Gov. Mike Braun orders cross-agency group to tackle soaring costs of autism therapy
In response to soaring costs in a Medicaid-covered therapy service for kids with autism ― a program that was recently the subject of a federal audit ― Gov. Mike Braun is ordering a cross-agency working group to figure out how to get the program under control.
His executive order comes just days after his administration abandoned a cost-cutting measure drafted at the tail end of the last administration that would have kicked a number of kids off Medicaid-reimbursed Applied Behavior Analysis, known as ABA, come April 1.
"I'm committed to protecting this program for the families that need it," Braun said Wednesday. "But in the future, we got to run it efficiently and make sure that we marshal the resources to keep it sustainable."
More: Federal audit finds $56 million in 'improper' Indiana Medicaid payments for autism services
The working group established by this executive order would consist of experts from the Family and Social Services Administration, the Department of Education and the Department of Child Services, as well as lawmakers and families.
The group will come up with recommendations for ideal clinical care models, better care coordination, transitioning kids from ABA therapy settings to other settings, caps on hours or the number of months a child can receive the service, appeals processes and new billing requirements to address the issues found in the federal audit. The experts will give a report to the governor by Nov. 30.
FSSA has been making changes to the program since 2023 in an attempt to rein in costs.
The state Medicaid office started covering ABA therapy in 2016 by reimbursing providers based on a percentage of whatever each individual provider billed. The first full year, the program cost the state $14 million. In 2019, it grew to $120 million; then $420 million 2022, and an anticipated $645 million in 2026.
That's partly because the number of kids receiving therapy has increased, but so has the cost per child.
In the fall of 2023, the agency implemented a standardized, flat reimbursement rate for these services, rather than the widely varied hourly rates that providers would charge. Providers largely agreed that the rate needed to be standardized to prevent abuses in the system, but feared the rate the state chose would force some of them to lay off staff or close.
More: 'Rippling effect': Autism therapy providers fear drastically lower proposed Medicaid rates
More than 40 state lawmakers signed a letter asking then Gov. Eric Holcomb to intervene after the first low rate FSSA proposed. The agency then landed on a compromise, and the new rate took effect at the start of 2024.
Then in December, at the tail end of Holcomb's tenure, FSSA proposed an amendment to the state Medicaid plan that would have capped Medicaid coverage of ABA therapy at 30 hours per week for a maximum of three years per child. This would have applied retroactively to children already undergoing therapy, meaning kids who happened to have started therapy three years ago would have been booted off on April 1.
Within days of proposing that amendment, the Health & Human Services Office of the Inspector General published an audit of Indiana's ABA claims in 2019 and 2020, finding at least $56 million in "improper" payments. That's more than a third of the audited payments in those two years. An FSSA spokesperson at the time said this audit "underscored" the need for their state plan amendment.
But after meeting with stakeholders and legislators, the Braun administration changed the proposed amendment. Pending federal approval, FSSA will implement a tiered system, where the limit on hours depends on the severity of the child's autism diagnosis and lends some deference to the provider's judgment. And crucially to advocates, the rule will no longer be applied retroactively.
Republican Rep. Robb Greene, who has a child who underwent ABA therapy, credited Braun and his FSSA secretary Mitch Roob with making this change based on his feedback.
'This goes beyond policy and politics for me, and I want the Governor to know that I'm grateful to him as a dad," Greene said in a statement. "This is a great first step, and I am excited to continue the work we are doing.'
Speaking to reporters Wednesday, Roob said discovering the true implications of the April 1 cutoff for certain kids was "not on my bingo card."
"And there was no plan to deal with these children," he said. "There was no connection to the school. There was no connection anywhere else. And I think that's why you saw the understandable outrage on the part of the parents. And so as soon as we found that out, we knew we had to change that."
The Arc of Indiana CEO Kim Dodson called the changes a "major victory," though the organization still wants to see the three-year limit removed.
"We thank the families and advocates who took the time and effort to educate their legislators and the governor on the importance of ABA therapy," she said. "Their efforts truly made a difference."
Roob said the administration plans to work on another state plan amendment, and may consider adjusting the three-year cap. He said the administration doesn't have a particular enrollment number in mind.
"We want to make sure that we are providing care in a holistic manner, hopefully preventative care, to those who are eligible for it and not to those who are not eligible," he said.
Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Kayla Dwyer at kdwyer@indystar.com or follow her on X: @kayla_dwyer17.
This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Gov. Braun orders agencies to get autism therapy costs under control
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) Soared On Thursday
We recently published a list of . In this article, we are going to take a look at where Oscar Health, Inc. (NYSE:OSCR) stands against other best-performing stocks on Thursday. Oscar Health snapped a five-day losing streak on Thursday, jumping 10.6 percent to close at $15.65 apiece as investors resorted to bargain-hunting while waiting for more concrete developments on the Trump administration's Medicare Advantage review. Earlier this year, lawmakers passed a $5-trillion tax-and-spending package that shaves as much as $900 billion in Medicaid, which servers over 70 million low-income households. A close up of a patient and a healthcare professional engaging in conversation, showing the company's commitment to patient care. Now, Senate Republicans to broaden savings by looking for supposed inefficiencies in the Medicare program for senior citizens. In the first quarter of the year, Oscar Health, Inc. (NYSE:OSCR) registered a 55-percent increase in attributable net income of $275 million versus the $177 million registered in the same period last year. Revenues rose by 42 percent to $3.046 billion from $2.142 billion year-on-year. Overall, OSCR ranks 5th on our list of best-performing stocks on Thursday. While we acknowledge the potential of OSCR as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
In Lansing, Democrats warn Medicaid and SNAP cuts would be a 'perfect storm' for the poor
U.S. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Holly) and U.S. Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet (D-Bay City) at a June 6, 2025 town hall in Lansing. | Kyle Davidson Members of the Michigan Democratic Party laid out the impacts of congressional Republicans' 'big beautiful bill' at a town hall on Friday, calling on residents of Michigan's 7th Congressional District to help educate their friends and family as well. A few hundred supporters packed into the gym of Everett High School in Lansing as U.S. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Holly), U.S. Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet (D-Bay City) and Michigan Democratic Party Chair Curtis Hertel detailed how the Trump administration's policies would impact everyone, particularly individuals with limited income. The Michigan Democratic Party has hosted several similar events in Republican districts throughout the state, Hertel said, noting House Republicans had been instructed to avoid town halls with their constituents. 'The most basic thing for a public servant is to be able to sit and answer questions. … The least someone can do is sit down with people and explain their votes' Hertel said. And the 7th Congressional District's current representative, Tom Barrett (R-Charlotte) has a lot of explaining to do, Hertel said, slamming Barrett for supporting Republican's spending plan, and arguing the representative failed to stand up to the President and make himself available to his constituents A Barrett spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. Prior to taking questions, McDonald Rivet slammed the Republican spending effort, telling audience members that it would take away healthcare and raise the cost of medicine, education and energy in order to deliver a tax break to the wealthy. 'Oh, and by the way, it's going to increase the deficit by several trillion dollars,' She said. Slotkin looked back on the president's first term, when Trump was looking to overturn the Affordable Care Act, which expanded access to Medicaid and barred insurance providers from denying people coverage or charging them due to preexisting health conditions. 'It was the first thing he talked about when he got sworn in, he even had the House of Representatives vote to repeal Obamacare. And now we not only still have it, we expanded it, and how? Because we educated people,' Slotkin said. However, rather than cutting people's healthcare outright, Slotkin argued Trump is aiming to hide those cuts by requiring individuals to reregister for Medicaid every six months, making it harder to qualify and more difficult to sign up. While the current proposal would implement work requirements for Medicaid recipients, Slotkin noted it also raises the age limit for those requirements to 64. According to KFF, an independent health policy organization, 92% of medicaid recipients under 65 are already working full or part time. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that Republican's budget plan would result in 10.9 million additional people being uninsured in 2034, with 7.8 million fewer individuals on Medicaid due to the policy's proposed work requirements. Even individuals who are not on Medicaid will feel the impacts of cuts to the program, Slotkin said, noting that nursing homes, hospitals and mental health facilities all rely on Medicaid funding. 'I would just say this bill is designed to really be a perfect storm for poor people. If you are living at or below the poverty line, you're getting hit in every direction. Medicaid, your health care; SNAP your food; a bunch of programs, right, that you depend on. … They are paying for those tax benefits for the most wealthy by really the perfect storm of cuts for the poorest among us,' Slotkin said. On top of cutting SNAP benefits by $300 billion, the Department of Government Efficiency had canceled $1 billion in funding to programs supporting school meals and food banks, McDonald Rivet said. 'So you're that hungry kid and you have lost access to a food bank. You have lost access to food at school, and now you don't have SNAP benefits. This is the America that this bill creates,' McDonald Rivet said. Alongside questions on cuts to SNAP and Medicaid, audience members asked the lawmakers about the legal challenges levied against the Trump administration, and Democrats' plans to counter Republicans heading into the 2026 mid-term election. On Friday, the Trump Administration backed down in its resistance of a Supreme Court order demanding that the administration facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was wrongly deported to El Salvador three months ago. However, the fight goes beyond Abrego Gracia, into whether the executive branch needs to obey orders from the Supreme Court, Slotkin said. 'Now, we haven't had to deal with this issue in the years past because Democrats and Republicans have largely said, 'Huh, if the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court issues a court order, we're going to follow it.' Trump is pushing the boundaries on all the democratic values and principles most of us grew up with,' Slotkin said. Should an individual defy a federal court order, U.S. marshals would eventually be sent to enforce that order, Slotkin said. However, the U.S. marshals are controlled by the United States attorney general. Should the U.S. marshals receive a request to enforce a Supreme Court order against the president, Slotkin raised the question on whether Attorney General Pam Bondi, a Trump loyalist, would approve it. 'We've needed to have this fight. We need to have it out. We need a court order that he needs to obey, and we need to precipitate this conversation on the U.S. marshals. But today was an important sign that they don't want to get to that point. They don't want to wait until the U.S. marshals are potentially getting an order to activate,' Slotkin said. In preparing to take on the Trump Administration, Slotkin said she'd gone back to her roots in national security and crafted a war plan in the form of a 17-page powerpoint, with plans to lay out her vision of the nation's future under Democratic leadership. 'It's about facing our problems head on and saying the only way we do well as a country, the only way that we have a strong middle class going forward, the American Dream going forward, is if we face these issues and have a vision. And it's economic, it's about national security, and it's about our democracy,' Slotkin said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Federal cuts force families to make difficult, and potentially deadly, choices
A mother rushes into the emergency department cradling her 6-month-old baby. He is lethargic, seizing and in critical condition. The cause? Severely low sodium levels in his blood — a result of formula diluted with extra water to make it last longer. With grocery prices climbing and her SNAP benefits running out before the end of the month, she felt she had no other choice. This story is not an outlier. Pediatric clinicians across Wisconsin are seeing the real and devastating consequences of policies that fail to prioritize the health and well-being of children and families. And now, the situation could get worse. The Trump Administration's proposed 'skinny' budget for Fiscal Year 2026 includes deep and dangerous cuts to federal programs that form the backbone of public health in our communities. These proposed reductions include: $18 billion from the National Institutes of Health – stalling critical pediatric research and innovation $3.5 billion from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – compromising disease surveillance, immunization programs, and emergency response efforts $1.73 billion from the Health Resources and Services Administration – cutting access to essential primary and preventive care services for children and families $674 million from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services – threatening the Medicaid and CHIP programs that provide health coverage to nearly half of Wisconsin's children. Opinion: We asked readers about wake boats on Wisconsin lakes. Here's what you said. And as if that weren't enough, further reductions to SNAP and other nutrition support programs are also on the table. These aren't just numbers on a spreadsheet. These are lifelines. Vital services that help children survive and thrive. When families can't afford formula, when clinics lose funding for immunization programs, when children lose health coverage, the consequences are immediate and, in many cases, irreversible. As front-line providers, we witness this every day. We can do better. Our federal budget is a reflection of our national values. It should not balance its books on the backs of our youngest and most vulnerable. I implore Wisconsin's elected officials to reject this harmful budget proposal. Think of that infant in the emergency room. Think of the thousands of other children across our state whose health and future depend on robust public health infrastructure, access to care, and support for families in need. We urge lawmakers to work toward a bipartisan budget that invests in children, strengthens public health, and protects the building blocks of a healthy society. Wisconsin's children deserve every opportunity to grow up healthy and strong. Our chapter of the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners stands ready to partner in this effort. Let's move forward — not backward — when it comes to the health of our children. Christine Schindler is a critical care pediatric nurse practitioner at Children's WI, a clinical professor at Marquette University, and the President of the Wisconsin Chapter of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners. She has been caring for critically ill and injured children for almost 30 years. All opinions expressed are her own. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Trump budget jeopardizes health of American children | Opinion