other contributions from domestic or international organizations. Donors would be eligible for tax breaks.
"This opens the door to massive leaks of both public and private funds," said Luis Córdova, a researcher at the Ecuadorian Conflict Observatory (Llamas), in an interview with local outlet Primicia.
He also raised concerns about a proposal to increase penalties for juvenile offenders.
While Cordero acknowledged the need to address youth involvement in crime, she argued that minors should not face the same penalties as adults. She emphasized that the state's absence in the country's poorest areas drives many young people to join drug gangs.
Because the Intelligence Law has faced criticism from human rights organizations, which argue it violates constitutional protections, it must be reviewed by Ecuador's Constitutional Court before it can take effect.
In 2024, Ecuador recorded an average of 38 homicides per 100,000 people -- the highest rate in Latin America, according to Insight Crime and other sources.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Supreme Court to hear New Jersey pro-life free speech case
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a faith-based pregnancy center's request, challenging New Jersey over its claim the pro-life group misled women about offering abortion services. Oral arguments in the case are scheduled for October. File Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI. | License Photo June 16 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a Christian-based pregnancy center's request, challenging New Jersey over its claim the pro-life group misled women about offering abortion services. The Supreme Court will decide later this year whether First Choice Women's Resource Centers can use federal courts to block the state's attorney general from investigating its donor, advertising and medical personnel records. First Choice, which provides parenting classes and free ultrasounds to women facing unplanned pregnancies, claims a 2023 subpoena violated its free speech rights. Attorney General Matthew Platkin "has made no secret of his hostility towards pregnancy centers," the pro-life group wrote in its petition to the Supreme Court, as it called Platkin's subpoena "invasive" for demanding access to records. "State attorneys general on both sides of the political aisle have been accused of misusing this authority to issue demands against their ideological and political opponents," lawyers for First Choice wrote. "Even if these accusations turn out to be false, it is important that a federal forum exists for suits challenging those investigative demands." Platkin argues that the subpoena he issued has yet to be enforced in state court. He also said the donor information he sought was from two websites, which he claimed may have misled people into thinking First Choice provided abortions. "Nonprofits, including crisis pregnancy centers, may not deceive or defraud residents in our state, and we may exercise our traditional investigative authority to ensure that they are not doing so -- as we do to protect New Jerseyans from a range of harms," Platkin wrote in a statement. The Supreme Court will focus on whether First Choice sued prematurely, not whether New Jersey's subpoena was valid, according to Platkin. "First Choice is looking for a special exception from the usual procedural rules as it tries to avoid complying with an entirely lawful state subpoena," Platkin added. "No industry is entitled to that type of special treatment -- period." Lawyers for First Choice said the group is not seeking special treatment and believes their free speech rights are being targeted. "New Jersey's attorney general is targeting First Choice simply because of its pro-life views," Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Erin Hawley said in a statement. "The Constitution protects First Choice and its donors from unjustified demands to disclose their identities, and First Choice is entitled to vindicate those rights in federal court." Oral arguments in the case are scheduled for October. "We are looking forward to presenting our case to the Supreme Court and urging it to hold that First Choice has the same right to federal court as any other civil rights plaintiff," Hawley added. "The First Amendment protects First Choice's right to freely speak about its beliefs, exercise its faith, associate with like-minded individuals and organizations, and continue to provide its free services in a caring and compassionate environment to people facing unplanned pregnancies."
2 hours ago
Chilling details emerge in Minnesota shootings as Vance Boelter faces federal charges: 'Stuff of nightmares'
Two state lawmakers were spared, authorities said. By and Emily Shapiro • 13 min read Chilling details emerge in Minnesota shootings as Vance Boelter faces federal chargesVance Boelter, 57, is accused of killing Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, and wounding state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Lassig/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock The man suspected of shooting and killing a Minnesota lawmaker and her husband as well as shooting and wounding a second lawmaker and his wife"stalked his victims like prey" and "shot them in cold blood," acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota Joseph Thompson said. "His crimes are the stuff of nightmares," Thompson said at a news conference as he outlined the "chilling" details. Vance Boelter, 57, is accused of killing Democratic Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, and wounding Democratic state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, in "political assassinations," Thompson said. Boelter allegedly showed up to their doors in the middle of the night impersonating a police officer and wearing a realistic-looking mask, officials said, noting that two other lawmakers were spared the night of the shootings. Minnesota State Representative Melissa Hortman and Minnesota State Senator John Hoffman are shown in these undated file House of Representatives | Minnesota Senate Boelter, who was arrested overnight near his farm in Green Isle, Minnesota, is facing federal charges including stalking and firearms charges and state charges including first-degree murder, officials said. Boelter allegedly had firearms and a list of 45 elected officials in notebooks in his car, Thompson said. Images of weapons found in a vehicle associated to Vance Boelter is displayed as the U.S. Attorney's Office announces plans to charge Boelter with numerous federal charges for the deaths of Democratic assemblywoman Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark, in Minneapolis, June 16, 2025. Tim Evans/Reuters He allegedly surveilled his victims' homes and took notes, Thompson said. In a search of a home in north Minneapolis tied to Boelter, authorities seized a list of public officials that had a notation under Melissa Hortman's name reading, "married Mark 2 children 11th term," according to the affidavit. Another notebook included an added notation next to Melissa Hortman's name reading, "Big house off golf course 2 ways in to watch from one spot," the affidavit said. Thompson outlined the four homes that Boelter allegedly drove to early Saturday. Boelter allegedly first drove to Hoffman's home in Champlin, Minnesota, in a black SUV with emergency lights turned on and a license plate that said "police," Thompson said. Hoffman's "chilling" security camera footage showed the suspect in a black tactical vest, body armor and a "hyper-realistic silicon mask," Thompson said. Armed with a flashlight and a 9 mm Beretta handgun, Boelter allegedly knocked on the front door and repeatedly shouted, "This is the police, open the door!" Thompson said. Vance Boelter wearing a latex mask when he knocked on the door immediately prior to his shooting of Minnesota State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife Yvette in Champlin, MORE: Members of Congress want more security after Minnesota lawmaker shootings When Sen. Hoffman and his wife came to the door, the suspect shined the flashlight in their faces, said there was a shooting reported in the house and asked if the couple had weapons, Thompson said. The Hoffmans shouted, "You're not a cop!" Thompson said, and then the suspect announced that "this is a robbery" and he forced his way into the home. This booking photo provided by the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office shows Vance Boelter in Green Isle, Minn., on June 16, 2025. Hennepin County Sheriff's Office When Sen. Hoffman tried to push the suspect out of the house, Boelter shot him and his wife, Thompson said. The Hoffmans' daughter called 911, Thompson said. At 2:24 a.m., Boelter allegedly drove to a state representative's house in Maple Grove, Thompson said. That lawmaker was not home as she and her family were on vacation, Thompson said, and Boelter left the scene. MORE: Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman killed, State Sen. John Hoffman wounded in 'targeted political violence' Boelter then allegedly drove to a state senator's home in New Hope and parked on the street, Thompson said. At 2:36 a.m., after learning of the shooting at Hoffman's home, New Hope police dispatched an officer to the New Hope lawmaker's house, Thompson said. When the officer arrived, she saw Boelter's car parked down the block and she believed Boelter was an officer dispatched to the scene, Thompson said. The officer pulled up next to Boelter, rolled down her window and tried to speak with him, but he did not respond and stared straight ahead, Thompson said. So the New Hope officer drove to the state senator's home and waited for other law enforcement, and by that time, Boelter had left the scene, Thompson said. State Sen. Ann Rest identified herself as that lawmaker who was spared. MORE: What to know about Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman, the lawmakers shot in Minnesota "I am so grateful for the heroic work of the New Hope Police Department and its officers. Their quick action saved my life," she said in a statement Monday. "I am also thankful for the work of state and local law enforcement to apprehend the suspect before he could take any more lives." Rest added, "I grieve for the loss of Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark, and I am praying for the recovery of John and Yvette Hoffman." After the Hoffmans were shot, officers also proactively went to the home of his fellow lawmaker, former Speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives Melissa Hortman, in the nearby town of Brooklyn Park. A memorial is seen on the desk of DFL State Rep. Melissa Hortman in the House chambers at the Minnesota State Capitol, June 16, 2025 in St. Paul, two Brooklyn Park officers arrived, they saw Boelter's SUV in the driveway with emergency lights flashing and Boelter standing in front of the house a few feet from the door, Thompson said. When Boelter saw the officers, he allegedly started firing and rushed into the house, killing Hortman and her husband, Thompson said. The Brooklyn Park officers fired at Boelter while he allegedly rushed into the home, but Boelter escaped into the house and out the back, Thompson said. Officers are posted in a staging area after what police said was a targeted shooting in the area around Edinburgh Golf Course in the Minneapolis suburb of Brooklyn Park, Minn., June 14, 2025. Ellen Schmidt/Reuters The officers who confronted the suspect likely prevented other shootings, according to Drew Evans, superintendent of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. The target list recovered from the suspect's car outside the Hortmans' house had a list of dozens of Minnesota Democrats, including Hoffman, Hortman, Gov. Tim Walz, U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar and U.S. Sen. Tina Smith, according to law enforcement sources familiar with the matter. Authorities gather at a baseball park in Green Isle, Minnesota, June 15, 2025, as they search for the 57-year-old Vance Luther Boelter, the suspect in the fatal shooting of Minnesota State Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband, Lassig/EPA-EFE/Shutterstocl The shootings sparked a massive, two-day manhunt that included 20 SWAT teams, helicopters and unmanned aerial vehicles, authorities said. Boelter was armed when he was apprehended in a rural area late Sunday, authorities said, but he was taken into custody without incident. Boelter, who is in federal custody, made a brief first appearance in federal court on Monday, wearing a two-piece orange jail suit, orange socks and black slides. Boelter said he has about $20,000 to $30,000 in his bank accounts and asked for a public defender. His combined preliminary and detention hearing was set for June 27. Vance Boelter, 57, was arrested near his farm in Green Isle, Minnesota. Ramsey County Sheriff's Office A motive is unclear, Thompson said. According to an interview with an unnamed witness, Boelter tried to buy an electronic bike and a Buick in north Minneapolis at 7 a.m. following the attacks, and allegedly drove with the witness to a bank where he withdrew $2,200 in cash, according to court documents. Hours after the shootings, Boelter allegedly texted his family, "Dad went to war last night ... I don't wanna say more because I don't want to implicate anybody," according to the affidavit. Boelter also allegedly texted his wife, "Words are not gonna explain how sorry I am for this situation ... there's gonna be some people coming to the house armed and trigger-happy and I don't want you guys around." In a search of Boelter's wife's car, law enforcement recovered two handguns, approximately $10,000 in cash and passports for Boelter's wife and her children, the affidavit said. ABC News' Pierre Thomas, Katherine Faulders, Mike Levine, Alexander Mallin and Brittany Shepherd contributed to this report.
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
Experts say EPA plan to roll back limits on power plant emissions will harm Chicago air quality
As the Environmental Protection Agency seeks to revoke a key rule setting limits on the amount of carbon dioxide emitted from fossil fuel-fired power plants, experts are concerned about how it could impact air quality in Chicago. Experts in science, environmental law, and those representing EPA workers said the move will harm the air people breathe in the Chicago area. The proposal would repeal greenhouse gas emission standards already in place. Those are emissions that impact people's health and the environment. "As soon as the rule was released, the EPA employees started talking about how terrible this was going to be for the state of Illinois," said Nicole Cantello, president of AFGE Local 704, the union representing EPA workers in the Chicago area. With air quality alerts and haze in the skies in the past couple weeks – related to the wildfires burning in Canada – we've all taken notice of the air we breathe in Chicago. "We need to control every bit of pollution we possibly can from coal and gas plants, so when that happens, at least it won't be as terrible as it could be," Cantello said. The rule the EPA is planning to roll back was put in place by the Biden administration. The rule was finalized in April 2024 and is projected to reduce 1.38 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide – a major greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change – from entering the atmosphere by 2047, as well as eliminate tens of thousands of tons of other harmful air pollutants that are dangerous to public health. "Emissions of carbon dioxide lead to serious concerns about climate change," said Don Wuebbles, emeritus professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Illinois. Every expert CBS News Chicago spoke to said the EPA's move would impact the air people breathe in Chicago. "We're talking about emissions equivalent to 300 million cars being added to the road," said Brian Lynk, senior attorney at the Environmental Law and Policy Center. "It's a serious problem for public health. This will be a serious problem for the environment." Just 30 miles away, in Gary, Indiana, a CBS News Chicago investigation revealed those residents are breathing some of the worst air in the country. People who live in Gary are surrounded by steel plants, and have higher risks for developing asthma and some cancers. "You have a still mill that is putting out a lot of pollutants and you're allowing there to be more of those emissions than you've had in the past. You're likely going to have even more major health issues," Wuebbles said. A spokesperson for the EPA issued a statement saying: "Unlike the previous administration that tried to ram through regulations to destroy industries that didn't align with their narrow-minded climate change zealotry, the Trump EPA is committed to EPA's core mission of protecting human health and the environment. This is a much better rationale than trying to sneak through unlawful regulations to appease the radical climate lobby and repeatedly get struck down by the Supreme Court. When it comes to 'loosening stringent standards', many environmental groups were ecstatic when the Obama administration implemented the 2012 MATS rule." Before the EPA can actually rescind the rule, there will be a process allowing the public to comment. Environmental groups across the country said they are prepared to sue the EPA if it moves forward with its plan. A spokesperson for the state responded to the plans in a statement, writing, "Illinois is reviewing the potential actions, but we remain committed to protecting Illinois residents and will not allow state air pollution rules to backslide."
