GCC states condemn Israeli attacks on Iran
Saudi Gazette report
GENEVA — The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states condemned Israeli attacks on Iran. The condemnation was delivered by Permanent Representative of Kuwait to the United Nations and other international organizations in Geneva Ambassador Nasser Al-Hayen, who spoke on behalf of the GCC states at the opening of the 59th session of the Human Rights Council in Geneva.
Ambassador Al-Hayen affirmed that these Israeli attacks constitute a flagrant violation of international law, the Charter of the United Nations, and international norms, reiterating the GCC states' condemnation of Israel's continued brutal aggression against the Palestinian people.
He pointed out that the GCC states emphasize the priority of peaceful conflict resolution and the promotion of dialogue and understanding as essential elements for protecting human rights.
Al-Hayen emphasized that the GCC states believe the protection of human rights depends on a stable international environment grounded in respect for sovereignty, a commitment to dialogue, and adherence to multilateral approaches aimed at preventing conflicts and fostering development.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leaders
an hour ago
- Leaders
Iran's Natanz Facilities Were 'Badly Hit': IAEA's Chief
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Chief, Rafael Grossi, on Wednesday said that important facilities at Iran's Natanz nuclear plant suffered significant damage due to the Israeli strikes. Speaking to Bloomberg TV, Grossi said Israel launched several attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities since the beginning of its military operation on Friday. Natanz Nuclear Facilities 'First of all, a very important facility in Natanz was badly hit, with a full enrichment operating hall being destroyed completely above ground,' he said. 'Then, the electric substation and power infrastructure in this big facility also being taken out with a direct impact on a very important underground enrichment facility, which is also there,' Grossi added. The IAEA's Chief also noted that this happened as a result of the 'sudden loss of power that caused immediate damage to these very delicate systems that the ultra-centrifuges that produce the enriched uranium are.' Isfahan and Fordo Grossi also said that the enrichment facility at Isfahan, which he describes as a 'very important nuclear compound,' was repeatedly hit with a few buildings being affected. However, the UN watchdog chief said he cannot be sure that the 409 kilograms stockpile of highly of enriched uranium kept underground is still safe because the nuclear sites are normally closed at times of war and the IAEA's inspections teams, who are still in Iran, are not inspecting. But he added: 'We assume that we have not seen anything that would suggest the stockpile has been moved.' Moreover, he noted that the Fordo nuclear site has not sustained a similar degree of damage, because it has the most important and sensitive parts situated underground deep in the mountains. Centrifuge Production Facilities The IAEA also said on Wednesday that two centrifuge production facilities in Iran, the TESA Karaj workshop and the Tehran Research Center, have suffered damage as a result of the Israeli strikes. 'At the Tehran site, one building was hit where advanced centrifuge rotors were manufactured and tested. At Karaj, two buildings were destroyed where different centrifuge components were manufactured,' the agency said in a statement. Radiation Monitoring in Saudi Arabia Amid mounting concerns over potential nuclear radiation from Iran's enrichment facilities, Saudi Arabia's Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Commission (NRRC) reaffirmed that it is actively monitoring radiation levels in the Kingdom. The NRRC monitors radiation levels through its National Network for Continuous Environmental Radiological Monitoring and Early Warning, which operates 240 stations across Saudi Arabia. Following the flare-up of tensions between Iran and Israel, the NRRC confirmed that radiation levels in Saudi Arabia remain normal, stressing that the Commission proactively evaluates potential nuclear emergency scenarios and implements the necessary precautionary measures to protect the people and environment from radiation impacts. Moreover, the NRRC noted that its proactive national capabilities to predict radioactive fallout cover the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, emphasizing that its evaluation indicates that there is no need for activating nuclear emergency response plans. Short link : Post Views: 14
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Iranian Ambassador in Tokyo hails Saudi and Arab support
TOKYO: Iranian Ambassador to Japan, Peiman Seadat, expressed his gratitude for the unified support of Saudi Arabia and other Arab and Muslim countries in their collective effort against the aggression of the Israeli war machine. He stated that this unity among Arab and Muslim nations is a testament to the strength of regional cooperation. In an exclusive interview with Arab News Japan on Wednesday, the Ambassador highlighted that Arab and Muslim countries recognize the seriousness of the aggression by the Israeli regime and the threat it poses to the entire region. Ambassador Seadat recognized the substantial support from Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Foreign Minister Prince Farhan. 'We are deeply grateful for the compassionate assistance provided by the Crown Prince to approximately 80,000 Iranian pilgrims who have been stranded in Saudi Arabia. His Highness personally assured us that these pilgrims are being welcomed as guests of the Kingdom. We will always remember the kindness shown to us by our brothers in Saudi Arabia.' The Iranian Ambassador, Seadat, also highlighted the support to Iran by Egypt, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Oman, among others. He also expressed gratitude to the Secretary-General of the Gulf Cooperation Council, for his clear condemnation of Israel's aggressive actions against Iran.
Arab News
5 hours ago
- Arab News
The Israeli-Iranian war and the security of the Gulf
The positions of the Gulf Cooperation Council states have been made very clear, as they openly expressed their opposition to Friday's initial Israeli military strikes that targeted Iranian nuclear facilities. On that day, Saudi Arabia issued a clear statement in which it expressed its 'strong condemnation and denunciation of the blatant Israeli attacks against the brotherly Islamic Republic of Iran, which undermine its sovereignty and security and constitute a clear violation of international laws and norms.' For its part, the Qatari Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced its 'strong condemnation and deep denunciation of the Israeli attack targeting the territory of the Islamic Republic of Iran.' The UAE, in a statement issued by its Ministry of Foreign Affairs, expressed its 'deep concern over the ongoing escalation and its repercussions on regional security and stability,' stressing the 'importance of exercising the utmost self-restraint and judgment to mitigate risks and prevent the expansion of the conflict.' The Gulf states have adopted a flexible, pragmatic approach that prevents them from remaining trapped in the past Hassan Al-Mustafa The Gulf Cooperation Council's Ministerial Council, in its 48th extraordinary session, unanimously expressed its rejection of 'the Israeli attacks on the Islamic Republic of Iran, which infringe its sovereignty and security and constitute a flagrant violation of international law and the Charter of the United Nations.' It emphasized 'the necessity of returning to the diplomatic path' and 'an immediate ceasefire,' in order to 'maintain the security and stability of the region.' It also called on the 'UN Security Council and the international community to assume their responsibilities toward the immediate cessation of this war.' The council's statement did not overlook a highly important point related to energy security, as it stressed 'the importance of preserving maritime security and waterways in the region, and countering activities that threaten the security and stability of the region and the world, including targeting commercial ships, threatening maritime navigation and international trade, and oil facilities in the GCC states.' The GCC states' positions were not limited to statements alone. Direct phone calls took place between Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. Pezeshkian also spoke with both Omani Sultan Haitham bin Tariq and UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al-Nahyan. The foreign ministries of the Gulf states are also in contact with the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to coordinate and de-escalate and to arrange logistical matters related to Iranian citizens stranded in these countries or Gulf citizens stranded in Iran, in addition to the messages being conveyed by various parties aiming to de-escalate the situation. Added to all this are the direct communications between the kings and presidents of the Gulf states and the US, France, the UK, Turkiye and other influential countries, which aim to create a genuine and practical political path that pushes for the resumption of US-Iranian negotiations, the halting of military actions and making diplomacy the sole path toward resolving disputes. Netanyahu is adopting extremist policies aimed at cementing a fait accompli in which Tel Aviv controls the Middle East Hassan Al-Mustafa Some may find these intensive efforts surprising, especially since they are coming from Arab countries that have political and security disputes with Iran. They have also experienced incidents where Tehran played a negative role that harmed Gulf security by supporting cells loyal to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which engaged in interference and sabotage operations in several Arab countries. These previous negative experiences are taken into account by the Gulf Arab states, but they have adopted a flexible, pragmatic approach that prevents them from remaining trapped in the past or being held hostage to reactions and emotional responses. This is especially the case given that a trust-building process has begun and is progressing step by step between Saudi Arabia and Iran following the signing of the Beijing Agreement between the two countries in March 2023, which was based on mutual respect and noninterference in each other's internal affairs. What distinguishes Riyadh and the other Gulf capitals is that they do not base their foreign policies on emotions. Rather, they build their diplomacy on what serves their national interests first, regional security second and their partnerships with neighboring countries — including Iran. They strive to make honest and serious dialogue the path to resolving ongoing issues. These pragmatic policies have formed a safety net, especially since Oct. 7, 2023, as Israel has continued to pursue aggressive policies and wage a bloody war against the Gaza Strip, while rejecting calls for a ceasefire. It has also been working to undermine the two-state solution — an issue highlighted in the statement issued on Tuesday by the co-chairs of the UN High-Level International Conference on the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine and the Implementation of the Two-State Solution, convened by Saudi Arabia and France. This statement stressed that 'the situation compels us to double our efforts to call for upholding international law, respecting the sovereignty of states and advancing peace,' while emphasizing the importance of achieving a 'just and lasting resolution of the Palestinian question through the implementation of the two-state solution.' The current extremist government in Israel rejects the two-state solution and it is exultant over what it sees as a crushing victory against its 'enemies' — whether Hamas in Palestine or Hezbollah in Lebanon — and the resulting shifts in Syria, as well as the halting of attacks against Israel by Iraqi armed factions. This sense of overwhelming power within Benjamin Netanyahu's government is pushing its prime minister to adopt extremist policies aimed at cementing a fait accompli in which Tel Aviv controls the Middle East, becoming the dominant force in the region that changes things at will and acts without consequences. This is something Saudi Arabia and the GCC states reject, as it violates international norms and laws. Furthermore, the current extremist Israeli policies are likely to foster an environment conducive to the growth of extremist ideologies — meaning that conflict will inevitably erupt again in the future, leading to further instability in the Middle East. The GCC states are seeking to urge US President Donald Trump to pressure Israel to halt its military operations in the region and move toward resuming nuclear negotiations with Iran — concurrently with ending the war on Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. This is because they realize that, without such steps, no one will be able to rein in Netanyahu's recklessness, his personal ambitions or the dreams of the Israeli far right, which listens to nothing but its own racist desires.
