Scottish drug safety activist Peter Krykant dies age 48
The campaigner inspired many to regard addiction as a health issue and paved the way for state-backed safe drug consumption areas.
He famously operated from his van in Glasgow's city centre between 2020 and 2021 in a bid to help those with drug addiction.
READ MORE: SNP minister responds to 'secret meeting to discuss John Swinney leadership' reports
Police Scotland have said that no suspicious circumstances surround the death at his home in Larbert, Falkirk, on Monday, according to the Daily Record.
Labour MSP Paul Sweeney, who helped man the mobile service with Krykant, which was regarded as illegal at the time, said the 48-year-old's campaigning helped make significant changes to Scotland's drugs policy.
'I'm shocked and saddened to hear of Peter's death,' he said.
'We can't underestimate the contribution he made to the drugs debate in Scotland, which came amid many years of increasing overdose deaths.
'He undoubtedly played a major part in changing policy in a political a system that was very much set in its ways and resistant to the kind of radical change that Peter advocated.
'The overdose prevention facility in Glasgow, which is now operating successfully, came after many minds were turned by Peter's efforts.'
Sweeney added that Krykant's efforts to force the opening of legal drug consumption areas in Scotland brought international recognition.
He said: 'I worked alongside Peter on the van, which itself came to be an iconic sign of the changes that were occurring in attitudes in Scotland and the UK as a whole.
'Peter also travelled the world to tell others about his methods to disrupt and bring change.
'He will be very sadly missed.'
In 2021, Krykant met then first minister Nicola Sturgeon and held talks about opening an official Drug Consumption Room site.
Following several months of running his van in Glasgow's city centre, Krykant donated the facility to the Transform Drug Policy Foundation and its Anyone's Child campaign, which took it on a UK tour.
He later took on roles with Cranstoun UK, a drug service provider.
Scottish Greens Co-Leader Patrick Harvie MSP described Krykant as a tireless campaigner for a fairer, more compassionate approach to handling drug misuse and addiction.
He said: 'We are all deeply saddened to hear of Peter's passing. Everyone from the Scottish Greens is thinking of his family and friends at this extremely difficult time.
'Peter was a tireless campaigner for a fairer, more compassionate approach to handling drug misuse and addiction, and his campaigning has left such an important legacy in the UK's first safe consumption room in Glasgow.
'His advocacy for drug reform, and of course, his yellow van, have no doubt saved countless lives in Scotland.'
A Police Scotland spokesperson said: 'Around 5.15pm on Monday, 9 June 2025, police attended an address in Graham Avenue, Larbert following a report of a concern for person.
'The body of a 48-year-old man was found within.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Humza Yousaf news, interviews and updates on former first minister
He first entered Holyrood in 2011 and has remained in the parliament ever since then, although he plans to step down at the next election. Yousaf resigned as Scotland's first minister last year after ending the Bute House Agreement with the Scottish Greens. Read on for all the latest Humza Yousaf news, interviews and updates on the former first minister. Humza Yousaf news and updates Scotland's oil profits 'must not be used to exploit citizens in Gaza' 'Scotland is not an island of strangers', says Humza Yousaf UK Government slammed after trade envoy Ian Austin visits Israel When did Humza Yousaf enter politics? Born and raised in Glasgow, Yousaf studied politics at the University of Glasgow before working as a parliamentary assistant for the late SNP MSP Bashir Ahmad. Yousaf (below) was first elected as an MSP for the Glasgow region in May 2011, aged only 26, and was the youngest minister ever appointed to the Scottish Government. He was then elected as a constituency MSP for Glasgow Pollok in 2016 – a position which he has held since. However, Yousaf confirmed he would be stepping down as an MSP at the 2026 Holyrood election. He announced the news in December 2024, saying that the 'time will be right for me to move on'. 'I could never have imagined the incredible political journey I have been on,' Yousaf added in a statement. When did Humza Yousaf become first minister? Yousaf has held several ministerial roles in the Scottish Government, including as minister for Europe and International Development and for transport and Scotland's islands. He also served as justice secretary from 2018 to 2021 and as health secretary from 2021 until 2023. The Glasgow MSP succeeded Nicola Sturgeon (below) as first minister in 2023, becoming the first person of colour to hold the office and the first Muslim leader of a western democracy. (Image: PA) Following Sturgeon's resignation, he fought a leadership contest against now-Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes and Ash Regan – who now serves as Alba's leader in Holyrood after defecting from the SNP. Humza Yousaf resignation Yousaf announced he would step down as first minister and as leader of the SNP on April 29, 2024. He held the position for a little over a year but resigned after ending the power-sharing deal with the Scottish Greens and was succeeded by John Swinney. At the time, he had also been facing a confidence vote in his leadership tabled by the Tories and a separate bid by Scottish Labour expressing no confidence in the Government as a whole. Speaking when he announced his resignation, Yousaf said: 'Unfortunately in ending the Bute House Agreement in the manner I did I clearly underestimated the level of hurt and upset that caused Green colleagues. 'For a minority government to be able to govern effectively, trust when working with the opposition is clearly fundamental.' Humza Yousaf Gaza Yousaf has consistently called for a ceasefire in Gaza, with Israel's bombardment having killed tens of thousands of people. He has also called for an end for arms exports to Israel and has spoken at pro-Palestine demonstrations. His in-laws returned to Scotland in November 2023 after being trapped for four weeks in Gaza. His wife Nadia El-Nakla's parents had spent time trapped in Gaza in a house where 100 people were sheltering, including a child of two months old. Before getting out, they had travelled to the border in an attempt to leave on three previous occasions. At the time, Yousaf said his brother-in-law, a hospital doctor, and his family remained in Gaza as did his wife's stepmother and grandmother. Elon Musk feud Yousaf has also been engaged in several clashes on Twitter/X with its owner Elon Musk. This started in October 2023 when Musk accused Yousaf of being a 'blatant racist' after the tech billionaire shared a highly selective clip of the SNP MSP when he was justice secretary. In August 2024, Yousaf accused Musk of 'amplifying white supremacy' after the Twitter/X owner said civil war is 'inevitable' in the UK following riots in England and Northern Ireland. Following this, there were then reports that Yousaf had issued a legal warning to Musk, who responded by calling the MSP a 'scumbag'. Humza Yousaf wife Yousaf is married to Dundee councillor Nadia El-Nakla. They announced the birth of their second child in July. Outside of politics Away from politics, Yousaf volunteered for community radio for 12 years and on a charitable project providing foot packages to homeless people and asylum seekers in Glasgow. He is a supporter of Celtic FC and regularly shows his support for the Scotland National Team. Humza Yousaf scooter Yousaf was captured on film falling off a knee scooter while he was travelling through one of the Scottish Parliament's corridors in 2021 following First Minister's Questions. The MSP had ruptured his Achilles while playing badminton days before the incident and had been getting around Holyrood using the alternative to crutches. The clip was shared by BBC Scotland political editor Glenn Campbell who said: 'The Health Secretary @HumzaYousaf does not appear to be having a good day at work …' Yousaf replied to Campbell and questioned his decision to post the video. He said: "All for media scrutiny and never shy away from it. Just not sure there is need or purpose to tweet out a video of me falling over while injured. "If anyone else had fallen over while on crutches, a knee scooter, or in a wheelchair would your first instinct be to film it and tweet out?"
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
The Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse constituency, explained
The late Christina McKelvie's winning margin over the Labour candidate in the seat was 12.6% at the 2021 election, which sounds healthy enough – but that was achieved in the context of a record-breaking national landslide for the SNP, when Scottish Labour were trailing by more than 26 points across the country. To win Thursday's by-election, Labour wouldn't need to be anywhere close to a Scotland-wide lead over the SNP. Trimming the SNP's national lead to 13 points would, on a uniform swing, be enough to push Labour ahead in the constituency. Consequently, this is a by-election that would have been unwinnable for the SNP during most of 2024. And as a reminder, the constituency overlaps with the Westminster seat of Hamilton and Clyde Valley, which was easily captured by Labour at last July's General Election by a 22-point margin. READ MORE: Scottish Labour by-election candidate flounders after dodging question 11 times By March of this year, when it became clear the by-election would be taking place, the SNP had re-established themselves and held an 11-point Scotland-wide lead on the Holyrood constituency ballot in a poll conducted by Survation – but even that was a small enough gap to leave Labour as slight favourites to gain Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse. Since then, there has been a poll showing the SNP with a huge 21-point national lead, which raised hopes that the by-election was taking place at a favourable time, and that the SNP might come away with a comfortable victory. But the most recent poll at the weekend from Norstat had the national lead at 14 points, which is consistent with only a razor-thin SNP advantage over Labour in Hamilton. History and symbolism are the other reasons why the SNP might have preferred this contest to be taking place somewhere else. Hamilton was the scene of their greatest-ever by-election success in 1967, when Winnie Ewing stunned Labour by winning on a mammoth 38% swing. The historical importance of that triumph can be explained very simply: prior to 1967, the SNP had never had any parliamentary representation (apart from for a few short weeks in 1945), but since then they have never been without parliamentary representation. And yet they've learned the hard way that returning to the scene of their most famous win has its dangers. In 1978, another Hamilton by-election came up, and the SNP put forward Margo MacDonald as a big-name candidate, in the hope and expectation that she would repeat Ewing's feat. Instead, there was a swing against the SNP, allowing Labour's George Robertson to romp home decisively. The symbolic turning of the tide in the very place where it had all started for the SNP helped to generate considerable momentum for Labour, and contributed to the SNP's massive setback in the 1979 General Election. If a third dramatic upset in a Hamilton by-election is reported by the media on Friday, that will be bad news for the SNP because by definition it will mean they have lost. And despite the arithmetic firmly suggesting Labour should be in the hunt on Thursday, most of the chatter from the ground suggests that if the SNP face any real threat, it comes from Reform UK. A win for Farage's Unionist ultras would undoubtedly qualify as a by-election spectacular on a par with Hamilton 1967, and would invite comparisons that the independence movement might prefer to avoid. However, the latest polling suggests that Reform are still well behind the SNP nationally, which means that the Nationalists ought to be able to fend off the challenge – especially as there doesn't seem a reason to believe that Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse is unusually favourable terrain for Reform. READ MORE: Nigel Farage splashes 'unimaginable cash' on private jet jaunt to Scotland There was no real sign of that at the General Election last year, when Reform took 8% of the vote in Hamilton and Clyde Valley – only a smidgeon better than their Scotland-wide showing of 7%. Constituency-level estimates from the 2016 EU referendum also suggest that the local vote for Leave may actually have been a tad lower than the Scotland-wide figure of 38% – and it's known there is still a strong correlation between support for Brexit and support for Reform. So despite the jitters, most of the indicators suggest the SNP are the likely winners on Thursday. But parliamentary by-elections are strange bubble environments in which voters often behave in a way they normally wouldn't. The only safe assumption is that almost anything is possible.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Activists question John Swinney's independence strategy after by-election loss
This activist works for the party and regularly attends national events. Speaking on the condition of anonymity, they said they can't help but worry that the SNP is 'heading back into the same old internal splits' seen at the height of Nicola Sturgeon's leadership. 'Which is exactly what the Unionists want,' they added. Leader John Swinney is currently facing a wave of discontent from members following the party's underwhelming performance in last week's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. READ MORE: 'Foolish': Former SNP MP hits out at John Swinney's by-election campaign When this paper spoke to activists following the result on Friday, it became clear that deeper fissures of frustration and worry had come to the surface. Members said concerns about party strategy had been dismissed by leadership, which echoes frustrations felt under Sturgeon. For others, it's a repeat of other past elections the SNP would rather forget. 'It's starting to feel like a repeat of [Swinney's] first time in charge,' the activist remarked. "We are the establishment and Swinney's been part of that shift, giving he's been at the front line for about two decades. "If John's serious about independence, then it has to be front and centre in everything we do. Right now, it's not.' One 2026 candidate summarised the thoughts of the majority: a quiet worry whether confidence in leadership will return in time for the elections. 'John has done a really good job of stabilising the party but it's clear that people have lost trust in all politicians," they said. 'We need to do more so that people know we are on their side, we're working hard to come up with ways to improve their day-to-day lives and that the SNP will fight for them. That message isn't getting through at the moment and we need to reflect on why that is.' Swinney previously led the party, with a sore end. In 2000, Alex Salmond stepped down as leader of the SNP, triggering a new leadership contest. Swinney, who launched his bid to become the leader of the SNP, advocated for a gradualist approach to independence and won, becoming leader of the opposition in Holyrood. After disappointing elections in 2001, 2003, and 2004, which saw the party's vote share and number of seats drop, Swinney resigned as SNP leader. This was despite other pro-independence parties like the Scottish Greens and Scottish Socialist Party making gains in Holyrood. His strategy then is similar to what is fuelling frustration within and outwith the party today. But it's nothing new and he has stood by his tactics when questioned, most thoroughly by Lesley Riddoch last year. 'I get that Swinney's steadied things after a rough patch, but it feels like we've gone quiet on the one thing that actually defines us,' the activist said. 'And in this by-election, we made the mistake of giving Reform a platform by turning them into a talking point.' Dr Michael Higgins, a political communications expert at the University of Strathclyde, said the SNP had 'demeaned themselves' by focusing on Reform UK in the by-election campaign. But Swinney doubled down on Sunday, saying he was 'standing up to Farage'. 'I'm going to make no apology for it,' he added. READ MORE: Has Swinney 'healed' the SNP or will they end up back on life support? And when asked if he was still the man to lead the party, Swinney said "Yes. Twelve months ago, the party turned to me. 'I was not seeking high office, I'd held high office for a long time in my life, and the party turned to me, at a moment of real jeopardy, and asked me to use all of my skills and experience, and the loyalty I command in the party, to bring people together and focus us on the future.' Last week, activists told The National they had voiced concerns over Swinney's strategy and had been 'shut down' for questioning the party's tactics. An affiliate convenor reflected that they felt the on-the-ground campaign "was good" but they had found more Labour support on the doors than expected, adding: "It didn't feel like it was taken seriously." Looking towards the SNP's record in government, activists are also angry. Pledge after pledge has been dropped in the last few years. Its flagship target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 75% by 2030 was scaled back, a conversion therapy ban was delayed, the human rights bill was kicked into the long grass, the national care service plan was dropped, and most recently, a new national park in Galloway was scrapped. One activist, who has been integral in building campaign networks and previously served as an SNP councillor, told The National: 'Personally, I believe there is an issue where the SNP is run from an inner circle that is guided by their own deluded thoughts rather than reality. 'The party I ran for election with was informed by effective engagement with its supporters and membership – not so called 'political insight' from 20-30 somethings who have been at the helm of a party that has not had to work that hard for a monopoly we've been able to sustain against very little organised opposition. 'We now have effective opposition through two forces: a Scottish Labour Party renewed with an impressive manifesto and insight to the issues facing Scotland – and Reform UK who are riding a global populist wave of support from disgruntled people of this nation. Of which I am very much one too.' They added: 'What is our vision? What is our plan? What are we delivering on right now that is actually aspirational given? Where is the proof that the SNP is working hard for our nation? Because I can't see it.' But where can the party go from here? ONCE again, the party is left asking the same question it has asked itself since Sturgeon quit: "What do we do now?" The former councillor suggests a 'dose of reality', adding: 'No matter how much we repeat that statement on the doorsteps, that 'we don't take any votes for granted,' we are very much taking the entire nation for granted for the very little effort we put in to being strategic on how we are leading this nation." READ MORE: How did Labour win the Hamilton by-election with an 'invisible man' candidate? Others have called for the party to simply be 'more inspirational,' with one staffer adding: 'The churn at the top over last few years has meant promises have often been dropped just as quickly as they've been made.' Another member said they had been 'stunned' by the result on Friday morning, sharing: 'We obviously lost votes to Reform. The Greens and our vote don't seem to be turning out. 'I think John Swinney is a good man but probably not the best person the get the voters excited enough to vote SNP. It scares me for 2026. Stephen Flynn may be better. There doesn't seem to be a direction for independence.' Former SNP policy convener Toni Giugliano said: 'It's becoming clear that SNP voters, activists and members want to see the party recommit to its founding mission of independence - not with words - but action. "How the party responds in the coming days and weeks will show whether it is willing to listen and engage with the party's grassroots. The door is open. "This is an opportunity to get back on track to doing what the SNP was elected to do - deliver a prosperous, independent Scotland in Europe. That's what independence voters expect it to do.' However, not everyone agrees that Swinney or the party is in trouble, including Swinney himself. Coming second in the vote, the First Minister said on Monday, is an 'indication that we are still able to perform strongly electorally'. The First Minister added that his party lost the overlapping seat at Westminster – Hamilton and Clyde Valley – by 9000 votes last year and by just 600 on Thursday. 'So, we are quite clearly in a position where we can achieve electoral success, but we have got to build on that and make sure we're stronger for 2026,' he added. 'Any suggestions the party isn't fully behind John is being peddled by those outwith the party or by a miniscule minority,' activist Logan Unwin said. Another activist, who campaigned heavily in the by-election alongside Swinney and candidate Katy Loudon, said: "I feel somewhat confident as feel that we are at a better position than last year. "I do think that what happened in the by-election was strategic errors and hopefully [will be] fixed next year, but do fear that similar seats to Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse might be at real risk and needs work to make sure they stay SNP". Glasgow activist Doug Daniel agreed, adding: 'The party seems to be in a much better place than it was when John took over, and although it's a shame we didn't quite get over the line in Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse, it's not quite the catastrophe some commentators are making it out to be. 'I think people forget we've only won one of the five previous Holyrood by-elections that have taken place since 2007, and this one was far closer than any of those. I think it'll be a different story in 2026 when people are asking themselves who they trust to stand up for Scotland against a failing Labour UK Government.'
