Did Donald Trump approve $1,200 monthly payments for stay-at-home moms? Here's the truth
Claims circulating across social media platforms suggesting that former U.S. President Donald Trump has approved a $1,200 monthly benefit for stay-at-home mothers are false, according to verified government sources and fact-checking agencies. The misinformation, largely amplified via TikTok and short-form video platforms, has gained traction in recent days, prompting official clarification.
Viral TikTok Videos Spark Confusion
The rumor appears to have originated from a series of widely shared TikTok videos that allege that a policy under Donald Trump is either in effect or soon to be enacted, providing direct monthly payments to stay-at-home moms for $1,200.
Many of these videos contain captions and hashtags designed to evoke urgency and support, such as "Apply now!" and "Mothers deserve this support," further misleading audiences, as mentioned in a report by USA Today.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
Several clips even featured screenshots of government websites and forms, falsely implying that the payments are part of a federal assistance program signed off by the former president. In reality, no such policy has been introduced or approved under any current federal legislative or executive initiative linked to Trump.
No Federal Program or Executive Order in Place
As of now, no federal agency, congressional body, or White House directive under Donald Trump's administration or post-presidency activity has endorsed a program offering monthly financial assistance to stay-at-home parents. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, as well as the Internal Revenue Service, have issued no updates that support these social media claims.
Live Events
Fact-checkers at multiple nonpartisan organizations, including Snopes and PolitiFact, have labeled the claim as entirely unsubstantiated.
A spokesperson for the
Social Security Administration
also confirmed that 'no new programs targeting stay-at-home parents have been implemented or proposed by any sitting or former administration in recent months', as quoted in a report by USA Today.
Misuse of Stimulus History Adds to Confusion
The origin of the $1,200 figure appears to be rooted in public memory of the
COVID-19 stimulus payments
that were issued during Donald Trump's presidency in 2020. At that time, eligible Americans received a one-time payment of $1,200 under the CARES Act, followed by subsequent stimulus packages.
However, those payments were broadly distributed to all qualifying adults and were not specifically tied to parenting status or employment circumstances.
Experts warn that misleading social media content often repackages older government initiatives to create the impression of new benefits, especially in politically charged or economically strained climates.
Experts Urge Caution and Media Literacy
Policy analysts and digital misinformation experts are urging citizens to exercise caution when encountering financial claims online, especially those not backed by reputable news outlets or official government releases.
'It's important for users to verify claims through trusted sources and not rely solely on viral content,' said Emily Gibbons, a political communication scholar based in Washington. 'Misleading information about government programs can result in confusion, scams, or false hope.'
FAQs
Did Donald Trump approve a $1,200 monthly benefit for stay-at-home moms?
No. There is no such policy approved or proposed by Trump or any federal agency.
Where did this rumor originate?
It appears to have started on TikTok and other short-form video platforms, using misleading captions and fake screenshots.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
30 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Bill Clinton's dig at Donald Trump over ‘my way or highway' style governance: 'Never seen…'
Former US president Bill Clinton has slammed Donald Trump's ignorance of the American legal system, saying he had never seen a leader who says, 'Whatever I want should be the law of the land". He added that most Americans 'don't agree with that". Bill Clinton was in an interview with CBS Sunday Morning, when he said Trump is acting in ways that go against American values and 'We've never seen anything like this before in my lifetime – somebody that says, 'Whatever I want should be the law of the land. It's my way or the highway.' he added. The ex-President then discussed Donald Trump's behaviour, which includes 'calling people names' and using forceful tactics. He said, 'I like to think that he's paid a price for this, you know, name-calling and throwing his weight around. I think it's made him less popular,' Clinton said. Clinton believes that while Trump can lead however he wants, the courts and elections will decide if his actions are acceptable. 'Only elections are going to change this,' he said. 'He (Trump) is looking for ways to basically defy all these court orders. But I think he'll have a hard time doing that. And if he does, I think it will hurt him in America,' Bill Clinton said. The former President added that the courts, including judges appointed by Trump himself, are pushing back. 'I do think the courts are getting their dander up,' he added. He then went on to criticise the republican President's attempts to block law firms from representing clients in federal buildings because of political disagreements. 'That ain't America. We've never done that,' Clinton said. 'The whole purpose of having a legal system is to have both sides be heard.' Clinton also urged Americans to work together and avoid division. 'Someone needs to stand up and say, 'Damn it, what we have in common matters more. We cannot destroy other people's trust in us. We need to preserve that and find a way to work together,' he said. 'We gotta just calm down and try to pull people together again,' CBS quoted former US President as saying. When asked about a recent book that questions Joe Biden's mental abilities, Clinton dismissed the claims. He said he had never seen Biden struggle. 'I thought he was a good president… I had never seen him and walked away thinking, He can't do this anymore. He was always on top of his briefs.' Clinton said he hadn't read the book, explaining, 'I didn't want to. 'Cause he's not president anymore, and I think he did a good job.' He also warned that some people might be using the book to blame Biden for Trump's return.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Give us jobs': Madrasi Camp resident after Delhi demolition drive, Tamil Nadu govt offers aid in return
'Give us jobs': Madrasi Camp resident after delhi demolition drive, Tamil Nadu govt offers aid to return NEW DELHI: The Tamil Nadu government has pledged full support to residents of Madrasi Camp in Delhi's Jangpura who wish to return to their home districts in Tamil Nadu, following a demolition drive on June 1. The demolition, conducted to remove illegal encroachments along the Barapullah drain in compliance with a Delhi high court order, has left hundreds of families, mostly originally from Tamil Nadu, displaced. Mani, a Tamil resident affected by the demolition, expressed frustration over the lack of opportunities in Tamil Nadu, stating, "They should give jobs to those already in Madras right now, and then they should call us. Why are people roaming around there? First, they should handle Tamil Nadu, then they should look at Delhi. If they had given us jobs, why would we have come to Delhi from Tamil Nadu?" On Sunday, authorities carried out a demolition drive at Madrasi Camp in Jangpura, South East Delhi, following court orders to remove encroachments along the Barapullah drain. The clearance was aimed at addressing flooding problems caused by the narrowing of the drain, which restricts water flow during heavy rainfall. A total of 370 encroachments were removed. Of the affected residents, 189 have been found eligible for resettlement and have been allotted flats in Narela, while 181 were deemed ineligible for rehabilitation. Anil Banka, district magistrate of South East Delhi, on the ongoing demolition drive at Madrasi Camp in the Jangpura area, said to ANI, "This action is being carried out as per the court's orders, and we are removing the encroachments solely based on those directives. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025: Steel Suppliers From Mexico At Lowest Prices (Take A Look) Steel Suppliers | search ads Search Now Undo The Barapulla drain had become narrow, hindering its cleaning and causing issues with water flow. During heavy rains, flooding spreads across the area due to these obstructions. The matter was under consideration in court, which has now permitted us to proceed with the removal starting today. We have also allotted flats in Narela to all eligible residents affected by this drive." He further said, "Notices regarding the encroachments were already given to residents, and until now, 370 illegal encroachments have been demolished. While 189 are eligible for resettlement, 181 are not eligible."
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump tariff hike threatens to impact $5 billion engineering goods exports: EEPC India
New Delhi: The proposed 50% tariff on all foreign steel and aluminium by US President Donald Trump could hurt India's engineering exports, as these metals and their derivatives account for nearly a quarter of the country's total engineering goods shipments to the US. The annual export of steel, aluminium and their derivatives to the US currently stand at around $5 billion. The 25% tariffs imposed by the US on steel imports (as per the proclamation order dated on 18th March 2025) have created a challenging environment for Indian steel exporters. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Learn More Undo Although India's direct steel exports to the US are relatively low, the tariffs have led to increased global competition and price pressures. The tariffs have also resulted in a shift in trade flows. 'In case the US goes ahead with its plan and impose a 50% tariff on steel, aluminium and their derivatives, exports of these key items will become costlier leading to a likely dip in shipments," said Pankaj Chadha, Chairman, EEPC India, in a statement. Live Events Chadha highlighted that the UK through its trade deal with the US recently got exemptions from 25% tariff on steel and aluminium and suggested that India should also ask for the same kind of waiver during the ongoing bilateral trade agreement (BTA) negotiations with the US. "This is perhaps not the opportune time to introduce such unilateral tariff especially when BTA negotiations are going on. It can make the work of the negotiators tricky. The proposed tariff increase by the Trump administration is likely to impact the engineering exports which are about $5 billion under this head," the EEPC India Chairman said.
