Alabama Senate committee approves teachers' injury compensation bill
Sen. Sam Givhan, R-Huntsville, listens to Senate President Pro Tem Garlan Gudger, R-Cullman speak in the chamber on Feb. 4, 2025 at the Alabama Statehouse in Montgomery, Alabama. The Alabama Legislature began its 2025 session on Tuesday. (Brian Lyman/Alabama Reflector)
An Alabama Senate committee Wednesday approved a bill that would expand workmen's compensation to Alabama teachers.
SB 1, sponsored by Sen. Sam Givhan, R-Huntsville, creates the Public Education Employee Injury Compensation Program to prevent teachers from paying out-of-pocket for injuries occurring on the job. The bill also creates a governing board and a trust fund.
The bill does not create a revenue source for the trust fund. A fiscal note attached to bill estimates the total cost of the program at $14.9 million a year.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'I think it's very important and it's my top priority,' Givhan said.
Givhan sponsored a similar bill last session that passed the Senate but did not come out of the House. The senator said he worked with Alabama House Speaker Nathaniel Ledbetter, R-Rainsville, to try to address the chamber's concerns, which mainly focused on mirroring language currently used for state employees' workers compensation. State employees currently receive compensation for on-the-job injuries.
'We did move more towards the model that the state employees have in terms of language set up in there,' Givhan said.
Sen. Rodger Smitherman, D-Birmingham, commended Givhan for bringing the bill again, saying it is long overdue. However, he said he wanted a bill that would give teachers sick leave upon hiring. Currently, teachers accumulate one sick day per month of employment, according to the State Department of Education.
'We've got a shortage of teachers,' Smitherman said. 'We're still trying to keep people in the profession and you know, and when you ask somebody to come out their pocket to pay for all those things.'
The bill now goes to the full Senate.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
How to win friends and influence climate policy
With help from Josh Siegel MAKING LIMONADE: Senate Democrats elevated one of their most progressive environmental champions when they picked Sen. Monique Limón as their next chamber leader Monday — showing it's still very possible to win friends and influence climate policy even in an era when the zeitgeist seems to have moved on to basic cost-of-living concerns. The Santa Barbara Democrat, elected to the state Assembly in 2016 and state Senate in 2020, will take on her new role in early 2026 before being termed out in 2028. Her path to the top has gone straight through the upper chamber's negotiations on the biggest climate bills of recent years, where she's gained a reputation as a detail-oriented policymaker who seeks wide input while remaining a staunch environmental justice ally. In a brief interview Tuesday, Limón signaled a willingness to follow the larger body's consensus even if it strays from her progressive leanings, bringing up her vote for a bill last year that sought to regulate warehouses despite opposition from community and environmental justice groups who saw it as greenwashing. 'I felt that moving something forward, even if it wasn't to the liking of those that I typically side with, was much more important for the state than waiting another year to be able to do it,' she said. 'There's these big things I've done, but at the end of the day, the leader of the house is really the vehicle to try to get to where the state wants, and that I think is important.' Her balancing of her environmental bona fides with wider political demands will perhaps most be put to the test on housing, which the Senate has remained divided on despite a push by the Assembly to waive environmental rules to spur more building. Limón has declined to support several measures aimed at boosting housing in recent years, in contrast to other lawmakers seen as pro tem contenders, Sens. Lena Gonzalez and Angelique Ashby — leaving YIMBY groups quiet or openly skeptical of her new role Monday. Most immediately, she'll have to exercise her newfound influence in the upper chamber's deliberations on the extension of the state's cap-and-trade program. She's seen as one of the most likely to push for reforms to the program, having been one of the sole Democrat votes against a 2017 deal on cap and trade in line with criticism from environmental justice groups. But her new role supercharges already-delicate negotiations with her counterparts in the Assembly and the governor's office. She has a track record of bringing together broad climate coalitions: Last year, she co-authored Prop 4, last year's $10 billion climate bond, which had the support of dozens of water, agriculture, energy and environment groups. But she's also not afraid of rocking the boat, including by authoring a bill to rein in the voluntary carbon offset market that drew opposition from everyone from the California Air Resources Board to the California Chamber of Commerce. She also has a track record of making enemies of oil and gas groups, including an early-career bill to ban new offshore oil drilling in state waters and pending legislation this year to slow a Texas-based oil company's restart of offshore oil drilling. She co-authored a bill to phase out neighborhood oil drilling in 2022, which became final in 2024 after oil groups agreed to pull a referendum on the bill from the ballot. Limón's new reach came through Tuesday morning, when she presided over her first Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee meeting since the vote. From her position as chair, she got farming and tribal groups to promise to negotiate over a bill to regulate flows on the Scott and Shasta rivers — and got called out by Republican Sen. Shannon Grove, who asked her to use her newfound influence to pressure the State Water Resources Control Board to act more quickly on the rivers. — CvK Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! DAYS NUMBERED: President Donald Trump is about to kill California's electric vehicle rules. Trump plans to sign a trio of resolutions Thursday to revoke the state's zero-emission sales mandates for cars and heavy-duty trucks, Sen. Shelley Moore Capito ( and Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) confirmed. The signings will finalize his administration's months-long effort to thwart California's nation-leading vehicle emissions standards through an unprecedented congressional maneuver that triggered pushback from the Senate parliamentarian. We know what's going to happen next: California Attorney General Rob Bonta has already vowed to sue once Trump signs the resolutions. Daniel Villaseñor, a spokesperson for California Gov. Gavin Newsom, said the state is ready. 'If it's a day ending in 'y,' it's another day of Trump's war on California. We're fighting back,' Villaseñor said in a statement. — AN WHAT'S THAT SMELL?: The fight over a purple San Diego congressional seat could come down to raw sewage. Jim Desmond, a San Diego County supervisor, has become a regular on Fox News and other conservative outlets about sewage flowing from Mexico through the Tijuana River and into California — just as he's mounting a campaign to replace Democratic Rep. Mike Levin, Timothy Cama reports for POLITICO's E&E News. Desmond has framed Levin's efforts to raise funds for infrastructure upgrades to a major sewage treatment plant that straddles the border as letting Mexican officials off the hook. 'My opponent is proud of the strategy of throwing more money into the processing of the sewage,' Desmond said. Levin countered that Desmond has only recently started talking about the issue and has proposed a dam along the river that's criticized by air and water experts. 'What he's done since then is talk in the media and point fingers, and frankly, offer a ridiculous, counterproductive idea,' Levin said. — AN CASH PROBLEMS: Pacific Gas & Electric is among the growing chorus of utilities, consumer advocates and environmentalists pleading with the Trump administration to finalize $23 billion in loans for energy infrastructure projects. The funding awarded in the waning days of the Biden administration — much of which would go to Midwest states that voted for Trump — could help finance investments in transmission lines, batteries, renewable energy and natural gas infrastructure, Brian Dabbs and Jason Plautz report for POLITICO's E&E News. But they still need approval from Trump's Department of Energy. A DOE spokesperson said it's 'conducting a department-wide review to ensure all activities follow the law, comply with applicable court orders and align with the Trump administration's priorities.' The stakes are high for PG&E customers. Jennifer Robison, a spokesperson for the utility, said that leveraging a low-cost $15 billion loan guarantee could save ratepayers $1 billion in interest costs over the life of the loan. The utility cited 'uncertainty' around the loan alongside tariffs and wildfires in a recent filing among the reasons it was asking for a slight rate increase. — AN — Opponents of Sen. Josh Becker's SB 540, to set up a Westwide electric grid, are circulating this New York Times story on the unpopularity of the Northeast's grid manager. — Tech giants like Google and Meta are fighting to save renewable energy subsidies in the tax and spending bill winding its way through Congress. — Listen to our editor Debra Kahn discuss why carbon capture could survive the GOP megabill on the POLITICO energy podcast.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections
WASHINGTON — The House advanced a bill to ban noncitizens from voting in local elections in Washington, D.C., marking the latest step from Republicans to crack down on city policies they view as too liberal. Lawmakers voted 268-148 largely along party lines to advance the measure, sending the bill over to the Republican-led Senate for consideration. The bill managed to garner some bipartisan support after 56 Democrats voted in favor. However, the legislation's future is uncertain as it would require seven Democrats to buck party leadership and support the proposal. 'The right to vote is a defining privilege of American citizenship,' House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said in a speech on the House floor. 'Diluting that right by extending it to noncitizens — whether here legally or illegally — undermines the voice of D.C. residents.' The bill would overturn the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act, a bill passed by the D.C. Council in 2022 that permits undocumented residents living in Washington to vote in local elections. City lawmakers have defended the measure by pointing to a 'long history of the U.S. allowing noncitizens to vote in local (or) state' elections. Lawmakers also note many of the undocumented residents pay local taxes, support businesses, and attend district schools — arguing that should qualify them to have a say in local elections. However, Republicans have argued that allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections sets a dangerous precedent that could negatively harm local governments. 'Some may wrongly dismiss these as local elections. The reality is local elections are a vital part of our democratic process and have a significant impact on communities,' Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, who led the bill in the House, said in a speech. 'Local elections determine matters such as taxation, the criminal code, and the election of city council members who create essential ordinances, including those that dictate voting rights.' Additionally, Republicans have criticized the law as a way to dilute 'the voice of American citizens.' 'It's also important to acknowledge that many local elections are decided by razor-thin margins underscoring their significance and importance of active participation,' Pfluger said. GOP lawmakers also cited opposition from D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who withheld her signature from the ordinance but allowed it to take effect. 'Why would my colleagues on the other side of the aisle want foreigners to vote in local elections in Washington, D.C.? What's the purpose?' Pfluger said. 'Free and fair elections are prerequisites for the healthy republic our founding fathers envisioned, with the District of Columbia as the epicenter.' House Republicans passed a bill in 2023 seeking to repeal the D.C. law allowing noncitizens to vote. The bill was spearheaded by Republicans but 52 Democrats ultimately joined all Republicans in approving the bill despite efforts from Democratic leadership to quash the proposal. However, the legislation was never considered in the Senate, which was controlled by Democrats at the time. Despite not being a state, Washington is permitted to operate as an independent city government under the D.C. Home Rule Act. However, local laws are still subject to congressional approval before they can take effect, occasionally setting up showdowns between Congress and local lawmakers. The vote on Tuesday is the first of three bills being considered this week by the House to rein in some of D.C.'s local ordinances. Other proposals being considered would rescind D.C. Council policies allowing city employees to not comply with requests from the Department of Homeland Security or Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republicans call on Michigan State Police leadership to resign following no confidence vote
Michigan State Police | Susan J. Demas Several Republicans in the Michigan House and Senate on Wednesday called for the director and chief deputy director of the Department of State Police to resign. The call for State Police Director James Grady and Chief Deputy Director Aimee Brimacombe to step down followed a weekend announcement from the Michigan State Police Troopers Association and the Michigan State Police Command Officers Association that said the two groups took a nearly unanimous no-confidence vote against the agency's leadership. Calls for their resignations came from Michigan Senate Minority Leader Aric Nesbitt (R-Porter Township), who is a Republican candidate for governor, state Sen. Jim Runestad (R-White Lake), who is the chair of the Michigan Republican Party, and state Rep. Mike Mueller (R-Linden). Department spokesperson Shanon Banner in a statement defended Grady and his leadership team, whom she said 'provide unwavering support to department members and are proud of the public safety services delivered every day to the public and our law enforcement partners across the state.' The no confidence vote follows a year's worth of discontent between the troopers' association and their leadership. Troopers filed an ethics complaint against Grady and Brimacombe in January. A handful of troopers also filed lawsuits against Brimacombe questioning her leadership, as well. Grady was appointed as director of the department following the departure of former director Joseph Gasper. Nesbitt said the vote of no confidence was a damning indictment on the agency's current administration. 'It is undeniable that this is the absolute worst leadership our state police has ever seen and completely unacceptable for the troopers and public they serve,' Nesbitt said in a statement released Monday. 'There needs to be a change at the top and that change needs to happen immediately. Col. Grady must step down or the governor must relieve him of his duties.' Runestad questioned how Grady and Brimacombe could continue in their roles after more than 1,000 troopers voted against their leadership. 'It has become alarmingly clear that Col. Grady and Lt. Col. Brimacombe's failed leadership has disparaged the reputation of the Michigan State Police,' Runestad said in a statement. 'I demand they step down immediately and urge the governor to relieve them of their duties if they do not resign voluntarily.' Mueller, a former law enforcement officer who has been investigating issues with State Police's leadership and other controversies at the individual post level, said troopers spoke loudly this weekend. 'They have no confidence in the current leadership. It is corrupt, dishonest, and doesn't keep the best interest of its own troopers in mind,' Mueller said in a scathing statement. 'If they have any shame, Grady and Brimacombe should resign right now.' In response, Banner said it has been a priority for Grady to conduct in-person visits to department worksites to listen to member feedback. 'During these visits, he's engaged in meaningful conversations, including seeking input from the membership about morale and opportunities for areas of improvement,' Banner said. 'Under Colonel Grady's leadership, the department has continued to invest in better training and professional development opportunities, updated equipment and improved technology. Further, dozens of new troopers joined the ranks last month and this year's proposed budget includes pay raises for troopers and sergeants.' Banner added that Grady remains committed to the department and 'is focused on moving the department forward while maintaining the department's proud tradition of service through excellence, integrity and courtesy.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
